UN: Over 1,000 Palestinians killed while seeking food aid in Gaza
An officially private effort, the GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel halted supplies into the Gaza Strip for more than two months, sparking famine warnings.
GHF operations have been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli forces firing on people waiting to collect rations in the Palestinian territory, where the Israeli military is seeking to destroy Hamas.
"Over 1,000 Palestinians have now been killed by the Israeli military while trying to get food in Gaza since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operating," UN human rights office spokesman Thameen Al-Kheetan told AFP.
"As of July 21, we have recorded 1,054 people killed in Gaza while trying to get food; 766 of them were killed in the vicinity of GHF sites and 288 near UN and other humanitarian organisations' aid convoys."
Kheetan added: "Our data is based on information from multiple reliable sources on the ground, including medical teams, humanitarian and human rights organisations."
The war in Gaza, sparked by Hamas's deadly attack on Israel on Oct 7, 2023, has created dire humanitarian conditions for the more than two million people who live in the coastal territory.
Gaza's population faces severe shortages of food and other essentials.
GHF says it has distributed more than 1.4 million boxes of foodstuffs to date.
"We're adjusting our operations in real time to keep people safe and informed, and we stand ready to partner with other organisations to scale up and deliver more meals to the people of Gaza," GHF interim director John Acree said Monday.
The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the GHF over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives and violates basic humanitarian principles.--AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Israeli cruise ship docks in Cyprus port after being turned away by protests on Greek island
NICOSIA, July 23 (Xinhua) -- An Israeli cruise ship with 1,600 Israeli nationals on board docked at the Cypriot port of Limassol on Wednesday after it left the Greek island of Syros as a result of a mass protest at the island's port, according to Limassol port authorities. Israeli media reported that the ship, the "Crown Iris", was forced to leave Syros as hundreds of local people gathered at the port to protest Israeli actions in Gaza. The ship's operators, Mano Maritime, said in a statement that the vessel encountered a demonstration by pro-Palestinian supporters at the port of Syros, and passengers were stuck on board without permission to disembark. The Limassol port authorities did not say how long the ship would remain there or whether its passengers would disembark. The "Crown Iris" had been used to transfer thousands of Israelis and third country nationals between Israel and Cyprus in June after Israel closed its airspace during an 11-day missile war with Iran.
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Gaza ceasefire calls mean nothing without halting arms sales
FOREIGN ministers from 28 countries, mostly from the West, have condemned Israel for denying the Palestinians the human dignity they deserve, as they called for an immediate end to the atrocities there in a joint statement on Monday. Israel must comply with its obligation under international humanitarian law, it went on to state the obvious. Isn't the statement 21 months too late? Why wait until the Israelis killed 59,000 Palestinians to call for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza? And the irony is that some of the 28 countries are supplying weapons or weapon parts used to slaughter the Palestinians. Don't they realise the supply of arms is making them complicit in Israel's denial of Palestinian human dignity, not to mention their complicity in the genocide committed by the Zionist regime? Let's be blunt: these so-called seekers of human dignity for the Palestinians are standing on the wrong side of history. You just can't call on Israel to end the Gaza war — oh how they abuse the word — while supplying the genocidal regime with weapons. We have read such statements before, the most recent being in May — when the United Kingdom, France and Canada jointly threatened some unspecified action if Israel's onslaught continued. Expectedly, nothing happened and the Israelis went on to kill thousands of Palestinians. Even those who were desperately seeking food aid were not spared. On Monday, Israel launched a ground assault on Deir al-Balah, the main hub of humanitarian aid, a day after killing 81 starving Palestinians seeking food, media reports said. The joint statement may have been motivated by the killing of food aid seekers. The Israelis know that this statement, like the few that went before, was issued to appease a growing outrage among the domestic audience, including lawmakers. If these nations are truly interested in getting Israel to treat the Palestinians with human dignity that they deserve, they must do three things. One, stop supplying weapons to the genocidal Zionist regime. Two, hold Israeli leaders and their defence forces accountable for the genocide they are committing. Threatening or sanctioning the International Criminal Court (ICC) for issuing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant is a clear breach of international law. Three, stop giving diplomatic support to Israel until it civilises itself. We know that the United States doesn't care for the human dignity of the Palestinians, otherwise it wouldn't keep vetoing United Nations Security Council resolutions calling for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and West Bank. Or sanction the ICC and its officials or those who criticise Israel for the genocide it is committing. But nations like the UK and those in the European Union that peddle rules-based world order? These have seen the genocide of Palestinians livestreamed. They know, too, the ethnic cleansing intent of Netanyahu and his ministers. Is this the reason for the occasional statements, an attempt to cleanse the conscience? Again, they know, too, the "war" — the abused word again — didn't start on Oct 7, 2023. The catastrophe that is unfolding today was evident from the start of the stealth birth of Israel in 1948.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Analysis-Rwandan rebels' fate clouds Trump's vision for mineral-rich Congo
(Reuters) -Moves to end fighting in eastern Congo that are essential to U.S. President Donald Trump's plans for a mining bonanza in the region are meant to get underway by Sunday, but the future of a small rebel group has emerged as one of the major obstacles. A U.S.-brokered peace agreement signed last month by the Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers was designed to halt violence that escalated this year with a lightning advance in the Democratic Republic of Congo by M23 rebels. Rwanda denies allegations from the U.N. and Western governments that it is fighting alongside the M23 rebels to gain access to Congo's minerals. Rwanda says its troops are there to tackle what it describes as an existential threat from thousands of Rwandan Hutu rebels known as the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). Security experts and diplomats say the FDLR, which includes remnants of Rwanda's former army and militias that carried out the 1994 Rwandan genocide, boasts only a few hundred combatants and is not a significant battlefield force. But the peace agreement explicitly requires Congo to "neutralise" the FDLR as Rwanda withdraws from Congolese territory, underscoring the group's importance to the fate of Trump's diplomacy. Both the Congolese operations against the FDLR and the Rwandan withdrawal are supposed to start by Sunday and conclude by the end of September. U.N. experts said in a report this month that Rwanda, along with M23, is trying to seize control of mineral-rich territory. Kigali responded that the presence of the "genocidal" FDLR "necessitates the defence posture in our border areas". The U.N. experts also accused the Congolese military of relying on the FDLR in its fight against M23. A spokesperson for Congo's government did not respond to a request for comment on that question, but Kinshasa has said it is on board with ensuring any threat posed by the FDLR is "definitively eradicated", including by voluntary disarmament. It has also accused Rwanda of using the FDLR as a pretext for deploying on Congolese territory. Congolese researcher Josaphat Musamba said it was not possible for Congo to rid the region of FDLR fighters given that M23 holds much of the territory where the FDLR now operates. "It would be feasible if the Rwandan-backed rebellion were not active and threatening to conquer other territories," said Musamba, a Ph.D. candidate at Ghent University who is from eastern Congo and studies the conflict there. Jason Stearns, a political scientist at Simon Fraser University in Canada who specialises in Africa's Great Lakes region, said lack of progress against the FDLR could be cited by Rwanda as a reason to keep its troops deployed in eastern Congo past September, throwing off Washington's timeline. "It would be fairly easy for Rwanda to claim that Congo is not abiding by its side of the deal - that its operations against the FDLR are not serious enough, have not been successful enough - and therefore to drag its feet," Stearns said. A spokesperson for Rwanda's government did not respond to a request for comment on its approach to the FDLR. Rwandan President Paul Kagame said on July 4 that Rwanda was committed to implementing the deal, but that it could fail if Congo did not live up to its promises to neutralise the FDLR. APPEAL TO TRUMP Trump said on July 9 the Congolese and Rwandan presidents would travel to the United States in the "next couple of weeks" to sign the peace agreement. They are also expected to sign bilateral economic packages that would bring billions of dollars of investment into countries rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. There has been no further word on a date. While Washington has hosted negotiations between Congo and Rwanda, Qatar has hosted separate direct talks between Congo and M23. On Saturday the two sides agreed to sign a separate peace deal by August 18. M23 currently has no concrete plans to withdraw from the territory it controls. The FDLR has urged Trump not to green-light a Congolese offensive against it. A July 2 letter to Trump from Victor Byiringiro, the FDLR's acting president, said attacking the FDLR would jeopardise the safety of Congolese civilians as well as more than 200,000 Rwandan refugees. In written responses to questions from Reuters, FDLR spokesperson Cure Ngoma said only "a frank, sincere, and inclusive dialogue among Rwandans" could bring peace, though Rwanda has repeatedly ruled out such talks with the group. Trump expects Congo and Rwanda to abide by the peace deal "which will foster lasting stability and prosperity in the region," Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson, said in response to Reuters questions about the FDLR's future. "All armed groups must lay down their arms and work within the framework of the peace process." The fighting has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more this year, while escalating the risk of a return to the kind of full-scale regional war which led to the deaths of millions of Congolese in 1998-2003. (Reporting by Sonia RolleyAdditional reporting and writing by Robbie Corey-BouletEditing by Philippa Fletcher)
