Men's college basketball's best of the last 25 years: Readers share their picks, favorite games
However, one thing is for sure: There's no consensus, and plenty of debate.
Advertisement
Nearly 2,000 people filled out our poll to vote for the best player, coach and team of the 2000s. And the race to be crowned best player was decided by one vote.
On to the results — and some of your best memories of a quarter-century of college hoops:
(Note: Submitted responses have been edited for clarity.)
As mentioned above, this was close! Carmelo Anthony, who led Syracuse to a national championship as a freshman in 2003, inched ahead of North Carolina's Tyler Hansbrough by a single vote. It's the classic one-and-done versus four-year standout debate that made this ranking so challenging. Hansbrough was a four-time All-American and reached two Final Fours, winning a title as a senior in 2009. Anthony also topped Lindsay Schnell's ranking last week.
Five of the top six vote-getters won a national championship. The seven players above were the only ones to receive at least 5 percent of a balanced vote; Davidson's Stephen Curry and Duke's Shane Battier and JJ Redick rounded out the top 10.
We also asked readers to pick a top-five list, in any order. Here are the results of that vote, and the comparison to our ranking.
Anthony was the only player to appear on more than half of the submissions. Interestingly, Curry was comfortably in the top five, though he didn't receive as many votes as the No. 1 player.
The Duke vote appeared to be split, with Redick and Battier again leading the way. Readers were higher on Durant and Redick than our ranking, and lower on Saint Joseph's Jameer Nelson — our No. 6 player appeared on only 3 percent of ballots.
Readers had more of a consensus on the top coach, with 30 percent of the vote going to former Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski. The No. 1 coach in CJ Moore's rankings, Bill Self, came in second. Krzyzewski and Roy Williams are the only coaches to win three national titles this century, but Self (who has two titles) got the edge for Moore because of his 18 conference championships and 24 NCAA Tournament appearances (every tourney this century).
Advertisement
Wright moves up here, with just more than half of the readers including him in their top five.
The 14 coaches above were the only ones to reach at least 10 percent. Readers were higher on Tom Izzo, John Calipari and Jim Calhoun, and lower on Rick Pitino and Kelvin Sampson.
Like the top player vote, this one was close. The UConn team of two seasons ago eked out a place atop the poll over Brendan Marks' No. 1 team, 2000-01 Duke. It's hard to argue with any of the top three.
This vote largely reflected our ranking, with the top eight comprising eight of Marks' top nine.
The 2006-07 Florida and 2023-24 UConn teams both won the second of back-to-back national championships at their programs, so it's not surprising to see the recognition that these belong in the top five. There also appeared to be a clear top five, with a decent gap to the 2008-09 North Carolina team, which was the top team not to make it.
Readers were higher on 2004-05 North Carolina and lower on 2020-21 Baylor, which ranked 16th on this list and No. 8 in our ranking.
We left the games question open-ended. Of course, many of the responses mirrored our top 25 games list, with many mentions of Kris Jenkins and Mario Chalmers' clutch championship shots, the Syracuse-UConn six-overtime game in the 2009 Big East tournament, and Duke's 'Miracle Minute' comeback against Maryland. However, some games were more memorable on a personal level — the result of a sport with hundreds of teams and thousands of games. Here were some of your responses.
'It has to be the 2008 national championship, right? The first time the Final Four featured the top-ranked teams. Leads changing, Memphis storming to a seemingly insurmountable lead with, what, two minutes left? Then the missed free throws. Then Mario. And then Mario. After the miracle, OT almost seemed like a formality.' — Chris P.
Advertisement
'Villanova-UNC national championship game, 2016. I'll never forget the seat cushions raining down on me after Marcus Paige tied the game with an off-balance 3, only for the fireworks and confetti to be set off after an even more stunning Kris Jenkins buzzer-beater seconds later. Nobody in the crowd could believe what had just happened. Top-five championship game in sports, ever.' — Andrew G.
'Six-OT game! Even as a UConn fan, there's no denying the spectacle of that contest and I'm happy we were part of it and that it's part of our program's zeitgeist, loss and all.' — Nick S.
'The 2010 NCAA final between Duke and Butler — it wasn't pretty but it was played at a high level throughout. Also, there was so much drama with Butler being such an underdog and basically having home-court advantage. Just great stuff.' — Lara L.
'Even on the losing side as a Purdue fan, the 2019 Elite Eight game against Virginia takes the cake. The Carsen Edwards shotmaking, the Virginia redemption story, the back-and-forth scoreboard, the Diakite shot and OT finish … it may not have been a title game, but it still won Virginia the title and was an instant classic.' — Jack G.
'The 2024 national championship game, UConn vs. Purdue. It felt like these two dominant teams were on a collision course all year, but it turned out to be the coronation of the last two years of UConn dominance. Back-to-back was historical and that UConn team was so much fun to watch. As Dan Hurley said, 'They were bulletproof.'' — Deryl W.
'March 16, 2006. No. 12 Montana 87, No. 5 Nevada 79. NCAA Tournament first round. The Grizzlies' first tournament win in 31 years and the last tournament win for the Big Sky Conference. A special moment for a proud program and an effective reminder as to why the size and structure of the tournament should be left alone.' — Kris G.
'ACC championship 2024. I'm a recent NC State alum and got to rush the bell tower with my dad that night. He's the one who introduced me to the Wolfpack. The rest of that run was pretty fun too. — Haley H.
Advertisement
'Forgotten Classic: Kansas 90, Texas 86 (March 3, 2007). Freshman Kevin Durant going off for 32 in Allen Fieldhouse, 25 in the first half, Kansas comes back from a 16-point deficit to win the Big 12 regular-season title. When you have Danny Manning on the bench watching a freshman going off in the toughest venue in college hoops, saying, 'That's the baddest man to play here,' that's a special game.' — David C.
'2017 Elite 8 — UNC over Kentucky: Tit for tat the entire ballgame with two legendary coaches at the helm. Obviously, the finishing sequence and Luke Maye will be remembered forever. People forget the December matchup between these teams, which was every bit as electric, only without the high stakes. Shows just how hard it is to beat a team twice.' — Brendan I.
'2011 Pac-10 championship game. Been to thousands of games at this point in my life, nothing took my breath away the way this one did. 'Cold-blooded!' Washington 77, Arizona 75 in OT. Easily the best game I've ever seen live.' — Rocco M.
'UCLA-Gonzaga Final Four in 2021. An 11-seed's improbable run collided with a mid-major's quest for perfection, ending in Jalen Suggs' half-court heave banking in at the buzzer. That game exemplified what this sport is all about.' — Brendan P.
'Michigan State beating Duke to advance to the Final Four in 2019. Kenny Goins hitting that 3 over Zion (Williamson) provided a moment of euphoria that I will chase for the rest of my life.' — Joey C.
'Michigan versus Kansas in the Sweet 16 during the 2013 NCAA Tournament. (Trey) Burke pulling up from planet Mars to hit a 3 and force overtime. I can still picture (Mitch) McGary falling to the floor after setting the screen.' — Andrew R.
'2005. Illinois vs. Arizona in the Elite 8. As a 12-year-old just beginning to fall in love with college basketball, this was my first 'Where were you watching?' game. — Jeremy K.
Advertisement
'Creighton Blue Jays vs. Bradley Braves, Feb. 1, 2011. The game had to start four hours early because a historic blizzard was coming (it would drop 20 inches of snow and halt life in central Illinois) and Creighton was favored. Bradley was on an 11-game losing streak. In front of a more-empty-than-usual Carver Arena, Bradley legend Andrew Warren scored 23, overpowering the Creighton star Doug McDermott. What a wonderful game to experience in person.' — Zach B.
'Florida and Wisconsin in the 2017 Sweet 16. Gators blow a double-digit lead/the Badgers hit an unbelievable 3-pointer to force overtime. Down two with four seconds left, nearly all hope was lost for Gator Nation. But Chris Chiozza hits an even more unbelievable 3-pointer at the buzzer. Pure elation!' — Rusty G.
'Collin Sexton at Alabama successfully playing three-on-five vs. Minnesota.' — Dan S.
'Saint Louis vs. Rhode Island, A-10 tournament 2010. Snuck out of work to watch the game. A friend encouraged me to stay out a little longer after SLU lost. I got my future spouse's phone number that night.' — Zach B.
'Duke vs. Gonzaga in the 2019 Maui Invitational. Being a Duke fan and my brother being a Zags fan, I wish we would've won the game. Still, the game being super back and forth while watching it with my brother remains one of my favorite CBB games in recent memory.' — Benjamin B.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Five key Dodgers trade deadline questions: Can they land a reliever and a bat?
A loaded farm system gives the Los Angeles Dodgers some trade chips, but who on the market is worth giving up a high-upside player? To discuss the deadline and set up a crucial week for the club, Dodgers beat writer Fabian Ardaya hosted a live Q&A with The Athletic subscribers on Tuesday afternoon. Here are five key questions (plus a bonus one) that were asked and answered during the chat. For more deadline coverage, read the full Q&A transcript, visit our Dodgers section for new stories, or check out our live blog for the latest all week long. With the Dodgers looking for a reliever and a bat, who would be the most realistic targets at both positions of need? Especially with all of the news that they don't want to trade their top prospects. — Joseph M. They're obviously going to be in the mix for all the big-name closers with club control, but I just don't see them doing that. Ryan Helsley and Pete Fairbanks are two bigger names that make sense to me with less club control (Helsley is a free agent after the year, Fairbanks has a club option for 2026) that would better fit what I think the Dodgers do. I also could see them — either in addition to one of those guys or instead of one of those guys — going and trying to find someone a little more off the immediate radar who they feel isn't being maximized right now. Michael Kopech last deadline comes to mind, and Chris Martin in 2022. I swear I'm not just going for the former Dodger angle, but Brock Stewart makes some sense for that reason (and he has a surprising amount of club control left). As far as a bat, I reported last week they were interested in guys like Harrison Bader and Brendan Donovan, though I don't know how likely either are. The sense I've gotten is that other clubs are having more active conversations on Bader than the Dodgers are right now (subject to change, obviously). Donovan's asking price would be 'sky high,' as my colleague Katie Woo has said. Same goes for Steven Kwan, who Ken Rosenthal reported the Dodgers are hotly pursuing from Cleveland. Advertisement When it comes to the bat, my sense is the team is looking for at least a carrying trait that they can bank on. They hoped it would be Michael Conforto's bat. Harrison Bader's trait would be his glove. Donovan's is his competence at multiple positions to go with a quality bat. If the Dodgers could maybe pry away, say, Trent Grisham from the Yankees, I think that helps the roster in a few ways. Of course, more names can easily enter the mix over the next couple of days. How likely would a trade for Steven Kwan be, and how much would it cost? — Chase R. When it comes to dealing with the Cleveland Grind Machine, it's hard to ever say a deal is likely. The cost would be high. Kwan is a high-floor, All-Star-caliber outfielder with a premium glove and years of control left. The Guardians have been trying to extend him, but have been unable to get anything done. Still, they aren't a team necessarily looking to bottom out. Their next good team likely would have to have Kwan on it. I have seen the smoke regarding Bader, and I wanted to ask: given Kiké Hernandez's status, would Willi Castro be a possibility as a floor-raising utility man? Also, is Luis Robert Jr. another option to improve outfield defense and potentially offense (given his recent improvement)? That's something that certainly crossed my mind with what Tommy Edman and Hyeseong Kim are dealing with. I'd imagine it's at least a possibility, but still would be lower on the priority list for the team. I even joked it was a shame that Amed Rosario already got traded, because the Dodgers certainly could use him for a 10-game spell like the team did after trading for him last deadline. Also, my read on the situation is the White Sox have been much, much higher on Robert the last couple of years than the industry consensus, so their asking price has remained quite high. Advertisement Between Zyhir Hope, Josue De Paula, Eduardo Quintero, and Mike Sirota, the Dodgers have four outfielders in or near the top 100. What are the odds we see one of them dealt (probably Quintero or Sirota)? Has Diego Cartaya's fall influenced how Andrew Friedman will operate with 'prospect hugging'? — John G. I think it depends on who they're pursuing. I'd find it a little hard to think the Dodgers get a deal done for, say, Kwan, without having to give up at least one of those guys. I'd put Hope and DePaula a slight tier above the other two — though Quintero's rise this season might give him as high an upside as the other two. The Dodgers people have said they gave Sirota a first-round grade when he was going through the draft process, and he's lived up to it. His health does raise a slight red flag, in my opinion. And yeah, Cartaya's fall was stark. Knowing when and which prospects to hold onto is a skill, but there's also so much of it that's unpredictable. Is Alex Freeland going to play 2B once Max Muncy is back, or will he be sent down? — Michael W. I think it depends in part on who goes on the IL today and what role Freeland winds up playing once active. If Edman or Kim misses a good chunk of time, it's a good opportunity for Freeland to have some runway. It's worth noting that Freeland has barely played any second base this season. That's partially a byproduct of the roster over at Oklahoma City (where Kim was getting reps at second early this season) and some of the needs the team was prepping him for (most of his third-base work has come since Muncy got hurt). I would also argue that even when healthy, the Dodgers' roster fits a bit better with Freeland on it, at least as a bench bat. Maybe it hurts Freeland's development long-term and/or Edman's ankle can't hold up playing more outfield, but it was a thought that crossed my mind last night. Advertisement Do you think the addition of Farhan Zaidi will help the Dodgers transition to finding incredible value from scrap-heap pick-ups? I realize they still do this somewhat, with Anthony Banda being a huge one. I sort of miss the anonymous pickups like Justin Turner or Max Muncy. I don't necessarily trust my observations on this, but have you observed this at all? Also wondering if Farhan is there to do a little of what he used to do. — L.M. The Dodgers have been churning as is. How fondly do you remember CJ Alexander's 24 hours on the 40-man roster? What was your favorite Steward Berroa memory? I did not make those two names up, and those were two guys who have been on the team's 40-man roster this season. Zaidi has been around and helping out, but his role is very general and isn't directly tied to the Dodgers. I don't have a clear idea of how much he's involved on a day-to-day basis. (Top photo of Steven Kwan: Greg Fiume / Getty Images)
NBC Sports
2 hours ago
- NBC Sports
EuroLeague CEO says NBA's plans of forming new European league 'would create confusion'
Adam Silver just kept bringing it up. Unprompted. Whenever discussion of NBA expansion came up as Silver spoke to the media in Las Vegas during Summer League, Silver spun the conversation toward the NBA having its eyes on Europe and a new league there. He and the owners see an opportunity — they are better at making money off the business of basketball than the current European EuroLeague system. The NBA is exploring the idea of jumping in with both feet across the Atlantic, forming a super league with some existing teams and creating some new ones (likely tied to soccer powerhouses on the continent). 'We'd be an independent league, what we're contemplating operating in Europe, but the fact that we would be creating new basketball teams in Europe is related [to NBA expansion],' Silver said. 'It's separate but related to this notion around building additional organizations in the league.' This would be a direct competition to the existing EuroLeague, and its CEO, Paulius Motiejunas, spoke to Mike Vorkunov of The Athletic, saying a new league would create more confusion than anything else. "[The NBA has] a really strong image. They can help with TV deals. They can help with sponsorship. We can grow the pie bigger if we go and work together. This is always the same message... But we have a huge fan base. We have 25 years of history. This is what we said to them. Why not sit down and see how we go and make decisions together, rather than just creating a new league and for them to start over?... 'This new league would create confusion. It would create division and on simple terms, you go to the sponsor, and you say, 'I'm now this new, you know, NBA League.' And then we go, 'Well, we are EuroLeague.'' The EuroLeague is set up differently from, for example, soccer's Champions League, where teams have to earn the right to play in it annually. There are 11 'A-license' clubs that are part owners and managers of the EuroLeague and whose teams are automatically in the tournament every year. Those teams include powerhouses Barcelona, CSKA Moscow, Maccabi Tel Aviv, Olympiacos Piraeus, and Real Madrid. The NBA is a couple of years out from starting a league on the continent, but its broad strokes idea is to poach a handful of those A-license clubs as well as forming a couple of new ones — in locations such as Manchester, England — plus having the opportunity for some teams to play their way into the competition. The NBA, with reason, believes its marketing arm and brand power can have this league making money that the existing EuroLeague system leaves on the table. The NBA and EuroLeague working together is not totally out of the question, but the NBA is working closely with the international basketball governing body FIBA, which has a history of tension with the existing EuroLeague. Silver and the NBA are not going to slow their European plans down — again, there is a reason Silver kept bringing that up while talking about the current NBA owners pumping the brakes on expansion stateside. There seems to be a real taste for a European league from NBA owners, who have long understood that the biggest growth in the association and their franchise values was going to come from international growth. If that means competing with the EuroLeague, NBA owners are not going to back away from it.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Luka Dončić's revenge muscles, plus Nikola Jokić's horse celebration
The Bounce Newsletter | This is The Athletic's daily NBA newsletter. Sign up here to receive The Bounce directly in your inbox. Chances are, if we have an in-person basketball conversation, I will steer it toward Ricky Davis, Jamal Crawford or Ronald 'Flip' Murray at some point. Today is Flip's 46th birthday. He was a walking bucket. There is a dearth of career highlight mixes on YouTube for him, but let this be a great entry to a fun rabbit hole. Happy birthday, Flip! Luka got shredded, LeBron is masterminding It would make sense if, after two-plus decades of LeBron James being a main figure (or the main figure) in NBA discourse (whether genuine or forced for ratings/clicks), one might be a little LeBron'd out at this point. At the same time, I find my LeBron fascination rejuvenated because of the awkwardness we see between him and the Lakers. James is entering his 23rd year in the NBA, and the Lakers have moved on to the Luka Dončić era after trading for the latter last season. The 26-year-old superstar gives the franchise a massive runway to work with, while the 40-year-old superstar is trying to figure out how to position himself to finish his career. And it doesn't seem like that will be with the Lakers, based on this offseason so far. Advertisement The Lakers seemingly ended up with Luka because Mavericks executive Nico Harrison did not believe Luka was committed to being in the proper shape to fit into the exec's ideal basketball identity. Following a nagging calf injury and perhaps deciding to jump in the gym with extra care for a little 'revenge body' glow-up (we've all been there after a breakup), Dončić now finds himself looking completely shredded and muscular on the cover of Men's Health magazine. Yup, that's Luka Dončić on the cover of Men's Health Mag 👀 [image or embed] — The Athletic (@ July 28, 2025 at 10:36 AM Normally, the 'best shape of his career' stuff is just preseason fodder and entirely laughable. But I'll fully admit this shot of Luka not only made me do a double take, it made me drop to the ground and ran off 25 straight push-ups. (Then that was it. I figured that's enough to be in shape without committing myself in any other way.) Luka's new muscle definition could further demonstrate what a disaster Harrison's move was. Mavericks fans probably went through the anger of the trade all over again, when this cover hit social media this week. It shows Luka's dedication to either being in proper shape to win a title or to pettiness to damn Nico forever — or maybe both! Regardless, Luka is the now and the future for the Lakers, assuming he extends his contract once he's eligible next month. And LeBron is someone making one-third of the salary while helping make this team good enough to be a playoff squad in the vaunted West, but not good enough to be a real title contender. That is, unless Deandre Ayton decides to dedicate himself in a manner we haven't really seen in his seven years so far. It's no surprise that LeBron might be looking for one last hurrah, and we know that James has a penchant for garnering attention when it feels like he won't be the story anymore. We've seen injuries pop up after he's been eliminated, as we find out he was playing through them. We've seen him flirt with the dot-connectors by throwing out something cryptic for the internet to decode. Or maybe, in this case, someone decided to do it for him. Misko Raznatovic posted a picture of himself, LeBron and longtime James friend and business partner Maverick Carter enjoying the boating life in Saint Tropez, France. The caption? Advertisement 'The summer of 2025 is the perfect time to make big plans for the fall of 2026!' He tagged LeBron and Mav in the pic. You're likely asking yourself, 'Who cares? Who is this Misko fellow anyway?' He just happens to be Nikola Jokić's agent. Hey, guess who is going to be a free agent in 2026? LeBron! That's when his current deal that pays him $52.6 million is over. Film noir! What a twist! As my friend Aaron perfectly stated about LeBron: 'He is the loudest at going quiet.' While so many are LeBron'd out at this point, watching how he chooses to finish the story of his career will be as fascinating as anything he's done since returning to Cleveland in 2014. If not more. The newly shredded Luka is the Lakers' focus, and rightfully so. How LeBron turns the league focus back to himself despite not being the focus of his own team is going to be a 4D chess-type of situation. Only one team better than Knicks? 🏀 Fresh start. Damian Lillard has returned to Portland. He sounds like a new man. 💰 New deal. The Bulls just agreed to a contract extension with coach Billy Donovan. He's 195-205 with one playoff win in five seasons there. 📈 Power Rankings! The league has shifted a bit this offseason. Are the Knicks the second-best team in the NBA? 🏀 Size matters. The Mavs are banking on their size to dominate opponents. Can a two-big lineup fuel them? 🎧 'NBA Daily.' Zena and Es are joined by Mike Vorkunov to discuss expansions, relocations and NBA Europe. YouTube here. Caring more about horse races than NBA titles Speaking of Jokić, one of the funnier running jokes on the internet is about how much the four-time MVP (counting the Finals MVP) seems to be bothered by his day job. To be clear, I firmly believe Jokić loves basketball. I do not believe you can become that historically great at this sport without having a passion to fuel your work. However, I question whether he likes/enjoys the NBA itself. So much of the pomp and circumstance of the NBA just doesn't seem to vibe with what he appears to be about, from the outside looking in. We know Jokić does have passions outside of basketball, though. It's been known for years how much Jokić obsesses over, invests in and enjoys horse racing. Over the weekend, Jokić made more internet memes/headlines by celebrating one of his horses winning a race in his home country of Serbia. Video showed Jokić being elated and emotional after the win. He enthusiastically popped a massive champagne bottle, sprayed his team, sprayed the horse a little and dumped the rest on himself. You can see how excited he is in the moment he pops the bottle and starts spraying. You can watch the entire emotional reaction from Jokić here. Now juxtapose that enthusiastic celebration with how Jokić celebrated the Nuggets winning the championship in 2023. Look at how he popped the bottle in the locker room, and didn't appear to even really go through the motions of spraying that champagne on his teammates: The difference between two years and two different celebrations is stark, to say the least. Remember: When asked about winning the 2023 NBA championship, immediately after securing it, Jokić's response was, 'The job is done. We can go home now.' He was perturbed that the championship parade was days away because he wanted to go back to Serbia. Jokić embodied the 'accidentally became important at work and it's ruining my life' meme. It's just good to see the big fella enjoy stuff outside of work. He has like two more months before he has to clock in again. Who is signing Giddey and Kuminga? Most everything from this NBA offseason has been resolved, unless we have a massive trade that's going to slap us in the face and challenge us to a duel out of nowhere. Aside from figuring out where Russell Westbrook might end up, we're basically just waiting to see how the big restricted free agents are going to resolve their contract negotiations. The big restricted guys left are Josh Giddey, Jonathan Kuminga, Cam Thomas and Quentin Grimes. Advertisement At this point, nobody really expects these players to end up in new places. Maybe Kuminga can find his way out of Golden State? There just aren't a lot of avenues this summer for that. Thomas has been pretty outspoken about how he's viewed the negotiation process, fair or unfair. The perception is the perception. Some people value him, and some people don't. Such is life in the NBA. Grimes is someone everybody expects Philadelphia to re-sign in some manner. We just don't know if some of these players will take the risk and accept the one-year qualifying offer to bet on themselves for unrestricted free agency in 2026. Or will they accept a longer-term deal to ensure financial stability? Kuminga might be the most intriguing situation with that potential approach. Fred Katz polled 16 rival front office people, and the average annual take-home salary for Kuminga was $20.4 million. The majority of the contract lengths for Kuminga would be three years. Kuminga appears to be wanting a four-year deal, roughly in the $25 million annual zone — and more importantly, off the Warriors, to explore expanding his role elsewhere. Kuminga and coach Steve Kerr haven't exactly meshed. In another poll of front office personnel, Giddey's prospects were seen as something you'd rather invest in. His annual average was roughly $22.3 million. But 10 of the 16 executives polled said he should get a four- or five-year deal. Giddey had the best season of his young career, putting up 14.6 points, 8.1 rebounds and 7.2 assists per game. But the career bests in 3-point percentage (37.8, previously 33.7) and true shooting percentage (57.0, previously 54.7) show why the intrigue and trust might be there more. Regardless, it feels like Giddey will eventually get his commitment from the Bulls, while we're not sure what is in store for Kuminga, Thomas and Grimes for long-term money or place of business. Maybe the qualifying-offer gamble ($7.9M for Kuminga, $6M for Thomas, $8.7M for Grimes) is worth the risk after all? Streaming links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. ( Photo: Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images)
