Landlord testifies 37,000 lb. of trash removed from property rented by alleged serial rapist
Mantha, 61, faces 20 charges, accused of victimizing seven women, six of whom worked in Calgary's sex trade. His offences include sexual assault with a weapon, administering noxious substances and kidnapping.
Mantha's trial began in January 2024 but was derailed, first when he fired his lawyers halfway through the trial and then again after he suffered a stroke in May 2024.
'The worst hoarder'
The trial resumed Tuesday with testimony from Paul Lock, who owns an acreage in Rockyview County between Chestermere and Langdon where Mantha rented a Quonset hut from late 2021 until his arrest in June 2023.
Justice Judith Shriar has already heard from several women who said they were victimized inside Mantha's RV, which was stored in the Quonset.
Lock testified that by the time Mantha was arrested, the two were "no longer on talking terms" to the point that he avoided the rented Quonset because "one of us was going to end up in jail for killing the other."
Although renting to Mantha had become a nightmare, Lock said he had no idea how bad the situation inside the Quonset was until police arrived to search the property.
Mantha was, according to Lock, "probably the worst hoarder that I've ever met in my life."
"He considered himself 'the Highway Hobo.' So if it wasn't bolted down, he'd take it," Lock told prosecutor Dominique Mathurin.
$33,000 to remove garbage
Lock said that since 2023, he's paid $33,000 to clean up his property, which involved removing 37,426 lb. (16,976 kg) of garbage, including some biohazard waste.
Police took several days to haul all of Mantha's property out of the Quonset in the course of executing a search warrant in connection with the sex assault allegations.
"My backyard looked like a landfill," said Lock.
Mantha's landlord described finding 200 crack pipes, buckets of human waste, dead animals, bags of clothing, scrap metal and wood, bricks, tiles, construction materials, tools and a shopping cart.
There were also several scrap cars, trucks and motorcycles.
'Sanctuary turned into a sewage hole'
Mantha also angered Lock by bringing women to the property.
"He was not to bring people there but he did, that's why we were at odds," said Lock.
"I know what an addict looks like … he was bringing them to my property to party or whatever they were doing, I'm not sure."
Under cross-examination by defence lawyer Justin Dean, Lock agreed that the majority of his animosity toward Mantha came after his arrest.
"Yes, because the sanctuary turned into a sewage hole," said Lock.
Two weeks have been set aside to complete the trial. A fifth complainant is scheduled to testify in the coming days.
Mantha's stroke has left him unable to speak in full sentences.
An application to have him deemed medically unfit to stand trial failed. Mantha is now using an iPad to communicate with his lawyer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
2 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Everything you need to know about restraining orders in Alberta
Article content According to Daniel Wilson, senior associate lawyer at Calgary-based Mincher Koeman, the main difference between applying for a restraining order and for an EPO to deal with family-related violence is whether the situation is urgent enough to necessitate an order without giving the defendant advance notice. Article content A no-contact order, according to Niv, is a condition that can be encompassed in either a restraining or an EPO. 'Either a judge will decide or the parties, most likely, will agree on (mutual no-contact),' he said. 'Technically that's a restraining order on both people, but it's limited to a no-contact condition.' Article content A restraining order, according to Wilson, can 'apply to an infinite number of situations'. Article content Article content 'There has to be some kind of offending conduct, like an invasion of privacy, stalking, harassment, unwelcome communication,' he said. Article content The court would have to determine if the person seeking the restraining order has a 'sincere, subjective basis for believing the offending conduct is going to continue … and that the belief is objectively reasonable,' he added. Article content The evidence would have to be specific, not speculative. 'It's not enough to say that if I don't get a restraining order, this person might engage in this unwelcome behaviour,' he said. 'The claimant would have to show that there's a likelihood that it will continue based on faces, not based on belief or dislike for someone.' Article content To qualify for an EPO, the judge has to be satisfied that it is an emergency with three determinations, according to Wilson. Article content 'The first is that family violence has occurred,' he said, whether that be physical violence, damage to property or threats of violence to a family member. Article content Article content 'Then the claimant or alleged victim has to believe that the respondent will continue or resume carrying out the family violence. Third, by reason of seriousness or urgency, the order should be granted for the immediate protection of the claimant and other family members. Article content 'So EPOs are supposed to be reserved for situations of urgency.' Article content How is a restraining order or an EPO obtained? Article content In the case of a restraining order, the person filing the application would have to give the defendant — whom the application is being filed against — 20 days notice, to allow time to make a defence. Article content 'The default principle our justice system normally works on is one of fairness and the other side is to be given an opportunity to respond to the case that is made against them before the court makes an order that will affect their rights,' Wilson said. Article content However, the court can allow for wiggle room to shorten the period of notice, whereby the defendant is instead served with 10 days notice and on the 10th day, the claimant can ask the court to shorten the notice period. Article content The court can also grant an interim or a 'without prejudice restraining order' until the hearing to approve or reject a full restraining order or EPO. 'It's just to create or preserve status quo without deciding against anyone because there hasn't been a fair hearing as yet,' he said. Article content For a client concerned about violence during the interim period, Wilson said he would first discuss the possibility of applying without serving notice. 'No harm in doing that, if you lose, you just have to make the application again,' Wilson said. Article content However, the respondent should know that any criminal acts conducted during that period could be used as evidence against them at the hearing for the order, especially actions in the nature of conduct that led to the restraining order being applied for. Article content However, an emergency protection order is a much simpler, expedited matter. As it caters to situations of emergency, a claimant seeking an order can go to a courthouse and fill out an application for the order. An available staff lawyer who will make the application to the judge for them and the claimant would have to give a brief oral evidence on the stand. The judge would then make the order or refuse to make the order, he said, the whole process of which would only take up to a half hour. Article content Article content If court isn't sitting, then a claimant can make the application via a phone call to a justice of peace. Article content Hiring a lawyer isn't necessary to obtain a protection order. But Niv said he's often called by clients who find the process too complex, lengthy and/or are too victimized to be able to write the affidavit and serve the person whom the order is taken out against. Article content 'Unless you hire third parties to do some of these tasks for you, you're going to have some interaction with the person want to last deal with,' he said. Article content It depends on the nature of the order. Article content Conditions set out in a protection order can vary widely, depending on the parties involved. For some, it may mean that one party is not allowed to set foot within a certain distance of the other or have limited contact through specific means or no contact at all. It may mean that both parties are prohibited from contacting each other or talking about each other. Article content Article content 'It can impact the defendant severely,' according to Wilson, by preventing them from returning home, visiting their neighbourhood, church, their place of employment, family members, visiting their children or discussing children with another parent. Article content 'It can prevent them from coordinating a visit where a third party brings kids to the visit just because the order might be worded in an unfortunate way,' he added. Article content The wording of an order can sometimes have unintended adverse consequences for both parties. For example, if the parties are spouses going through a separation, an order may force them to only communicate through their lawyers, instead of texting — 'which is very expensive.' Article content It could also preclude the claimant from visiting places where the respondent might be. 'It makes things practically very difficult and expensive and slow,' he said. Article content What happens if an order is defied? Article content It depends on how the order was customized. 'Because civil restraining orders and emergency protective orders are more party-driven, it's up to the private individuals to decide what they're asking for and they can negotiate that with the other individual,' Wilson said. Article content An order, for example, can include police enforcement clauses. 'If a breach is reported, the police or any peace officer can arrest the party in breach' and bring them to a judge to be held in a contempt hearing, Wilson said. Article content Because it is a civil order, breaching it is not a criminal offense, but it can result in a fine or imprisonment, Wilson said. Article content In Niv's experience, most of the time, the person served with the order stays away. Article content 'The fact that one has been filed is usually enough to tell people who are doing the problem to stop,' he said. Article content Article content However, both Niv and Wilson emphasize that it does not guarantee a person's safety against an alleged perpetrator. Article content 'An EPO or a restraining order will at best create civil or criminal consequences for a respondent who breaches it,' Wilson said. 'But it will not protect a person from an assault or an attempt on the claimant's life. It's a piece of paper, so the only thing that will do that is incarceration of the respondent.' Article content However, by filing and obtaining an order, the hope is that it would keep the person whom the order is taken out against, from breaching conditions to avoid criminal charges or civil sanctions. Article content 'They won't want to be charged with an offence. They won't want to be charged with contempt. They won't want their behaviour to reflect poorly on them if there is a parenting dispute,' he said. Article content Article content When it does happen, it's usually because someone attempted communication with a former spouse via a family member to encourage them to drop the restraining order, he said. 'Or not respecting a condition of staying away 100 m or 50 m,' he added. Article content A 'blatant, wilful' disobedience of the order would result in 'immediate consequences' as the claimant would presumably call the police. 'And if they show they won't comply with court orders, especially if they have criminal charges against them, then they're going to have their judicial interim release revoked and they might be waiting in remand until their charges are dealt with,' he said. Article content
Edmonton Journal
2 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
'Public narrative was one-sided': Hockey Canada sex assault defence lawyers respond to verdict
Five former Canadian world junior hockey players were found not guilty in a high-profile sexual assault trial related to a 2018 incident in London, Ont. The case had sparked a national reckoning over hockey culture, and what is and what isn't considered consent. Here's how the lawyers for Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote reacted to Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia's verdict, which was delivered in a London courtroom on Thursday. Article content Article content Article content Mr. McLeod will not be speaking to the media, and I understand the other players will not be speaking to the media. I will not be taking questions and other counsel who come to address you, they will not be taking any questions. Article content Mr. McLeod had confidence in the Justice process, and he welcomes Justice Carrocia's decision, confirming that he and his co defendants are not guilty of sexual assault. Justice Carrocia's carefully reasoned decision represents a resounding vindication for Mr. McLeod and for his co defendants. Justice Carrocia's found that the complainant's testimony was incredible and was unreliable. Article content For years, public perception was shaped by a one-sided narrative from a civil lawsuit that went unchallenged. In large part because hockey Canada settled the claim without first informing or consulting the players. The decision was made unilaterally, and the players were only told of the lawsuit and the settlement after the fact. Had they been consulted, they would have refused to settle, and they would have vigorously contested EM's allegations. Article content Article content That version of events dominated headlines and created a lasting and, a false, a false impression of guilt. It was only through this criminal trial that the allegations were fully and finally tested. The court compared the complainant's 2018 statements to the police, which rightly resulted in no charges with the later conflicting civil claim. Key elements of EM's story were contradicted by the evidence, exposing serious falsehood and leading to today's clear and just verdict of not guilty. Justice Carrocia rejected EM's claims of fear and her claims of non consent. That should be the takeaway from today's judgment. Article content Article content The damage to Mr. McLeod's reputation and his career has been significant. But today's decision begins to restore what was very unfairly taken away from him. Mr. McLeod is deeply grateful to his family, friends, his agent, and everybody who stood by him.
CTV News
7 hours ago
- CTV News
Police searching for girl, 12, missing since June
Khalida Moar, 12, was last seen in Winnipeg on June 8, 2025. (Winnipeg Police Service) Winnipeg police are concerned about the well-being of a 12-year-old girl who hasn't been seen in over a month. Khalida Moar was last seen at 10:30 p.m. on June 8 in Winnipeg's Silver Heights neighbourhood. She is described as five-foot-seven with a medium build, black hair and brown eyes. She was last seen wearing a black hooded sweater, black sweatpants and white Nike shoes. Police said Moar is known to frequent Brandon and Dauphin. Anyone with information on her location is asked to call police at 204-986-6250.
