
Woman who lost limbs in Tube accident was negligent, claims TfL
Sarah de Lagarde, 46, had two limbs amputated after falling into the gap between the train and platform at High Barnet station in north London in 2022. The mother of two, who was returning home from work at the City investment firm Janus Henderson, brought a High Court case against TfL and is seeking damages of more than £25 million.
TfL has claimed in court documents that 'the incident was caused or contributed to by the claimant's negligence', suggesting she 'placed herself in a position of danger' because she was careless when getting off the train.
• Woman who lost limbs in Tube accident seeks Sadiq Khan meeting
Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, previously told TfL to avoid 'victim blaming' when passengers were injured or killed on public transport in the capital.
De Lagarde, who now has an AI-operated bionic arm and prosthetic leg, was travelling home late on the Northern Line on September 30, 2022, when she fell asleep. She eventually woke up at High Barnet, at the end of the line, at 9.53pm and alighted the train, slipping on a wet platform.
'The claimant took a few steps forward onto the platform and then took a few steps backwards, before the rear of her body struck the rear side of the door of the train she had exited from,' according to TfL's court documents, first obtained by the Standard. 'The claimant continued to move backwards and, approximately seven seconds after exiting the train, she fell into the gap between carriages five and six of the train.'
No one heard her cries for help and she broke her nose and two teeth in the fall. Around five minutes later, the train driver walked back through the train to get to the driver's cab to start his return journey southbound.
He noticed wedged between the train and the platform De Lagarde's brown leather bag, which he later handed to lost property. He did not investigate further and TfL's submission stated that he 'did not see or hear the claimant at that point and did not look into the gap, having no reason to do so'.
De Lagarde again called out for help but no one came and the train departed from the station, taking her right arm with it. She managed to reach her phone but her face was so badly injured she was unable to unlock it using Face ID. Rain meant it was too wet for the touchscreen to function.
She again cried out for help and again no one came. Then a second train arrived at the station, running over her right leg. De Lagarde was not found until the driver of a train on a different platform heard her shouts and called the emergency services. Air Ambulance paramedics crawled under the train to reach her and later received a national bravery award.
De Lagarde had surgery at the Royal London Hospital and was later transferred to the amputee rehabilitation unit in Lambeth, south London, until being discharged on December 1, 2022.
She posted on Instagram today: 'I'm not a freak incident, I'm one of 162 people a month who get injured or killed on the TfL network. It's a systemic failure while senior leaders are enjoying their six-figure salaries and performance bonuses. The London Underground was once iconic. Now it's described as dirty and dangerous.
'While ticket prices keep increasing, service keeps declining. TfL tells us to 'See it. Say it. Sorted'. Well, if you see something that needs fixing, say it — log it with TfL and write to your MP. It's time for TfL to put passengers before profit and sort it.'
De Lagarde's claim states: 'The breaches of duty caused the claimant to suffer life-changing injuries.'
Thomas Jervis, the Leigh Day partner representing De Lagarde, said: 'Like millions of other Londoners, Sarah de Lagarde was just trying to get home from work when she was hit by two Tube trains at High Barnet station. Transport for London is refusing to accept liability and positively blames Sarah for what happened.'
A spokesman for TfL said: 'We are responding to a legal claim brought by Sarah de Lagarde. It is not appropriate to discuss details of our defence while this case is ongoing. Our thoughts continue to be with Sarah and her family following this terrible incident and we will continue to make every possible effort to learn from any incident on the Tube network. Safety is our top priority and we will always place it at the forefront of our thinking.'
The trial is due to open in January 2027.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Motorcyclist in his 60s dies in Godalming crash
A man in his 60s has died after his motorcycle crashed in Godalming, police have said. Surrey Police said officers were called to the A286 Grayswood Road in Brook just before 15:20 BST on 27 June, following reports the rider of a black Triumph Tiger motorcycle had been involved in a single vehicle attended but the man was pronounced dead at the scene, police and anyone with footage related to the incident has been asked to get in contact.


BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man arrested after swastikas drawn on benches in Bognor Regis
A man has been arrested on suspicion of causing criminal damage after swastikas were drawn and carved onto benches at a West Sussex Police appealed for information when the offensive symbols were discovered at Hotham Park in Bognor Regis last identified suspect was spotted by an off-duty officer, whose colleagues then made an arrest on Monday after a search of the suspect found three black marker pens and a template kit for a said that a 42-year-old man of no fixed address has been bailed pending further enquiries. More than 50 pieces of park furniture have been vandalised since the start of June, costing Arun District Council thousands of pounds to Ross Beaumont said: "We are aware this damage caused notable upset, along with gaining national media attention, and would like to express gratitude for the public's support in disrupting this behaviour."In response to the damage, the force said it had increased patrols and engagement in the area.


The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ex-GP found guilty of sex offences after carrying out ‘unnecessary' genital exams
A former GP is facing jail after conducting 'unnecessary' genital examinations on patients, including two teenage boys. Gregory Manson, 56, has been found guilty of conducting groin exams even when his patients came in with coughs, headaches, back pain and knee sprains. Some of his accusers said he pulled down their underwear without asking their permission. Manson told jurors at Canterbury Crown Court that his medical examinations were 'not sexually motivated at all' and were instead based on ruling out rare diseases which he had misdiagnosed in the past. After originally working in South Africa, Manson qualified as a GP in the UK in 1998 and also worked as a GP trainer, programme director of GP training and GP appraiser for the General Medical Council before his dismissal in 2017. Manson, of Tower Way, Canterbury, denied 18 offences of sexual assault and six of indecent assault in respect of nine victims. On Thursday, he stared at the floor as jurors at Canterbury Crown Court returned their verdicts after 10 hours and 29 minutes of deliberation. Manson was convicted by majority verdict of 12 sexual assaults and four indecent assaults against nine men which took place over almost two decades. He was found not guilty of six offences, and two others were alternative charges which did not require verdicts. Judge Simon Taylor KC warned Manson: 'It will be a prison sentence, so you need to prepare for that.' During the trial, the prosecution noted that 'many examinations he performed were not medically justified' and that other GPs would not have carried them out. 'In truth Dr Manson took frequent opportunities to examine patients' genitals, not because he needed to but because he wanted to,' said Jennifer Knight KC, prosecuting. The earliest two victims of the former GP were brothers, and he was their doctor before and after they were 16, the court heard. They both remember being taken to an examination room next to the consultant room before being told to sit on the bed and pull down their trousers and boxer shorts. The older brother's medical notes suggests that he was seen 11 times by Manson between the ages of 14 and 19, and he remembered his genitals being examined on 'over half' of those visits. Ms Knight said: 'The examinations seemed to him (the victim) to be done professionally and as a young teenager, he assumed they were required. 'As he got older however, he became uncomfortable about these examinations and wondered whether they should be so frequent.' Their mother told investigators she never met the former GP when they were young teenagers as she would stay in the waiting room. Many of the examinations relate to what the former GP called 'well person checks' which were offered to new patients at the surgery he worked for, the court heard. Giving evidence last week, Manson said: 'Part of your work as a GP is disease prevention and health promotion, we do that all the time. 'You're looking for any pathology or disease that may be asymptomatic that somebody is not necessarily aware of.' A professor of forensic medicine and GP, Ian Wall, was 'surprised' that Manson considered testicular examination part of a new patient check during his review of Manson's medical notes, jurors heard during the trial. Manson added: 'When I worked in South Africa, particularly in many hospitals that didn't have facilities to further investigate things, your training was very much in examination and being thorough with examinations. An MRI was not available in Soweto.' He told the court about his early work as a GP and why losing patients had made him conduct more 'thorough' investigations. The former GP said that every doctor remembered their 'first death', and his was a man who had arrived with what was initially thought to be a stomach ulcer but was in fact an abdominal aortic aneurysm. 'When you have experiences like this and you examine an abdomen you are haunted,' said Manson. Opening the case, Ms Knight told jurors: 'Dr Manson performed unnecessary examinations of male patients' genitals without offering a chaperone or providing any proper explanation to the patients involved of the reason for the examination, and without wearing gloves. 'Dr Manson also failed to document in patients' notes the fact that such examinations had taken place or what his findings if any were.' Following his conviction, Will Bodiam from the Crown Prosecution Service said: 'These patients trusted Manson as he was their GP and he abused that trust in an appalling way, carrying out intimate examinations which were not all medically justified. 'They described their discomfort at what happened to them and some of them actively tried to avoid seeing Manson because of their previous experiences with him. 'On several occasions, the victims were not even given the option to consent to the examinations and had their underwear removed with no warning.' He added: 'This is not what patients should expect from their GPs.' Manson will be sentenced on July 4, and remains on bail until then, with new conditions of residence and that he does not enter an international airport, train station or port.