Air India warned by watchdog over pilot scheduling breaches
The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) instructed Air India to remove three company executives from crew scheduling roles over the breaches, according to government reports, seen by the Reuters news agency.
A divisional vice president, a chief manager of crew scheduling, and a planning executive have been removed at the aviation agency's instruction.
The flights on 16 May and 17 May exceeded the allowed pilot flight time limit of 10 hours, according to the report.
It cited "systemic failures in scheduling protocol and oversights" and criticised the lack of strict disciplinary measures against responsible officials.
The report is unrelated to this month's crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8 that killed 241 people.
0:34
The Gatwick-bound flight, which was carrying 53 Britons, came down just after take-off from Ahmedabad airport in western India on Thursday, 12 June.
An investigation into the crash is ongoing.
1:57
On Thursday, authorities warned Air India for breaching safety rules after three of its Airbus planes flew despite being overdue for checks on emergency equipment of escape slides.
In a statement to Reuters, Air India said it has implemented the DGCA order, and in the interim, the company's chief operations officer will directly oversee the Integrated Operations Control Centre.
"Air India is committed to ensuring that there is total adherence to safety protocols and standard practices," it added.
The DGCA stated in its order that Air India had voluntarily disclosed the violations.
Last year, around half of the fines handed out by India's aviation agency were given to Air India or Air India Express.
The biggest fine was $127,000 (£94,370) on Air India for "insufficient oxygen on board" during some international flights.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Scrutiny concerns over new Jersey maritime legislation
A scrutiny panel in Jersey has raised concerns after it reviewed proposed regulations aimed at strengthening maritime legislation on the Economic and International Affairs Scrutiny Panel said new proposed legislation did not include "sufficient provisions to deter operators of ships navigating while under the influence of alcohol or drugs".It said under the proposed changes, law enforcement would only be permitted to test for alcohol or drugs if a vessel had operated in a careless way or where it had resulted in the serious injury or death of another person. The panel said the new proposed legislation was not being "taken seriously enough". The proposition will be debated later. 'Mixed message' "The panel believes this sends a very mixed message from the Government about what is acceptable when operating a vessel and is at odds with what is expected of road users," it its comments paper, the panel recommended the minister for Sustainable Economic Development should analyse the data of all maritime accidents and call outs of the coastguard on a quarterly basis to establish if there had been an increase in cases that involved drugs or there was, the panel suggested the minister should consider updating the regulations to include provisions for breathalysing ship operators on suspicion of alcohol or drug consumption. Deputy Montfort Tadier, the chair of the panel said while evidence suggested the number of incidents involving drugs or alcohol in the island's water was "relatively low", the figures were likely to only reflect occasions when they were tested said: "What concerns the panel is that incidents involving drugs or alcohol may be missed as they do not meet the thresholds of dangerous or careless operation of a vessel or have not resulted in the death or serious injury of another person. "The panel recognises that it is not necessarily appropriate to apply the rules of the road to the sea, but we do recognise that like cars, vans and trucks, boats can be very dangerous too, when operated incorrectly."The panel therefore cannot accept that the proposed regulations fully meet their intended purpose and will be considering its next steps."The proposition is due to be debated by the States Assembly on Tuesday.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Queensland zoo reopens after owner's sister-in-law loses arm to lion attack
A Queensland zoo under investigation after a lion attack has reopened its doors, two days after the owner's sister-in-law lost her arm. The woman, in her 50s, remains in hospital in a stable condition after the incident, which occurred on Sunday morning at Darling Downs zoo south of Toowoomba, in Queensland. The owner, Steve Robinson, updated media on the incident outside the zoo on Tuesday morning. He said the attack took place at a holding enclosure, in an area where only trained staff are permitted to go, just moments after others had finished cleaning the main enclosure. Robinson said the zoo uses 'protected contact', which means nobody enters an enclosure with an adult lion. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email He revealed the victim was his sister-in-law, a school teacher from New South Wales who regularly travels to Toowoomba with her family on holidays. Robinson's wife and a carnivore keeper were nearby and Robinson credited a second keeper, well trained in first aid, with saving his sister-in-law's life. 'She actually took my wife's leather belt off and applied a tourniquet. Very quickly, the first aid kit was there, we wrapped her up in a thermal blanket and the paramedics locally were here very, very quickly indeed,' he said. Robinson said only staff are permitted in the area, which is known as the 'keeper's area'. Asked why she was in a restricted area, Robinson said the zoo was careful about who they let into back areas and she had been allowed in for 20 years. The zoo has never had an incident before, he said. Robinson said his sister-in-law often took photos to produce calendars for the zoo. He also rejected any blame on the animals themselves, telling media 'there's no aggression and no nastiness' in the animals and their current theory is that the animal was just playing. 'We've raised these lions ourselves. Their temperaments are excellent. We can still interact with them through the mesh of the cage,' he said. He said it was hard to tell what had happened because nobody saw the incident. 'There were people working very, very close nearby, but it was all over in a split second,' he said. 'It was that quick that we could only surmise at this stage. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The lady in question is currently in surgery right now again, and she has been in no condition to be interviewed fully about what happened.' Workplace Health and Safety Queensland is investigating the incident. The victim will undergo surgery again on Tuesday, Robinson said. 'Emotionally, both her and my wife are on a rollercoaster. It's the great unknown at the moment, we just don't know, ultimately, what's going to be involved and where we're going to end with this,' he said. Dozens went through the gates at Darling Downs Zoo after it reopened at 9am on Tuesday. The lions remained on display, but paid encounters would not be offered this week for the sake of the keepers, Robinson said. Robinson said some had brought boxes of chocolates and cookies to keep their spirits up. The zoo turned 20 last month. It has nine lions and four lion keepers.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie shock jock turns on his bosses and sues radio network after 'royal prank' call to a UK hospital led to nurse's suicide
A 'shock jock' who made a prank call to a UK hospital caring for Princess Catherine claims he was not supported by his employer in the fall-out of a nurse's death by suicide. Mike Christian and Mel Greig were presenting on 2Day FM on December 4, 2012 when they made the phone call to the King Edward VII Hospital in London. The then-Duchess of Cambridge had been admitted to the hospital for severe morning sickness ahead of her first child's birth. Christian alleges he was ordered by 2Day FM's production team to make a prank call to the hospital and impersonate Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth to try to gain access to the duchess. Nurse Jacintha Saldanha died by suicide days after the prank call, leading to widespread backlash against the radio hosts and broadcaster. Almost 13 years later, Christian has sued 2Day FM's broadcaster Southern Cross Austereo in the Federal Court, claiming the firm promised to provide support if the content put out by its 'shock jocks' ever went too far. The former radio host - who was made redundant in February - says he believed these claims, but was let down by the organisation. The broadcaster did not 'step in' but rather let its radio presenters take the blame, negatively impacting their careers, court documents seen by AAP allege. Christian and Greig called out Southern Cross Austereo and tried to prevent the company from crossing the line, but were left in the cold after the suicide, the documents say. 'SCA did not immediately take public accountability for the incident, but rather allowed Mr Christian and Ms Greig to be left exposed to relentless public vitriol, harassment and abuse, including death threats,' his lawyers wrote. 'The radio presenters were left by SCA as the convenient fall guys and scapegoats for SCA management decisions and non-compliance.' Greig made a tearful apology to Ms Saldanha's family at an inquest into the nurse's death in 2014, placing the blame on the radio station and commercial radio culture. Rhys Holleran, SCA's chief executive at the time of the incident, told the ABC in 2024 he suffers anxiety about it. 'I have always felt completely and utterly responsible for this,' he said. Christian says he started as a 2Day FM presenter just two days before the prank call, which he alleges breached the Australian Communications and Media Authority code of practice. He claims he was told in early 2013 the broadcaster would help restore his reputation and rebuild his career. He remained working for 2Day FM and did not pursue legal proceedings against them because of this promise, court documents say. However, the firm failed to provide meaningful health support, did not start a public relations campaign to rebuild his brand, and failed to offer meaningful opportunities or pay rises to reward his loyalty, he alleges. Instead, he claims he was 'gradually marginalised' within the organisation. Christian did not sign a release preventing him from speaking publicly about his time at the broadcaster, instead retaining lawyers after learning of his impending redundancy in February. 'Mr Christian claims that the redundancy was not genuine, particularly in circumstances where SCA still requires Mr Christian's former role to be performed,' court documents allege. Christian is seeking penalties, compensation for economic loss and damages. The matter is yet to appear before the Federal Court.
