Ohio Game Wardens Who Busted CJ Alexander Honored with Pope and Young Award
'We started [an award] back in 1995 to recognize wildlife biologists for their work, and I started thinking we need to something [similar] for conservation officers,' P&Y conservation chair and retired game warden Doug Clayton tells Outdoor Life. 'You look at all the work these officers do and it's [mostly] behind the scenes. So the general public doesn't see this, and even the hunting community, they know poaching goes on but they don't really know the extent of it.'
Gifford and Roberts are the first-ever co-recipients of the award as well as the first Ohioans, according to the agency. Giffords, 26, has worked for the DNR since 2023, while Roberts has more than 20 years with the agency. The two officers were selected for the award because of their roles investigating the now-notorious poaching case involving CJ Alexander.
After using a crossbow to poach what would have been Ohio's new No. 1 all-time typical whitetail, Alexander made up an elaborate story to cover up the fact that he committed more than a dozen related crimes, including repeated trespassing. He then shared that fabricated story to promote himself and the deer with multiple media outlets — which included interviews with Outdoor Life and selling his story to at least one other hunting outlet.
'This was an excellent case,' Clayton says. 'A lot of wildlife cases are cut and dry, but then you have these big ones that just spiderweb out — you find one thing that leads to something else, and sometimes you're dealing with multiple jurisdictions or the Feds. A lot of people just don't realize how involved some of these cases are, and what it takes to bring them to fruition.'
Gifford and Roberts conducted a careful investigation for a full year. Although Alexander repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and doubled down on his innocence, the two wardens eventually cracked the case wide open by securing his cell phone records. The texts, GPS location data, and other evidence therein revealed Alexander's long history with the buck he nicknamed 'Megatron', along with his true intentions for killing the deer.
In Alexander's own words, texted to his fiancé just a few weeks before he poached the 200-plus-inch buck: 'I'm gonna get offered stupid money for this deer head babe …. Like buying house type money … This deer is gonna make us money.'
Read Next: CJ Alexander to Serve Time, Pay $43K for Poaching Giant Ohio Buck and Trying to Cover It Up
In October 2024, Alexander pleaded guilty to 14 charges related to the poaching. He was sentenced in December to 90 days in jail, along with $43,000 in fines. Of that, $39,696.73 went directly to the Ohio Wildlife Fund to reimburse the state for the loss of such an incredible buck. (Like some states, Ohio calculates a special restitution fee based on total inches of antler of an illegally-taken deer.) Alexander's accomplices, his sister Kristina and his friends Corey and Zachary Haunert, also pleaded guilty and were charged separately.
The last recipient of P&Y's Wildlife Law Enforcement Officer Award was Lt. Stacey Lewton of the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission in 2023. Lewton and the NGPC were instrumental in the Hidden Hills Outfitters bust, which spanned multiple states and involved more than 30 other individuals, including the Bowmars.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Protesting in Ohio and Kentucky? Here's what you can, can't do under the law
Protests across Ohio on July 17 included an ICE protest on the Roebling Bridge in Greater Cincinnati that led to multiple arrests after a tense exchange between protesters and law enforcement officers. The rallies were organized in response to the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration, among other policies. Those arrested face charges such as rioting, unlawful assembly, failure to disperse, obstructing a highway, obstructing emergency responders, criminal mischief, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest, The Enquirer reports. What are your protest rights in Ohio and Kentucky? Can you wear a mask when protesting? Do you need a permit to organize a rally? Peaceful protests and assembly are protected under the First Amendment, but local or statewide restrictions still apply. Here's what protest attendees should know about their rights during demonstrations. Your rights when protesting: What Ohioans can and can't do during protests The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, assembly, and petition. Typically, demonstrations can happen in public places like streets, sidewalks, and parks. However, your freedom of expression could have limitations if it incites riots or violence. While not an exhaustive list, here are a few rules Ohio protestors must follow, according to the ACLU of Ohio and the Legal Aid Society of Cleveland. You can't protest on private property without permission from the owner. You cannot stop others from using a public space, such as by blocking traffic or pedestrian walkways. No fighting, rioting, or 'disorderly conduct' under Ohio law. Law enforcement can implement "time, place, and manner' restrictions like enforcing noise levels or permits. You may need a permit for events that block traffic or close down streets, or if you use amplifiers, such as bullhorns. Demonstrators are allowed to wear a mask as part of their protest, but they may be required to provide information if suspected of a crime. It is a federal crime to threaten to harm the president, the vice president, or a major candidate. Do not physically or verbally antagonize the police or law enforcement. Avoid carrying any drugs or weapons to protests. If arrested, you could face additional charges for possession. Refusing to provide information or providing false information when stopped is illegal. If you are arrested, the ACLU of Ohio provides additional guidance on what to do, such as not resisting arrest and your right to hire an attorney. What are Kentuckians' rights during protests? Similarly, the ACLU of Kentucky lists a few legal rules and tips for attending protests, among other suggestions, the Louisville Courier Journal reports: Your right to free speech is strongest in public spaces, such as streets, sidewalks and parks. Speech can be restricted on private property. In the event of a counter-protest, police can separate the two groups — as long as the groups can still see and hear each other. But they must treat protesters and counter-protesters equally. Memorize an emergency contact's phone number or write it on your arm in case you lose your phone or other belongings. If you are stopped by the police while protesting The ACLU suggests the following if you've been stopped by the police during a protest: Stay calm with your hands visible. Don't argue, resist, or obstruct the police, even if you believe they are violating your rights. Ask if you are free to leave. If you are under arrest, ask why and request a lawyer. You do not have to answer any questions. You can make a local phone call, and if you're calling your lawyer, the police are not allowed to listen. You do not have to consent to a search of yourself or your belongings. Police may "pat down" your clothing if they suspect you have a weapon. If you refuse a search, that may not stop them from searching you against your will, but objecting before it happens or during the search can be helpful in legal proceedings. Police officers may not confiscate or demand to view your photographs or video without a warrant, nor may they delete any data. If you believe your rights have been violated, the ACLU recommends writing down everything you can remember (including the officers' badge and patrol car numbers), contact information for witnesses, and pictures of injuries to file a written complaint. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Ohio protests lead to arrests: See protest rights, laws in Ohio, Kentucky Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Yahoo
Don't scan that QR code on Montreal parking meters. It's likely a fraud
The agency in charge of Montreal's parking meters is warning of potentially fraudulent QR codes posted on its signs. The Agence de mobilité durable de Montréal said in a media release on Tuesday that it was aware that some of its signs had been vandalized with a QR code that wasn't supposed to be there. The agency hung the signs on parking metres across the city to encourage people to download their new parking app, Mobicité. The signs have no QR code, but some users have reported seeing one posted on them. Do not scan the QR code, the agency said, it may direct you to a fraudulent or malicious website. "Our team is working hard to identify and remove them as quickly as possible," the media release said. "Thank you for your vigilance and for reporting any suspicious signs to us." The agency changed its parking app from P$ Service mobile, which allowed users to pay for parking, to the new app, Mobicité, to allow additional features in the coming years. For now, the Mobicité app will allow users to only pay for parking, like the old app did. But down the line, Laurent Chevrot, the general manager of the agency, says the app will add other functionalities over the next few years, such as the ability to provide parking information and customer service. "With the other application, that wasn't possible," he said. Mobicité rolled out at the beginning of June. It cost $719,000 and took 10 months to produce.


CBS News
15-07-2025
- CBS News
LA County awards $14 million to man who wrongfully served 20 years in prison
A Paramount man who spent 20 years behind bars for a wrongful murder conviction was awarded $14 million by Los Angeles County on Tuesday. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved the millions from the budgets of the Sheriff's Department and the District Attorney's Office to settle the wrongful conviction lawsuit of Alexander Torres. Torres was arrested in 2001 for the Paramount shooting death of a rival gang member. The 20-year-old was convicted of second-degree murder six months later and was sentenced to 40 years to life in state prison. He insisted he was innocent, and key evidence proving that someone else committed the killing led to his release from prison in 2021 -- after he had already served 20 years behind bars. The Innocence Project asked a judge for a finding of "factual innocence," stating that there wasn't any evidence that pointed to Torres's guilt, but rather that "a preponderance of the evidence" proved his innocence. Torres was accused of jumping out of a car and shooting rival gang member, Martin Guitron on Dec. 31, 2000, in Paramount. He was arrested on Jan. 18, 2001, and he admitted to investigators that he had confrontations with Guitron, but said he did not leave his house the night of the shooting. Torres was identified as a suspect, primarily based on eyewitness testimony from two people, who had conflicting accounts of who the shooter was. After his murder conviction, a private investigator hired by Torres' brother in 2006 interviewed the driver of the getaway car, who named another person as the shooter. The county's "Summary Corrective Action Plan" listed a series of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department investigative oversights and errors as justification for the settlement, including "Homicide Investigators' failure to follow proper investigative protocols regarding evidence and witness interviews."