Queenstown council wants Environment Court to make decision on discharge into Shotover River
The Shotover River where Queenstown Lakes District Council discharged 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater in March.
Photo:
RNZ / Tess Brunton
The Queenstown Lakes District Council wants its retrospective application to discharge treated effluent to Shotover River to go directly to the Environment Court.
In late March, the council enacted emergency powers under the Resource Management Act to
pump at least 12,000 cubic metres of treated wastewater into the river
each day from the Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant after its disposal field failed.
The
council submitted a retrospective resource consent
to the Otago Regional Council in May and asked for it to be publicly notified.
The Queenstown Lakes District Council has now applied to the regional council to directly refer its resource consent to the Environment Court.
District council property and infrastructure general manager Tony Avery said it believed that this would provide the most efficient and robust approach given the nature of the consent.
"Shotover River is a significant natural resource and comes with considerable cultural and community values.
"As such, we believe it is beneficial for the evaluation of and decision on council's application to be made in an experienced and well-resourced court," Avery said.
If approved, it would mean the regional council would no longer be the decision-maker in the first instance - the Environment Court would.
Earlier this year, the regional council took the district council to Environment Court over
repeated resource consent breaches at the plant
.
It resulted in the [. http://rnz.co.nz/news/national/563664/queenstown-lakes-district-council-must-fix-issues-with-shotover-wastewater-plant-court district council being ordered to pay at least $235,000] in costs and fix the issues at the plant
The Queenstown Lakes District Council said that meant the Environment Court was already well acquainted with the matter and "would help to provide an efficient and comprehensive decision from a neutral arbiter".
Public notification, submission timeframes and assessing the application would still fall under the regional council's jurisdiction, and it would still need to provide that assessment and a report before the matter was heard by the court.
The district council said the Environment Court would be able to properly test evidence to assist decision makers.
"Referring the matter to the Environment Court would result in a faster decision, ensure access to the necessary resourcing in a cost-effective way, and provide a simple process that the public can engage with and take part in if they wish to," the district council said.
"Rights of appeal would remain intact."
If the regional council declined the request, it would stay as the decision maker and a council hearing would be held.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
How to get into the housing market with $80
HomeShare has worked with the Financial Market Authority to finetune its offering. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds If you want to get into the property market, but don't have the money to do so, you may be about to get your chance - again. New fintech start-up HomeShare plans to launch later this year, offering investors the opportunity to buy a share in residential property. If that sounds familiar, that's because it's not the first attempt to offer this sort of investment scheme - The Property Crowd and The Ownery have both tried it within the past decade. In 2022, the Financial Markets Authority suspended the crowdfunding licence of The Property Crowd, after it contravened licensee obligations. No investors were using the platform at that point. The Ownery launched in 2016, offering shares in an Ellerslie house, but there was reportedly underwhelming investor interest and less than a quarter of shares were sold. It has not responded to a request for comment. Homeshare founder Martin van Blerk said the key difference between those previous attempts and his latest was that he had worked with the Financial Markets Authority in its fintech sandbox. The 'sandbox' is designed to encourage innovation, and allow participants to test their new products and services in a controlled environment, getting a better understanding of what the regulator will expect of them and adjusting as required. Van Blerk said HomeShare would offer 10,000 shares in a property based on an independent valuation. Its first property would be in Hamilton. People could buy single shares or many. On an $800,000 property, a share would be $80. Martin van Blerk is aiming for an October launch for HomeShare. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds "The goal is making housing more affordable, more transparent and just easier to access for a lot of people, who'd otherwise be locked out, either because they don't have enough for a deposit or a mortgage, or they just don't know how to go about it." He said he aimed for an October launch and hoped to eventually have properties all over New Zealand. "Instead of buying one property in Auckland, you could buy shares in 100 throughout New Zealand, so it's a great way to diversify risk for property owners." Owners would receive a proportionate amount of rental income from the property and pay a proportional amount of the cost of ownership, including maintenance. People who wanted to exit their investment could sell their shares on HomeShare's secondary marketplace, as long as the price was set within what the company said was a reasonable range. Fees would be charged when shares were bought and sold. For first-home buyers, the fee is 0.95 percent "or slightly higher if you're a traditional investor". Van Blerk said the model had proved popular in other countries. "New Zealand is sort of lagging behind. I think this is a chance to put us at the front of a shift that's happening." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Pasifika Medical Association rejects claims public funds used inappropriately
Pasifika Medical Association group chair Kiki Maoate. Photo: Pasifika Medical Association Group The Pasifika Medical Association (PMA) is rejecting claims that public funds have been used in an inappropriate manner. Te Puni Kōkiri is launching an independent review into allegations that money was used inappropriately for Whānau Ora commissioning services. It relates to allegations of funds misused by two agencies, including Pasifika Futures Limited, where it is alleged that [ Moana Pasifika received $770,000 a year] from a Whānau Ora contract with the Pasifika Medical Association. However, Pasifika Medical Association group chair Kiki Maoate said no public funding has been used to support the professional rugby team. "We strongly reject any claim that public funds have been used in an inappropriate manner," Maoate said. Moana Pasifika became part of the Pasifika Medical Association Group (PMA) on 1 July 2024. At that time, the Moana Pasifika Charitable Trust was formally established to hold both the professional rugby team and the Moana Pasifika Community Sports Programme, Maoate said. "Moana Pasifika has always been more than a rugby team. From the outset, it was established as a platform for social good and long-term transformation for Pacific people. That founding purpose made it a natural strategic fit for PMA, which recognised the opportunity to strengthen and expand Moana Pasifika's reach. With that alignment of values and mission, PMA invested to optimise the organisations positive impact, capability and connection to Pacific communities. "In 2021, a small amount of funding was provided to the Pacific Business Trust to support the development of a business case for the establishment of the Moana Pasifika Charitable Trust. This was consistent with broader support for Pacific-owned and delivered initiatives under the economic domain of Pasifika Futures. "Since that time, any public or Whānau Ora funding has been directed solely to the Moana Pasifika Community Sports Programme. No public funding has been used to support the professional rugby team." the statement from PMA said. RNZ has approached the PMA for further comment. Te Pou Matakana, otherwise known as the Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency Limited, is also being investigated after Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka seeked urgent advice on "electioneering concerns". The concerns related to an advertisement encouraging Māori to sign-up to the Māori electoral roll paid for by Te Pou Matakana, which was released this week. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
How to get into housing market with $80
HomeShare has worked with the Financial Market Authority to finetune its offering. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds If you want to get into the property market, but don't have the money to do so, you may be about to get your chance - again. New fintech start-up HomeShare plans to launch later this year, offering investors the opportunity to buy a share in residential property. If that sounds familiar, that's because it's not the first attempt to offer this sort of investment scheme - The Property Crowd and The Ownery have both tried it within the past decade. In 2022, the Financial Markets Authority suspended the crowdfunding licence of The Property Crowd, after it contravened licensee obligations. No investors were using the platform at that point. The Ownery launched in 2016, offering shares in an Ellerslie house, but there was reportedly underwhelming investor interest and less than a quarter of shares were sold. It has not responded to a request for comment. Homeshare founder Martin van Blerk said the key difference between those previous attempts and his latest was that he had worked with the Financial Markets Authority in its fintech sandbox. The 'sandbox' is designed to encourage innovation, and allow participants to test their new products and services in a controlled environment, getting a better understanding of what the regulator will expect of them and adjusting as required. Van Blerk said HomeShare would offer 10,000 shares in a property based on an independent valuation. Its first property would be in Hamilton. People could buy single shares or many. On an $800,000 property, a share would be $80. Martin van Blerk is aiming for an October launch for HomeShare. Photo: Supplied/Susan Edmunds "The goal is making housing more affordable, more transparent and just easier to access for a lot of people, who'd otherwise be locked out, either because they don't have enough for a deposit or a mortgage, or they just don't know how to go about it." He said he aimed for an October launch and hoped to eventually have properties all over New Zealand. "Instead of buying one property in Auckland, you could buy shares in 100 throughout New Zealand, so it's a great way to diversify risk for property owners." Owners would receive a proportionate amount of rental income from the property and pay a proportional amount of the cost of ownership, including maintenance. People who wanted to exit their investment could sell their shares on HomeShare's secondary marketplace, as long as the price was set within what the company said was a reasonable range. Fees would be charged when shares were bought and sold. For first-home buyers, the fee is 0.95 percent "or slightly higher if you're a traditional investor". Van Blerk said the model had proved popular in other countries. "New Zealand is sort of lagging behind. I think this is a chance to put us at the front of a shift that's happening." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
