Trump Meets with Zelenskyy and Says Higher NATO Defense Spending May Deter Future Russian Aggression
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the NATO summit Wednesday and suggested that increased spending by the trans-Atlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its neighbors.
NATO members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5% of gross domestic product annually on core defense requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending. That target had been 2% of GDP.
'Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,' Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after seeing Zelenskyy. 'And hopefully we're going to get that solved.'
Trump also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022.
'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Trump said. 'He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia.''
Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy was their first face-to-face session since April, when they met at St. Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis' funeral. Trump also had a major confrontation with Zelenskyy earlier this year at the White House.
Zelenskyy, on social media, said he discussed with Trump the possibility of Kyiv producing drones with American companies and buying U.S. air defense systems. 'We can strengthen each other,' he wrote.
He said he also talked to Trump about 'what is really happening on the ground.'
'Putin is definitely not winning,' Zelenskyy said.
Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more U.S.-made Patriot air defense missile systems.
Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause.
'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Trump said. 'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.'
Over the course of the war, the U.S. has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defense systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia.
Trump laid into the U.S. media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth toward the Ukrainian reporter.
'That's a very good question,' Trump said about the query about Patriots. 'And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.'
Ukraine, which is not a NATO member, has been front and center at recent alliance summits. But as the group's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Zelenskyy was not in the room. The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join NATO.
The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war.
During Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war. He saw it as a costly boondoggle that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won reelection in 2020. Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Putin and Zelenskyy.
Zelenskyy spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones. The White House did not allow press coverage of Zelenskyy's nearly hourlong meeting with Trump.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds ($95 million) raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
29 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Says He Will Move Aggressively to Undo Nationwide Blocks on His Agenda
An emboldened Trump administration plans to aggressively challenge blocks on the president's top priorities, from immigration to education, following a major Supreme Court ruling that limits the power of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions. Government attorneys will press judges to pare back the dozens of sweeping rulings thwarting the president's agenda 'as soon as possible,' said a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal deliberations. Priorities for the administration include injunctions related to the Education Department and the U.S. DOGE Service, as well as an order halting the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the official said, detailing efforts to implement plans President Donald Trump announced Friday. 'Thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis,' Trump said at a news conference, during which he thanked by name members of the conservative high court majority he helped build. Trump on Friday cast the narrowing of judicial power as a consequential, needed correction in his battle with a court system that has restrained his authority. Scholars and plaintiffs in the lawsuits over Trump's orders agreed that the high court ruling could profoundly reshape legal battles over executive power that have defined Trump's second term – even as other legal experts said the effects would be more muted. Some predicted it would embolden Trump to push his expansive view of presidential power. 'The Supreme Court has fundamentally reset the relationship between the federal courts and the executive branch,' Notre Dame Law School professor Samuel Bray, who has studied nationwide injunctions, said in a statement. 'Since the Obama administration, almost every major presidential initiative has been frozen by federal district courts issuing 'universal injunctions.'' Nationwide injunctions put a freeze on an action until a court can make a decision on its legality. They have became a go-to tool for critics of presidential actions in recent times, sometimes delaying for years the implementation of an executive order the court ultimately approves. Experts said the Supreme Court's ruling could make it more difficult and cumbersome to challenge executive actions. It could result in courts issuing a patchwork of rulings on presidential orders in different parts of the country. In the short term, the ruling is a setback for liberals who have gone to court to thwart Trump. But the decision could also ultimately constrain conservatives seeking broad rulings to rein in a future Democratic president. Trump undertook a flurry of executive actions in the opening month of his term that ranged from dismantling government agencies to seeking the end of birthright citizenship. There have been more than 300 lawsuits seeking to block his executive actions. Federal district judges have issued roughly 50 rulings to date, temporarily holding up the administration's moves to cut foreign aid, conduct mass layoffs and fire probationary employees, terminate legal representation for young migrants, ban birthright citizenship, and more nationwide. Some of those rulings have been stayed by higher courts. The Supreme Court found Friday that federal district courts must limit their injunctions to the parties bringing the case, which could be individuals, organizations or states. They had previously been able to issue injunctions that applied to people not directly involved in cases. The ruling came as part of a case challenging Trump's ban on birthright citizenship. The court did not rule on the constitutionality of that executive order. The justices left it to lower courts to determine whether a nationwide injunction might be a proper form of relief for states in some cases, like the ban on birthright citizenship, where the harm could be widespread. The court also did not forestall plaintiffs from seeking nationwide relief through class-action lawsuits. Smita Ghosh, a senior appellate counsel with the Constitutional Accountability Center, a progressive public interest law firm, said the ruling could be a blow to plaintiffs seeking to stymie Trump's executive orders. The CAC has filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of plaintiffs challenging the birthright citizenship ban. 'This approach will make it more difficult and more time-consuming to challenge unconstitutional executive practices, limiting courts' abilities to constrain unlawful presidential action at a time when many believe that they need it most,' Ghosh said. Many groups will pivot to filing class-action lawsuits to sidestep the ruling, she predicted, as some plaintiffs in the birthright citizenship lawsuit sought to do Friday. Such lawsuits allow individuals or groups to sue on behalf of a larger class of individuals who have suffered a similar harm from a government policy. It's likely courts will see more and more class- or mass-action lawsuits from cities, counties and states that realize they can no longer rely on litigation brought by others to advocate for their interests, said Jonathan Miller, chief program officer for the Public Rights Project, which is challenging several Trump policies. 'I think this decision will be perceived by this administration as a green light to more aggressively pursue its agenda, be bolder when it comes to compliance with injunction and its willingness to test the limits of the judiciary,' Miller said. Not everyone expected the ruling to have broad impacts. Skye Perryman, president and CEO of Democracy Forward, which has filed numerous challenges against Trump's agenda, called it a 'limited ruling' and said the court left open a number of routes for challenges against executive actions that could result in broad blocks on Trump's policies. Ed Whelan, a conservative attorney, was likewise skeptical. He wrote in a newsletter that 'the ruling is probably going to accomplish much less than many people celebrating it realize,' in part because plaintiffs would instead pursue more class-action lawsuits that would ultimately produce similar results as nationwide injunctions. The administration on Friday trumpeted the decision at the White House as a victory in its broader fight against the judiciary. Officials frequently deride judges who rule against the administration as activists and obstructionists. Dozens of judges appointed by presidents of both parties have temporarily paused many of Trump's efforts, and data shows threats against the judiciary have risen since he took office. 'Americans are getting what they voted for, no longer will we have rogue judges striking down President Trump's policies across the entire nation,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said, standing beside Trump at the news conference. She added, 'These lawless injunctions … turned district courts into the imperial judiciary.' Both Democratic and Republican presidents have complained about the blocks, said Jesse Panuccio, a partner at the Boies Schiller Flexner law firm and a Justice Department official in the first Trump administration. 'I think the ruling is seismic for how the federal district courts have been doing business in the last 20 years or so because the universal injunction has become a fairly standard and – in my view – unlawful remedy in cases,' Panuccio said.
Yomiuri Shimbun
29 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
What's in Trump and Senate Republicans' Tax and Immigration Bill?
New tax breaks. Massive spending on border security. Cuts to social safety net programs. Pullbacks on investments to fight climate change. New limits on student loans. If it becomes law, President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans' massive bill will reshape much of the federal government – and the U.S. economy. The House narrowly passed the legislation in May and sent it to the Senate, which is set to take up the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as soon as Saturday. Republicans are trying to move quickly to reverse many of President Joe Biden's legislative accomplishments and cement Trump's legacy in the tax code, on the U.S.-Mexico border, and in generations-old anti-poverty programs. The legislation would devote hundreds of billions of dollars to finishing Trump's border wall, fortifying maritime border crossings, outfitting the Defense Department and more. It would extend the tax cuts that were one of the signature legislative achievements of Trump's first term, create new savings accounts for newborns and fulfill some, but not all, of the president's campaign promises. The Republican negotiations over the bill are far from over. The Senate overhauled the legislation in ways that some House lawmakers find unrecognizable. Trump and Senate leaders are banking on the House accepting those changes, even if lawmakers in the lower chamber have concerns over myriad issues, including the social safety net and national debt. The GOP is using the budget reconciliation process to shepherd the measure, which allows them to dodge a Democratic filibuster in the Senate and pass it on party lines. Here's what's in the Senate version of the proposal released overnight. Extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act cut taxes for individuals of nearly all income levels, concentrating most of the benefits among the wealthiest earners and corporations. The business tax cuts are permanent, but the individual portions expire at the end of the year. So if Congress doesn't act, tax rates will go up on most households. The Republican bill would permanently extend the lower rates for individuals. Increase the standard deduction The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act doubled the standard deduction, which is the baseline amount of income filers can collect tax-free. This legislation would preserve that policy and add to it, increasing the deduction by up to $2,000 for married couples filing jointly and $1,000 for single filers, to $32,000 for couples and $16,000 for individuals. Cuts to Medicaid To meet budget goals, Republicans are making deep cuts and instituting eligibility restrictions on Medicaid, the federal health insurance program for low-income individuals and people with disabilities. The Senate implements work requirements and new cost-sharing structures and puts strict limits on Medicaid provider taxes, duties that states charge medical providers as a roundabout way of collecting more federal Medicaid dollars. Some in the GOP wish to use that policy to force states to jettison immigrants from benefits rolls. Rural hospital bailout fund To soften the blow of the provider tax limitations, the Senate created a $25 billion fund to stabilize rural hospitals and health clinics. The fund would begin in 2028 when the new provider tax policies begin, and sunset in 2032. A little SALT The bill quadruples the cap on the state and local tax deduction, or SALT, which lets filers write off the amount they paid in local taxes from their federal tax bill. But that increase would only last a little while. After five years, the SALT cap would snap back down to $10,000. Making states pay for SNAP The legislation would cap future expansion of SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program formerly known as food stamps. It would also pass on more of the cost for administering the program to state governments, potentially forcing local officials to decide whether to cut benefits or dig into their state and municipal budgets. States with higher rates of improper payments would be required to shoulder up to 15 percent of benefits costs. Today, states and the federal government split the costs of running SNAP's operations evenly. Beginning in 2027, the federal government would only cover a quarter of the cost. Increase the child tax credit – for some The child tax credit is a tax break for filers with children. The Republican measure would increase the credit to $2,200 per child, from $2,000, then would link it to inflation. But not every family can qualify: The legislation limits eligibility to parents or guardians with Social Security numbers, essentially requiring claimants to be citizens or immigrants who have obtained valid Social Security numbers. That would mostly exclude noncitizen parents from claiming the credit on behalf of a child who is a citizen. A border wall, other barriers and immigration restrictions The Senate version designates nearly $85 billion for the Trump administration's border and immigration crackdown. That is about half of what the House proposed for border and immigration funding. The Senate would spend $6.5 billion to complete the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and other fortifications, including at maritime crossings. More than $54 billion would go to building and maintaining detention centers to house and transport families of deportees. New taxes on colleges and universities The legislation aggressively taxes income generated by the endowments of colleges and universities. Current law imposes a 1.4 percent tax on those institutions. This bill creates a new system that would set varying tax rates depending on the size of the endowment per enrolled student: Savings accounts for newborns The proposal would give newborn babies a $1,000 savings account that the legislation calls a 'Trump account.' (A previous version dubbed them 'money account for growth and advancement,' or a MAGA account.) Parents or beneficiaries could contribute $5,000 each year to that account until the beneficiary is 31 years old. The idea mirrors a pitch from Democratic Sen. Cory Booker (New Jersey) for 'baby bonds.' No tax on tips Trump campaigned heavily on ending taxes on tips, and now that policy is in the bill. The legislation would allow a tax deduction for the total amount of tipped income received. It contains some guardrails to prevent 'highly compensated employees' from claiming their earnings as tips and specifically identifies food service, hair care, nail care, aesthetics, and body and spa treatments as professions eligible to receive the deduction. No tax on overtime Another of Trump's campaign promises, this provision would exempt overtime wages from taxes through a new deduction. The legislation wouldn't allow deduction of overtime wages from tips or for 'highly compensated employees,' and requires filers to use a Social Security number when claiming the deduction, deeming most undocumented immigrants ineligible. No tax on car loan interest The bill would allow purchasers of American-made cars to deduct up to $10,000 in car loan interest payments for four years – an idea Trump talked about on the campaign trail and then returned to as his tariffs began to bite the auto industry. For tax filers earning more than $100,000 (or $200,000 for married couples filing jointly), the loan interest deduction would phase out by $200 for every $1,000 of additional income. A bonus deduction for seniors Trump promised last year to end taxes on Social Security benefits. The bill doesn't include that provision, but it would add an extra $6,000 to the standard deduction for people over 65 years old. The policy would taper off as a recipient's income increased. Billions for defense, including Trump's 'Golden Dome' There is roughly $158 billion in the bill for the Defense Department, spread over several priorities: $25 billion for the munition and defense supply chain, $329 billion for shipbuilding, and $34 billion for missile defense and space capabilities – that's partially for Trump's 'Golden Dome' continental missile defense system. Sell federal land The bill would require the Bureau of Land Management to sell between a quarter and half a percent of the agency's land holdings to build new housing. It specifically exempts national parks, national monuments, national recreation areas, wilderness areas, other wildlands and contracted grazing areas. Repeal Biden student loan forgiveness The legislation would save $320 billion over 10 years by repealing the Biden administration's student loan forgiveness program and making other changes to loan repayments. Tax credits for home schooling or private school The bill includes up to $4 billion per year in tax credits that benefit people who donate to organizations that help families pay for private-school tuition or home schooling. It would create a 100 percent tax credit for donations to scholarship-granting organizations, with taxpayers fully reimbursed for their donations when they file their taxes. Rescind money to fight climate change The proposal would gut elements of Biden's signature 2022 climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act. It would eliminate a federal tax credit of up to $7,500 that consumers can receive for buying an electric vehicle. Republicans would also quickly phase out incentives for the production of clean energy, such as wind and solar power. New oil, gas and coal production The Natural Resources Committee would require the federal government to immediately begin selling leases for oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and in protected Alaskan wildlands. It would also force the Interior Department to approve more coal production and reduce regulations to make it cheaper to extract. Auction the spectrum The electromagnetic spectrum is necessary for everything from wireless technologies to military communications and radars. The legislation would renew the Federal Communications Commission's authority to auction off bands of spectrum that the Commerce, Science and Transportation says could raise $85 billion over 10 years. Cut protections for federal workers The legislation would require an audit of dependents of federal employees on government health insurance plans. Earlier editions of the measure would have forced new federal employees to choose between accepting an at-will classification that would make it easier to be fired or putting more of their salary toward retirement, and recalculated worker retirement benefits. Those provisions were removed. Raise the debt ceiling The debt ceiling sets the amount of money the federal government can borrow to pay for expenses already incurred. The government technically eclipsed the limit at the end of 2024, but the Treasury Department is taking 'extraordinary measures' to put off the need to take on more debt. But those measures will expire sometime in August. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Friday refused to answer questions on an exact date, a break from previous administrations. The Senate bill would raise the debt limit by $5 trillion.
The Mainichi
43 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Hundreds of thousands mourn top Iranian military commanders and scientists killed in Israeli strikes
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) -- Hundreds of thousands of mourners lined the streets of downtown Tehran on Saturday for the funeral of the head of the Revolutionary Guard and other top commanders and nuclear scientists killed during a 12-day war with Israel. The caskets of Guard chief Gen. Hossein Salami, the head of the Guard's ballistic missile program, Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh and others were driven on trucks along the capital's Azadi Street as people in the crowds chanted: "Death to America" and "Death to Israel." Salami and Hajizadeh were both killed on the first day of the war, June 13, as Israel launched a war it said was meant to destroy Iran's nuclear program, specifically targeting military commanders, scientists and nuclear facilities. State media reported more than 1 million people turned out for the funeral procession, which was impossible to independently confirm, but the dense crowd packed the main Tehran thoroughfare along the entire 4.5 kilometer (nearly 3 mile) route. There was no immediate sign of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in the state broadcast of the funeral. Khamenei, who has not made a public appearance since before the outbreak of the war, has in past funerals held prayers for fallen commanders over their caskets before the open ceremonies, later aired on state television. Top officials are among the mourners Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was on hand, and state television reported that Gen. Esmail Qaani, who heads the foreign wing of the Revolutionary Guard, the Quds Force, and Gen. Ali Shamkhani were also among the mourners. Shamkhani, an adviser to Khamenei who was wounded in the first round of Israel's attack and hospitalized, was shown in a civilian suit leaning on a cane in an image distributed on state television's Telegram channel. Later on Saturday night, state TV showed Shamkhani saying he and other generals knew they would be targets before Israel initiated the war earlier this month. The morning of the strike on his residence, he said he woke up for dawn prayer when suddenly everything around him had become ruins. He initially thought that an earthquake had taken place, and it took search and rescue teams at least three hours to find him in the rubble. Shamkhani said most of his injuries were internal, including a chest fracture. Iran's Revolutionary Guard was created after its 1979 Islamic Revolution. Since it was established, it has evolved from a paramilitary, domestic security force to a transnational force that has come to the aid of Tehran's allies in the Middle East, from Syria and Lebanon to Iraq. It operates in parallel to the country's existing armed forces and controls Iran's arsenal of ballistic missiles, which it has used to attack Israel twice during the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip. Over 12 days before a ceasefire was declared on Tuesday, Israel claimed it killed around 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists, while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted, but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. Saturday's ceremonies were the first public funerals for top commanders since the ceasefire, and Iranian state television reported that they were for 60 people in total, including four women and four children. Crowd expresses feelings of anger and defiance Authorities closed government offices to allow public servants to attend the ceremonies. Many in the crowd expressed feelings of anger and defiance. "This is not a ceasefire, this is just a pause," said 43-year-old Ahmad Mousapoor, waving an Iranian flag. "Whatever they do, we will definitely give a crushing response." State media published images of an open grave plot at Tehran's sprawling Behesht-e-Zahra cemetery where army chief of staff, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, who was killed on the first day of the war, was to be buried beside his brother, a Guards commander killed during the 1980s Iran-Iraq war. Many of the others were to be buried in their hometowns. The Iranian judiciary's Mizan news agency confirmed that the top prosecutor at the notorious Evin prison had been killed in an Israeli strike on Monday. It reported that Ali Ghanaatkar, whose prosecution of dissidents, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, led to widespread criticism by human rights groups, would be buried at a shrine in Qom. Iran has always insisted its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes. But Israel views it as an existential threat and said its military campaign was necessary to prevent Iran from building an atomic weapon. Khamenei's last public appearance was June 11, two days before hostilities with Israel broke out, when he met with Iranian parliamentarians. On Thursday, however, he released a pre-recorded video, in his first message since the end of the war, filled with warnings and threats directed toward the United States and Israel, the Islamic Republic's longtime adversaries. The 86-year-old downplayed U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites as having not achieved "anything significant" and claimed victory over Israel. Questions remain over possible talks The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency, Rafael Grossi, has characterized the damage done by American bunker-buster bombs to Iran's Fordo nuclear site, which was built into a mountain, as "very, very, very considerable." U.S. President Donald Trump has said that he expects Iran to open itself to international inspection to verify it doesn't restart its nuclear program, and White House officials have said they expect to restart talks soon with Iran, though nothing has been scheduled. Iran's parliament has voted to suspend collaboration with Grossi's International Atomic Energy Agency for the time being. In a post on X on Saturday, Araghchi indicated that Iran might be open to talks, but criticized Trump's remarks from Friday in which the president scoffed at a warning from Khamenei against further U.S. attacks, saying Iran "got beat to hell." "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers," Araghchi wrote.
