logo
Legislation would coordinate law enforcement response to rail cargo theft

Legislation would coordinate law enforcement response to rail cargo theft

Yahoo11-04-2025
Railroads and retailers are praising a bipartisan bill in Congress that aims to reduce cargo theft.
The Combating Organized Retail Crime Act (CORCA), introduced Thursday by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and co-sponsored by nine Republican and five Democratic senators, would create a coordinated federal response to a rising wave of sophisticated cargo thefts, many of which target consumer goods in containers carried on double-stack trains.
'Organized criminal operations continue to evolve and escalate their targeted attacks against our nation's supply chain and retailers,' Association of American Railroads CEO Ian Jefferies said in a statement on Thursday. 'This alarming trend affects every industry – including the nation's largest railroads, which experienced a 40% spike in cargo theft last year.'
The AAR says the bill would provide the framework necessary to disrupt criminal networks and safeguard supply chains. Specifically, it would enhance federal law enforcement tools and establish a centralized coordination center that would bring together federal, state and local law enforcement as well as railroad police to counter organized theft operations.Both the frequency and tactics of cargo theft attempts have rapidly evolved and escalated from what once was a crime of opportunity to one that cost the industry more than $100 million last year, the AAR says. Today, rail cargo thefts are calculated, coordinated and executed by sophisticated perpetrators often with links to domestic and transnational organized crime groups.
Because thieves frequently bring trains to a stop by disconnecting brake system air hoses, the thefts pose operational hazards, the AAR says.
The rail industry estimates suggest that over 65,000 thefts occurred against the Class I railroads in 2024. Nike shoes have been a frequent target.
'Whether stealing mass quantities of products from retail stores or hijacking consumer goods throughout the supply chain, these gangs are wreaking havoc. And these criminal rings use the profits from retail theft to support larger illicit activities such as human trafficking, gun smuggling, narcotics, and terrorism,' said Michael Hanson, senior executive vice president, public affairs, at the Retail Industry Leaders Association. 'In order to expose and prosecute these sophisticated criminal rings, we need federal, state and local law enforcement to be coordinated, which is exactly what CORCA will do.'Related:
Railroads say freight theft cost more than $100 million in 2024
The post Legislation would coordinate law enforcement response to rail cargo theft appeared first on FreightWaves.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Times says he will take the newspaper public in the coming year
Billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Times says he will take the newspaper public in the coming year

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Times says he will take the newspaper public in the coming year

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Times since 2018, said this week that he intends to take the newspaper public in the coming year. During an interview on Monday's 'The Daily Show With Jon Stewart,' Soon-Shiong said the move would allow the Times 'to be democratized and allow the public to have ownership of this paper.' Soon-Shiong said he's working with 'an organization that's putting that together right now.' He didn't identify the organization or say whether the deal would involve an initial public offer to sell shares of the company or another investment arrangement. 'Whether you're right, left, Democrat, Republican, you're an American. So the opportunity for us to provide a paper that is the voices of the people, truly the voices of the people, is important,' he said. Soon-Shiong, a biotech billionaire, acquired the Times as part of a $500 million deal, returning it to local ownership two decades after the Chandler family sold it to Tribune Co. Soon-Shiong's purchase raised hopes after years of cutbacks, circulation declines and leadership changes. But like much of the media industry, the Times has continued to face financial difficulties, losing money and subscribers. Last year the company said it would lay off at least 115 employees — more than 20% of the newsroom — in one of the largest staff cuts in the newspaper's history. Also in 2024, executive editor Kevin Merida suddenly stepped down after a 2 1/2-year tenure at the newspaper that spanned the coronavirus pandemic and three Pulitzer Prizes, as well as a period of layoffs and contentious contract negotiations.

US senators introduce bipartisan bill to make it easier to sue tech companies over AI copyright theft
US senators introduce bipartisan bill to make it easier to sue tech companies over AI copyright theft

New York Post

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Post

US senators introduce bipartisan bill to make it easier to sue tech companies over AI copyright theft

Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) rolled out bipartisan legislation to make it easier for people to sue tech companies for pirating their data to train artificial intelligence models — calling the rampant practice 'the largest intellectual property theft in American history' The proposed AI Accountability and Personal Data Protection Act — which follows a recent hearing in which the US lawmaker accused companies including Meta and OpenAI of pirating vast amounts of protected material — would bar AI companies from training on personal data or copyrighted works. 'AI companies are robbing the American people blind while leaving artists, writers, and other creators with zero recourse,' Hawley said in a statement. 'It's time for Congress to give the American worker their day in court to protect their personal data and creative works.' Advertisement 3 Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is teaming up with a Democratic colleague to rein in Big Tech. Getty Images The bill would allow people to sue for use of their personal data or copyrighted works without giving consent. It would also require companies to disclose which third parties will be given access to data if consent is granted, and provides for financial penalties and injunctive relief. The Post has sought comment from Meta and OpenAI. Advertisement Hawley added that the 'bipartisan legislation would finally empower working Americans who now find their livelihoods in the crosshairs of Big Tech's lawlessness.' 3 Hawley and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) rolled out bipartistan legislation on Monday. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images Blumenthal, his Democratic partner on the bill, underscored privacy risks and the need for legal recourse. 'Tech companies must be held accountable — and liable legally — when they breach consumer privacy, collecting, monetizing or sharing personal information without express consent,' he said. Advertisement In recent years, tech firms have been sued by content creators and publishers who allege that their copyrighted material was 'scraped' for use by AI models. Thomson Reuters successfully sued Ross Intelligence, saying Ross used Westlaw's copyrighted legal headnotes to build its legal research AI. In February, a federal court agreed, ruling that Ross was guilty of copyright infringement. 3 Several tech firms have been sued for allegedly using pirated material to train their large language models. AFP via Getty Images The news agency is seeking unspecified damages. Advertisement In December 2023, the New York Times filed suit against OpenAI and Microsoft alleging that its articles were used to train systems such as GPT‑4 without permission. That case is ongoing. Last month, a federal judge said Anthropic's use of books to train its AI model was 'highly transformative' and counted as fair use, but that keeping direct copies ('pirated' versions) in a central library was 'direct infringement.' The fight over damages and remedies is still ahead. Authors including Richard Kadrey say Meta used their books without permission to train LLaMA and other large language models. A court said Meta's use was also 'highly transformative' and fair use, but the case continues over whether any stored 'pirated' materials create liability.

Speaker Mike Johnson blocks Epstein-related votes as pressure mounts within GOP
Speaker Mike Johnson blocks Epstein-related votes as pressure mounts within GOP

Business Upturn

time28 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Speaker Mike Johnson blocks Epstein-related votes as pressure mounts within GOP

Advertisement House Speaker Mike Johnson announced on Monday that he will not allow any votes on legislation related to the Jeffrey Epstein case during the House's final week in session before its extended summer recess, a move that has sparked frustration among members of his party. Despite growing calls for transparency, particularly from conservative lawmakers and vocal supporters of former President Donald Trump, Johnson insisted the current course of action should be handled by the executive branch. 'I believe we need to give the administration the space to do what it is already doing,' Johnson told CNN. 'If further congressional action becomes necessary or appropriate, then we'll consider it, but I don't think we're at that point just yet.' His stance has triggered criticism from some Republicans who see this delay as a failure to act on an issue that remains a focal point for many constituents. As frustration builds, a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers is working to bypass Johnson's decision through a rarely used procedural move known as a discharge petition. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, is leading this effort, with ten GOP members, including Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert, already backing the initiative. If all House Democrats sign the petition as expected, it would be enough to force a floor vote. Advertisement The measure being proposed calls on the Trump administration to declassify and release all materials related to Jeffrey Epstein, including documents, communications, investigative records, and, crucially, a list of government officials who may be named in those records. This push is being driven in part by high public demand. Representative Greene told CNN that her office has received an overwhelming volume of calls from constituents asking for more information about Epstein, saying, 'People want the truth. They don't want another cover-up when it comes to the most notorious convicted pedophile in recent memory.' Under House rules, even with a discharge petition in motion, the earliest possible vote could not take place until after the Labour Day recess. Procedural requirements stipulate that lawmakers must wait seven legislative days before formally collecting the necessary signatures. This standoff over transparency comes just after the House delayed a separate $9 billion spending cut vote last week, largely due to heated debate over how to address the Epstein case. Ultimately, lawmakers passed a non-binding resolution urging further file releases, but Speaker Johnson has remained silent on whether that resolution will be acted upon in any meaningful way. Former President Trump, who has been connected to Epstein through past social and professional ties, commented on the situation via his Truth Social account. He suggested that no amount of disclosure would ever satisfy what he called 'radical left lunatics' and 'troublemakers,' even if a court ordered full transparency. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice has added to the controversy by confirming that there is no so-called 'Epstein client list,' contradicting previous statements by former Attorney General Pam Bondi. The DOJ also reiterated its conclusion that Epstein died by suicide while in jail, a determination that continues to face public scepticism and fuel conspiracy theories. As Congress heads into its five-week summer break, the Epstein case remains a source of political tension, both within the GOP and across the broader political spectrum. What happens after Labour Day could test Speaker Johnson's control over his party, and the willingness of lawmakers to press forward in the face of internal resistance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store