Cambridge takes up to £4.9m from Chinese Communist Party-linked donor
Cambridge was under pressure on Thursday night to hand back the cash amid claims that accepting the 'tainted' money compromised its academic independence.
The donor Daryl Ng, who is estimated to be worth more than £11billion and whose family's business empire includes the Sino Group, has worked for both Carrie Lam and John Lee Ka-chiu, the former and serving chief executives of Hong Kong respectively.
Mr Ng has served on two regional advisory committees in mainland China, which form part of the Chinese Communist Party's governing structures, and has praised Beijing's approach to Hong Kong.
Both Lam and Lee were sanctioned by the US Treasury in 2020 for their crackdown on free speech and political freedoms in the city, carried out at the behest of Beijing. It was widely condemned by western Governments after causing mass protests.
The UK has also accused Hong Kong's leaders and Beijing of reneging on legal commitments that the city maintain a high degree of autonomy. Since the clampdown began, more than 150,000 Hongkongers have fled to Britain under the British National Overseas visa route.
Now, a freedom of information request has revealed that Cambridge University last year accepted a donation of between £1 million and £4.99 million from Mr Ng to fund a land economy PhD scholarship. Cambridge refused to specify the exact sum.
Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory leader, said Cambridge should hand back the money. He said: 'What Cambridge is trying to do is to disguise the nature of his links to the Chinese Communist Party and try to do it in a way that doesn't alert anybody. But they have been found out.
'This is not the only time. My worry is that Cambridge has pretty much sold out to China. Anything that comes from China is going to be money that is tainted by the CCP's own actions.
'It is a brutal Government that practises genocide and slave labour. Cambridge should hand [the donation] back.'
Luke de Pulford, the executive director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said: 'This is a characteristic failure of due-diligence by Cambridge, which has one of the worst Beijing dependency problems of any UK university.
'Ng enjoys senior CCP positions and is literally all over the Chinese internet calling for Hongkongers to use their influence abroad. This kind of investment is not benevolent. It will come at a heavy price for Cambridge, where, as we have seen time and again across the UK, academic freedom will suffer.'
Mr Ng, whose family is originally from Singapore, was born in Hong Kong and has spent most of his career working for his family's Hong Kong real estate businesses as deputy chair of the Sino Group.
He has also built deep political ties in the former British colony and mainland China. In 2017, he served as deputy director of Lam's election campaign to become Hong Kong's chief executive. Five years later, he also formed part of the three-member campaign finance team for Lee, who replaced Lam as chief executive.
During Lam's tenure, Beijing imposed a new national security law on Hong Kong, granting it and the Hong Kong authorities more power to stifle opposition to the two respective governments.
Mr Ng has served on municipal people's political consultative committees for Sichuan province and Beijing, which granted him an award in 2020 that is given to 'those who love the motherland, are committed to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, and have made outstanding contributions to international cooperation and exchanges'.
Such committees form part of China's 'patriotic united front' and have no official legislative role. According to the Taiwanese government, members are 'hand-picked to function as a rubber stamp' of CCP policy.
In August last year, the same month he donated to Cambridge, Mr Ng also wrote an article praising the CCP's 'visionary grand design [with] promising implications for Hong Kong' in the South China Morning Post.
When his donation was announced by Cambridge, the university made no reference to the sum of money or his political affiliations, citing only his 'passion for real estate' and that the studentship would be named in honour of his grandfather who studied at Cambridge in the 1940s.
Mr Ng is just one of several wealthy donors to have given to the university since the clampdown in Hong Kong began. In the past four years, it received £24.45 million from donors in the city, compared with just £13.57 million in the previous four-year period.
Cambridge has accepted multiple donations from China particularly under Stephen Toope, its former vice-chancellor. This week, Jesus College announced that its controversial China Forum would close after criticism over opaque funding arrangements and avoiding controversial subjects such as treatment of the minority Uyghurs.
A Cambridge university spokesman said: 'The studentship was funded by Mr Ng, a Singaporean citizen, to honour his late Singaporean grandfather who studied at Cambridge in the 1940s. It supports talented students of all nationalities to undertake research. The University has a robust system for reviewing strategic relationships, donations, and sources of funding.'
Mr Ng has been contacted for comment via his company.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Lutnick: TikTok will go dark unless China agrees to US control
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick warned Thursday that TikTok will go dark unless China agrees to a deal in which American owners take control of the popular social media app and its algorithm. 'It's got to come out of Chinese control,' Lutnick told CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street.' 'We've made the decision. You can't have Chinese control and have something on a hundred million American phones. That's just not okay.' 'So, if it's in American control, China can have a little piece, or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece,' he continued. 'But basically Americans will have control, Americans will own the technology and Americans will control the algorithm.' TikTok has remained online for the past seven months despite a law requiring its parent company ByteDance to divest from the app or face a U.S. ban. The law, passed by Congress last year, was meant to go into effect the day before President Trump took office. However, former President Biden declined to enforce the law in his final days in office, and Trump quickly followed this up with an executive order delaying enforcement. He has since given TikTok two more extensions, as he attempts to strike a deal to keep the app available. The next deadline is set for Sept. 17. Trump said late last month that he had found a buyer for the app, which he described as 'very, very wealthy people.' However, he underscored the deal would likely require the approval of the Chinese government. 'If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen,' Lutnick added Thursday. 'If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark. And those decisions are coming very soon. …. The deal is over to them right now.' The Trump administration had previously finalized a deal on TikTok in April, but the effort was scuttled by the announcement of the president's 'reciprocal' tariff regime, which targeted China and other countries with hefty new import taxes.


Boston Globe
20 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Soft power delivers big returns, but Trump is slashing it anyway
Studies in many countries show that spending on diplomacy, cultural engagement, and humanitarian relief generates a huge economic return on investment —at least six times greater than the dollars invested. Advertisement The European Union's Creative Europe program produced three to four times the amount invested in cultural diplomacy. Advertisement The United States has not measured its soft power directly, but there is no doubt that it boosts its image by providing humanitarian and disaster aid. In 2003, the United States spent $400 million to help Indonesia recover from the massive tsunami in the Indian Ocean. Public approval of the United States in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim country, Today, the United States is turning away from such opportunities. What may look like savings through layoffs and grant rescissions will in fact cost billions in lost trade, weakened alliances, and diminished global influence. In nearly every other policy domain — whether approving a medicine, a public safety regulation, or building new infrastructure — government decisions are informed by cost-benefit analysis. No such analysis has been performed here. If cost-benefit thinking were applied to soft power, it would be clear that the benefits of soft power far outweigh the costs. Advertisement The concept is well understood in the private sector. Businesses spend heavily to acquire 'goodwill' — brand value, reputation, and customer trust. Such intangible assets drive future profits and provide protection against commercial competitors. Governments should treat soft power the same way: as a hedge that reduces economic and military conflict. When nations trust America and see us as a partner rather than a threat, they are far less likely to take hostile actions that would require costly military responses. Soft power investments provide a double dividend that pays off in both economic gains and reduced defense spending. The full value of America's global engagement may only become evident once it is withdrawn. The Trump administration is working hard to achieve this end. The Trump administration has laid off government scientists, educators, and health experts, including last week's As the United States slashes its soft power budget,China is scaling up. The Chinese Belt and Road Initiative has committed more than $1 trillion in infrastructure spending. Chinese-funded rail projects in Malaysia, Advertisement The dollar 'savings' that Thune crowed about amount to less than the cost of a single F-35 fighter jet. But a fighter jet can't help refugees, teach Afghan girls to read, or persuade African leaders to choose American over Chinese technology. As Nye pointed out, soft power is easy to squander and difficult to recover. The cuts, combined with the Trump administration's sustained assault on the nation's leading universities, represent a colossal soft power miscalculation. They will cost America global influence that no amount of military spending can replace.


Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China's Surprise Move on Capital Gains Tax Is Genius Timing
You can't go broke paying capital gains taxes, but you will feel the pinch — and for mainland Chinese with sizable overseas investments, a bit of apprehension. Chinese authorities have been contacting residents who trade US and Hong Kong stocks, asking them to declare their earnings and pay tax liabilities. A 20% levy is applied to dividend income as well as annual net stock trading profits.