Building more high-quality career pathways in Texas and beyond
Why it's important: Aligning workers' skills with employer needs expands economic mobility and contributes to enhanced regional competitiveness, new business development, and reduced recruitment and training costs.
For instance, increasing the share of working-age Americans with at least a bachelor's degree by 10% could lead to an annual GDP growth increase of almost one percentage point.*
The challenges: Insufficient resources, siloed policies, fragmented funding streams, difficulties collaborating and rapid labor market changes can make it difficult to create the necessary career pathways.
Despite these challenges, the demand for improved career pathways has sparked innovation, leading to promising strategies that can be replicated to accelerate progress.
📍 Texas, with more than a decade of investment in high-quality career pathways, can serve as a blueprint for communities looking to develop integrated education and workforce systems.
A new report from JPMorganChase explores five key insights from Texas' innovative career pathway strategies, including how the state enabled significant policy shifts — like Texas House Bill 8, a historic investment in the state's community colleges to boost student career outcomes.
Here's what's needed ➡️
1️⃣ Public-private partnerships.
Texas has demonstrated the importance of cross-sector collaborations between nonprofit organizations, government, business and philanthropic sectors.
These partnerships are essential in aligning education and workforce systems.
2️⃣ Strong data infrastructure.
A robust data infrastructure is essential for supporting high-quality career pathways — especially enhancing the capacity of tech platforms to share data across systems.
This infrastructure allows local intermediaries and to evaluate outcomes, inform policy recommendations and tailor programs to meet regional workforce demands.
3️⃣ Intermediaries developing leadership tables.
Intermediaries play a crucial role in engaging local stakeholders, including education institutions, business leaders and philanthropic organizations.
Strong intermediary organizations ensure that strategies are data-driven, have broad buy-in and contribute to successful policy implementation.
4️⃣ Stakeholder involvement.
HB 8 reflects public feedback from local stakeholders convened and requested by the Texas Commission on Community College Finance.
This inclusive approach ensures the funding model addresses the unique needs of various communities and institutions.
5️⃣ Workforce outcome-based funding.
HB 8 ties funding to measurable student career outcomes, such as earning credits of value, dual credit completion and successful transfers to four-year institutions.
This aligns education with employer needs and incentivizes colleges to support students in achieving credentials that lead to family-sustaining wages.
How it's done: These insights showcase how local leaders can unite to create a visionary, integrated education and workforce system that broadens opportunities for individuals and communities.
⭐️ An example: Recognizing the need to improve career pathways, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board released the "Building a Talent Strong Texas" strategic plan for higher education in 2015.
The goal: To have 60% of Texans ages 25 to 64 earn a degree certificate or other credential of value by 2030.**
While many states have established similar goals, Texas' plan is notable because of the leadership provided by local and statewide organizations that collaborated to advance solutions.
A key player in this effort is The Commit Partnership, a coalition of more than 200 organizations in Dallas County focused on improving educational outcomes and workforce readiness.
The Commit Partnership's progress in Dallas as well as input from other local leaders across the state has informed strategies developed by groups like Aim Hire Texas, a consortium of advocates, employers, nonprofit organizations, and education and training programs working to improve the Texas workforce system.
Together, the organizations brought employers to the table, including JPMorganChase, to inform alignment between labor needs and higher education in the region.
JPMorganChase has been one of the business leaders supporting these efforts to build high-quality career pathways and strengthen Texas community colleges.
Here's what else: High-quality student-level data from key state agencies has provided the backbone to understand, analyze and respond to educational and workforce needs.
Intermediary groups like Texas 2036 and The Commit Partnership utilize the data to address challenges, tailoring programs and championing policy changes that improve education and workforce outcomes.
As a result, Texas has developed a comprehensive system that provides detailed, disaggregated data that equips stakeholders with the information needed to refine metrics and outcomes through data-driven decision-making.
🎓 The results: The work of these cross-sector collaborations, along with strong data infrastructure, have laid the groundwork for advancements in Texas' education and workforce systems.
Looking ahead: By aligning community college funding with workforce outcomes, Texas is pointed to drive state and regional economic growth, ensuring students are equipped with the skills and credentials needed to thrive in a rapidly changing labor market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
How Democrats can stop talking past each other and start winning
A second group of moderates, including important donors, are libertarians who endorse ' Advertisement The third group of moderate Democrats yearns to turn back the clock to the New Deal coalition. A chief spokesperson is Ruy Teixeira of the Liberal Patriot newsletter. '[T]he New Deal Democrats were moderate and even small-c conservative in their social outlook,' he Advertisement Beginning in the 1970s, college-educated progressives began to focus on issues involving race, gender, the environment, and sexual freedom. Teixeira This brings us to the only moderate position that holds promise for Democrats: defining moderate as being pragmatic, rather than doctrinaire. College-educated progressives need to recognize that their priorities and their cultural values don't match those of most Americans. In 2024, inflation and the economy were Advertisement Centering that economic message is the first pragmatic step in rebuilding Democrats' brand to appeal to both college grads and noncollege grads. The second step is to recognize that cultural preferences differ across class lines. Non-elites value self-discipline because they need to get up every day, on time, without an attitude, to work at jobs with little autonomy. Consequently, they highly value traditional institutions that anchor self-discipline: religion, the military, the family. Those same institutions offer non-elites sources of social status independent of their subordinate positions in a capitalist economy. Blue-collar values reflect blue-collar lives. That's why, on cultural issues, college-educated progressives need to stop demanding a mind-meld with the Democratic Party. If you're playing to win, politics requires not purity but an ability to build coalitions with people whose values may differ from yours in fundamental ways. Democrats need to treat voters without college degrees as respected coalition partners, making tradeoffs. Advertisement This doesn't mean that progressives need to abandon their values; it means they have to act on them. Here are two uncomfortable facts: Progressive activists as a group are much
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
I didn't want to need free groceries
So I share Kidder's lament that feeding the hungry is on track to be a growth industry in Donald Trump's America. The Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Experience first. Before 2009, as the son of a judge and the privileged middle class, I'd never been unemployed and in need of charity in three decades of working. I loved what I did, even though freelance writing is a constant scramble for income. I've always read a book before bed; as a freelancer, I chose only books for which I was earning a reviewer's paycheck. Advertisement When the recession and its double-digit unemployment hit, the 'subprime mortgages,' 'mortgage-backed securities,' and unregulated 'shadow banks' that underlay them — and that many Americans had never heard of — unleashed work-killing forces too devastating for individual initiative to counter. Even wealthy Harvard scrapped a lucrative project (by my bank account's standards) that I'd done for four straight summers. My then-wife's part-time job invaluably backstopped the family income. But after a year of little work and with no idea how long I'd be idle, I despaired of ever being employed again. Free groceries to stretch our household resources seemed the only responsible path, especially with a child to feed. Advertisement The other folks in St. Paul's basement made for an interesting cross-section of people. Some were fellow baby boomers. The age and dress of others suggested they were students, presumably not destitute but nevertheless on a budget as they contended with Greater Boston's formidable living costs. No one dressed in rags. (Neither did the recipients Kidder observed, which he attributes to their efforts 'to ward off disgrace' from having to seek charity.) My anxious heart beat fast during my first time at the pantry. Normally a chatterbox, I made little small talk with others. It took a number of weeks before the habitual visits and the saintly volunteers' freedom from judgment thawed some of my embarrassment. I also found psychic balm in the relief of free food for my household's budget. Not everyone adjusted as easily. At least one person at the pantry teared up at having to seek aid in public. I never saw her return. Advertisement The volunteers who set out and distributed food never questioned who we were or why we were there. Hard hearts will call that poor quality control. Those who know better, who relied on the kindness of these strangers, recognize it as mindfulness of recipients' dignity. Today, those who do such work can't fully backfill the Beautiful Bill's shrinkage of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly called food stamps). Kidder notes that the national food bank network Feeding America says SNAP supplied nine times as much food as its own agency's food banks do. That the bill's backers had not just food support but the broader safety net in their sights is clear from the legislation's attaching work requirements to Medicaid. Two years ago, perhaps anticipating this dark American moment, Republican Representative Steve Scalise Yet do work. Work requirements Perhaps if our leaders saw who goes to food pantries and why — perhaps if they spent a week or two living as pantry patrons — the mythic myopia would lift from their eyes. But there are none so blind as those who will not see. Advertisement
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Gutting EPA climate rules will put lives at risk
Removing the greenhouse gas regulations will increase extreme weather and pollution, which will put lives at risk, hurt the economy, and increase Americans' health costs by shifting costs to lost productivity and lost income. Advertisement The very real impact of extreme weather is hard to miss. Brutal heat is becoming the norm. Take last month, when Advertisement Further, an estimated But beyond the headlines of death and destruction, extreme weather is also having an impact on daily lives. Climate change compromises livelihoods, particularly for the millions who work outdoors. If it's too hot to harvest a crop or work on a construction site, it will impact workers' incomes as well as the bottom line for businesses. Extreme heat causes In the agriculture sector, extreme heat drives up food prices, because there are fewer days when food can be harvested — a Cutting regulation isn't saving ordinary Americans money; it's saving big business money. The EPA Advertisement The sad truth is the administration is abandoning its responsibility to act, and American citizens and people around the globe will pay the price. Denying the incontrovertible truth about climate change risks more death and damage to property and business. Further, under the guise of deregulation, the administration is strategically undermining the authority of scientists and the public's access to facts on how greenhouse gas emissions will impact lives and livelihoods. White House officials will not back down. Instead Congress and state and city officials, as well as courts, must block the plan. Otherwise, we risk deepening misunderstanding with the public, economic damage, more loss of life, and putting our long-term prosperity at risk. This isn't giving Americans more choice, it's stripping them of their right to clean air, safe communities, and a secure job.
