
U.S. Retreat From Global Vaccine Effort Is A Gift To Diseases, Experts Warn
A decade of protection. That's what Elizabeth Khayumbi was seeking for her six-month-old daughter, Jaisley, on a recent trip to a local public health clinic near Nairobi, Kenya.
'I know immunisation protects her, as I too was protected,' Khayumbi recently told Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Over the past twenty-five years, Gavi has helped immunize more than 1.1 billion children just like Jaisley. Working across 78 low-income countries, the organization has prevented nearly 19 million deaths from diseases like pneumonia, diarrhea and measles while creating stronger health systems to help combat other viruses like HIV.
Last week, Gavi held its sixth fundraising replenishment, securing $9 billion in pledges—$2.9 billion short of its goal, but more than expected given the turbulent year for global health, especially for multilateral institutions. Portugal increased its contribution by 54%. Indonesia, a country that once received Gavi funding became its newest donor, showing that progress is possible. And the European Commission, Australia and Spain all increased their pledges. But there was one noticeable absence from the donor list: The United States.
In a video that was released by the Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic, announced that the U.S. would not pledge any money to Gavi, saying the organization had 'ignored the science' around vaccine safety.
It was a move that doctors described as stunning and calamitous. The U.S. was an original donor to Gavi in 2001 and a rapid retreat from the organization could jeopardize thousands, if not millions, of children's lives.
A World With More Deaths And Diseases
If you want to see Gavi's impact, just look at a country like Kenya. In 1989, only 44% of Kenyan children were vaccinated. By 2023, that number had risen to over 93%. The organization followed a simple recipe: As Gavi raised more money, it purchased and distributed more life-saving vaccines. As a result, more children were vaccinated against devastating viruses, and more were lives saved. Between 2000 and 2023, Kenya's child mortality rate plummeted from 96 deaths per 1,000 live births to 40 deaths per 1,000 live births. Yes, Gavi invested a lot of money in Kenya, nearly $1 billion, but the Kenyan government also increased its domestic health resources, too. Thanks to their collective efforts, well over one million child deaths were averted.
Without U.S. assistance, Gavi will have to make some tough decisions. The organization may have to reduce the number of vaccines it offers or curb the number of countries it helps. Roughly 13% of the organization's budget comes from American taxpayers. Absent U.S. generosity, as many as 75 million fewer children will be vaccinated and an additional one million children could die.
Kennedy's announcement, which aligns with President Trump's 'America First' rhetoric, may have also given other countries permission to step back from the world's most vulnerable. The United Kingdom, historically Gavi's top donor, issued a pledge that constituted a 40% cut in real terms from the last commitment made under conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
'Many thousands of children who could have lived will instead die – it's hugely disappointing to see the UK government backsliding rather than driving progress on global poverty,' Dr. Sandy Douglas, a senior vaccinologist at Oxford University's Jenner Institute, told the Guardian.
Gavi directly supports vaccination campaigns against roughly 20 diseases ranging from Ebola to malaria. Fewer resources could cause more diseases and infections. Experts fear this could trigger health setbacks for both low-income countries and for Western ones, too, as viruses and diseases do not require passports. Children with less access to vaccines are more likely to contract opportunistic infections that are prevalent among immunocompromised individuals living with viruses like HIV. And a pullback in health system strengthening and capacity building could lead to fewer maternal and newborn health services and higher mother-to-child transmission rates.
Who Will Step Up?
When countries like the U.S. and U.K. step back, the world does not stand still. Others, like China, tend to step forward. The country's Belt and Road Initiative is well documented. But less has been written about China's efforts to leverage vaccine diplomacy.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, China donated hundreds of millions of vaccines to Africa, the Asia-Pacific and Latin America. To date, some Chinese vaccines companies have shunned Gavi-backed markets. However, as Chinese biotechnology companies develop drugs at a faster, cheaper clip than the U.S., they may well be positioned to fill the vacuum.
On a hopeful note, Gavi announced new private sector partnerships worth over $149 million to strengthen digital and supply chains. Zipline and Gavi will continue scaling up their vaccine drone-based delivery efforts across Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, and Nigeria. Integrate Health and partners are aiming to further vaccine equity across Guinea and West Africa. And the UPS Foundation committed to helping improve supply chain networks to better deliver vaccines to children in low-income countries. While experts caution there is no substitute for public sector leadership, private sector innovation and expertise can be transformative.
What's Next?
Following Secretary Kennedy's announcements, advocacy organizations, including the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition underscored the bipartisan nature of America's longstanding support for Gavi and the need for Congress to have the ultimate say. The plea's came as the House and Senate continue the appropriations process that is expected to culminate before the start of the fiscal year on October 1st.
In the meantime, Gavi will plow ahead with its essential work. The $9 billion haul of mostly new pledges helps put the organization another step closer to supporting its goal of vaccinating 500 million children from preventable disease and averting between 8 and 9 million future deaths.
'In a very, very dire moment for global health… this is far better than I hoped it would be,' Sania Nishtar, Gavi's Chief Executive, told Reuters. 'But we have to be mindful that if we fall short… there will be lives we are unable to save.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Israeli airstrikes kill 14 Palestinians in Gaza and another 10 die seeking food
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israeli airstrikes killed 14 Palestinians in Gaza and another 10 were killed while seeking food aid, hospital officials in the embattled enclave told The Associated Press on Saturday, as U.S.-led ceasefire efforts appeared to gain momentum after nearly 21 months of war. Two American aid workers with the Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation were injured in southern Gaza in an attack at a food distribution site, which the recently created organization blamed on Hamas, without providing evidence. Weary Palestinians expressed cautious hope after Hamas gave a 'positive' response late Friday to the latest U.S. proposal for a 60-day truce but said further talks were needed on implementation. 'We are tired. Enough starvation, enough closure of crossing points. We want to sleep in calm where we don't hear warplanes or drones or shelling,' said Jamalat Wadi, one of Gaza's hundreds of thousands of displaced people, speaking in Deir al-Balah. She squinted in the sun during a summer heat wave of over 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit). Hamas has sought guarantees that the initial truce would lead to a total end to the war and withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. President Donald Trump has pushed for an agreement and will host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Monday to discuss a deal. Previous negotiations have stalled over Hamas demands of guarantees that further negotiations would lead to the war's end, while Netanyahu has insisted Israel would resume fighting to ensure the militant group's destruction. 'Send a delegation with a full mandate to bring a comprehensive agreement to end the war and bring everyone back. No one must be left behind,' Einav Zangauker, mother of hostage Matan Zangauker, told the weekly rally by relatives and supporters in Tel Aviv. A Palestinian doctor and his 3 children killed Israeli airstrikes struck tents in the crowded Muwasi area on Gaza's Mediterranean coast, killing seven people including a Palestinian doctor and his three children, according to Nasser Hospital in the southern city of Khan Younis. Four others were killed in the town of Bani Suheila in southern Gaza. Three people were killed in three strikes in Khan Younis. Israel's army did not immediately comment. Separately, eight Palestinians were killed near a GHF aid distribution site in the southern city of Rafah, the hospital said. One Palestinian was killed near another GHF point in Rafah. It was not clear how far the Palestinians were from the sites. GHF denied the killings happened near their sites. The organization has said no one has been shot at its sites, which are guarded by private contractors and can be accessed only by passing Israeli military positions hundreds of meters (yards) away. The army had no immediate comment but has said it fires warning shots as a crowd-control measure and only aims at people when its troops are threatened. Another Palestinian was killed waiting in crowds for aid trucks in eastern Khan Younis, officials at Nasser Hospital said. The United Nations and other international organizations have been bringing in their own supplies of aid since the war began. The incident did not appear to be connected to GHF operations. Much of Gaza's population of over 2 million now relies on international aid after the war has largely devastated agriculture and other food sources and left many people near famine. Crowds of Palestinians often wait for trucks and unload or loot their contents before they reach their destinations. The trucks must pass through areas under Israeli military control. Israel's military did not immediately comment. American aid workers injured The GHF said the two American aid workers were injured on Saturday morning when assailants threw grenades at a distribution site in Khan Younis. The foundation said the injuries were not life-threatening. Israel's military said it evacuated the workers for medical treatment. The GHF — a U.S.- and Israeli-backed initiative meant to bypass the U.N. — distributes aid from four sites that are surrounded by Israeli troops. Three sites are in Gaza's far south. The U.N. and other humanitarian groups have rejected the GHF system, saying it allows Israel to use food as a weapon, violates humanitarian principles and is not effective. Israel says Hamas has siphoned off aid delivered by the U.N., a claim the U.N. denies. Hamas has urged Palestinians not to cooperate with the GHF. GHF, registered in Delaware, began distributing food in May to Palestinians, who say Israeli troops open fire almost every day toward crowds on roads heading to the distribution points. Several hundred people have been killed and hundreds more wounded, according to Gaza's Health Ministry and witnesses. The U.N. human rights office says it has recorded 613 Palestinians killed within a month in Gaza while trying to obtain aid, most of them while trying to reach GHF sites. The war began when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking 251 others hostage. Israel responded with an offensive that has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children. according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which is led by medical professionals employed by the Hamas government. It does not differentiate between civilians and combatants, but the U.N. and other international organizations see its figures as the most reliable statistics on war casualties. ___ Kullab reported from Jerusalem. ___ Follow news of the war at
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Going hungry': More than 700 Palestinians killed seeking aid in Gaza
More than 700 Palestinians have been killed trying to get food in the Gaza Strip over the past few weeks, according to new figures from the Gaza Health Ministry, spurring renewed condemnation of a contentious United States and Israeli-backed aid scheme. The Health Ministry said on Saturday that at least 743 Palestinians were killed and more than 4,891 others were injured while seeking assistance at Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution sites. The GHF, which began operating in the bombarded Palestinian enclave in late May, has drawn widespread criticism amid multiple reports that its contractors as well as Israeli forces have opened fire on aid seekers. 'The tragedy is that this is again a conservative reading of casualties who were at these distribution points, waiting for food parcels,' Al Jazeera's Hani Mahmoud said of the ministry's latest figures. Reporting from Gaza City, Mahmoud said the attacks on aid seekers come as Palestinian families are desperate to feed their families amid dire shortages caused by Israel's blockade of Gaza. 'People are going hungry. People are rationing supplies. A lot of families are not eating. Mothers here skip meals in order to provide for their children,' he this week, a report by The Associated Press news agency quoted American contractors who said live ammunition and stun grenades have been fired at Palestinian civilians seeking aid at GHF distribution points. Two unnamed US contractors told AP that heavily armed staff members appeared to be doing whatever they wanted. The GHF denied the news agency's reporting as 'categorically false' and said it takes 'the safety and security of [its] sites extremely seriously'. The administration of US President Donald Trump also has stood by the GHF, with a State Department spokesperson telling reporters on Wednesday that the group is the 'one entity that has gotten food and aid into the Gaza Strip'. In late June, the Trump administration pledged $30m in direct funding for the organisation. On Saturday, the GHF said two US workers at one of its sites in southern Gaza's Khan Younis were injured when grenades were thrown at them at the end of food distribution. 'The injured Americans are receiving medical treatment and are in stable condition,' the group said. It was not immediately clear who was responsible for the attack. Leading humanitarian and human rights groups have demanded the immediate closure of the GHF, which they accused of 'forcing two million people into overcrowded, militarized zones where they face daily gunfire and mass casualties'. Amnesty International has described the group's operations as an 'inhumane and deadly militarized scheme'.'All the evidence gathered, including testimonies which Amnesty International is receiving from victims and witnesses, suggest that the GHF was designed so as to placate international concerns while constituting another tool of Israel's genocide,' Amnesty said. Still, faced with dire shortages of food, water and other humanitarian supplies under Israel's blockade, many Palestinians in Gaza say they have no choice but to seek assistance from the group, despite the risks. 'I was forced to go to the aid distribution centre simply because my kids had not eaten for three days in a row,' Majid Abu Laban, a Palestinian man who was wounded in an attack at a GHF site, told Al Jazeera. 'We try to fool our children by all means, but they are starving,' Abu Laban said. 'So I decided to risk my life and head to [an aid distribution point] at Netzarim,' he said, referring to an Israeli military-established corridor south of Gaza City. 'I took the road at midnight hoping to get some food. As crowds rushed in, Israeli forces fired artillery shells at us. In the chaos, everyone was just trying to survive.'
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Sickening' and ‘evil': Musk bashed for USAID cuts after study predicts millions could die
Medical experts and lawmakers are denouncing Elon Musk as cruel after a new study predicted that the billionaire's efforts to help the Trump administration dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development could lead to more than 14 million deaths over the next five years. According to the analysis, published Monday in the medical journal The Lancet, programs funded by USAID prevented nearly 92 million deaths worldwide from 2001 through 2021. Researchers found that across 133 countries, the agency helped stop more than 25 million deaths from HIV/AIDS, about 11 million from diarrheal diseases, 8 million from malaria and nearly 5 million from tuberculosis. Using that data, experts calculated that 14 million people around the globe could die over the next five years because of the USAID cuts, including about 4.5 million children younger than 5. USAID became an agency of particular interest to Musk, as his so-called Department of Government Efficiency carried out President Donald Trump's mission to slash the federal budget. In February, Musk bragged on X that he 'spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper.' A month later, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the cancellation of 83% of USAID's programs, saying they did not serve 'the core national interests of the United States.' Rubio's move had an immediate effect, as NBC News reported: The action brought many overseas humanitarian efforts to a grinding halt, leading to the closings of food kitchens and health clinics in underserved countries and in some cases delaying or stopping the distribution of lifesaving medications, bed nets to ward off malaria, nutritional packets for starving children and chlorine tablets to disinfect dirty water. Samantha Power, who led USAID during the Biden administration, told CNN that the effects that Musk's cuts will have on global health are 'not something that any American should tolerate.' 'Efficiency, we're all for efficiency, but actually taking away programming that is saving lives … that's just devastating,' Power said. Timothy Caulfield, a professor of health law and science policy at the University of Alberta in Canada, called the prediction 'Sickening. Heartbreaking. Evil.' Rachel Clarke, an English physician specializing in severe illness, seemingly singled out Musk, attributing the estimated death toll to 'one man's cruelty & venality.' Congressional Democrats also shared their reactions to the study. 'Donald Trump's legacy: As many as 14 MILLION more deaths over the next five years thanks to USAID cuts made by him, Elon Musk, and his DOGE bros,' Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois wrote on X. 'Absolutely shameful.' 'This administration's cruelty knows no bounds,' Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington wrote in her own post. This article was originally published on