
Alaska election bill stalls in House committee with days remaining in legislative session
Senate Bill 64 is a compilation of voting-related measures that passed the Senate along caucus lines on Monday, giving the House just 10 days' time to parse the 33-page bill before the end-of-session deadline. The legislative session must end on Wednesday.
The package includes measures to allow Alaskans to correct mistakes on absentee ballots, a process used in two-thirds of states; it removes the requirement for witness signatures on absentee ballots; it speeds up the ballot counting process; and it streamlines the process of removing ineligible voters from the rolls, among other changes.
It would ensure that the Division of Elections is staffed with rural liaisons, in an effort to address repeat instances in which polling places in rural Alaska do not open due to missing election materials or understaffing. The measure would also require the state to offer prepaid ballot postage for absentee ballots, and allow voters to opt-in to receive absentee ballots every election year, rather than having to request an absentee ballot ahead of every election.
If the bill does not pass this year, lawmakers could take it up again when they reconvene in January, but that may make it difficult for the Division of Elections to implement the changes ahead of the 2026 election.
Sen. Bill Wielechowski, an Anchorage Democrat who took the lead on crafting the bill, said this was the top issue he worked on this session.
"This has been my No. 1 focus," Wielechowski said Saturday. "I've had dozens of meetings on it with everybody — all caucuses, the governor's office."
But ultimately, none of the Senate Republican minority members voted in favor of the bill, and in the House Finance Committee, the bill faced question after question about the bill's implications for election security. The bill includes provisions introduced by Gov. Mike Dunleavy earlier this year, but the governor has remained silent on it.
The House Finance Committee spent several hours debating the bill on Wednesday and Thursday, before Foster said Friday that he would not take up the bill again in committee before the end of the session.
"I'm going to be setting that aside," Foster said during a Friday committee hearing. "We gave it a shot, thinking that we might be able to arrive at some consensus, but we just simply can't do it in the short amount of time that we have, to give it the proper due diligence that we need to get through introduction all the way through passage."
Foster later said that minority members had indicated they would introduce up to 100 amendments to the bill, which would take up more than a day's worth of committee work.
Rep. Jeremy Bynum, a Ketchikan Republican who serves on the Finance Committee, said his questions were not intended to stall the bill, but rather to ensure it received sufficient consideration.
The measure is supported by several Alaska groups, including the Alaska Federation of Natives, which sent out a message on Friday urging its members to call lawmakers and push for the bill's passage. Alaska Native voting advocates have long said that the state's voting system does not provide adequate support for voters in the state's rural communities, and many of the fixes they have requested are included in the bill.
The reform efforts are motivated in part by a special election conducted in 2022 by mail, in which thousands of absentee ballots were rejected due to deficient witness signatures, impacting rural communities disproportionately. The 2024 election also saw hundreds of absentee ballots rejected, many for lacking a witness signature.
This would not be the first time that an omnibus election bill fell apart in the final days of a legislative session. In 2022, a last-minute deal to restore Alaska's campaign finance laws fell through in the last day of the session, tanking with it other pieces of election-related legislation. The following year, a bill to update Alaska's election laws was again introduced but failed to pass both the House and Senate before the 2024 session concluded.
A separate piece of election-related legislation is still poised for consideration in the Senate before the session concludes. House Bill 16, which has already passed the House, would impose campaign contribution limits for state-run elections for the first time since a federal judge in 2021 invalidated the state's previous limits.
Wielechowski said some pieces of the election bill could still pass this year, as he works on paring down the measure and selecting the pieces of it that can garner broad support.
"This is not going away. It's been a decade in the making," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
2 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Court rules Mississippi's social media age verification law can go into effect
A Mississippi law that requires social media users to verify their ages can go into effect, a federal court has ruled. A tech industry group has pledged to continue challenging the law , arguing it infringes on users' rights to privacy and free expression. A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals overruled a decision by a federal district judge to block the 2024 law from going into effect. It's the latest legal development as court challenges play out against similar laws in states across the country.

Associated Press
2 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Court rules Mississippi's social media age verification law can go into effect
A Mississippi law that requires social media users to verify their ages can go into effect, a federal court has ruled. A tech industry group has pledged to continue challenging the law, arguing it infringes on users' rights to privacy and free expression. A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals overruled a decision by a federal district judge to block the 2024 law from going into effect. It's the latest legal development as court challenges play out against similar laws in states across the country. Parents — and even some teens themselves — are growing increasingly concerned about the effects of social media use on young people. Supporters of the new laws have said they are needed to help curb the explosive use of social media among young people, and what researchers say is an associated increase in depression and anxiety. Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch argued in a court filing defending the law that steps such as age verification for digital sites could mitigate harm caused by 'sex trafficking, sexual abuse, child pornography, targeted harassment, sextortion, incitement to suicide and self-harm, and other harmful and often illegal conduct against children.' Attorneys for NetChoice, which brought the lawsuit, have pledged to continue their court challenge, arguing the law threatens privacy rights and unconstitutionally restricts the free expression of users of all ages. The industry group, which has filed similar lawsuits in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Ohio and Utah, represents some of the country's most high-profile technology companies, including Google, which owns YouTube; Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat; and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. In a written statement, Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said the group is 'very disappointed' in the decision to let Mississippi's law go into effect and is 'considering all available options.' 'NetChoice will continue to fight against this egregious infringement on access to fully protected speech online,' Taske said. 'Parents — not the government — should determine what is right for their families.' ___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Wants To Make Offensive Sports Team Names Great Again
Amid ICE raids, tariff tumult, health concerns and increasing anger about his alleged ties to predator Jeffrey Epstein, President Donald Trump is keeping his eyes on culture wars. In a Sunday morning post on Truth Social, the president wrote, 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past.' Both football's Washington Commanders and baseball's Cleveland Guardians walked away from their controversial old names in the wake of the 2020 racial reckoning sparked by the murder of George Floyd. The moves were a culmination of yearslong campaigns by Native American groups and advocates who argued team names evoked harmful stereotypes of Indigenous savagery along with logos that were often offensive caricatures. But in his post, Trump claimed that public sentiment had since shifted and even Native communities were asking for the teams to reverse course. 'Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,' his post went on, saying, 'Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them.' 'Times are different now than they were three or four years ago,' Trump continued. 'We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' The president made similar comments earlier this month when asked about the Commanders' old identity. 'I wouldn't have changed the name. It just doesn't have the same, it doesn't have the same ring to me,' he told a reporter. Washington D.C.'s football team dropped the Redskins name in July 2020 and rechristened itself as the Commanders in February 2022. But when members of congress approved a bill paving the way for Washington to build a new stadium last November, it reportedly came with a condition they bring back its former mascot, which was based off the image of real-life Piegan Blackfeet Chief John Two Guns White Calf. While there have been some discussions about reviving the logo, the Commanders' front office has said there was no chance the team would be reviving its racist old name. In 2023, the club's then-president, Jason Wright, told Washington radio station 106.7 The Fan: 'Going back to the old name is not being considered. Period.' One year later, Commanders owner Josh Harris said that reviving the old team name was a nonstarter for 'obvious reasons.' Cleveland's baseball team ditched its controversial logo, a smiling crimson-faced man named 'Chief Wahoo,' in 2018, but it took another two years to walk away from The Indians moniker. The organization rechristened itself as The Guardians a year later. Related... Trump Admits He Misses Sports Team's Old, Racist Name Cleveland's Baseball Team Finally Has A New Name After Dropping Racist Logo Washington's NFL Team Is Finally Changing Its Racist 'Redskins' Name