Army barred from showing kit at Armed Forces Day, sparks anger
But the decision outraged part-time soldiers from the Queen's Own Yeomanry, who reportedly withdrew entirely from the event in protest. It comes amid claims the decision was taken to avoid inflaming pro-Palestine demonstrators, with a whistle-blower telling military blog Fill Your Boots the council was worried about 'triggering a protest'. Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon was appalled at the claims and accused the council of 'capitulating' to activists like Palestine Action - which over the weekend was banned and branded a proscribed terror group. The former commander of the military's Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Regiment told MailOnline: 'It's absolutely bonkers if a Labour council is seemingly supporting a proscribed terrorist group over the army.'
'The military is there to protect the civilian community, but it seems at the moment whether you're an activist against climate change or anything else they get the rub of the green rather than the people doing the hard yards. 'It's a hugely disappointing and the people who serve us - the council and MPs - need to man up a bit and stand for those on the right side of the law rather than capitulating to the likes of Palestine Action, that's a proscribed terror group.'
Speaking ahead of the event, Councillor Claire Douglas (pictured) - leader of York City Council - said the day was 'a show of unity, pride and community spirit'. And Martin Rowley, the city's lord mayor and an army veteran, said it was about thanking and celebrating 'all who serve or have served'. But in a post on Facebook, seen by MailOnline, Mr Rowley conceded: 'We could and should have handled this situation differently.'
Local Tories hit out at the fiasco, with Councillor Chris Steward, leader of the York Conservative group, telling York Press : 'Military equipment is not a big part of Armed Forces Day by volume, but it is a crucial part. What use is any military without equipment? We totally condemn this decision of the Labour councillors. It shows how far the Labour Party has fallen from a proud, patriotic party which recognised the courageous and vital job our military do, to one more concerned how their actions may offend their increasingly extreme supporters who seem to want to protest against our long held values.'
The council declined to comment on whether the decision to block the Jackal vehicle from attending was taken due to fear it could lead to protests.
However, in a statement, Cllr Douglas said: 'With our military partners, we carefully considered residents' concerns and decided that the day will go ahead as planned, with the only change being no military equipment on show. This decision in no way diminishes how seriously we take Armed Forces Day and our deep respect and commitment to those who serve and have served.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
4 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK facing ‘very significant' volume of cyber attacks, security minister warns
Dan Jarvis said new measures send a signal to cyber criminals that ransom demands will not be tolerated. Proposals from the Home Office would ban public sector bodies and operators of critical national infrastructure from paying hackers. It would also mean private sector companies not covered by the ban would be required to notify the Government if they intended to pay a ransom. 'The UK is not alone in this regard, along with our international allies, we are subjected to a very significant number of cyber attacks every year,' Mr Jarvis told the PA news agency. 'But from a UK Government perspective we are crystal clear that these attacks are completely unacceptable. 'There's more that we need to do to guard against them and that's why we're introducing these measures.' Mr Jarvis said the measures mean cyber criminals will be 'less incentivised' to target UK institutions because of the clarity the ban on ransom payments brings. 'We think these proposals will provide a powerful deterrent, and what we're wanting to do is break the business model of the cyber criminals who think that they can get away with extorting money from UK-based institutions,' he told PA. He stressed the Government would ensure 'cyber criminals, whether they're in Russia or wherever they might be, face the full weight of the UK law'. Ransomware refers to software used by cyber criminals to access the computer systems of its victims, which can then be encrypted or data stolen until a ransom is paid. It comes after four young people were arrested for their suspected involvement in damaging cyber attacks against Marks & Spencer, the Co-op and Harrods in recent months. Microsoft also said on Tuesday night that Chinese hackers had breached its SharePoint document software servers in a bid to target major corporations and government agencies. Furthermore, under the proposals, a mandatory reporting regime would mean companies and institutions that are targeted by ransomware attacks are required to report it. Mr Jarvis said the Government was going to 'look very carefully at the precise details' of the regime but that it would provide more clarity and intelligence to government agencies. M&S chairman Archie Norman told MPs earlier this month that UK businesses should be legally required to report major cyber attacks as he claimed two recent hacks involving 'large British companies' had gone unreported. Mr Norman said the retailer believed an Asia-based ransomware operation, DragonForce, had been involved in the attack – but refused to say whether or not a ransom was paid.
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK govment go cut foreign aid and Africa go dey more impacted
Di UK govment don reveal details of dia plans to cut foreign aid, and support for children education and women health for Africa go chop di biggest reductions. Dem bin don tok for February dis year say dem go slash foreign aid spending by 40% - from 0.5% of dia Gross National Income (GNI) to 0.3% - in order to increase dia defence spending. Dis dey come afta di US President Donald Trump bin approve ogbonge cut for foreign aid, including dissolving di United States Agency for International Development (USAID), di major agency wey dey oversee US aid programmes around di world. BBC don report how di US aid cuts go impact Africa especially pipo wey get serious health challenges like HIV/Aids, Tuberculosis, and also maternal and child health. One report from di UK Foreign Office show say di biggest cuts dis year na for Africa, and dis go get ogbonge impact on women health and water sanitation and di risk of disease and death fit increase. UK network of aid organisations, Bond, say na women and children for di most marginalised communities go pay di highest price. "E dey concerning say bilateral funding for Africa, gender, education and health programmes go drop. Di most marginalised communities for di world, particularly dose wey dey experience conflict, and women and girls, go pay di highest price for di political choices," Bond policy director Gideon Rabinowitz tok. "For dis time wen di US don stop all gender programming, di UK suppose to be stepping up, not stepping back." Di UK govment explain say di cuts follow "a line-by-line strategic review of aid" by di minister, focusing on "prioritisation, efficiency, protecting planned humanitarian support and live contracts while ensuring responsible exit from programming wia necessary". Di Foreign Office say bilateral support for some kontris go decrease and multilateral organisations wey no dey perform well go chop funding cuts. But dem neva announce di particular kontris wey go dey affected. Official UK figures show say at 0.5% of GNI, di UK aid budget by 2027 suppose be around £15.4 billion, but based on dis new target of 0.3%, di amount go be just about £6.1 billion. Wen di goment bin first make di announcement in February, some opposition members of di parliament including di Leader of di Opposition, Kemi Badenoch, bin welcome di increase for defence spending and she also support di decision to reduce di UK aid budget in order to finance it. Oda politicians like di leader of di Liberal Democrats, Ed Davey, support to increase defence spending, but e say cutting di aid budget too much go "leave a vacuum for Russia and China to fill". However, Anneliese Dodds, wey be di International Development Minister dat time, resign from her position afta di decision. She say reducing aid funding fit lead to a UK pull-out from plenty African, Caribbean and Western Balkan kontris, at a time wen Russia and China dey increase dia own actions for dis kontris. Why di UK dey cut foreign aid? According to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, govment go use di money wey dem save from aid funding to increase dia defence spending to 2.5% of dia GDP by 2027 and 3% by 2030. E mean say di UK go dey spend extra £13.4 billion on defence from 2027. Anoda reason, according to di UK Trade Minister Douglas Alexander, be say di money no too dey again and di UK public no longer support too much spending on international aid. Even if moni no dey tight, you go need to make di argument for investment in foreign aid, oga Alexander tell BBC for one interview in June. "I tink we don lose dat argument at various points. We get interest to build a stable, more equal, more safe world for our future generations, but public consent don withdraw," e tok. Wetin dis go mean for Africa and which kontri go be worst hit? Di UK dey provide support in terms of aid to Africa across plenty sectors like health, education, governance, humanitarian assistance and more. Malaria No More UK, one UK charity organisation wey dey help combat malaria across Africa, say di cutting of funding go "reset di clock on di progress wey we don make in saving children lives by fighting malaria". Astrid Bonfield, wey be di oga for Malaria No More UK tok for one statement say: "We must remember say even though international aid na for abroad we dey spend am, di benefits na for home here we dey feel am because e dey make di UK safer, healthier and more prosperous." Though di goment no mention kontris wey go dey more impacted by dis cuts, but kontris wey dey experience serious crisis and climate change wahala like Sudan, South Sudan, Chad, Niger, Ethiopia, etc, fit feel di impact more. Di Nigeria govment bin sign eight partnership agreements wit di UK govment dis year wey worth about N589 billion. E neva dey clear now weda dis agreements go dey impacted by di decision to cut foreign aid funding. Oda western kontris wey don reduce aid funding Apart from di US where President Trump bin cancel more dan 80% of all programmes wey USAID bin dey carry out, France, Germany, and Sweden don also reduce dia foreign aid funding well-well between 2024 and 2025. According to Donor Tracker - one website wey dey track all foreign aids wey kontris dey give - France cut dia Official Development Assistance (ODA) budget by $1.5 billion for dia 2025 budget. Dis represent 23% decrease to compare to dia 2024 budget. Germany for dia 2025 budget also reduce di funding for dia ODA-relevant ministries by about 19.8 billion Euros. Similarly, for September last year, di Swedish Minister for International Development Cooperation, Benjamin Dousa reveal say dia annual ODA allocation go drop by about $291 million 2026-2028.
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bank of England Governor hits back at Reeves over regulation
By Andrew Bailey yesterday put himself at odds with Rachel Reeves over the Chancellor's outspoken attack on regulation. The Bank of England Governor made clear that he did not share Reeves' recent claim that the enforcement of red tape acted as a 'boot on the neck' of business. Andrew Bailey yesterday put himself at odds with Rachel Reeves over the Chancellor's outspoken attack on regulation. The Bank of England Governor made clear that he did not share Reeves' recent claim that the enforcement of red tape acted as a 'boot on the neck' of business. Speaking to MPs on the Treasury select committee, he urged caution over a proposed shake-up of the ring-fencing system that separates traditional lending and deposit-taking from riskier investment banking. The comments appear to be a shot across the bows of the Chancellor as she seeks to unravel some of the reforms put in place during the financial crisis in a bid to boost growth. They suggest she may face an unwanted battle with Threadneedle Street to add to friction with Labour backbenchers over spending cuts and the battle to balance the books, amid dismal economic growth and deteriorating public finances. Reeves took aim at regulators during her Mansion House speech to the City earlier this month. But Bailey chose to dissociate himself from the 'boot on the neck' comments. He said: 'It's not a term I'd use. 'I think there are areas that we clearly should look at it – we've announced a whole range of things we're doing, and that's a good thing. But we can't compromise on basic financial stability and that would be my overall message.' Reeves has also promised 'meaningful reform' of the ring-fencing regime – something being demanded by the bosses of a number of major banks who say they are a drag on business. But Bailey said he favoured keeping the rules. He told MPs: 'I do think that the ring-fencing regime is an important part of the structure of the banking system.' Bailey said the rules make it easier to deal with banks that get into trouble in a way that spares consumers, businesses and households. He added: 'I'm sure there are things that can be improved and we will work constructively to get through that process.
