
India reacts to Trump's 25% tariff on exports to US
Trump's decision dashes hopes of a limited trade agreement between the two countries, which had been under negotiation for several months.
Here are some reactions:
Madhavi arora, economist, emkay global
'While the negotiations seem to have broken down, we don't think the trade deal haggling between the two nations is over yet. We see it more from the lens of geopolitics than purely economics and see both sides striving to get the deal done, even as the power equations may change a bit in U.S. favour.'
Ranen banerjee, partner of economic advisory, pwc India
'Higher tariffs for India compared to countries it competes with, for exports to the U.S., are going to be challenging.
However, the expectation is that the trade deal is likely to be finalised shortly and hence the period of applicability of these higher tariffs could be short.'
Nilesh shah, md kotak mahindra amc
'Despite the unpredictable policy making of the U.S., the market was expecting a tariff deal to work out as longer-term U.S.-India strategic interests are aligned.
Markets will hope for a 'TACO' trade if better senses prevail.
India, US trade talks face roadblocks ahead of tariff deadline, Indian sources say
China is defying U.S./UN sanctions on Iran oil, Myanmar and Russia trade and North Korea support. Size and the competitiveness of the economy has its advantages.
I hope and pray that this unilateral imposition should accelerate Indian policy making to be growth supportive. Our biggest deterrence continues to remain GDP size and competitiveness.'
Agneshwar sen, trade policy leader, ey India
'The decision to raise the U.S. tariff to 25% on Indian exports is an unfortunate development, particularly given the strong strategic partnership that has been steadily built between India and the USA in recent years.
However, it's important to note that both countries remain positively engaged in active negotiations with the U.S. team expected in India later in August to finalize a comprehensive trade agreement.'
Kirit bhansali, chairman, gem and jewellery export promotion council India
'This is a deeply concerning development. The Indian gem and jewellery sector, in particular, stands to be severely impacted.
The United States is our single largest market, accounting for over $10 billion in exports - nearly 30% of our industry's total global trade. A blanket tariff of this magnitude will place immense pressure on every part of the value chain.
We recognise the need to address trade imbalances, but such extreme measures undermine decades of economic cooperation. We urge the U.S. administration to reconsider, and call on both governments to engage in constructive dialogue that safeguards bilateral trade and protects the millions of jobs that depend on it on both sides.'
N. Thirukkumaran, general secretary of tiruppur exporters' association
'It is just a negotiation tactic. Trade negotiations are ongoing. The Indian government is tough on certain terms like agriculture and dairy — India isn't opening up.
If it goes through, U.S. exports from the association will be affected, because Vietnam has lower tariffs. We will be losing our competitive edge.
India prioritises national interest in US trade talks, trade ministry source says
We are optimistic that an imminent trade agreement will be on the lines of the one with the UK. We have to wait and watch, and not panic. There is no reason to panic.'
Garima kapoor, economist, institutional equities, elara securities, mumbai
'Overall, we continue to see a deal by end Q3 but, a kneejerk reaction in Indian asset classes is likely in the near term.'
S.C. ralhan, president of the federation of Indian export organisations
'This is a major setback for Indian exporters, especially in sectors like textiles, footwear, and furniture, as the 25% tariff will render them uncompetitive in the US market against rivals from Vietnam, China, and elsewhere.
However, we remain hopeful that both countries will work towards a bilateral trade agreement.'
Avinash gorakshakar, director of research at profitmart securities
'Until the final document is released, it's all speculation. India is a large, attractive market that the U.S. cannot afford to ignore, so any move will ultimately be weighed against long-term interests. My sense is that the August 1 deadline may itself be flexible and India is unlikely to budge easily.
In the short term, the announcement could trigger some selling pressure, but in the longer term, I expect the impact to neutralize. India's market attractiveness remains intact.'
Colin shah, md, kama jewelry
'With U.S. being one of the key export destinations, this will severely impact the sectors like gems and jewellery that are heavily dependent on exports.
Going ahead, we expect trade activities to remain muted with U.S. However, we also need to wait and watch how the situation unfolds.'
Rahul mehta, chief mentor, clothing manufacturers association of India
'Having seen the several about turns on the tariff front in the case of other countries, I would not press panic buttons right now. But, if the proposed terms do come into effect, it will make our products 7% to 10% more expensive than some of our competitors, and it will certainly hurt our apparel exports to the U.S.
India and US advance toward interim trade deal after four-day talks
Fortunately, this set-back has come at the time when we have just signed an FTA with UK, and are proceeding rapidly with an FTA with EU.'
Sakshi gupta, principal economist, hdfc bank, gurugram
'For now, the announcement of 25% tariffs is likely to cause volatility in the FX market with mounting depreciation pressure on the rupee. Although the RBI is likely to intervene tomorrow to tamp down the depreciation pressure.'
Aditi nayar, chief economist, icra
'When the U.S. had initially imposed tariffs, we had lowered our forecast of India's GDP expansion to 6.2% for FY2026, presuming a tepid rise in exports and a delay in private capex. The tariff (and penalty) now proposed by the U.S. is higher than what we had anticipated, and is therefore likely to pose a headwind to India's GDP growth. The extent of the downside will depend on the size of the penalties imposed.'
Ashok chandak, president, india electronics & semiconductor association
'The imposition of a 25% tariff by the U.S. on Indian goods will be short term. Indian electronics exports is a short-term challenge that could disrupt supply chains and dent price competitiveness.
India does not have any major advantage compared to other Asian countries anymore if 25% tariff above baseline 10% is continued. However, it also underlines the urgency for India's electronics sector to diversify export markets, deepen domestic markets, develop Indian brands and products, and move up the value chain to reduce dependency on price-sensitive, tariff-exposed exports.'
Rishi shah, partner and economic advisory services leader, grant thornton bharat
'Given the escalating rhetoric around Russia-Ukraine negotiations, some form of adverse development was anticipated… the specifics of the additional 'penalty' beyond the 25% tariff may determine the actual economic impact.'
Harsha vardhan agarwal, president, federation of indian chambers of commerce and industry
'We hope that this imposition of higher tariffs will be a short-term phenomenon and that a permanent trade deal between the two sides will be finalised soon.
The aim is to secure a beneficial pact rather than a hurried deal that gives short term benefit but may result in adverse outcomes in the long term.
It is also important to note that India offers a large market for U.S. businesses and many of the large companies from the U.S. benefit from leveraging the demand as well as the skills and talent pool that we have to offer.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
23 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Netherlands uses new NATO channel to pay for US arms for Ukraine
AMSTERDAM: The Netherlands said on Monday it will contribute 500 million euros ($578 million) to purchase U.S. military equipment for Ukraine, becoming the first NATO country to contribute to a new mechanism to supply Kyiv with American weapons. President Donald Trump said last month the U.S. would provide weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but he did not provide details on how this would work. 'As the first NATO ally, the Netherlands will deliver a €500 million package of US weapon systems (including Patriot parts and missiles),' Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans said in a post on X. NATO chief Mark Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, welcomed the announcement and said he has encouraged other alliance members to participate in the new mechanism, called the NATO Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) initiative. 'This is about getting Ukraine the equipment it urgently needs now to defend itself against Russian aggression,' Rutte said in a statement. US approves $322mn in arms sales to Ukraine 'I have written to all NATO Allies, urging them to contribute towards this burden sharing initiative, and I expect further significant announcements from other Allies soon,' he added. The U.S. ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, told Reuters on Monday that he expected many more countries to announce over the coming weeks that they will participate. 'We're moving as fast as possible,' Whitaker said in an interview at NATO headquarters in Brussels. Asked about a timeline for getting U.S. deliveries to Ukraine under the new mechanism, he said, 'I think we'll see it moving very quickly, certainly in the coming weeks, but some even sooner than that. 'The Dutch are just the first of many. You're going to see a series of announcements in the coming weeks,' he added. NATO said it would coordinate the new initiative, which is funded by European members of the alliance and Canada and will be divided into packages worth approximately $500 million. In a statement, the alliance said, 'Working closely with Ukraine and the United States, the Supreme Allied Commander Europe Alexus Grynkewich will validate packages that correspond to Ukraine's needs, such as air defence, ammunition and other critical equipment for rapid delivery from U.S. stockpiles'. Kyiv welcomed the Dutch decision. 'Ukraine, and thus the whole of Europe, will be better protected from Russian terror,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy wrote on X. 'I am sincerely grateful to the Netherlands for their substantial contribution to strengthening Ukraine's air shield,' he added.


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
India slams ‘unjustified' action by US, EU over its Russian oil purchases
NEW DELHI: India's foreign ministry said Monday that the United States and European Union were 'targeting' it due to its buying of Russian oil, adding that the moves were 'unjustified' and that it would protect its interests. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' India Foreign Ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement, after US President Donald Trump vowed to raise tariffs on the country over its oil purchases from Russia. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' It did not provide further details on the measures. India became a major buyer of Russian oil, providing a much-needed export market for Moscow after it was cut off from traditional buyers in Europe because of the Ukraine war. New Delhi saved itself billions of dollars while bolstering Moscow's coffers. But India on Monday argued it 'began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict'. It also noted that Washington at that time had 'actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability.' Trump says will 'substantially' raise tariffs on goods from India over Russian oil purchases It pointed to what it suggested were double standards of EU and US trade with Moscow. 'It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia,' Jaiswal added. 'Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion.' Jaiswal singled out examples of where deals were being done with Moscow. 'Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilisers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment,' the statement added. 'Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals.' India, the world's most populous country, was one of the first major economies to engage the Trump administration in broader trade talks. The United States is India's largest trading partner, with New Delhi shipping goods worth $87.4 billion in 2024. India's protectionist trade policies, however, saw it run up a surplus of nearly $46 billion the same year. On Monday, Trump said in a post to his Truth Social platform that India was 'buying massive amounts of Russian Oil' and selling it for 'big profits.' 'Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA,' he wrote. But he did not provide details on what tariff level he had in mind. For now, an existing 10 percent US tariff on Indian products is expected to rise to 25 percent come Thursday. Last month, the EU and Britain sought to ramp up economic pressure on Russia to halt the war in Ukraine by slashing a price cap meant to choke off revenues from key oil exports.


Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Donald Trump drags in Taylor Swift while praising Sydney Sweeney's controversial American Eagle ad
President Donald Trump reignited his public criticism of Taylor Swift in a recent post on Truth Social, while expressing strong support for actress Sydney Sweeney and her controversial American Eagle ad campaign. The remarks, made on Monday (Aug. 4), included a claim that Swift is 'no longer hot' and a broader commentary on political affiliations and cultural appeal. Trump praised Sweeney, describing her American Eagle advertisement as the 'hottest ad out there,' and attributing the campaign's success to her status as a registered Republican. 'Go get 'em, Sydney!' he wrote, referencing reports that Sweeney registered as a Republican in 2024. The ad has stirred controversy due to its messaging, with critics drawing comparisons between Sweeney's statement about having 'great genes' and past fascist propaganda. President Trump speaks on Sydney Sweeney being a registered Republican 'Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican? Now I love her ad. If she is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic' — FearBuck (@FearedBuck) August 4, 2025 Despite the backlash, Trump celebrated the campaign's performance, claiming American Eagle jeans are 'flying off the shelves.' The fashion brand responded to criticism by emphasizing that the campaign is focused solely on the jeans, not political ideology. 'Great jeans look good on everyone,' American Eagle stated on Instagram. In contrast, Trump targeted Swift, labeling her a 'woke singer' and repeating his earlier claims that her popularity has declined since he publicly expressed dislike for her. He reiterated past assertions that she was 'booed out of the Super Bowl,' a claim contradicted by eyewitness accounts, which indicate Swift attended the entire game and was cheered by fans. Trump has long criticized Swift, particularly following her political endorsements of Democratic candidates such as Phil Bredesen in 2018 and Kamala Harris in 2024. In May, Trump questioned whether Swift's popularity had declined since he said he 'hated' her, again suggesting that being 'woke' is detrimental to cultural relevance.