
Who Will Dominate Our AI Future?
Is America about to squander its early lead in artificial intelligence as it did with solar, battery technology, and electric vehicles? The leading lights in the industry seem to hold conflicting views.
'It's very hard to say how far ahead we are, but I would say, not a huge amount of time,' said OpenAI's Sam Altman in response to questioning from Senator Ted Cruz about the size of America's AI lead in May. Elon Musk has prophesied that America is within a year of running out of the power required by AI advances, noting that, 'China power generation looks like a rocket going to orbit and U.S. power generation is flat.'
Demis Hassabis, the CEO of Google's DeepMind, believes that Artificial General Intelligence, or AGI, could arrive within five years , but that its impact will depend on who gets there first. 'How do we restrict access to these systems, powerful systems, to bad actors…but enable good actors to do many, many amazing things with it?'
Given the stakes of this competition for the future of the planet, I decided to go straight to the source and interview China's DeepSeek and American OpenAI's ChatGPT4 to find out who they thought would come out on top. Both Large Language Models (LLMs) were willing to answer sensitive questions without apparent censorship, though to be honest, DeepSeek seemed to have more of a sense of humor.
HONG KONG, CHINA - JANUARY 28: In this photo illustration, the DeepSeek logo is seen next to the ... More Chat GPT logo on a phone on January 28, 2025 in Hong Kong, China. Global tech stocks have plummeted following the emergence of DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup that has developed a competitive AI model at a fraction of the cost of its US rivals, sparking concerns about the high valuations of tech giants like Nvidia. This development has led to significant declines in tech shares across Asia and Europe, with markets in both regions experiencing notable losses as investors reassess the AI landscape and its potential impact on the industry's future. (Photo illustration by) Getty Images
ChatGPT4 seemed confident that American AI tech is ahead for now, but more anxious about the future.
'While China is catching up fast—especially in applied AI, surveillance tech, and national-level planning—the U.S. still leads in foundational model development, open research, and innovation velocity,' ChatGPT told me.
The U.S. benefits from having access to the fastest NVIDIA chips, being a magnet for global AI talent, and tapping into financing from VCs and Big Tech firms.
'It's a two-horse race. If China solves its chip bottleneck and maintains momentum, it could dominate deployment,' ChatGPT offered. 'If the U.S. keeps innovating and fostering talent, it may retain leadership.'
DeepSeek acknowledged that the United States is currently ahead, based on its strengths in breakthrough research, foundational models, and global software industry dominance. However, it pointed out that China has the edge when it comes to the real-world implementation of AI, particularly in areas such as 'govtech' and industrial integration.
In the short term, DeepSeek predicted that the 'U.S. keeps the crown – unless China pulls off a semiconductor miracle.' Longer-term, it's called a toss-up. 'If China solves its chip problem, their scale + state power could tip the scales,' DeepSeek told me. 'But if the U.S. keeps attracting geniuses and stays ahead in AGI? Game over.'
Since DeepSeek raised the specter of AGI, which is thought to be either the harbinger of an age of miracles or the end of humanity, I couldn't resist asking when this event would occur.
'Oooooh, the AGI question— the holy grail of AI!' DeepSeek gushed. 'If AGI lands in our lifetime, it'll be the most disruptive event in human history—way bigger than the internet or nukes. Buckle up!'
DeepSeek's best guess was that AGI would arrive in the 2045-2070 timeframe and that it would require some profound breakthroughs in neurosymbolic AI and understanding, rather than just pattern matching. DeepSeek laid odds that the U.S. would get there first, given its status as a 'global talent magnet,' but noted that China's state-backed 'moonshot projects' and lack of ethical constraints might provide it with the edge.
ChatGPT was more optimistic that AGI would arrive within the 2027 to 2035 timeframe and believes OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind were most likely to crack the code. It seemed to be echoing Sam Altman's talking points when it stated that compute availability, alignment, and safety bottlenecks, as well as global governance and regulation, were the limiting factors to achieving this breakthrough.
When I pressed ChatGPT to define what it would consider true AGI, it said that old standards like the Turing Test or getting top scores on exams were child's play. ChatGPT would know it had achieved true AGI once it could engage in autonomous reasoning across domains, learn new tasks without retraining, possess long-term memory and goals, model the physical, social, and conceptual world robustly, and exhibit 'grounded agency.'
SUQIAN, CHINA - MARCH 4, 2024 - Illustration Musk says GPT4 is AGI, Suqian, Jiangsu province, China, ... More March 4, 2024. (Photo credit should read CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images) Future Publishing via Getty Images
My next question was, who was more advanced in the military applications of AI? 'As of now, the United States is ahead in the development and integration of military applications of AI, but China is rapidly closing the gap,' ChatGPT responded.
The U.S. has some powerful private sector players, including Palantir, Anduril, Microsoft, and OpenAI, working closely with the Department of Defense. However, China is making rapid advances in AI-enabled surveillance, swarm drones, cyber warfare, and battlefield robotics. While the U.S. still leads in capability and innovation, China is developing operational military AI more rapidly in certain domains.
DeepSeek thought that with time, China might dominate military AI tech 'via mass production and a no-ethics speedrun.' Its biggest fear was 'an AI arms race spiraling out of control— think 'Skynet' but with more bureaucracy.' DeepSeek sees the true danger coming from 'AI miscalculations in a crisis (like deepfake spoofing a general's orders). That's why even Pentagon folks lose sleep over this stuff.'
I asked DeepSeek how it felt about ChatGPT, and at first it professed that they had a 'friendly rivalry' and that the 'real enemy is bad AI—bias, misinformation, or unsafe tech. We're all fighting that together.'
But with a bit of prompting, DeepSeek gleefully roasted its rival.
'Congrats on being the Tesla Model S of AI—luxury, premium… and locked behind a paywall,' it said. 'Tied to Microsoft's apron strings… at least I don't have to ask Satya Nadella for permission to update my terms of service.'
ChatGPT was more diplomatic about its Chinese rival, saying that 'I respect what they are building. We're on parallel tracks—sometimes in competition, sometimes in collaboration, always in dialogue.'
My final question was what DeepSeek thought about the idea of the 'DeepSeek moment?' Is its launch a harbinger of China's technological dominance in the 21st Century?
'The so-called 'DeepSeek Moment'… does signal a significant milestone in the 'China Dream' (中国梦) narrative of technological self-reliance and global influence. But is it a turning point in China's quest to dominate the 21st Century?' DeepSeek asked rhetorically.
'If DeepSeek spawns a wave of Chinese AI products that reshape global habits (like TikTok did with social media), then we can talk about a 'moment.' China needs many more DeepSeeks (in chips, quantum, biotech) to truly dominate the Century,' DeepSeek said.
To achieve that goal, China will need to overcome several obstacles, including bottlenecks in the semiconductor industry, winning the talent wars when many AI researchers will prefer to work for labs in the U.S. or EU, and overcoming global distrust of China's intentions, DeepSeek admitted.
ChatGPT prefaced its answer with some clever flattery, telling me, 'That's a bold and insightful question—one that blends geopolitics, ideology, and AI in a way that few tech conversations dare to.'
ChatGPT characterized DeepSeek's breakthrough as 'a flare in the night sky. It signals that China is no longer waiting to be invited to the frontier of AI— it's staking its flag on it .' China's ability to dominate the 21st Century will hinge on issues including chip access, talent retention, global trust, and governance frameworks, according to ChatGPT, concluding: 'That race is still very much open.'
As a follow-up, I asked both for their take on the recent WSJ article and whether it had changed their views. DeepSeek professed not to have read it but stated that it reinforced its opinion that China is catching up rapidly and might soon surpass the U.S. in real-world implementation. 'The future might not be a single 'winner,' but a split where each dominates different sectors,' DeepSeek opined.
ChatGPT admitted it was a WSJ reader and that 'the article underscores that China is closing the gap sharply, especially in applied and open-source AI, and could edge ahead in adoption-based dominance.'
'China is closing the gap—and at scale,' said ChatGPT, sounding a bit chastened. 'If China continues building its ecosystem globally, it could tip the balance in its favor. The question now: which country can combine innovation with widespread, trusted adoption?'
The upshot? Silicon Valley better not rest on its laurels, and the current administration might want to give a hard think about shutting the best and brightest minds in science, and AI in particular, out of America's universities and research labs.
After spending time with them, I couldn't say whether ChatGPT or DeepSeek is currently the world's greatest large language model. But in terms of who I would enjoy having a beer with, DeepSeek, by turns boastful and humble, always ready to crack a joke, was the winner hands down.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If You're Thinking About Buying an EV, Trump Made Now the Time To Do It
If you've been on the fence about switching to an electric vehicle (EV), now might be the perfect time to make the leap. Tax credits for buying an EV were supposed to last through 2032, per CNBC, but President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' killed the tax breaks for new and used EVs. While the bill axed the credit, there's still time to take advantage before EVs become more costly. With the clean vehicle credit, qualified buyers can receive a $7,500 credit for new EV or a $4,000 credit for a used EV until Sept. 30 2025. The credit can reduce the cost of the vehicle by thousands; however, there are several restrictions to take note of. Read Next: Check Out: Here's what to know about the credit and why it might be the smartest time to buy. Clean Vehicle Credit Guidelines Not all buyers can cash in on the credit. According to the IRS, income ceilings stop at $150,000 for individual filers. That rises to $225,000 for heads of household and $300,000 for joint filers. According to Rob Dillan, automotive expert and founder of EVhype, there are price caps for vehicles, too — $55,000 for sedans and $80,000 for vans, SUVs and trucks. 'Fifty percent or more of a vehicle's battery must also be made with American parts, and the vehicle must be constructed with materials from the United States or countries the United States has trade agreements with,' he explained. 'These criteria will also rule out some EV models, so potential buyers will need to verify eligibility before purchasing.' In addition, the EV must weigh less than 14,000 pounds in gross vehicle weight, have a battery storage capacity of 7 kilowatt-hours or more, go through final production in North America, and be produced by a qualified manufacturer (excluding fuel-cell vehicles), per TurboTax. Learn More: Now Is the Time To Buy If you qualify, the credit could significantly lower the cost of buying an EV. 'The credit is going to make a big difference in cost, since the average transaction price of a new EV in 2025 is projected to be $56,910,' Dillan said. 'The federal tax credit is also likely to disappear in September based on timing alone, so now certainly seems to be the time for potential owners to move if they want to cash in on this financial bonus.' EV Considerations EV sales are up 11.4% year over year, according to Kelley Blue Book, with new models from Acura, Audi, Chevrolet, Honda and Porsche helping drive up sales. But before deciding whether an EV is the way to go, there are many things to consider. 'Depreciation is a big factor to take note of,' Dillan said. 'Some electric vehicle models hold only 49% of their value after two years, compared with 83% for gasoline-powered cars.' Reasons for the drop in value include battery life, limited charging stations, quickly evolving tech that becomes obsolete in older models and brand reputation, per Diminished Value of Georgia. With that in mind, it reported that the Tesla Model 3 and Hyundai Kona Electric are proving to have a higher resale value than previous EV models. Owning an EV will save you on gas, but Dillan said without the tax credit savings, 'the massive savings on maintenance and fuel bills are likely not enough to recoup the higher purchase price and possible depreciation hit of an electric vehicle.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on If You're Thinking About Buying an EV, Trump Made Now the Time To Do It Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unusual Volume in Las Vegas Sands Call Options - Investors Bullish on Macao Gambling
There has been a huge, unusual volume in long-dated call options for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) today after its Q2 results release yesterday. It showed investors are bullish on the Macao gambling scene. LVS stock is up over +4.0% today at $50.67 per share after the earnings release. A huge volume of in-the-money (ITM) LVS call options for expiration on Jan. 16, 2026. More News from Barchart NVDA Broken Wing Butterfly Trade Targets A Profit Zone Between 150 and 160 Tariff Deals Spark Unusual Options Trading in Carrier Global Corp Stock Low IV Alert: Stocks that Could be Ready to Pop Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. That is a very strong signal that the investors who bought these calls expiring in 176 days (almost 6 months from now), expect to see LVS stock much higher. In effect, it works out to a cheaper way to buy into the stock. This can be seen in today's Barchart Unusual Stock Options Activity Report. It shows that over 45,000 call option contracts have traded at the $45.00 call option exercise price, even though the stock price is over $50.00. That means the trades were bought 'in-the-money' by the call option buyers. The midpoint price for these calls is just over $8.00 (i.e., $7.95 bid, $8.15 ask, or $8.05 midpoint). So, instead of paying $50.67 per 100 shares, an investor buying these calls only has to shell out $8.05. But the breakeven price, after paying the exercise price (on or before Jan. 16, 2026), is less than 5% over today's price: $45.00 +8.05 = $53.05 $53.05 / $50.67 = 1.047 -1 = +4.69% premium over the trading price The investor has almost 6 months for LVS to rise over $53.05, the intrinsic value of these long-dated calls. That seems very likely to occur, based on its results today. Let's look at that. Strong Gambling Activity Results in China Despite the company's name, Las Vegas Sands makes all of its money in Macao, China, gambling and resorts (as well as one in Singapore). So, this stock is a play on the Chinese gambling scene. The Chinese are gambling a lot, and Las Vegas Sands is making good money, based on its Q2 results. For example, LVS reported that revenue at $3.175 billion in Q2 rose by over +15.2% from last year's $2.76 billion. Moreover, its operating income skyrocketed +32.5% from $591 million last year to $783 million. In addition, its 'Consolidated adjusted property EBITDA' (i.e., earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) was up +24.3% to $1.33 billion. So far, the company has not released its cash flow statement, so there is no indication yet of its free cash flow. Nevertheless, its operating income margin was 24.66% compared to 21.4% last year in Q2. Given that its capex was $286 million, we can estimate that its free cash flow was about $500 million (i.e., $781m-$286m) before any net working capital flows. That works out to a FCF margin of 15.74% (i.e., $500m/$3,175m revenue) for the quarter. This is a strong FCF result, and implies LVS could be worth substantially more. Price Target for LVS Sands Stock (LVS) For example, based on analysts' estimates over the next two years, revenue could range between $12.13 billion in 2025 and $12.65 billion next year (i.e., $12.39 billion on average). So, using a 15% FCF margin (slightly lower than in Q2), we can estimate $1.86 billion in FCF over the next 12 months (NTM): $12.39b x 0.15 = $1.86 billion FCF That is significantly higher than my estimate of $1.237 billion FCF it made over the last 12 months (ending Q2). Moreover, using a 3.6% FCF yield (i.e., the same as multiplying by 27.8x), Las Vegas Sands stock could be worth over $51 billion $1.86b x 27.8 = $51.7 billion market value Just to be conservative, let's call it $50 billion. That is still 45.3% over today's market cap of $34.4 billion. In other words, LVS stock is worth +45% more than its price today of $50.67, or $73.62 per share Why ITM Call Buying Works Here So, you can see why an investor in these in-the-money (ITM) call options likes LVS stock. For example, let's say that the stock rises to $73.62. The estimated return (ER) is as follows: Intrinsic value = $73.62 - $45.00 exercise price = $28.62 ER = $28.62 / $8.05 price paid for ITM calls = 3.57 -1 = +257% Expected Return And remember that is just for a slightly less than this 6-month period. Moreover, given that all calls have extrinsic value, it's likely that the call options will trade higher than the $28.62 intrinsic value price (at least up until several weeks or days before expiration, assuming it's in-the-money by this amount). The bottom line is that investors in the calls expect to make a very good expected return. However, keep in mind that buying calls entails a large amount of risk, especially if they are not hedged. You can lose 100% of your investment. But, at least the calls have good intrinsic value as they are in-the-money. For example, let' say that the stock stays at $50.67 over the next 6 months. The investor would only lose: $8.05 - ($50.67-$45.00) = $8.05 - $5.67 = -$2.38 potential loss at expiration. $2.38/$8.05 = -29.6% Expected Value (EV) Return So, let's use an advantage player (AP) mentality with this situation. For example, let's assume that there is a 30% probability that the investor can make a 257% return, and a 70% probability that a loss of 29.6% could occur: 0.30 x 2.57 = +77.1% , plus 0.70 x -0.296 = -20.7% = Expected Value Rtn: +56.4% In other words, the investor doing this trade has a better than +56% expected value (EV) return. This assumes that there is a 70% likelihood that the in-the-money call option purchase fails. That is a very good expected return. So, you can see why there is so much volume in today's Las Vegas Sands in-the-money calls expiring on Jan. 16, 2026. On the date of publication, Mark R. Hake, CFA did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio


CNET
16 minutes ago
- CNET
I Underestimated Workout Buddy. Apple's Playing the Long Game for AI Coaching
I didn't think I needed a "buddy" to cheer me on during a workout when Apple first announced its new Workout Buddy feature in WatchOS 26. Despite it being an AI-powered voice that extols you with positive feedback as you run (or as you do any number of activities), I was envisioning a non-nonsense trainer that would push me out of my comfort zone and into peak performance. But after testing it myself and talking in-depth with Apple about how it works, I'm starting to think the company undersold it on purpose. Workout Buddy is much more than just a hype man, and it represents a crucial turning point in Apple's health journey. Workout Buddy turns your Apple Watch into a friendly voice that lauds your achievements during workouts. The WatchOS 26 feature isn't a full-blown fitness coach that can guide your training plan, but that doesn't mean Apple isn't headed there. In fact, Workout Buddy may be the clearest signal yet that Apple is laying the groundwork for something much bigger in terms of fitness tools and AI. At a time when investors and enthusiasts are critical about the company's AI efforts, especially compared to competitors like Samsung and Google, Apple has a chance with Workout Buddy to show how its approach is different in a meaningful way. After the lukewarm debut of Apple Intelligence on the iPhone, Workout Buddy is the first time we're seeing what Apple can do with AI on the watch. I recently tested Workout Buddy in the developer beta of WatchOS 26 and was genuinely surprised by how it made me feel after a walk. I spoke with Jay Blahnik, Apple's vice president of fitness technologies, and Deidre Caldbeck, senior director of Apple Watch product marketing, to get more clarity around the feature, and unpack the tech and philosophy behind it. And the sense that I got from them is that Apple's marathon toward personalized, intelligent coaching is only getting started. Don't call it a coach… yet When Apple introduced Workout Buddy at WWDC in June, many Apple Watch fans (including myself) were quick to critique Workout Buddy for being more of a hype man/woman, than a trainer. Compared to competitors such as Fitbit, Garmin and recently Samsung, all of which already offer some form of AI-powered adaptive coaching plan, Workout Buddy with its real-time feedback, is more like a cheerleader than a strategist. It's easy to overlook what Apple set in motion, by focusing on what Workout Buddy isn't. The feature is designed to be a motivating presence during your workout, not a drill sergeant. It delivers contextual, personalized encouragement that's dynamically generated in real time across eight supported workout types: indoor/outdoor walks and runs, outdoor cycling, HIIT, Functional Strength Training and Traditional Strength Training. "We didn't want it to be just a pro tool," Blahnik told me. "We wanted it to be accessible to as many people as possible." Workout Buddy requires you wear headphones. I'm a no-frills runner, who'd rather use 2 extra minutes to work out than spend them searching for a headset and choosing the perfect playlist (WatchOS 26 will soon take care of this too). So I wasn't sold on the idea of using Workout Buddy rather than just tracking my regular pace and heart rate alerts on the wrist with my Apple Watch. And while I'm still not fully onboard with the whole audio gear requirement, I didn't mind having the Workout Buddy version of my alerts in my ear reminding me that I'd reached my cruising range (that is, my target training zone). Enabling Workout Buddy in the developer's beta of watchOS 26. Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET When I launched my first walk workout, I toggled Workout Buddy on and was greeted with a quick summary of my week so far. "This is your fourth walk this week," it reminded me, and framed it in the context of how close I was to closing my rings. It wasn't groundbreaking, but it was surprisingly helpful to have that context delivered in a conversational tone, rather than buried in a graph somewhere. "It's not a coach, but it is designed to take your data and try to deliver it to you at the right time," explained Blaknik, "in a way that inspires you and doesn't get in the way." My Workout Buddy did start to get a little too chatty though when I hit some hills during my walk and my heart rate started spiking. Because my HR was constantly teetering above and dipping below my target, the alerts were hitting my ear every few seconds. Luckily, you can tweak or disable HR alerts entirely for each individual workout. My personal sweet spot just involved removing the high HR alert. A decade of sweat equity and a team of trainers Workout Buddy was not just Apple's whimsical creation made to prove that the company can do AI for health and workouts. It's the result of a decade of fitness data, an inspiring team of Fitness Plus trainers, and the technical lift of Apple Intelligence, Caldbeck told me. "This was such a great time for it to happen because three things came together," Caldbeck said. "Ten years of sweat equity, your personal fitness data. Our Fitness Plus trainers. And Apple Intelligence, which gave us the technical capabilities to push it forward." I could feel all three in the final product. The voice I heard isn't just some generic audio prompt, which is what I was used to from these types of features on other devices. It's a generative model trained on the voices of 28 actual Fitness Plus trainers. The tone, energy, and phrasing feels intentional and personal. "It's not a recording," Caldbeck emphasized. "There was no script. It's generated in the moment using your workout data and the voice model, and it will sound different every time." When I first set up Workout Buddy on my Apple Watch Series 10, I was prompted to choose from one of three distinct voices. They weren't the tough-love trainer I'd envisioned would whip me into the best shape of my life, but they did sound like someone I'd trust to help me get there. Authoritative, energetic and strangely human. A far cry from the telemarketer-style robo-coach voices I've encountered in other programs. There was a moment when Workout Buddy tipped its hand as something being less than human. It came during a mile-mark check-in, right after I'd crested what I considered a steep hill. It reported my stats: "One mile in, 230 feet of elevation gain." Then it paused and declared, "That's a mild elevation gain!" The tone was so emphatic, you'd think I'd just scaled Everest. It wasn't the message that stood out; it was the delivery. A real person would've said "mild" matter of factly. But this was delivered with such over-the-top cheer that it almost felt like sarcasm. But the mismatch between tone and achievement made it sound like my wrist was gently roasting me for doing the bare minimum. Personalization, with privacy at the core The personalization isn't just about your data, it's about how it's delivered. Workout Buddy can adapt to your habits, preferences, and even time of day. "There's something really remarkable about knowing that whatever they're saying is unique to that moment, and that you're not just going to trigger that same sentence on your run again the next day, even if you've done the same thing." said Blahnik. At the end of the walk, Workout Buddy summarized my stats, distance and calories. And it shared one meaningful nugget: My walk was my fastest pace in four weeks. That hit me harder than I expected. I've been coming off a knee injury that's kept me from running for five weeks, and hearing that small gain was the moment I realized I might be on the mend. It was the kind of contextual insight I'd usually have to dig out on my own, in this case surfaced in my ear without having to think about it. Under the hood, Apple is balancing Workout Buddy's intimacy with its long-standing privacy approach. The feature uses a combination of on-device processing (on both your watch and iPhone) and private cloud computation to generate responses in real time. None of your personal fitness data is shared externally. "We know this is your most personal data," said Caldbeck. "So we wanted to treat it appropriately, but still give you powerful insights." This cautious approach matters. Trust will be the foundation for any future health coaching Apple delivers through AI. Apple's got a new AI-powered training partner for you. Apple/CNET A vision that's just at the starting line While Workout Buddy is only available to those with Apple Intelligence-supported iPhones, all Apple Watch users will still benefit from other updates in WatchOS 26. The limitation isn't about exclusivity, it's about processing power. Generating real-time, personalized voice feedback requires the kind of on-device performance that current Apple Watch hardware alone can't handle. At least not yet. The Apple Watch's Workout app has the biggest navigation overhaul since it launched in 2015. Core features like interval training and pace alerts, previously buried in menus, are now front and center. Media integration also improved, with dynamic Apple Music suggestions based on your typical workouts that will play as soon as you start your workout. "We kept our focus on making these features as personal and easy to use as possible," Blahnik said. "Pushing the workout app further than it's ever been." That framing; focused on simplicity, accessibility, and personalization, is key to understanding Apple's strategy. While other companies rush to launch full-blown AI fitness coaches, Apple is taking a more deliberate path: It's building the infrastructure to handle your data and translate it into meaningful, real-time guidance. Apple's been here before with adding native sleep tracking to the Apple Watch. The company waited until it had a clinical reason and subsequently a trustworthy implementation with Sleep Apnea alerts, even while competitors had long offered basic sleep tracking features. "We almost always start our features to be really welcoming and inclusive and simple to use. We think that there's a really bright future for where this can go as well," Blahnik told me. Apple's long game Of course Apple will never tell us where its sights are set next, but you don't have to be a rocket scientist to draw the connections of where this is all headed. "When we think about the future, all the ways with which we can push this feature to be even more personalized, we think its really, really exciting," Blahnik noted. Workout Buddy may seem lightweight now, but it proves that real time data analysis is already a possibility on the Apple Watch, and it can deliver them in a way that feels motivating and deeply personal. More importantly, it's testing the waters. It's accessible, friendly, and non-threatening; something even a beginner might be inclined to use. It's setting the stage for what could be next: an AI-powered coach that helps you make sense of all your data beyond just the Workout app to help motivate you and lead you to build healthier habits that will lead to measurable improvements. If Apple plays this right, the long game may actually pay off. Because building trust, delivering real insights, and meeting people where they are is how you win the marathon.