Scottish Parliament won't release files on trans toilet policy
The National lodged a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the Parliament asking for documents, emails, memos, or other correspondence relating to the decision, or around the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) guidance.
Holyrood officials released one email sent to parliamentary staff from the senior executive team setting out its position but did not give out any background information.
In its refusal letter, the Scottish Parliament admitted it held the documentation we had requested, but cited several exemptions.
READ MORE: Scottish Government changes guidance that led to Supreme Court ruling
They claimed it would 'inhibit substantially the free and frank provision of advice', that disclosure would 'prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs' and that it refers to legal advice, which is exempt.
On May 9, Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone announced that trans women would be barred from using female toilets following the Supreme Court judgment on the definition of a woman and the subsequent EHRC guidance.
The move led to MSPs and staff writing to Holyrood's governing body expressing 'deep concern' over the decision, but the policy has remained in place.
We previously told how the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) defended the decision in the Holyrood chamber last week.
(Image: PA) The Scottish Parliament said it was refusing our request as correspondence related to a 'sensitive topic'.
'While an interim position concerning single sex facilities at the Scottish Parliament has been taken, work is planned to inform further practical changes which may be needed,' it stated.
'As such, this remains a live topic, and parliamentary officials must be able to communicate with each other freely and gather information for the purposes of provision of advice to the SPCB. 'The SPCB agreed to conduct an extensive consultation to inform what further changes may be required to facilities in the medium to longer term.
'This consultation will also take account of the updated EHRC statutory code of practice when it becomes available later this year.
'Disclosure of information in response to a freedom of information request has the effect of releasing information into the public domain.'
READ MORE: I spent all day counting Keir Starmer's 17 U-turns — see the full list
The refusal notice also claimed releasing the documents would discourage officials from 'engaging freely with each other when gathering information'.
It added that it would not release correspondence or complaints as it was not in the public interest.
'It is important that members of the public feel free to express themselves on the matter they are corresponding about without the fear that their correspondence or our reply will be released into the public domain,' the notice added.
In the one-page document that was released through the FOI, officials told staff in an email dated May 8 that they wanted to 'reassure you that we are managing our response at Holyrood with the utmost care and sensitivity'.
'We remain deeply committed to ensuring that all our staff feel supported, and we will continue to uphold our values of respect and inclusiveness as an employer,' they said, before explaining that all staff and visitors were able to use gender neutral facilities on the parliamentary estate.
'Holyrood must be a safe, respectful and inclusive environment in which to work and visit and one feature of an inclusive environment is the availability of convenient facilities for all individuals,' the email added. Officials then pointed staff to support and counselling services.
'In the meantime, Directors and I are happy to answer any questions you might have and we encourage all managers at Holyrood to take steps to support their trans and non-binary staff, offering ongoing wellbeing support,' the email concluded.
Last week, Scottish Tory MSP Jackson Carlaw, responding on behalf of the SPCB, insisted the governing body had 'legal responsibilities'.
READ MORE: Labour's 'minor' U-turn will leave benefits system 'woefully inadequate'
'Our job, even though we are politicians, is not to debate the politics of an issue, but to ensure that we are implementing the law as the law is communicated to us,' Carlaw told the chamber.
And, on Monday, the Westminster Parliament implemented the same ban, after stating they would wait for official guidance to be published.
It came after a transgender barrister was accosted by gender critical activists outside of a women's bathroom on the parliamentary estate.
The EHRC was forced to rescind part of its interim guidance amid a legal challenge. Full guidance is expected to be published following a consultation, which is currently underway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rod Stewart comes out in support of Reform UK
Rocker Rod Stewart has publicly endorsed Nigel Farage and the Reform UK party, urging his fans to give Farage a chance. Stewart expressed dissatisfaction with the current government and criticised Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer 's new Brexit deal, stating he is also 'fed up with the Tories'. He said Farage is coming across well as a political option for the UK. Stewart's current support for Farage contrasts with his 2024 criticism of the politician for blaming the West for the war in Ukraine. Stewart has been a vocal supporter of Ukraine since the conflict began, even renting out a home for a refugee family.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
I think Keir Starmer's ineptitude here takes some beating
Sir Keir Starmer pays for that first challenge through reputational damage. We will all pay for the second challenge through other spending curbs and possible tax hikes. I have covered politics for the odd decade. I have witnessed missteps aplenty by leaders from each and every political party. However, the ineptitude displayed here takes some beating. Read More: Consider the PM's demeanour. There he was at the NATO summit, promising a substantial increase in defence spending. Which, in itself, leaves some Labour MPs disquieted. Asked about the growing insurrection over cuts to disability payments, he dismissed the complaints as 'noises off'. Cue yet more anger from discontented backbenchers, furious that their genuine concerns for the disadvantaged were downplayed in such a fashion. Then, inevitably changing tack, he conceded on Thursday that there would be talks with the dissidents, aimed at achieving a settlement in line with 'Labour values of fairness.' The rebels duly entered those talks. But many were privately asking themselves what happened to those 'Labour values' when Ministers proposed a package of reforms which their own official advisers said would push a quarter of a million people into poverty, including 50,000 children. For pity's sake, what did Sir Keir and his Cabinet think the reaction would be to such a forecast? Meek acquiescence? In viewing this spectacle, I could not help thinking of Neil Kinnock's 1985 conference speech, condemning Militant, when he summoned up 'the grotesque chaos of a Labour council – a Labour council – hiring taxis to scuttle round a city handing out redundancy notices to its own workers.' Change the accent, excise the oratory and you have Keir Starmer heading a Labour government – a Labour government – driving people into poverty with cuts in disability support. Sir Keir has now performed a hat-trick of U-turns. On winter fuel payments, on a statutory inquiry into grooming gangs – and on welfare. This is by far the most substantive. Can he come back from this? He can – although there is a much shorter electoral timetable in Scotland. But, still, it makes us revisit basic questions about his leadership. Firstly, last July's big Labour win is not solely or even chiefly down to him. He entered Downing Street because folk were heartily sick of the Tories – and sought a conduit to kick them out. As things stand, Reform seem to be offering an alternative for those who have broadened their disgust – and are utterly sick of established politics, full stop. Secondly, with some exceptions, the team around him have failed to shine. Including the Chancellor. Was there really nobody to suggest gently that the emperor was somewhat short of bodily cover on the benefits issue? Were they, perhaps understandably to some degree, so engrossed in global crisis that they failed to notice – or, rather, sufficiently address – the concerns of their backbenchers over the most distressed and disadvantaged of our citizens? Thirdly, and ironically, the very weakness of the Conservatives adds to Sir Keir's problems. To be blunt, he has nothing to beat. Relatively little is required of him in the Commons or in public discourse. Finally, those Labour values. When you contemplate Sir Keir, do you really summon up principles such as egalitarianism and fairness? Yes, you will know of his upbringing, His mum, the nurse. His father, the toolmaker. He told us often enough. But do values of commonality and collective endeavour shine through from him? I get the concept. He took over from Jeremy Corbyn and felt obliged to stress that Labour had moved from the Left, had changed – and would, consequently, change the country. On assuming office, Rachel Reeves felt the need to assuage the markets with a balanced budget. Hence the stress she placed upon curbing winter fuel payments. For a Labour Chancellor, it was deliberately counter-intuitive. Again, I get it. In due course, they backed down on winter fuel. And the cuts to disability benefits went too far for their party. Way too far. And for the voters. By chance, I chaired a conference on the issue in Glasgow this month. Two things stood out. Deep, genuine apprehension over the benefit cuts. And entrenched distrust over the package of support for getting jobs. Labour know they got this badly wrong. The emphasis on job creation needed to come first. The cuts needed to be moderated. Both will now happen. Sir Keir will insist that reform is still on track. However, this has been a fundamentally damaging episode for the PM. I understand the motivation. The desire to be fiscally cautious, to generate funds for spending in other quarters. But this was the wrong target, introduced in the wrong way. No doubt temporarily, Sir Keir seemed to forget which party he was leading – and in which legislature. He is Prime Minister, primus inter pares, completely dependent upon Commons votes. Not a dismissive, stand-alone President. Those were not 'noises off'. They were concerns voiced by his backbenchers, his supporters, the bulwark of his power. Then there is Scotland. Where former Labour Minister Brian Wilson, writing in The Herald, urged a rethink to avoid 'a deep and lasting split'. Where former MSP Neil Findlay questioned the sanity of Labour MPs – while warning that their chances of re-election would be reduced, not enhanced. Where the Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was left stranded. Backing the principle of reform – while urging 'fairness'. In practice, as his MP colleagues made up their minds, his influence appeared minimal. He was duly lampooned by John Swinney at Holyrood – as the SNP cited figures indicating that child poverty is down in Scotland, by contrast with England and Wales. There is a way back for the PM. There is almost always a way back. But this has been deeply, deeply damaging. For Sir Keir Starmer, never glad confident morning again. Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre – and Dundee United FC
Belfast Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Ireland's media watchdog defends €500,000 funding of ‘Kneecap' film as Belfast rappers prepare for Glastonbury gig
Irish media regulator boss has defended his decision to give nearly half a million euro (£427k) in funding to Kneecap's film. The Belfast rap trio will take to the stage at Glastonbury this afternoon, despite opposition from UK prime minister Keir Starmer who said he did not feel it was 'appropriate' given the current court case against band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh.
