logo
Trump's ‘reciprocal' tariff pause is about to expire: cue the confusion

Trump's ‘reciprocal' tariff pause is about to expire: cue the confusion

RNZ News8 hours ago
By
Elisabeth Buchwald
, CNN
US President Donald Trump holds a chart titled 'Reciprocal Tariffs' during an event in April.
Photo:
AFP / Brendan Smialowski
The 90-day deadline US President Donald Trump set for countries to make trade deals with the United States or risk substantially higher tariffs is just days away. What will happen after that's reached at 12:01am ET on 9 July (4pm, July 9 NZT) is anyone's best guess.
The stakes could not be higher, with the entire global economy on notice.
On 2 April (3 April NZT), a date Trump dubbed "Liberation Day," he unveiled
new, "reciprocal" tariff rates
for key US trading partners, with some levies as high as 50 percent. Collectively, the rates were the highest the US has charged on foreign goods in over a century. Economists quickly sounded alarms about a recession hitting not just certain countries, but rather the whole world.
As the tariffs
went into effect
on 9 April, they sparked a sell-off on Wall Street and the bond market rebelled, forcing Trump to announce a three-month pause to give countries more time to solidify deals with the US, saying investors "were getting a little bit yippy, a little afraid."
Since then, almost all goods the US imports have been subject to a minimum 10 percent tariff. Stocks, meanwhile, have not only recovered all those losses but have set multiple new record highs. And inflation has barely budged. But if tariffs start to rise again and inflation roars back, those gains could quickly get erased all over again.
After months of meeting with foreign government officials and countless claims that several trading partners were on the cusp of completing deals, only three have been announced. One of those, with Vietnam, has yet to be finalized and few details are known about it.
Still, the Trump administration is advertising that a flurry of deals are forthcoming. At the same time, the president has threatened to send letters to countries that don't ink deals, telling them the rate at which their exports to the US will be taxed.
Leading up to 9 July, Trump administration officials threatened to simply return to April tariff rates, or possibly even higher levies. They also floated the possibility of extending the pause for countries "negotiating in good faith," without defining what that means or which it includes.
It's not clear where Trump, who will get the ultimate say, stands.
"We can do whatever we want. We could extend it; we could make it shorter," Trump recently said. "I'd like to make it shorter. I'd like to just sent letters out to everybody, 'Congratulations, you're paying 25 percent.'"
"We'll look at how a country treats us - are they good, are they not so good - some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out," Trump also recently said.
On Friday, he said he'd begin sending letters over the coming days.
"They'll range in value from maybe 60 percent or 70 percent tariffs to 10 percent and 20 percent tariffs," Trump said.
For many countries, such rates would deal an even bigger economic blow compared to the levels Trump announced in April. But countries may have the opportunity to still negotiate, given Trump said most new rates won't take effect until 1 August.
The deal Trump announced on Wednesday with Vietnam, which calls for minimum tariffs of 20 percent on Vietnamese goods, double the rate throughout the three-month pause, has raised the possibility that countries may not be able to score lower rates even if they reach a trade agreement.
But considering tariffs on Vietnam were set to rise to a minimum of 46 percent if the rates Trump announced in April held - which was among the highest Trump announced - 20 percent suddenly feels like a relief.
That may be an intentional strategy on Trump's part, allowing him to stick to his major campaign promise of levying higher tariffs on other nations in an effort to raise revenues and bring manufacturing jobs back to the US.
"On balance, we take the US-Vietnam accord as a positive step toward more durable bilateral deals for the US and toward greater clarity for investors," Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, global head of equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, said in a note last week.
"Headline risks around trade may persist as negotiations continue, but we think the market impact should moderate as President Trump's negotiating tactics become increasingly familiar," he said. "Ultimately, we expect the US administration to prioritise economic stability over more maximalist tariffs, especially ahead of the 2026 midterm elections."
-
CNN
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's An Eventful Week Ahead
It's An Eventful Week Ahead

Scoop

time5 hours ago

  • Scoop

It's An Eventful Week Ahead

Here's our take on current events It's a big week. For us of course, our focus is on the RBNZ's Monetary Policy Review on Wednesday. After six straight meetings delivering rate cuts, totalling 225bps, the RBNZ looks set to take a breather. The last time we heard from the RBNZ was, simply put, kind of weird. The May statement read dovish, with forecasts for the Kiwi economy appropriately downgraded. Similar to our house view, the RBNZ were clear to point out that trade uncertainty presents downside risks to growth and inflation. But the communication by RBNZ officials, along with the 1-5 dissenting vote, stopped short in signalling an easing bias consistent with their outlook and OCR track. Market pricing allows the RBNZ to skip this meeting, and come back in August without causing a stir. Just 3bps of a cut (12% chance) is priced in for Wednesday. For August, the market is pricing in 16bps (just shy of a 65% chance) of a rate cut. Wednesday's decision is another case of what we think they should do versus what we think they will do. While a hold is the likely outcome, we recommend a cut. The need for lower rates is clear. The RBNZ themselves have signalled the need for further cuts. So why wait? Yes, there is worry right now about the recent spike in inflation we're experiencing. But monetary policy makers must look through short-term volatility, even if it's eye-watering. Monetary policy is set today to influence the medium-term. And risks to the medium-term outlook are skewed to the downside. A global growth slowdown is expected with US tariffs. NZ export prices may come under pressure. Also, significant spare capacity remains within the Kiwi economy. Both these factors are disinflationary. And we've seen that in the QSBO survey. There is a net 2% of firms looking to reduce their prices in the coming months. History tells us that pricing behaviour like that only happens during recessions. All up, the real risk is that inflation undershoots the RBNZ's 2% midpoint. While the RBNZ may not pull the trigger this week, we expect them to maintain a dovish bias due to the balance of risks. Beyond the RBNZ, we'll also hear from the RBA this week. Meeting tomorrow, the RBA is expected to resume their easing cycle and deliver a 25bp cut to 3.60%. Having been late to hike, the RBA has also been late to cut. A cut tomorrow would mark just the third in this cycle. Compared to the 6 cuts we've had here at home. But the tides have turned. While the RBNZ has turned more ambiguous, the RBA has become more dovish. Because Aussie inflation is sitting at the lower end of the RBA's target band, and the labour market starting to lose its lustre. And of course, we can't forget that July 9th (US time) marks the deadline of President Donald Trump's 90 day pause on reciprocal tariffs. Now, with just 3 deals across the line out of the 70+ countries who were set to come to the negotiation table, an extension of some sort seems likely. That, or a mad dash of deals to the finish line for negotiations. Although we're now also hearing about a more 'Dear John' letter-style approach from Trump with the White House set to send letters to countries outlining its new tariff rate. Still, as we all know, no one can truly predict Donald Trump's next move. We expect a route of de-escalation to remain the path forward. But we remain wary of the risks at present. Just last week, Trump threatened Japan with a 30-35% tariff rate, up from their 23% liberation day tariff, if a deal wasn't reached before the July 9th deadline. Again, maybe it's just more big talk, but it's a reminder that no de-escalation is yet set in stone. And in any case, the ante is high over this week as we wait for developments to unfold. At least in some semi-positive news, a trade deal was struck between the US and Vietnam last week. Under the deal, the US will now impose a 20% tariff on Vietnamese exports, compared to the 46% announced on Liberation Day, but higher than the 10% of the last 3 months. Additionally, the agreement also sees the US implementing a 40% tariff on any products originating from another country sent through Vietnam for final shipment to the US – a shot likely fired towards China. Meanwhile in exchange, Vietnam is giving the US tariff-free access to its markets. Charts of the Week: The 'on the ground' business feel. Last week's Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion by NZIER showed that the gap between hopeful optimism and the harsh reality of daily business, continues to widen. Meanwhile firms are saying they are feeling less price pressure and passing on less pressure. The argument for stimulatory monetary policy is unequivocal. Price-related indicators suggest that inflation remains well-contained. Both cost and pricing indicators eased over the June quarter. Fewer firms reported an increase in costs, from half of firms to a net 42%. The improvement was likely supported by the recent appreciation in the Kiwi dollar after starting the year on the backfoot (trading in the 55-56c range). At the industry level, the experience however is mixed. Fewer retailers experienced higher costs over the quarter, while cost pressures have intensified in the building sector. A net 59% of builders reported increased costs, up from net 35% in Q1). Despite this, the building sector reported the biggest fall in pricing – from a net 3% raising their prices last quarter, to a net 35% decreasing their prices. Meanwhile, pricing across retailers held steady. Overall, the weak demand environment continues to weigh on firms' pricing power. A net 1% of firms had dropped their prices over the quarter, and a net 2% expect to do the same in the coming quarter. Outside of the Covid pandemic, 2009 was the last time the survey pointed to an expectation for price declines. Another piece of good news to come out of the survey was the long awaited lift in investment intentions. After 13 consecutive quarters of negative investment intentions (excluding a short-lived blip following the election), investment intentions are finally back in the black. Well, mostly. A net 1% of firms are still planning on reducing investment in buildings. But a net 8% of firms are planning to get back to investing in plant and machinery over the coming year. The Government's 'Investment Boost' scheme has likely helped get some firms off the side lines. But we imagine others will still be holding off until they have more conviction about a sustained recovery in demand. Looking over at hiring, firms continued to cut headcount over Q2, though fewer than over Q1. A net 12% of firms reduced staff numbers in the June quarter compared with the net 17% in the March quarter. Although it seems hiring in the quarter ahead seems more promising with a net 4% of firms looking at expanding headcount. Check out our full review – Reality bites, as business optimism improves.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store