US court allows Trump to keep control of National Guard in LA
A US appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump can keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles, despite objections from city leaders and California Governor Gavin Newsom.Trump deployed the troops in response to widespread protests against his immigration crackdown. Local officials called it an unnecessary provocation.A three-judge panel on Thursday said he was within his rights to order the troops into service to "protect federal personnel... [and] property". Trump called it a "big win".The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when mobilising the troops.
In that earlier ruling, Judge Charles Breyer said Trump "did not" follow the law set by Congress on the deployment of a state's National Guard."His actions were illegal... He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith," he wrote in his decision.The judge however stayed the order until 13 June to give the Trump administration time to appeal against it, which it did almost immediately after.Thursday's unanimous ruling said Trump's "failure to issue the federalisation order directly 'through' the Governor of California does not limit his otherwise lawful authority to call up the National Guard"."This is much bigger than Gavin [Newsom], because all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done," Trump wrote on social media after the decision.He also congratulated the court, adding: "America is proud of you tonight!" The 38-page ruling, however, said the judges disagreed with the president on the merits of the legal challenge against his use of the National Guard. It said his decision to use the troops was not "completely insulated from judicial review".Newsom responded to the decision, saying the court "rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court."We will not let this authoritarian use of military soldiers against citizens go unchecked", he wrote on X, adding: "Donald Trump is not a king and not above the law."The court's decision allows for the continued deployment of around 4,000 troops to Los Angeles. The Trump administration says they have been protecting federal immigration agents and federal property during raids.It said it took over California's National Guard to restore order and to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents as they conducted raids across Los Angeles to detain people they believed were in the country illegally.Trump also ordered 700 Marines to the city, despite Newsom's objections. The National Guard was last deployed by a president without a governor's consent during the civil rights era more than 50 years ago.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pam Bondi fires three DOJ prosecutors who were involved in prosecuting January 6 rioters, report says
The Department of Justice has reportedly fired at least three career prosecutors who worked on cases against January 6 rioters. The prosecutors included two supervisors who oversaw the sweeping DOJ case against the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol in early 2021, as well as a third attorney, the Associated Press reports. The attorneys were fired on Friday in a letter signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi informing them they were 'removed from federal service effective immediately,' NBC News reports. The Independent has contacted the Justice Department for comment. The reported firings come after the administration axed about a dozen lower-level DOJ officials who worked on the January 6 cases, and pardoned more than 1,500 people convicted in Capitol riot cases, including violent offenders. Separately, earlier this year, the administration removed more than a dozen prosecutors involved in prior criminal investigations into Donald Trump, including several who worked for Jack Smith, the special counsel bringing a now-dismissed election subversion case against the Republican. 'You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,' a letter to these officials, obtained by CNN, said. The White House has also sought to penalize law firms tied to perceived opponents of the president, including Smith and prominent Democrats, attempting to strip their security clearances and punish federal contractors that did business with them. On the campaign trail, Trump referred to the mob that stormed the Capitol to overturn the certification of his 2020 election loss, injuring about 150 police officers in a riot that ultimately led to at least seven deaths, as ' hostages.' The January 6 case was the largest in Justice Department history, netting over 1,500 convictions and requiring scores of federal attorneys, many of whom remain with the government. Despite erasing this prosecution against mass disturbance from the books, since taking office, the Trump administration has sought a firm response to civil unrest targeting his policies, deploying federal agents, Marines, and the National Guard for a nearly unprecedented civil law enforcement role in response to Los Angeles protests against immigration raids.
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Republican congressman Don Bacon of Nebraska will not seek re-election
Republican congressman and vocal Donald Trump critic Don Bacon is reportedly not going to seek re-election during the midterm races in 2026. The conservative politician represents a swing district in Nebraska that includes Omaha, and word of his plans prompted Democratic figures to signal optimism that they could take the seat as the party tries to regain a House majority it has not had since 2023. Bacon's decision was first reported on Friday by the outlets Punchbowl News and NOTUS before being confirmed on Saturday by the Washington Post. NOTUS and the Post cited anonymous sources familiar with the situation, with the former of those adding that Bacon would make a formal announcement in the coming days. While Bacon had not immediately commented on the reports, his verified social media account did engage with multiple posts expressing 'good riddance' to him. He called the author of one such post 'an idiot' and told another who claimed he was a thinly veiled Democrat that he was 'the real Republican', having supported the party since he was 13 in 1976. The second congressional district of Nebraska that Bacon represents voted for Kamala Harris when she lost to Trump during November's White House race. It also voted for Joe Biden when he took the Oval Office from Trump four years earlier. And in May, Omaha elected its first-ever Black mayor: John Ewing Jr, who defeated three-term Republican incumbent Jean Stothert. Bacon's politics have come to reflect those realities in his district to some extent. The retired US air force brigadier general in May demanded the removal of Trump's defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, after he shared information about military strikes on Yemen in a Signal messaging app group chat that inadvertently included the editor of the Atlantic. Though the president chose to keep Hegseth in place despite the so-called Signalgate scandal, Bacon told the Post in an interview that he 'would have been fired' at any point in his military career for doing what Hegseth did. Separately, in a Post opinion column, Bacon criticized the brutal job and spending cuts that the Trump administration has inflicted within the federal government since the president retook office in January. He filed a bill aiming to hand Congress control over tariffs rather than continue leaving that power with the president as Trump upended financial markets by imposing substantial levies on some of the US's largest trading partners. Furthermore, he stood as the lone House Republican to vote against a measure that would take Trump's executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the 'Gulf of America' and make it law. 'I'm not into doing silly stuff,' Bacon, who joined Congress in January 2017, wrote on social media. 'It is sophomoric.' And he has said he and his family endured threats after he opposed Ohio Republican congressman Jim Jordan's unsuccessful 2023 bid to become House speaker, which at the time had been endorsed by Trump in between his two presidencies. 'I'd rather be a defender of the traditional conservative values than just be a team player,' Bacon said to Omaha's KMTV news station in May. 'I think – a team going in the wrong direction, you need somebody to speak up and try to stand for what's right.' A statement distributed by Democratic congressional campaign committee spokesperson Madison Andrus on Friday said that Bacon's foregoing re-election marked a 'vote of no-confidence for House Republicans and their electoral prospects'. 'The writing has been on the wall for months,' Andrus's statement also said. In a separate statement, the Nebraska Democratic party's chair, Jane Kleeb, said her party's prospective candidates 'truly represent the values of the district' Bacon's seat is in. 'We are ready for change,' Kleeb said.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The death toll in a landslide in Colombia rises to 22 with 8 missing
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
