The next step after beating cancer? Reclaiming identity through hair restoration
Image: Thirdman/pexels
For anyone who's walked the long road through cancer, survival is a word that means everything. But making it through treatment, chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery is only part of the story.
For many survivors, the next chapter is about restoration: rebuilding confidence, reclaiming identity, and, sometimes, rediscovering joy in the mirror.
In South Africa, cancer touches thousands of families every year. According to the Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA), cancers like breast, prostate, colorectal, and skin cancer are among the most common, with over 100 000 new cases reported annually.
While medical advances save more lives than ever before, the emotional and physical scars can linger.
One of the most visible and emotionally charged reminders of cancer is hair loss.
Why hair loss hurts so much
Losing your hair during cancer treatment isn't just about looks. It can feel like losing a part of yourself, your identity, your femininity or masculinity, your privacy, your sense of normalcy.
As Dr Kashmal Kalan, medical director at Alvi Armani South Africa, puts it: 'This isn't about vanity. It's about healing the whole person. Even after treatment ends, survivors often see someone in the mirror who still looks like a patient. That can make it hard to reconnect with the person they were before cancer.'
Why does hair fall out during cancer treatment?
The answer is both simple and scientific. Chemotherapy and radiation attack rapidly dividing cells. While this helps kill cancer, it also harms healthy cells that grow quickly, like those in our hair follicles. The result?
Hair may thin, recede, or fall out entirely, sometimes never regrowing the same way. A study published in "Psycho-Oncology" found that hair loss ranked as one of the most distressing side effects, especially for women.
Losing your hair during cancer treatment isn't just about looks. It can feel like losing a part of yourself, your identity, your femininity or masculinity, your privacy, your sense of normalcy
Image: Michelle Leman /pexels
Restoration is more than cosmetic
For survivors like Cindy Pretorius, a basal cell carcinoma survivor, hair restoration was the last step in her healing journey. After surgery left her with visible scarring along her hairline, she received a minimally invasive hair transplant at Alvi Armani South Africa.
And she's not alone. For many, regaining hair is about reclaiming self-worth, dignity, and a sense of hope not just for themselves, but for loved ones who've walked the journey beside them.
A game-changing initiative for South African survivors
In August, CANSA and Alvi Armani are launching a powerful new initiative: free, personalised hair restoration consultations for cancer survivors.
Whether you've just finished treatment or are years into remission, this program offers scalp assessments, checks for lingering treatment effects, and, where needed, advice on restorative treatments or even hair transplants.
The goal is to make world-class care accessible to South Africans, regardless of background or income.
Alvi Armani's advanced techniques, like the Vitruvian and Maximus follicular unit extraction (FUE), are used in their clinics from Beverly Hills to Johannesburg, ensuring survivors here receive the same expert care as patients abroad.
'People who've overcome cancer deserve more than just a life saved. They deserve the chance to live it fully, with confidence and joy,' explains Kalan.
There's real evidence that restoring hair can help restore lives. Research from the Journal of Clinical Oncology shows that persistent hair loss after treatment can fuel anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal.
For some, hair regrowth is slow or incomplete, making it hard to move forward. He adds, 'Hair is a part of how we express identity. By restoring it, we help people feel like themselves again, more confident to re-enter public life, apply for jobs, or socialise without feeling marked by illness.'
How to get involved
If you or someone you love is a cancer survivor in South Africa, you can contact Alvi Armani South Africa directly and mention your CANSA affiliation for a complimentary consultation.
The program also features information sessions at CANSA events, like Relay For Life and the CANSA High Tea, bringing expert advice and support to survivors nationwide.
Makoma Raolane, CANSA's Sustainability Manager, sums it up perfectly: 'Healing also means restoring dignity, self-confidence, and quality of life. Our partnership with Alvi Armani reflects our commitment to holistic survivorship care.'
Survival is about more than beating cancer. It's about living again, fully and freely, no longer defined by scars, but by strength.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Smartphones may threaten children's mental health, advocates warn
Smartphone-Free Childhood SA (SFC-SA), a parent-led initiative, is calling for a more cautious and intentional approach to digital access during childhood, as a global study warns of serious mental health risks associated with early smartphone use in children. This follows the release of a comprehensive international study published in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, which analysed data from over 100 000 individuals across more than 160 countries. The study found that children who received smartphones before the age of 13 were significantly more likely to experience mental health challenges in early adulthood, including anxiety, depression, emotional instability, aggression, and social withdrawal. The research also highlights social media as the biggest contributing factor, accounting for 40% of the link between early smartphone ownership and declining mental health. Other contributors include disrupted sleep (12%), strained family relationships (13%), and cyberbullying (10%). SFC-SA's Claire Thompson tells Saturday Star that the findings should serve as a wake-up call for South African families. 'Children between 10 and 16 are in a critical stage of brain development. The emotional centres of the brain are in overdrive while impulse control and reasoning are still under construction. Giving them unfiltered access to the digital world during this time can be incredibly destabilising.' Thompson warns that smartphones, particularly when unsupervised, expose children to psychological stressors and inappropriate content they are not equipped to process. 'Being excluded from a group chat or receiving fewer likes on a post may seem minor, but for a child, it can feel like deep rejection. They don't yet have the tools to manage that kind of feedback.' She added that the dangers go beyond emotional strain. 'We've seen children stumble upon explicit content or fall prey to online predators. These are risks that require maturity and guidance to navigate safely.' In response, SFC-SA is advocating for community-wide support in delaying smartphone ownership, implementing digital literacy programs, and encouraging policies that protect young minds. The movement is part of a growing global push to reconsider how and when children are introduced to technology. 'Smartphones aren't going anywhere, but how we integrate them into our children's lives is still within our control. We're not anti-technology, we're pro-childhood.' As awareness of the issue spreads, the organisation aims to reshape the conversation around kids and tech, focusing on mental health, developmental readiness, and safer digital habits for the next generation. Lerato Ntwampe, an admitted attorney of the High Court involved with the movement, shares her insights from her interactions with schoolchildren. 'I think one of my biggest concerns when I engage with schoolchildren during talks is how unaware many of them are about the range of online harms that exist. It's not that they don't know these things happen; many are aware, but they don't always understand the legal implications. Some of these online behaviours are not just harmful; they're illegal. This includes hate speech, cyberbullying, sexting, and the sharing of child sexual abuse material (commonly referred to as child pornography in South Africa), and how this content is often circulated on WhatsApp groups and platforms like Instagram and TikTok. ' One parent, wishing to remain anonymous, voiced her agreement with SFC-SA and shared her own struggles in navigating smartphone access for her 10-year-old son. 'I've allowed my son to have a smartphone out of fear of him feeling left out among his peers. However, I implemented the Google Family Link app to monitor his usage,' she shares. Yet, she laments that technical issues have rendered her efforts ineffective, leaving her son free to explore the digital world without limitations. A teacher from a phone-free primary school in the Free State expressed her support for the cause stating, 'In my classroom, I recently used the topic 'At what age should a child get a smartphone?' for a speaking assessment. My aim was to encourage students to engage with their parents while also exploring factual information from credible studies. I hoped parents would take notice of the compelling research surrounding smartphone usage among children.' [email protected] Saturday Star

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
South Africa's breastfeeding crisis: key reasons behind the decline and solutions for our babies
Breastfeeding isn't just about nutrition. As the Department of Health explains, it protects babies against infections, reduces the risk of obesity and type 1 diabetes, and even shields mothers from certain cancers and chronic diseases. Image: Serdi Nam /pexels There's something quietly powerful about breastfeeding. It's nature's golden elixir, a living substance scientists still can't replicate. Yet, as World Breastfeeding Week (WBW) reminds us each August, South Africa finds itself on the back foot, and babies could pay the highest price. While global exclusive breastfeeding rates have seen modest growth, South Africa's numbers have moved in the wrong direction. The country's exclusive breastfeeding rate dropped from 32% in 2016 to just 22% in 2024, according to the Department of Health. It's a worrying trend, especially when you consider the World Health Assembly's goal of at least 50% by 2025 and 70% by 2030. And unless real change happens beyond slogans and billboards, experts say we won't get there. Breastfeeding isn't just about nutrition. As the Department of Health explains, it protects babies against infections, reduces the risk of obesity and type 1 diabetes, and even shields mothers from certain cancers and chronic diseases. 'Breastfeeding is not just about reaching country and global targets, but also about supporting infant health and development, as well as maternal well-being,' said Dr Lynn Moeng-Mahlangu, chief director of Health Promotion, at the department panel in 2023. Yet despite these benefits, South African mothers are turning away from exclusive breastfeeding earlier than ever before. breastfeeding is not an isolated decision. It is influenced by the social and structural fabrics surrounding new mothers. Image: pexels Why are mothers stopping breastfeeding? According to Chantell Witten, health systems director at iLifa Labantwana, the reasons run deeper than 'lack of information'. Speaking to the "Daily Maverick", Witten said it's about lack of support at every level: from workplaces that don't give mothers time and space to express milk, to formula companies whose marketing quietly chips away at mothers' confidence. 'Given the lack of maternity protection and stable employment opportunities, South African mothers are not protected to enjoy a successful breastfeeding journey,' Witten explained. 'The insidious marketing of formula through health professionals undermines government efforts to promote, support and protect breastfeeding.' Formula marketing isn't a new challenge, but digital platforms have supercharged it. And for families struggling financially, formula can feel like a convenient solution, even if it isn't the healthiest one. Lactation issues Insufficient milk supply: Mothers may perceive that they are not producing enough milk to satisfy their baby. Painful nipples: Sore or cracked nipples can make breastfeeding uncomfortable and lead to early cessation. Infant refusal to breastfeed: Some infants may go through periods of refusing to breastfeed, known as "nursing strikes". Concerns about infant satisfaction: Mothers may worry that their baby is not getting enough milk or not being satisfied by breast milk alone. Need to take medication: Some medications are not compatible with breastfeeding, requiring mothers to stop or supplement with formula. Maternal illness: Mothers may need to stop breastfeeding due to their own health issues or postpartum depression. Social and support factors Unsupportive work policies: Lack of access to private lactation rooms or flexible work schedules can make it difficult to continue breastfeeding at work. Breastfeeding is a shared responsibility The Department of Health, supported by WHO, UNICEF, and organisations like the South African Breastmilk Reserve (SABR), emphasises that exclusive breastfeeding shouldn't rest only on mothers' shoulders. Fathers, grandparents, employers, communities, and even policymakers all play critical roles. Creating truly supportive environments means maternity leave that actually lasts, safe places to breastfeed in public, and workplaces that see breastfeeding not as a disruption, but as an investment in the next generation's health. The theme of World Breastfeeding Week 2025, 'Prioritise Breastfeeding: Create Sustainable Support Systems', isn't just a slogan. It's a call to build systems that protect mothers from pressure, shame, and misinformation. Malnutrition As breastfeeding rates fall, South Africa faces an alarming surge in childhood malnutrition. The Department of Health notes rising rates of stunting, wasting, and overweight in children under five. The irony? Breastfeeding could help prevent these outcomes. Globally, UNICEF reports that breastfed children have at least a sixfold greater chance of survival in the first months of life compared to non-breastfed infants. Yet, here at home, we still risk missing out on these life-saving benefits. Education campaigns alone aren't enough. Dr Moeng-Mahlangu has called for new strategies to encourage mothers to breastfeed exclusively for six months, and to continue up to at least 12 months. Breastfeeding saves lives, builds healthier children, and safeguards mothers. As we observe World Breastfeeding Week, it is vital that we engage with what should be seen as a public health crisis that matters to us all. Image: Anna Shvets /pexels This could mean everything from paid maternity leave to community-based peer support groups and better training for health workers to tackle formula marketing head-on. 'We need to move beyond awareness to real, structural change,' she emphasised. Breastfeeding isn't an individual choice made in a vacuum. It happens or doesn't because of the world we build around new mothers. South Africa's breastfeeding numbers aren't just statistics. They're a mirror reflecting how well or how poorly we support the earliest, most fragile months of life. Breastfeeding saves lives, builds healthier children, and protects mothers. And maybe, as World Breastfeeding Week reminds us, that's the real crisis we should all care about

IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
Smartphones may threaten children's mental health, advocates warn
Smartphone-Free Childhood SA (SFC-SA), a parent-led initiative, is calling for a more cautious and intentional approach to digital access during childhood, as a global study warns of serious mental health risks associated with early smartphone use in children. This follows the release of a comprehensive international study published in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, which analysed data from over 100 000 individuals across more than 160 countries. The study found that children who received smartphones before the age of 13 were significantly more likely to experience mental health challenges in early adulthood, including anxiety, depression, emotional instability, aggression, and social withdrawal. The research also highlights social media as the biggest contributing factor, accounting for 40% of the link between early smartphone ownership and declining mental health. Other contributors include disrupted sleep (12%), strained family relationships (13%), and cyberbullying (10%). SFC-SA's Claire Thompson tells Saturday Star that the findings should serve as a wake-up call for South African families. 'Children between 10 and 16 are in a critical stage of brain development. The emotional centres of the brain are in overdrive while impulse control and reasoning are still under construction. Giving them unfiltered access to the digital world during this time can be incredibly destabilising.' Thompson warns that smartphones, particularly when unsupervised, expose children to psychological stressors and inappropriate content they are not equipped to process. 'Being excluded from a group chat or receiving fewer likes on a post may seem minor, but for a child, it can feel like deep rejection. They don't yet have the tools to manage that kind of feedback.' She added that the dangers go beyond emotional strain. 'We've seen children stumble upon explicit content or fall prey to online predators. These are risks that require maturity and guidance to navigate safely.' In response, SFC-SA is advocating for community-wide support in delaying smartphone ownership, implementing digital literacy programs, and encouraging policies that protect young minds. The movement is part of a growing global push to reconsider how and when children are introduced to technology. 'Smartphones aren't going anywhere, but how we integrate them into our children's lives is still within our control. We're not anti-technology, we're pro-childhood.' As awareness of the issue spreads, the organisation aims to reshape the conversation around kids and tech, focusing on mental health, developmental readiness, and safer digital habits for the next generation. Lerato Ntwampe, an admitted attorney of the High Court involved with the movement, shares her insights from her interactions with schoolchildren. 'I think one of my biggest concerns when I engage with schoolchildren during talks is how unaware many of them are about the range of online harms that exist. It's not that they don't know these things happen; many are aware, but they don't always understand the legal implications. Some of these online behaviours are not just harmful; they're illegal. This includes hate speech, cyberbullying, sexting, and the sharing of child sexual abuse material (commonly referred to as child pornography in South Africa), and how this content is often circulated on WhatsApp groups and platforms like Instagram and TikTok.' One parent, wishing to remain anonymous, voiced her agreement with SFC-SA and shared her own struggles in navigating smartphone access for her 10-year-old son. 'I've allowed my son to have a smartphone out of fear of him feeling left out among his peers. However, I implemented the Google Family Link app to monitor his usage,' she shares. Yet, she laments that technical issues have rendered her efforts ineffective, leaving her son free to explore the digital world without limitations. A teacher from a phone-free primary school in the Free State expressed her support for the cause stating, 'In my classroom, I recently used the topic 'At what age should a child get a smartphone?' for a speaking assessment. My aim was to encourage students to engage with their parents while also exploring factual information from credible studies. I hoped parents would take notice of the compelling research surrounding smartphone usage among children.' Saturday Star