Israeli evacuation order in central Gaza 'devastating' to aid efforts, warns UN
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs yesterday warned that the "mass displacement order issued by the Israeli military has dealt yet another devastating blow to the already fragile lifelines keeping people alive across the Gaza Strip."
The Israeli military ordered those in the central Gaza area to leave due to imminent operations, with whole families seen lugging their few belongings and heading south.
OCHA said UN staff were "remaining" in the territory and their coordinates had been shared with "relevant parties."
"These locations - as with all civilian sites - must be protected, regardless of displacement orders," OCHA said, warning that any damage to health clinics, water infrastructure, and aid warehouses in the area "will have life-threatening consequences."
Between 50,000 and 80,000 people were in the area when the evacuation order was issued, according to OCHA's initial estimates.
Yesterday, Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli forces opened fire on crowds of Palestinians trying to collect humanitarian aid in the war-torn Palestinian territory, killing 93 people and wounding dozens more.
Since the start of the war, nearly all of Gaza's population, which is also facing severe food shortages, has been displaced at least once by repeated Israeli evacuation orders.
According to OCHA, the latest order means that 87.8% of Gaza's area is now under displacement orders or within Israeli militarized zones.
That leaves "2.1 million civilians squeezed into a fragmented 12% of the Strip, where essential services have collapsed," said the UN agency.
The order "will limit the ability of the UN and our partners to move safely and effectively within Gaza, choking humanitarian access when it is needed most."
Israel yesterday withdrew the residency permit of the head of the OCHA office in the country, Jonathan Whittall, who has repeatedly condemned the humanitarian conditions in Gaza.
Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed 58,895 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. The UN finds these figures credible.
The war was sparked by Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel in which 1,219 people, most of them civilians, were killed, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
23 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Failing to protect planet from climate change ‘could violate international law'
The UN's top court has announced that if countries fail to take measures to protect the planet from climate change they could be in violation of international law. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered an advisory opinion in a landmark case about nations' obligations to tackle climate change and the consequences they may face if they do not, calling it an 'urgent and existential' threat to humanity. 'Failure of a state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system… may constitute an internationally wrongful act,' court president Yuji Iwasawa said during the hearing. The court also said countries harmed by climate change could be entitled to reparations for the damage they have suffered from rising global temperatures, but what they are owed should be determined on a 'case by case' basis. The non-binding opinion, which runs to more than 500 pages, is seen as a potential turning point in international climate law. The court said a 'clean, healthy and sustainable environment' is a human right. Enshrining a sustainable environment as a human right paves the way for other legal actions, including states returning to the ICJ to hold each other to account as well as domestic lawsuits, along with legal instruments such as investment agreements. The case is led by the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu and backed by more than 130 countries. All UN member states including major greenhouse gas emitters such as the United States and China are parties to the court. Outside the court, climate activists gathered with a banner that read: 'Courts have spoken. The law is clear. States must act now.' The courtroom, known as the Great Hall of Justice, was packed. After years of lobbying by vulnerable island nations who fear they could disappear under rising sea waters, the UN General Assembly asked the ICJ in 2023 for an advisory opinion, an important basis for international obligations. A panel of 15 judges was tasked with answering two questions: What are countries obliged to do under international law to protect the climate and environment from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions? Second, what are the legal consequences for governments when their acts, or lack of action, have significantly harmed the climate and environment? 'The stakes could not be higher. The survival of my people and so many others is on the line,' Arnold Kiel Loughman, attorney general of the island nation of Vanuatu, told the court during a week of hearings in December. In the decade up to 2023, sea levels rose by a global average of around 4.3cm, with parts of the Pacific rising higher still. The world has also warmed 1.3C since pre-industrial times because of the burning of fossil fuels. Vanuatu is one of a group of small states pushing for international legal intervention in the climate crisis, but it affects many more island nations in the South Pacific. 'The agreements being made at an international level between states are not moving fast enough,' Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu's minister for climate change, told the Associated Press. Activists could bring lawsuits against their own countries for failing to comply with the decision. 'What makes this case so important is that it addresses the past, present, and future of climate action. It's not just about future targets – it also tackles historical responsibility, because we cannot solve the climate crisis without confronting its roots,' Joie Chowdhury, a senior lawyer at the Centre for International Environmental Law, told the Associated Press. The United States and Russia, both of whom are major petroleum-producing states, are staunchly opposed to the court mandating emissions reductions. But those who cling to fossil fuels could go broke doing it, the UN secretary-general told the Associated Press in an exclusive interview this week. Simply having the court issue an opinion is the latest in a series of legal victories for the small island nations. Earlier this month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights found that countries have a legal duty not only to avoid environmental harm but also to protect and restore ecosystems. Last year, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that countries must better protect their people from the consequences of climate change. In 2019, the Netherlands' Supreme court handed down the first major legal win for climate activists when judges ruled that protection from the potentially devastating effects of climate change was a human right and that the government has a duty to protect its citizens.
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Brazil to join South Africa's ICJ case against Israel over actions in Gaza
South Africa filed a case in 2023 asking the ICJ to declare that Israel was in breach of its obligations under the 1948 Genocide Convention in its crackdown against the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza. Other countries such as Spain Turkey, and Colombia have had already asked the court to intervene in the case. The decision was reported earlier by the Brazilian newspaper Folha de S. Paulo and confirmed by Reuters.
The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Moment Iran helicopter faces off with US warship in the Gulf in pathetic show of force after Trump threatens new strikes
THIS is the moment a single Iranian naval helicopter tries to drive away a huge US destroyer in a pathetic show of force. The USS Fitzgerald was sailing through the Gulf of Oman this morning when the attack helicopter buzzed the guided missile destroyer. Advertisement 11 The USS Fitzgerald is seen from an Iranian helicopter today Credit: Tasnim News Agency 11 Iran claimed it forced the destroyer to retreat Credit: Tasnim News Agency 11 Iran has vowed to push on with its nuclear enrichment programme 11 Iranian state media claims the pilot issued a "stern warning" to vacate the waters. Footage shows the pilot attempting to order the destroyer to "change course" without success. The destroyer issued threats of its own, Iran said, but "the Iranian pilot... reiterated the warning to stay away from Iranian waters", forcing the US vessel to "give in" and alter its course. Iranian forces have a history of confronting US forces in waters off the country's southern coast. Advertisement Read more about Iran here In 2023, the rogue state said it forced a US submarine to surface while crossing the strategic Strait of Hormuz, which Washington denied. The flashpoint comes at a tense moment between the two nations a month after Donald Trump struck three nuclear sites during Iran's frenzied 12-day war with Israel. Iran's president Masoud Pezeshkian has warned Iran will not halt its nuclear programme despite Trump unleashing the devastating blitz on the trio of facilities. The leader, who was wounded in the leg during the war and forced to flee a high-profile emergency meeting, said it is as "illusion" for Trump to suggest their nuclear programme has been obliterated. Advertisement Most read in The US Sun Latest Breaking He said: "Our nuclear capabilities are in the minds of our scientists and not in the facilities." The comments echo previous remarks by Tehran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi who said Iran would never abandon its uranium enrichment programme. Iran vows to press on with nuke enrichment despite Trump's threats and 'serious damage' done by stealth bombings Pezeshkian added that Iran remains on guard for any future Israeli attack and doesn't believe the ceasefire will hold. He said: "We are fully prepared for any new Israeli military move, and our armed forces are ready to strike deep inside Israel again." Advertisement Reflecting the simmering tensions that remain in the region despite the ceasefire, Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said yesterday there is a possibility of renewed attacks against Iran. His statements came during a situation assessment with several top Israeli military officials, including the chief of staff. He stressed the need for an effective plan to ensure that Iran does not restore its nuclear program. Earlier this week, Araghchi told Fox News: "We Advertisement "And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride ." The Foreign Minister also said: "Enrichment is so dear to us." 11 Iran's president Masoud Pezeshkian has warned Iran will not halt its nuclear programme Credit: Alamy 11 A satellite view shows an overview of Fordow underground complex after the US bombings on June 21 Advertisement 11 Firefighters extinguish a blaze after an Israeli missile strike Credit: AP 11 Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Iran would keep pushing forward with the programme Aragchi confirmed that the damage done by Donald Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer on Iran's nuclear sites had been "serious". But he stopped short of commenting on whether any enriched uranium survived the Advertisement "Our facilities have been damaged – seriously damaged," Araghchi said. "The extent of which is now under evaluation by our atomic energy organisation." He did confirm, however, that all enrichment capabilities in Iran had been ceased as a result of the facilities being "seriously damaged". Iran is due to meet with representatives from Britain, France and Germany on Friday to discuss its nuclear programme. Advertisement The European trio have warned that if no progress is reached by the end of August, they will invoke a "snapback" mechanism. This would reimpose UN sanctions on Tehran that were lifted under a 2015 deal in return for restrictions on Iran's nuclear programme The three European countries, along with China and Russia, are the remaining parties to the 2015 nuclear deal - from which the United States withdrew in 2018. 11 Israeli Iron Dome air defence system intercepts missiles over Tel Aviv Advertisement 11 President Donald Trump and his national security team meeting in the Situation Room in June 11 Tehran denies seeking a nuclear weapon and says its nuclear programme is solely meant for civilian purposes. This was despite enrichment levels reaching 60% prior to the US bombardment. Advertisement The The Israelis also orchestrated Operation Red Wedding - which saw 30 top Iranian military chiefs killed in a near-simultaneous blitz as Tel Aviv sought to root out the Less than a fortnight later, Trump joined the Israeli bombing campaign against Iran with The US military 's flagship Advertisement The The Don celebrated his sophisticated blitz on the Iranian regime - and said that the US bombs went through enemy nuclear sites " Iran, which vowed to hit US military bases across the Middle East, sought its revenge by But Tehran seemingly Advertisement Trump dubbed the expected response "weak" before announcing that a ceasefire deal had been reached between the Israelis and Iranians.
