Aryna Sabalenka avoids major shock with fightback win over Laura Siegemund
Comeback complete 🙌
World No.1 Aryna Sabalenka defeats Laura Siegemund 4-6, 6-2, 6-4 to reach her third #Wimbledon semi-final. pic.twitter.com/VBfLu53Evz
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 8, 2025
However, Sabalenka kept her nerve and her emotions in check as she dug in for a 4-6 6-2 6-4 victory in just under three hours.
'I need some time to cool down and recover, she pushed me so much,' said Sabalenka.
'After the first set I was looking at my box and saying 'book the tickets, we're out of this place'.'
German women aged 37 have been the great disruptors of the English summer, with Tatiana Maria claiming a surprise win at Queen's Club before Siegemund's unlikely run here.
Laura Siegemund was a break up in the decider (Ben Whitley/PA)
A renowned doubles player, her game is built around slices, angles, drop shots and being nimble on her feet.
But the two clubbing backhand winners with which she sealed two breaks of serve in the opening three games were straight from the Sabalenka playbook.
It was a drop shot which brought up another break point, which was secured when an increasingly glum-looking Sabalenka went long, and when the Belarusian dumped a forehand into the net for the umpteenth time she found herself a set down for the first time this fortnight.
Sabalenka disappeared off court at the changeover, and when play resumed she moved a break up, only for Siegemund to claw it straight back.
Siegemund was beginning to deploy the dark arts she has built a reputation for, taking an age between points as Sabalenka waited to serve.
It was clearly irritating the 27-year-old, but she took her frustration out on the ball with some trademark power hitting eventually levelling the match – the first set Siegemund had dropped this Championships.
Yet the underdog bit back in the deciding set, and when she broke for 4-3 she was two games away from a seismic shock.
However, Sabalenka broke back immediately and then roared with delight after putting away a smash on match point to reach the semi-finals for the 10th time in the last 11 grand slams.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Iga Swiatek and Aryna Sabalenka to BOTH take the first set and win their semi-final matches boosted as stars eye their first Wimbledon finals
Aryna Sabalenka and Iga Swiatek are two of the giants in women's tennis right now, but curiously neither of them have ever reached the final of Wimbledon. Sabalenka has only dropped one set on her way to the semi-finals this year, and will take on Amanda Anisimova after victories over the likes of Emma Raducanu, Elise Mertens and Laura Siegemund. Her Polish rival has been similarly imperious, her only dropped set coming in the second round, before beating Danielle Collins, Clara Tauson and Liudmila Samsonova to reach the last four. The four-time French Open champion now faces Belinda Bencic in the semis for the right to take on Sabalenka, who must find a way past Anisimova, to tee up what could be a mouth-watering clash. For Sabalenka to beat Anisimova, she faces favourable odds of 4/11 given her status as World No 1, while her opponent is priced at 9/4 to cause an upset. Similarly, World No 4 Swiatek is backed at the exact some odds as Sabalenka - 4/11 -with Switzerland's Bencic at 5/2. Both players are favourites in their respective matches, but they are also subject of a special Price Boost offering from Sky Bet. For Sabalenka and Swiatek to both win the first set and go on to win their semi-final matches, customers can find odds of 9/4. Those odds have been boosted after previously being priced at 13/8. Sky Bet match-winner odds: Aryna Sabalenka 4/11 Amanda Anisimova 9/4 Belinda Bencic 5/2 Iga Swiatek 4/11 Sky Bet Price Boost odds: Swiatek and Sabalenka to both win the first set and win the match WAS 13/8 NOW 9/4
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Novak Djokovic is ready to face Jannik Sinner and the other young guys at Wimbledon
Novak Djokovic began expressing a heartfelt thought about returning to the semifinals at the All England Club — 'It means the world to me,' he was saying, 'that I'm still able, at 38, to play (in the) final stages of Wimbledon' — when the Centre Court crowd interrupted with yelling and applause. 'Thank you for cheering for my age. I really appreciate it. That's beautiful. Makes me feel very young,' he said with a smile. 'Another thing that makes me feel very young is competing with youngsters.' Truth is, Djokovic should be used to this sort of thing by now. He is the last member of a golden era of men's tennis still on tour, and after beating one 23-year-old in the quarterfinals, Flavio Cobolli, to reach his 52nd Grand Slam semifinal as he bids for a record 25th major singles championship, Djokovic will meet yet another 23-year-old, No. 1-ranked Jannik Sinner, on Friday for a berth in the final. 'That motivates me — to see how much can I still keep going with these guys, toe-to-toe,' the sixth-seeded Djokovic said. Djokovic enters his Wimbledon semifinal with 4 losses in a row to Sinner He's lost his last four matches against Sinner, including in the semifinals of this year's French Open. And Djokovic lost each of the past two title matches at Wimbledon to Carlos Alcaraz, who is almost exactly 16 years younger, meaning they're the men with the second-largest age gap between major final opponents. No. 2 Alcaraz, who is 22, will play No. 5 Taylor Fritz, 27, in the other semifinal. Alcaraz and Sinner — a pair Djokovic identified as 'the leaders of (men's) tennis today' — have combined to win the last six Slam trophies in a row. Djokovic is more than a decade older than the other men left at Wimbledon For Alcaraz, his career haul of five Slams includes the title last month at Roland-Garros, where he overcame a two-set deficit and a trio of championship points to sneak past Sinner in a five-set, 5 1/2-hour classic of a final. Sinner's count is three. Both have been ranked No. 1. (Fritz's best showing at a major was being the runner-up to Sinner at the U.S. Open last September.) All noteworthy. But nothing compared to what's on Djokovic's resume, which includes seven triumphs at Wimbledon alone — one shy of Roger Federer 's men's mark — and 100 tournament titles, along with the most weeks spent at No. 1 in the rankings by any player. 'He's a legend of our sport,' the 22nd-seeded Cobolli said Wednesday after being eliminated 6-7 (6), 6-2, 7-5, 6-4 by Djokovic. Sinner's playing style draws comparison's to Djokovic's, from the returning prowess to the court coverage to the power-plus-precision groundstrokes. Not much higher a compliment is possible. Djokovic took each of their first three head-to-head matchups, including at the All England Club in the 2022 quarterfinals and 2023 semifinals. But Sinner has gone 4-1 since. 'Me and Novak, we know (each other) ... because we played quite a lot. So we understand what's working and what's not,' said Sinner, who out-served big-hitting Ben Shelton in a 7-6 (2), 6-4, 6-4 quarterfinal victory Wednesday. 'But I've never won against him here in Wimbledon, so it's going to be a very, very tough challenge.' Worth monitoring Friday: Djokovic took an awkward fall in the last game against Cobolli; Sinner hurt his right elbow when he slipped in the last game of his fourth-round match Monday. Alcaraz seeks a sixth Grand Slam title, Fritz eyes his first Alcaraz and Fritz have met just twice, never at a major and never on grass. Alcaraz won both matches. But Fritz has become a different player over the past year, improving his returns and overall game while still possessing one of the best serves around. The surface at Wimbledon can only help, he figures. 'I'm happy that we're not playing at the French Open, on clay, with the French Open balls, 'cause that would be an absolute nightmare,' the Californian said. 'Grass is very much so an equalizer.' ___
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Golf club at centre of Wimbledon expansion row is an overgrown eyesore
The first thing you notice is the weeds. Wherever you turn, it seems little has escaped the clutches of nature's graffiti. Then there are the 'EXCLUSION ZONE' signs and their dire warnings to keep out of the most overgrown regions for your own safety or that of the local wildlife. Smaller patches of land deemed hazards are encircled by wooden or ugly plastic-mesh fencing. Even the accessible areas are unkempt, sun-scorched or dust-ridden. You have to remind yourself that you are standing on what once was Wimbledon Park Golf Club, a place of pristine fairways, sculpted bunkers and manicured greens that had stood proudly for more than a century opposite the grass tennis courts of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club (AELTC). If this is what has become of that 73-acre strip of land in the two-and-a-half years since the golf club closed, what ravages will be wreaked upon it while a bitter legal battle over its future rages on? This decaying landscape is usually closed to the public, kept under lock and key behind fences and signs that warn 'Patrol Dogs on site'. But it is opened up during Wimbledon fortnight, primarily as home to the Championships' famous queue and as a car and cycle park. This year, that has coincided with a two-day judicial review into plans to transform the defunct golf course into 39 tennis courts – including a new 8,000-seat show court – as part of a £200 million expansion of the AELTC. Those plans, which would allow the Wimbledon qualifying tournament to be brought in-house and extend the existing event staged at the grounds by a week, have pitted the AELTC against hundreds of local residents behind a campaign called Save Wimbledon Park (SWP). The warring factions have been on a collision course ever since the AELTC acquired the leasehold of the golf club for £65 million in 2018 and arguably even since it bought the freehold from Merton Council a quarter of a century earlier – when it also agreed to a covenant restricting future development on the site. 'You could not have a more protected piece of land in London,' SWP's KC, Sacha White, told the High Court hearing into last year's approval of the AELTC expansion plans by the Greater London Authority. And yet, as Telegraph Sport found when patrolling it the following day, this piece of land is far from being 'protected' thanks to a dispute which has left its future shrouded in uncertainty. That future will be a bleak one unless the AELTC is allowed to develop some sort of tennis facility on the golf club. For, what is the alternative? What use is that land to the AELTC otherwise? Why would it commit tens, or hundreds, of millions of pounds to develop it into anything else? And who would buy that land from the AELTC if they, too, were prevented from commercialising it? Merton Council certainly could never afford to buy it back. And, even if it could, would taxpayers really want hundreds of millions of pounds of public money spent transforming the golf club? Especially when the AELTC is offering to fund such a project in its entirety, convert 27 acres of private land to public parkland in the process, and even clean up the park's lake in a move that has won the support of legendary sailor and local resident Sir Ben Ainslie. Never mind scrolling through the various artists' impressions that have been released by the AELTC, you only need look at the current Wimbledon grounds to see what expansion could look like. There is surely not a more beautifully-maintained facility in all the land. It is perfectly legitimate to question whether as many as 39 new tennis courts are needed to bring the Wimbledon qualifying tournament in-house, or the extent to which local residents have been consulted about those plans, or whether moves should have been made to sweeten the deal for them. After all, Wimbledon Park Golf Club members got £85,000 each when the AELTC bought a leasehold for the land that was due to expire in 2041. But the idea that it has a viable future that excludes enough tennis courts to incentivise the AELTC to invest in it is pure fantasy. Typically, each side of the legal row has effectively blamed the other for the land being left in limbo, with senior figures at the AELTC privately questioning the motives of some of the opponents of expansion and pointing out no one had put forward an alternative plan to its own. A spokesperson said: 'Our proposals will deliver one of the greatest sporting transformations for London since 2012. 'They are crucial to ensuring Wimbledon remains at the pinnacle of tennis, one of the world's best sporting events, and a global attraction for both London and the UK. On offer are substantial year-round benefits for our community and the delivery of significant social, economic and environmental improvements. 'This includes more than 27 acres of new public parkland on what is currently inaccessible, private land. Our plans will increase the size of Wimbledon Park by a third and create spaces for people and nature to thrive. 'There will be a very significant increase in biodiversity across the site and our proposals are underpinned by more than 1,000 hours of ecological surveys, which are endorsed by the London Wildlife Trust. 'We have spoken to more than 10,000 people as part of our consultation events, and we know that the vast majority of people just want us to get on and deliver the many benefits on offer.' A spokesman for SWP, Simon Wright, told Telegraph Sport that one of the opponents of the AELTC's plan, Richard Rees, had been working on an alternative proposal for the site. But he said Rees, who was previously the lead planner for the building of Wimbledon's Court No 1 and the development of Henman Hill, was not ready to share details of that publicly. He added: 'We at Save Wimbledon Park are not anti-tennis – we love tennis and love Wimbledon. We love Wimbledon the way it is and we do not want to see it triple its current size, moving from 'tennis in an English garden' to an industrial tennis complex. 'For the last four years, the AELTC have said that the development scheme they have put forward is the only possible scheme that is acceptable to them and that there is no Plan B. 'Repeatedly, we have called for AELTC to withdraw their plans and to come up with a revised plan having consulted meaningfully with local groups and key stakeholders. We are only taking action in the High Court because AELTC have refused to engage with us in any other way. 'Despite these two days in court, we remain convinced that conversation is better than litigation. Guided by highly experienced tennis master planner Richard Rees and working with other architectural and development experts in the SWP group, we believe that alternative schemes should be possible which would allow AELTC to achieve the overwhelming majority of their original goals with a reduced environmental impact and less loss of net biodiversity. 'However, SWP are not the property developers, and the onus must therefore be on AELTC to suggest an alternative way of using the former golf course land. We urge them to do so, and to base this on a truly independent consultation with the local community. 'The local community has lost significant trust in AELTC. Withdrawing these plans and beginning again would be a good way to begin to restore that trust.'
