Who's responsible for small businesses surviving disasters?
In disaster after disaster, they are among the first to be affected and the last to recover.
While saving lives is always the top priority, we need to talk seriously about livelihoods.
A lost business or farm isn't just an economic loss, it's a personal tragedy, a collapse of purpose and, in some cases, a precursor to additional loss of life.
Without livelihoods, communities struggle to recover.
The 2011 National Strategy for Disaster Resilience introduced the concept of "shared responsibility" in Australia's approach to emergencies. But what does that mean in practice when it comes to small businesses and farms? And have we progressed any further since 2011?
Let's be honest: the primary responsibility for continuity lies with the business or farm owner.
But the reality is, most small-business owners aren't risk analysts or continuity planners.
A pub owner in a regional town is likely managing shifts and stock, not developing a flood risk management plan.
MORE OPINION:
A farmer running a multi-generational cattle property may be juggling drought, debt, and livestock, not drafting an evacuation or recovery blueprint.
A hairdresser in a small coastal town is thinking about customers and payroll, not business impact assessments.
So, whose job is it to ensure these vital parts of our community survive and bounce forward after disasters?
The answer should be: all of us.
Small businesses and farms are the social and economic backbone of Australia's regions. According to Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman Bruce Billson, they employ nearly half the private sector workforce.
Yet the average small business operator earns below minimum wage. They're investing everything - often including their family homes - to keep going.
It's unconscionable that these stakeholders remain a blind spot in national disaster policy and practice.
Will the newly appointed Minister for Small Business, Cowan MP Dr Anne Aly, prioritises disaster resilience for this sector? Or does the responsibility fall to the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), the body charged with driving national resilience?
Perhaps it's both. And what about the state governments, who are closer to the ground?
In this complex landscape, the NSW Reconstruction Authority offers a compelling example of what "good" looks like.
Their collaboration with certified social enterprise Resilient Ready in the Business Beyond Disasters Northern Rivers program demonstrates how small business resilience expertise can be effectively deployed through targeted government investment.
This kind of partnership is exactly what's needed - programs developed by people who understand the real challenges small operators face and can meet them where they are.
But timing is critical.
We keep talking about the need for a window between disasters to work on preparedness.
That window no longer exists.
In our new reality of compounding and cascading disasters, we must prepare as we recover. Resilience isn't a nice-to-have anymore, it's an operational necessity.
We must do disasters differently.
That means embedding resilience thinking into every layer of recovery funding and programming.
It means funding practical, place-based support for small businesses that focuses not only on rebuilding but rethinking how to reduce risk.
It also means creating space for peer-to-peer learning, local storytelling and connection because resilience grows through relationships.
Responsibility is not just on the business owner or farmer.
Work delivered with the Torrens Resilience Initiative for the South Australian grape and wine sector last year very clearly showed there's much more to be done.
The government must better understand how and why small businesses and farmers are key to community resilience.
The Productivity Commission's 2023 report into natural disaster funding called for a rebalancing toward mitigation and risk reduction, not just response and recovery.
That rebalancing must include tailored support for small businesses and farmers.
Let's stop pretending these operators should fend for themselves.
Let's recognise that their survival is not only their responsibility but a shared national priority.
Because when small businesses and farms fall, whole communities fall with them.
We must enable them to connect, survive and thrive, not just endure.
That's not only a smart investment in Australia's economic future, it's the right thing to do.
My heart breaks for the communities currently devastated by floods across NSW. But it aches even more for the small-business owners and farmers trying to stay afloat - again.
In disaster after disaster, they are among the first to be affected and the last to recover.
While saving lives is always the top priority, we need to talk seriously about livelihoods.
A lost business or farm isn't just an economic loss, it's a personal tragedy, a collapse of purpose and, in some cases, a precursor to additional loss of life.
Without livelihoods, communities struggle to recover.
The 2011 National Strategy for Disaster Resilience introduced the concept of "shared responsibility" in Australia's approach to emergencies. But what does that mean in practice when it comes to small businesses and farms? And have we progressed any further since 2011?
Let's be honest: the primary responsibility for continuity lies with the business or farm owner.
But the reality is, most small-business owners aren't risk analysts or continuity planners.
A pub owner in a regional town is likely managing shifts and stock, not developing a flood risk management plan.
MORE OPINION:
A farmer running a multi-generational cattle property may be juggling drought, debt, and livestock, not drafting an evacuation or recovery blueprint.
A hairdresser in a small coastal town is thinking about customers and payroll, not business impact assessments.
So, whose job is it to ensure these vital parts of our community survive and bounce forward after disasters?
The answer should be: all of us.
Small businesses and farms are the social and economic backbone of Australia's regions. According to Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman Bruce Billson, they employ nearly half the private sector workforce.
Yet the average small business operator earns below minimum wage. They're investing everything - often including their family homes - to keep going.
It's unconscionable that these stakeholders remain a blind spot in national disaster policy and practice.
Will the newly appointed Minister for Small Business, Cowan MP Dr Anne Aly, prioritises disaster resilience for this sector? Or does the responsibility fall to the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), the body charged with driving national resilience?
Perhaps it's both. And what about the state governments, who are closer to the ground?
In this complex landscape, the NSW Reconstruction Authority offers a compelling example of what "good" looks like.
Their collaboration with certified social enterprise Resilient Ready in the Business Beyond Disasters Northern Rivers program demonstrates how small business resilience expertise can be effectively deployed through targeted government investment.
This kind of partnership is exactly what's needed - programs developed by people who understand the real challenges small operators face and can meet them where they are.
But timing is critical.
We keep talking about the need for a window between disasters to work on preparedness.
That window no longer exists.
In our new reality of compounding and cascading disasters, we must prepare as we recover. Resilience isn't a nice-to-have anymore, it's an operational necessity.
We must do disasters differently.
That means embedding resilience thinking into every layer of recovery funding and programming.
It means funding practical, place-based support for small businesses that focuses not only on rebuilding but rethinking how to reduce risk.
It also means creating space for peer-to-peer learning, local storytelling and connection because resilience grows through relationships.
Responsibility is not just on the business owner or farmer.
Work delivered with the Torrens Resilience Initiative for the South Australian grape and wine sector last year very clearly showed there's much more to be done.
The government must better understand how and why small businesses and farmers are key to community resilience.
The Productivity Commission's 2023 report into natural disaster funding called for a rebalancing toward mitigation and risk reduction, not just response and recovery.
That rebalancing must include tailored support for small businesses and farmers.
Let's stop pretending these operators should fend for themselves.
Let's recognise that their survival is not only their responsibility but a shared national priority.
Because when small businesses and farms fall, whole communities fall with them.
We must enable them to connect, survive and thrive, not just endure.
That's not only a smart investment in Australia's economic future, it's the right thing to do.
My heart breaks for the communities currently devastated by floods across NSW. But it aches even more for the small-business owners and farmers trying to stay afloat - again.
In disaster after disaster, they are among the first to be affected and the last to recover.
While saving lives is always the top priority, we need to talk seriously about livelihoods.
A lost business or farm isn't just an economic loss, it's a personal tragedy, a collapse of purpose and, in some cases, a precursor to additional loss of life.
Without livelihoods, communities struggle to recover.
The 2011 National Strategy for Disaster Resilience introduced the concept of "shared responsibility" in Australia's approach to emergencies. But what does that mean in practice when it comes to small businesses and farms? And have we progressed any further since 2011?
Let's be honest: the primary responsibility for continuity lies with the business or farm owner.
But the reality is, most small-business owners aren't risk analysts or continuity planners.
A pub owner in a regional town is likely managing shifts and stock, not developing a flood risk management plan.
MORE OPINION:
A farmer running a multi-generational cattle property may be juggling drought, debt, and livestock, not drafting an evacuation or recovery blueprint.
A hairdresser in a small coastal town is thinking about customers and payroll, not business impact assessments.
So, whose job is it to ensure these vital parts of our community survive and bounce forward after disasters?
The answer should be: all of us.
Small businesses and farms are the social and economic backbone of Australia's regions. According to Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman Bruce Billson, they employ nearly half the private sector workforce.
Yet the average small business operator earns below minimum wage. They're investing everything - often including their family homes - to keep going.
It's unconscionable that these stakeholders remain a blind spot in national disaster policy and practice.
Will the newly appointed Minister for Small Business, Cowan MP Dr Anne Aly, prioritises disaster resilience for this sector? Or does the responsibility fall to the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), the body charged with driving national resilience?
Perhaps it's both. And what about the state governments, who are closer to the ground?
In this complex landscape, the NSW Reconstruction Authority offers a compelling example of what "good" looks like.
Their collaboration with certified social enterprise Resilient Ready in the Business Beyond Disasters Northern Rivers program demonstrates how small business resilience expertise can be effectively deployed through targeted government investment.
This kind of partnership is exactly what's needed - programs developed by people who understand the real challenges small operators face and can meet them where they are.
But timing is critical.
We keep talking about the need for a window between disasters to work on preparedness.
That window no longer exists.
In our new reality of compounding and cascading disasters, we must prepare as we recover. Resilience isn't a nice-to-have anymore, it's an operational necessity.
We must do disasters differently.
That means embedding resilience thinking into every layer of recovery funding and programming.
It means funding practical, place-based support for small businesses that focuses not only on rebuilding but rethinking how to reduce risk.
It also means creating space for peer-to-peer learning, local storytelling and connection because resilience grows through relationships.
Responsibility is not just on the business owner or farmer.
Work delivered with the Torrens Resilience Initiative for the South Australian grape and wine sector last year very clearly showed there's much more to be done.
The government must better understand how and why small businesses and farmers are key to community resilience.
The Productivity Commission's 2023 report into natural disaster funding called for a rebalancing toward mitigation and risk reduction, not just response and recovery.
That rebalancing must include tailored support for small businesses and farmers.
Let's stop pretending these operators should fend for themselves.
Let's recognise that their survival is not only their responsibility but a shared national priority.
Because when small businesses and farms fall, whole communities fall with them.
We must enable them to connect, survive and thrive, not just endure.
That's not only a smart investment in Australia's economic future, it's the right thing to do.
My heart breaks for the communities currently devastated by floods across NSW. But it aches even more for the small-business owners and farmers trying to stay afloat - again.
In disaster after disaster, they are among the first to be affected and the last to recover.
While saving lives is always the top priority, we need to talk seriously about livelihoods.
A lost business or farm isn't just an economic loss, it's a personal tragedy, a collapse of purpose and, in some cases, a precursor to additional loss of life.
Without livelihoods, communities struggle to recover.
The 2011 National Strategy for Disaster Resilience introduced the concept of "shared responsibility" in Australia's approach to emergencies. But what does that mean in practice when it comes to small businesses and farms? And have we progressed any further since 2011?
Let's be honest: the primary responsibility for continuity lies with the business or farm owner.
But the reality is, most small-business owners aren't risk analysts or continuity planners.
A pub owner in a regional town is likely managing shifts and stock, not developing a flood risk management plan.
MORE OPINION:
A farmer running a multi-generational cattle property may be juggling drought, debt, and livestock, not drafting an evacuation or recovery blueprint.
A hairdresser in a small coastal town is thinking about customers and payroll, not business impact assessments.
So, whose job is it to ensure these vital parts of our community survive and bounce forward after disasters?
The answer should be: all of us.
Small businesses and farms are the social and economic backbone of Australia's regions. According to Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman Bruce Billson, they employ nearly half the private sector workforce.
Yet the average small business operator earns below minimum wage. They're investing everything - often including their family homes - to keep going.
It's unconscionable that these stakeholders remain a blind spot in national disaster policy and practice.
Will the newly appointed Minister for Small Business, Cowan MP Dr Anne Aly, prioritises disaster resilience for this sector? Or does the responsibility fall to the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), the body charged with driving national resilience?
Perhaps it's both. And what about the state governments, who are closer to the ground?
In this complex landscape, the NSW Reconstruction Authority offers a compelling example of what "good" looks like.
Their collaboration with certified social enterprise Resilient Ready in the Business Beyond Disasters Northern Rivers program demonstrates how small business resilience expertise can be effectively deployed through targeted government investment.
This kind of partnership is exactly what's needed - programs developed by people who understand the real challenges small operators face and can meet them where they are.
But timing is critical.
We keep talking about the need for a window between disasters to work on preparedness.
That window no longer exists.
In our new reality of compounding and cascading disasters, we must prepare as we recover. Resilience isn't a nice-to-have anymore, it's an operational necessity.
We must do disasters differently.
That means embedding resilience thinking into every layer of recovery funding and programming.
It means funding practical, place-based support for small businesses that focuses not only on rebuilding but rethinking how to reduce risk.
It also means creating space for peer-to-peer learning, local storytelling and connection because resilience grows through relationships.
Responsibility is not just on the business owner or farmer.
Work delivered with the Torrens Resilience Initiative for the South Australian grape and wine sector last year very clearly showed there's much more to be done.
The government must better understand how and why small businesses and farmers are key to community resilience.
The Productivity Commission's 2023 report into natural disaster funding called for a rebalancing toward mitigation and risk reduction, not just response and recovery.
That rebalancing must include tailored support for small businesses and farmers.
Let's stop pretending these operators should fend for themselves.
Let's recognise that their survival is not only their responsibility but a shared national priority.
Because when small businesses and farms fall, whole communities fall with them.
We must enable them to connect, survive and thrive, not just endure.
That's not only a smart investment in Australia's economic future, it's the right thing to do.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
a minute ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Frosty on Trump': Australians eager for more independence from the US
Australians are voicing a strong desire for the country to assert more independence from the United States amid Donald Trump's turbulent presidency, with most voters saying they do not blame Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for failing to secure a meeting with the US President. The latest Resolve Political Monitor survey of more than 2300 people, conducted for this masthead, found that most Australians continue to have strongly negative views of Trump six months after he re-entered the White House. Fewer than one in five Australian voters believe Trump's election was a good outcome for Australia. When asked whether it would be a good or a bad thing for Australia to become more independent from the US on foreign policy and national security, 46 per cent of respondents said they believed it would be a good thing, compared to 22 per cent who said it would be a bad thing. When compared along political lines, 56 per cent of Labor voters said they supported Australia adopting a more independent foreign policy and just 12 per cent opposed the idea. Coalition voters were evenly split, with 34 per cent favouring more distance from its closest security partner while 35 per cent said it would be bad to become more independent of the US. Since returning to the White House, Trump has imposed a 10 per cent tariff on all Australian goods, as well as a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminium imports. The Trump administration has also called for Australia to dramatically increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, while launching a review into the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact. Since his re-election, Albanese has stressed the importance of Australian sovereignty and said his government would not commit to joining the United States in a hypothetical war with China over Taiwan.
Sydney Morning Herald
a minute ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
ASX set to slip, Wall Street hits record; US-EU reach trade deal
Wall Street ended the week on a positive note, with stocks hitting fresh all-time highs, while on Sunday, the United States struck a framework trade deal with the European Union, averting a spiralling battle between two allies which account for almost a third of global trade. The trade deal announcement came after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travelled for talks with US President Donald Trump at his golf course in western Scotland to push a hard-fought deal over the line, which will see a 15 per cent US import tariff imposed on most EU goods. 'I think this is the biggest deal ever made,' Trump told reporters after an hour-long meeting with von der Leyen, who said the 15 per cent tariff applied 'across the board'. 'We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world, and it's a big deal. It's a huge deal. It will bring stability. It will bring predictability,' she said. The deal, that also includes $US600 billion ($914 billion) of EU investments in the United States and significant EU purchases of US energy and military equipment, will indeed bring clarity for EU companies. However, the baseline tariff of 15 per cent will be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal, although it is better than the threatened 30 per cent rate. The deal mirrors parts of the framework agreement the United States clinched with Japan last week. On Friday, the S&P 500 rose 0.4 per cent to set an all-time high, the fifth time it did so this week. The Dow Jones climbed 208 points, or 0.5 per cent, and the Nasdaq composite added 0.2 per cent to its own record set the day before. A closely watched gauge of equity volatility – the VIX – closed below 15. The Australian sharemarket is set to slip, with futures, set before the US-EU trade deal was announced, pointing to a slide of 5 points, or 0.1 per cent, at the open.
Sydney Morning Herald
a minute ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Ansett Australia is back. But not as you know it
It was once Australia's second-largest airline, ferrying more than 10 million passengers around the country every year before it collapsed into administration in 2002. More than 20 years after its final flight, Ansett is making a comeback. Melbourne-based technology entrepreneur Constantine Frantzeskos has revived the Ansett brand, bringing back the iconic Australian airline as an AI-powered travel agency. The Ansett Travel platform, which is now live, is designed as a hyper-personalised travel concierge that will offer predictive trip recommendations and itineraries based on a customers' preference, budget and calendar events. 'Ansett was such a wonderful, innovative brand. It was a pioneer of great service, they were the first ones to bring business class to Australia, and they were loved by their customers,' Frantzeskos said in an interview. 'I thought wouldn't it be a cool thing to genuinely bring this brand back to life. And that's what I'm doing, I'm building the personal travel agent of the future. 'This will be a travel agent that understands you, your family, your needs, your budget and where you've been. That's the vision.' Ansett had operated for 65 years and was the nation's second-largest airline before it was grounded in late 2001, with some 16,000 jobs lost as a result. Its downfall was seen at the time as a 'perfect storm' of poor culture, financial strain, union issues and fleet mismanagement.
