logo
Germany's 'debt brake' at centre of economic debate

Germany's 'debt brake' at centre of economic debate

Local Germany16-02-2025
The rule, which strictly limits government borrowing, now finds itself at the centre of debate over Europe's ailing top economy, a key election battleground.
Critics blame it for years of chronic underinvestment that has caused infrastructure to deteriorate, kept defence spending low and hit education standards. Its defenders insist it has helped keep the country's finances stable.
Here are some questions and answers about the controversial rule:
What is the debt brake?
The constitutionally enshrined measure prevents the central government from running a deficit of more than 0.35 percent of annual GDP, except in emergencies.
It was introduced in 2009 by the government of then-chancellor Angela Merkel, at a time of debate about national debt levels during the global financial crisis.
More than two-thirds of the upper and lower houses of parliament voted for the rule, as it required a change to the constitution. It came into force for the federal government in 2016.
It was suspended for four years to permit extra spending during the coronavirus pandemic and then the energy crisis triggered by Russia's war in Ukraine, but it came back into force in 2024.
What do its supporters say?
They say it has helped keep spending levels under control in Europe's top economy -- Germany's public debt is around 60 percent of GDP compared to around 100 percent or more for most other G7 countries.
One of its key political backers is the pro-business Free Democratic Party, part of Scholz's coalition. It argues that the brake ensures that future generations are not burdened with the debts taken on by their forebears.
"Every euro of debt taken on today will have to be repaid by future generations," the party says.
But the refusal of party leader Christian Lindner to countenance any easing of the rule when he was finance minister under Scholz left him at loggerheads with his coalition partners, and contributed to the government's implosion.
What about criticism?
Critics blame the brake for preventing investment in areas such as defence, as US President Donald Trump pressures Europe to boost funding, and for infrastructure problems, from late trains to patchy internet.
Other challenges, such as decarbonising the economy, also need vast public outlays.
Meeting them will require an additional 782 billion euros ($811 billion) of government spending between now and 2030, according to the Dezernat Zukunft think tank.
"It is almost certain (that the country) will take on more debt in the future for public infrastructure and defence," said Klaus Baader, the chief economist with France's Societe Generale bank.
The government created off-budget funds for spending in certain areas such as defence and climate, drawing accusations they had engaged in accounting trickery to circumvent the rules.
The constitutional court ruled in November that the government had indeed broken the debt rules, specifically over a manoeuvre where they transferred money from a coronavirus support fund into climate change investments.
The ruling blew a hole in the coalition's budget, ratcheting up tensions over the brake.
What happens after the election?
Leader of the centre-right opposition and favourite to be the next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, has sent mixed signals about the brake.
His CDU party's position is that it should remain but he has occasionally indicated an openness to reforming it in certain circumstances.
In a recent television debate with centre-left leader Scholz, he gave vague answers when asked about the subject: "One can discuss anything, but certainly not at first."
Scholz's SPD -- whom some speculate could end up in coalition with the CDU -- backs loosening the strict rules to boost investment, a position shared by the Greens.
Much will however depend on the shape of the new ruling coalition after the February 23 election.
If fringe parties, such as the far-right AfD and far-left BSW do well, it could inhibit the ability of the mainstream parties to push reform of the brake through parliament, as that would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada Central Bank Holds Rate Steady Citing US Tariff 'Threats'
Canada Central Bank Holds Rate Steady Citing US Tariff 'Threats'

Int'l Business Times

time6 days ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Canada Central Bank Holds Rate Steady Citing US Tariff 'Threats'

Canada's central bank held its key lending rate at 2.75 percent on Wednesday, as the major US trading partner confronts economic uncertainty two days before President Donald Trump's latest tariff deadline. Canada remains uniquely vulnerable to Trump's trade war given the deep, broad ties between the neighboring economies. Trump's threat to hike tariffs to 35 percent on certain goods if no new trade deal is reached by Friday could wreak further havoc across a Canadian economy already strained by US protectionism. "Let's hope there's an agreement between Canada and the United States. Let's hope it's a good agreement," Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem told reporters after announcing the rate pause. He conceded, however, that "there is a sense that US policy may well remain unpredictable." "There's a sense going to be hard to restore that trust," in the United States as an economic partner, he added. A statement from the bank said that "while some elements of US trade policy have started to become more concrete in recent weeks, trade negotiations are fluid (and) threats of new sectoral tariffs continue." Canada was the first G7 country to begin cutting rates last year, following several hikes to tame pandemic-fuelled inflation. But Wednesday marked the bank's third consecutive pause, caution largely driven by Trump's policies. "It's hard to be as forward-looking as usual when you've got an unusual amount of uncertainty," Macklem said. A central bank forecast released Wednesday outlined a scenario where the impact of new US tariffs could be relatively muted, if new levies do not apply to goods compliant with an existing trade deal Trump signed -- and praised -- during his first term. The bank said 100 percent of energy exports and 95 percent of all other exports, excluding auto parts, could be compliant with the United-States-Mexico-Canada-Agreement (USMCA). But Trump's auto tariffs are expected to remain in place, bringing further pain to a Canadian sector that has already seen layoffs and shift cuts triggered by the president's push to have more cars made entirely in the United States. Canada's auto plants are highly integrated with US production sites, with parts crossing back and forth across the border multiple times during assembly. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has in recent days tried to temper expectations about the prospect of a comprehensive trade deal with the United States. He has said a tariff-free deal with Washington may not be possible, and that he would not sign an agreement that did not benefit Canada. The prime minister, who previously led the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, has also said a recently agreed US-EU pact should not be viewed as a template for Canada. "There are differences. One is geographic proximity," Carney said this week. The Bank of Canada did not rule out more rate cuts later this year to help struggling borrowers. "The Bank appears to be getting a little more comfortable with the notion that the Canadian economy will need the support from further interest rate cuts in the future," CIBC economist Andrew Grantham said in statement, reacting to Wednesday's announcement. But Macklem stressed the bank would act if it sees tariffs driving inflation. "We are going to make sure that a tariff problem does not become an inflation problem," he told reporters. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump at a G7 meeting in June AFP

Home From Home: Trump Showcases His Resorts In Golf Diplomacy
Home From Home: Trump Showcases His Resorts In Golf Diplomacy

Int'l Business Times

time28-07-2025

  • Int'l Business Times

Home From Home: Trump Showcases His Resorts In Golf Diplomacy

Ever-confident of his own prowess and deaf to claims of a conflict of interest, Donald Trump has been hosting European leaders and getting in some golf while proudly promoting his luxury Scottish resorts. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen found herself at the centre of this unabashed "golf diplomacy" on Sunday, as she visited the US president's Turnberry course to seal an EU-US trade deal. Criticised by some European political leaders as a capitulation by Brussels, the pair announced the pact to the world from a lavish ballroom named after Trump. "This just opened ... (a) relatively short time ago and it's been quite the success," the former real estate developer boasted to an impassive von der Leyen. "It's an honor to have you at the new ballroom at Turnberry," he added. Trump acquired the storied complex on Scotland's stunning southwestern coast in 2014. Like all his properties and assets, Turnberry was transferred to a holding company now managed by his sons. The family have long hoped it will again be used to host golf's British Open, the only major men's event outside the United States. It last hosted the illustrious occasion in 2009, well before Trump took charge of it. On Monday, he had to be content with welcoming Keir Starmer to the resort, as the UK prime minister arrived to talk trade and international affairs to the wail of the bagpipes, which initially drowned out their words. Starmer said it was "fantastic to be here, thank you for your hospitality, and to see this amazing golf course. "I'll invite you to a football ground at some stage, we can exchange sports," Starmer, who is a football fan, told Trump. The US president later regaled the UK leader during a rambling press conference with tales of how he used local Scottish tradesmen to repair the ballroom's roof and huge windows. The pair were to travel to another Trump golf resort in northeast Scotland later Monday to be joined by Scottish leader John Swinney, where the US president will inaugurate a new course on Tuesday. The controversy during Trump's first term around the use of his own properties to conduct government business appears to have largely dissipated. The 79-year-old Republican leader announced in 2019 he would host an upcoming G7 summit at another of his branded golf courses in Florida, before backing down following a domestic political backlash. Six years on in Scotland, he appears very much at home in his own residences bearing his name in golden letters at the entrance -- and even on paper cups provided to visitors. Any outcry appears minimal as Trump openly holds court with European leaders between rounds of golf, seemingly bending them to his will. Swinney, who had expressed a preference for Trump's Democrat rival Kamala Harris during last year's US presidential election contest, has drawn criticism after reportedly agreeing a subsidy for a tournament to be held on the Aberdeenshire course. Meanwhile on Sunday, von der Leyen courteously listened as the American president chastised Europe for its migration policies and ranted about wind turbines, which he branded a "con job". "In all fairness Germany tried it and wind doesn't work," he told his European counterpart, who happens to be German. Trump, who has made personal preoccupations political priorities, has long disliked wind turbines railing against them as being "ugly", and battling -- unsuccessfully -- to stop the installation of an offshore cluster near his Aberdeenshire golf course. Von der Leyen appeared at pains to remain diplomatic, making a point of flattering the American president. "You're known as a tough negotiator and dealmaker," she said. "But fair!" Trump interrupted, eliciting approving laughter from his delegation. "But fair," the EU chief conceded, ahead of a brief discussion which culminated in the Europeans resigning themselves to 15 percent tariffs on their exports to the US. US President Donald Trump hosted EU chief Ursula von der Leyen at a sumptuous ballroom inside his Turnberry golf resort AFP Trump waits to greet Starmer and his wife, Victoria, at the Trump Turnberry Golf Courses in Scotland AFP British police officers stand on duty Balmedie Beach, and the sand dunes leading to the course at Trump International Golf Links, in Aberdeenshire north east Scotland ahead of a visit by US President Trump AFP

EU Targets Russian Oil In Tough New Ukraine War Sanctions
EU Targets Russian Oil In Tough New Ukraine War Sanctions

Int'l Business Times

time18-07-2025

  • Int'l Business Times

EU Targets Russian Oil In Tough New Ukraine War Sanctions

The EU on Friday adopted a sweeping new package of sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine war, looking to pile more pressure on the Kremlin by lowering a price cap for Moscow's oil exports. The 18th round of economic measures from Europe against Russia since its 2022 invasion comes as allies hope US President Donald Trump follows through on his threat to punish Moscow for stalling peace efforts. "The EU just approved one of its strongest sanctions packages against Russia to date," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said. "The message is clear: Europe will not back down in its support for Ukraine. The EU will keep raising the pressure until Russia ends its war." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky hailed the sanctions' adoption as "essential and timely". The new measures were approved after Slovakia dropped a weeks-long block following talks with Brussels over separate plans to phase out Russian gas imports. Kremlin-friendly Slovakian leader Robert Fico -- whose country remains dependent on Russian energy -- dropped his opposition after getting what he called "guarantees" from Brussels over future gas prices. France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot called the latest moves "unprecedented" and said that "together with the United States we will force (Russian President) Vladimir Putin into a ceasefire". "We are keeping up the pressure on Russia," said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. But the Kremlin said it would seek to "minimise" the impact, and warned the measures would backfire on the EU. As part of the new sanctions designed to sap Russia's war chest, the EU agreed to lower its price cap on Russian oil exported to third countries around the world, to 15 percent below market value. That comes despite EU allies failing to convince Trump to go along with the plan. The cap is a G7 initiative aimed at limiting the amount of money Russia makes by exporting oil to countries such as China and India. Set at $60 a barrel by the G7 in 2022, it is designed to limit the price Moscow can sell oil around the world by banning shipping firms and insurance companies dealing with Russia to export above that amount. The EU has largely already cut off its imports of Russian oil. Under the new EU scheme -- which Brussels hopes will get G7 allies like Britain and Canada on board with -- the new level will start off at $47.60 and can be adjusted as oil prices change in the future. EU officials admit that the scheme will not be as effective without US involvement. In addition, officials said the EU is blacklisting over 100 more vessels in the "shadow fleet" of ageing tankers used by Russia to circumvent oil export curbs. There are also measures to stop the defunct Baltic Sea gas pipelines Nord Stream 1 and 2 from being brought back online in the future. Among other targets, sanctions will be placed on a Russian-owned oil refinery in India and two Chinese banks as the EU seeks to curb Moscow's ties with international partners. There is also an expanded transaction ban on dealings with Russian banks and more restrictions on the export of "dual-use" goods that could be used on the battlefield in Ukraine. The latest round of EU measures comes after Trump on Monday threatened to hit buyers of Russian energy with massive "secondary tariffs" if Russia doesn't halt the fighting in 50 days. The move from Trump represented a dramatic pivot from his previous effort of rapprochement with the Kremlin, as he said his patience was running out with Putin. The multiple rounds of international sanctions imposed on Moscow in the three-and-a-half years since its invasion have failed so far to cripple the Russian economy or slow its war effort. But Western officials argue that despite Russia's economy largely weathering the punishment to this point, key economic indicators such as interest rates and inflation are getting worse.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store