logo
Government urges Fujitsu to pay compensation to victims of Post Office scandal

Government urges Fujitsu to pay compensation to victims of Post Office scandal

They also argued the under-fire company 'should be nowhere near' new Government contracts as it emerged it continued to secure lucrative multimillion-pound deals with Whitehall, bankrolled by the taxpayer.
The company has already acknowledged it has a 'moral obligation' to contribute to compensation, pending the outcome of the public inquiry led by Sir Wyn Williams.
Chair Sir Wyn Williams (Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry)
The firm has come under renewed pressure after the publication of the first part of Sir Wyn's final report.
It found around 1,000 people were wrongly prosecuted and convicted after Fujitsu's defective Horizon accounting system made it appear as though money was missing at their Post Office branches.
Some victims were sent to prison or financially ruined, others were shunned by their communities, and some took their own lives.
The long-running battle for justice accelerated dramatically after ITV broadcast the drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, which highlighted the scandal.
Sir Wyn said around 10,000 people are eligible to submit compensation claims following what has been dubbed as the worst miscarriage of justice in British legal history.
Labour former MP Kevan Jones, who now sits in the upper chamber as Lord Beamish, has been a long-standing champion for the subpostmasters.
Kevan Jones (PA)
He said: 'To date, the Government and taxpayers have paid over a billion pounds, quite rightly, to those victims.
'Fujitsu have not paid one penny piece. They may have a moral obligation, but moral obligations do not pay compensation.'
He added: 'So when will the Government get on and force Fujitsu to act on its moral obligations, put its hands in its pockets and at least pay some interim payments?
Responding, Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent said: 'With regards to the payments by Fujitsu, we urge them to make interim payments, but there are ongoing conversations with Fujitsu, including regular meetings with the Crown representative, the Cabinet Office and DBT (the Department for Business and Trade) and we will continue to have such meetings.'
Conservative peer Lord Arbuthnot, who played a pivotal role in exposing the scandal, said: 'Fujitsu has paid not one penny towards the victims of the havoc and misery that it helped to cause.
'Is the Government – is the country – over a barrel to Fujitsu? If not, why is Fujitsu still winning government work? If we are, what are the Government doing about it?'
Lady Anderson said: 'They have accepted that they have a moral obligation to give funds, but he will be even more aware than I am that we are yet to see a penny.
'Fujitsu have agreed that they will have to make a financial contribution, but I am urged not to give a running commentary, although we will welcome any interim payment in due course.'
In addition to extensions available under Fujitsu's existing contracts, a further 12 new deals had been struck with the company over the last year.
The Government has said the majority are for services already provided by Fujitsu and were put in place to ensure continuity of services.
Liberal Democrat Lord Clement-Jones raised concerns over HM Revenue & Customs continuing to award contacts to Fujitsu.
He said: 'In the light of the Horizon report, which condemns Fujitsu's conduct as a key contributor to the suffering of thousands of innocent people, isn't it already very clear that Fujitsu should be nowhere near any new contract?'
Lady Anderson said: 'Some of this is about continuity of service, to make sure that we are still able to have business supply secured.'
Given the 'human tragedies' caused by the wrongful convictions of subpostmasters, Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick pressed the minister over due diligence measures 'to ensure that contractors with a history of significant failures or legal issues can demonstrate that they have addressed these concerns before being awarded new contracts'.
Lady Anderson said new procurement legislation provided buyers with more scope to exclude suppliers who had performed poorly on previous contracts.
She added: 'Due diligence on such failures is also more straightforward as the act now provides for the sharing of information on poorly performing suppliers.'
A Fujitsu spokesperson said: 'We remain committed to providing our full cooperation to the inquiry as Sir Wyn prepares his final report and we are engaged with Government regarding Fujitsu's contribution to compensation.'
They added: 'We continue to work with the UK Government to ensure we adhere to the voluntary restrictions we put in place regarding bidding for new contracts while the Post Office inquiry is ongoing.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside hellhole jail where British Angel Delight drug smugglers face terrifying 'threats'
Inside hellhole jail where British Angel Delight drug smugglers face terrifying 'threats'

Daily Mirror

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Inside hellhole jail where British Angel Delight drug smugglers face terrifying 'threats'

Three British drug smugglers have been spared the death penalty in Indonesia, but experts reveal that the conditions they will face whilst serving their sentences will be hard to endure Three British drug mules have been sentenced to one year in prison after being caught smuggling over 900 grams of cocaine into Indonesia. ‌ At first, it was feared that all three could face the death penalty after coming afoul of the country's strict anti-drug laws. However, Lisa Stocker, 39, her partner, Jon Collyer, 39, and accomplice Phineas Float, 31, were spared this fate - and could be back in the UK relatively soon after finishing their prison sentences. ‌ The trio were arrested on February 1 at Bali's international airport, after a routine search found 17 packets of Angel Delight in their luggage, in which £300,000 of cocaine was hidden. It comes after a woman, 20, was found dead on bus with 26 iPhones glued to her body. ‌ Collyer had 10 of the packets in his suitcase, and Stocker had seven, and their accomplice, Float, was due to receive the 922g of the Class A drug a few days later. All three pleaded guilty to the smuggling charges and were sentenced to one year in prison. Because of time served, they should be home by January 2026 - but the conditions they will have to endure in the meantime will likely take a "heavy psychological toll", experts have warned. All three of the drug smugglers are expected to serve their sentences in Kerkoban prison - a facility notorious for its overcrowded conditions, gang deaths, and riots. ‌ Criminologist and psychologist Alex Iszatt explains to the Mirror: "Unlike many foreign drug offenders in Indonesia who face long sentences or even the death penalty, this case is unusual for the relatively light sentencing. The court pointed to their remorse and polite behaviour as mitigating factors. But that doesn't make their time behind bars any easier. "Jonathan Collyer, Lisa Stocker, and Phineas Float have avoided execution, yes, but their one-year prison sentences will still be brutal – marked by harsh conditions, isolation, and a heavy psychological toll, even for such a short term. "Indonesian prisons, especially Bali's notorious Kerobokan facility, are overcrowded, under-resourced, and riddled with corruption." ‌ Adam Jones, Legal Expert at HD Claims, echoes these sentiments, explaining that despite the short length of their sentences, it will still be an incredibly challenging period for the three Brits. "While the couple have avoided the death penalty – which is still a legal punishment for drug trafficking in Bali – their sentence will still be extremely tough by UK standards," Adam says, adding, "Prison conditions in Bali are known to be strict and, in some cases, harsh – with overcrowding, limited access to healthcare, and hard labour not uncommon. Communication with family members is possible, but often restricted and subject to state approval, making regular contact a challenge." ‌ Inaccessible healthcare will present problems for Stocker, who is said to suffer from some health problems. "Health concerns add another layer of difficulty. Lisa reportedly has pre-existing skin cancer, and Indonesia's prisons have very limited healthcare facilities. These prisons are also hotspots for diseases like tuberculosis and dengue fever, while chronic illnesses often go untreated," says Alex. Both experts felt that being foreign nationals in the notorious jail will bring extra challenges for Stocker, Collyer, and Float. ‌ "Foreign prisoners may also face added scrutiny or stigma and often struggle to understand or access legal or procedural support compared to local inmates," Adam explains. Alex noted, "As foreigners convicted of drug offences, they occupy a precarious position inside prison. Locals may resent them, seeing them as targets, but their British nationality could also buy some protection – if they have the funds to bribe guards or gangs. "Physical violence might be less common because of their short sentences, but extortion, intimidation, and psychological pressure remain very real risks." ‌ There is a chance that the three Brits could "fare slightly better" Alex explains, but the expert pointed out that Indonesian prisons are a world away from what people from the UK might expect to find. "Foreign inmates sometimes fare slightly better, but basic necessities – clean water, medical care, even a decent place to sleep – are often in short supply. These prisons are nothing like what Brits expect. Prisoners rely heavily on money sent from family to buy essentials like food and medicine. Without that support, they're vulnerable to the system's harsh realities." ‌ Stocker and Collyer - a couple - are not likely to be together during their sentences - or have much contact, the experts explain, which could add to the psychological pressure they are under during their time in prison. "Lisa will be held separately in the women's section, while Jonathan and Phineas will be in the men's. Conjugal visits are almost unheard of in Indonesia, meaning Jonathan and Lisa may not see each other throughout their sentence," explains Alex. "Foreign nationals in Indonesian prisons are typically separated by gender, so it's very likely the pair will be placed in different facilities, with little to no direct contact. That, combined with language barriers and unfamiliar cultural expectations, can create a highly isolating experience," Adam said. ‌ There is no doubt in Adam's mind that it will be an "extremely tough" sentence for the three Brits, with the expert pointing out, "Their mental and physical resilience will be tested throughout their sentence." Alex agreed, explaining, "The mental strain is severe. After the terror of facing the death penalty, the shock of incarceration, even for a year, can cause intense anxiety and depression. Language barriers and social isolation only make it worse. "While their sentence is lenient by Indonesian standards – where drug traffickers often face decades behind bars or execution – the reality is that a year in Kerobokan will feel much longer. The one silver lining is that their sentence will be reduced by the time they've already spent in detention since February 2025, meaning they could be out by early 2026."

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

Leader Live

time28 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

Western Telegraph

time41 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech

In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. The act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer X statement This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became involved in a row with the Reform UK leader (Jonathan Brady/PA) The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store