logo
Check Call: New legislation targets freight fraud

Check Call: New legislation targets freight fraud

Yahoo15-04-2025
Freight fraud has continued to be a hot topic of discussion in the freight brokerage space. Last week at the Transportation Intermediaries Association annual conference, TIA President Chris Burroughs provided some guidance on the agency's plan to tackle freight fraud.
Burroughs referenced 2020 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration data showing the agency had more than 80,000 complaints of freight fraud. He called the figure 'staggering and quite frankly unexpected.'
He doubled down on the need for enforcement: 'We're also working directly with Congress and the federal agencies to push forward and getting regulations that are already on the books enforced.'
Prosecuting and otherwise doing more than just reporting bad actors and stolen freight has long been a struggle for the entire freight industry. It seems there is some hope to be found in this arena after all. A bipartisan bill has been brought to the Senate in hopes of cracking down on flash mob robberies and intricate retail theft schemes.
The Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2025 would establish a coordinated multiagency response and create tools to tackle evolving trends in organized retail theft. The two main sponsors of the bill are Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev.
The proposed law would create a department under the Department of Homeland Security and develop means to investigate and prosecute thieves.
Grassley said: 'Our bill improves the federal response to organized retail crime and establishes new tools to recover stolen goods and illicit proceeds, and deter future attacks on American retailers.'
Cortez Masto added: 'Large criminal organizations are constantly evolving their tactics to steal goods from retailers and the supply chain in communities across the Silver State [Nevada]. The rise in organized retail crime has left businesses scrambling, and it is time for Congress to pass this bipartisan legislation to help law enforcement agencies keep our communities safe.'
Grassley and Cortez Masto introduced similar legislation in 2022 and 2023. Here's hoping the third time is the charm.
Legislation like this could not come at a better time. There is a strong fear that more fraud will occur as tariffs continue to change and surge between the U.S. and China.
Grace Sharkey notes in a FreightWaves article: 'Importers facing steep duties are resorting to creative, and sometimes illegal, methods to avoid paying the required fees. Mislabeling goods, undervaluing shipments and falsely declaring the country of origin are just a few tactics being employed to bypass customs inspections.'
Sharkey also brings up the historical precedent for tariff evasion. 'These types of fraudulent activities have already had significant financial implications. In one case from the early 2000s, a group of importers used fraudulent schemes to misrepresent the country of origin of textiles from China to evade tariffs. In that instance, the perpetrators were caught, but not before costing the U.S. Treasury over $100 million in lost duties.'
A new artery for fraud and no way to stop the bleeding are the last things the supply chain needs. Last year estimated losses to fraud were $454.9 million. That's just the reported number; it's likely much larger once you get into loss of revenue, loss of business and financial fraud. The average value per theft also rose to $202,364 in 2024, up from $187,895 the previous year.
Market Check. Ontario, California, typically serves as a strong barometer for the freight market in the U.S. It's a trendsetter. With most West Coast imports coming through the ports of LA and Long Beach and then heading inland, Ontario serves as that gateway. That being said, there is plenty of excess truck capacity and most outbound lanes have decreasing spot rates.
Inbound container ships have seen a drop-off in volumes amid the threat of tariffs, which has pulled significant volume from the market. The prognosis for spot rates isn't much better as the Outbound Tender Rejection Index is 2.12% – half the national average. Ontario saw a 1.49% drop in rejection rates, which is great for shippers and brokers in the market as contract carrier compliance is incredibly high for this time of year.
Who's with whom. Tariffs on goods coming into the U.S. from Mexico were subject to a 25% tariff before tariffs were paused for 90 days. It seems as though that number is subject to an increase. President Donald Trump has brought up a long-running water dispute between the U.S. and Mexico as a reason to possibly levy higher tariffs. The spat is over a 1944 water treaty, the 'Treaty Relating to the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande.'
The gist of the treaty is that the U.S. is obligated to deliver 1.5 million acre-feet of water annually to Mexico from the Colorado River and Mexico is obligated to deliver 1,750,000 acre-feet of water over a five-year cycle to the United States from the Rio Grande, with an average annual delivery of 350,000 acre-feet.
Why does a treaty about water stand to disrupt cross-border freight? Great question. The current administration is saying Mexico has not fulfilled its water obligation. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum claims the drought has made it difficult for Mexico to comply fully with the treaty. However, the International Boundary and Water Commission, the organization that enforces the treaty, has been working to identify solutions that benefit both countries.
The water shortage is negatively impacting produce grown in the Rio Grande Valley, which can also negatively impact the freight market, especially since produce season is around the corner.
There has been no official word on whether additional tariffs would be levied or what possible actions could be taken against Mexico. The main impact seen from this will be decreased produce volumes from South Texas in a few weeks.
Trump exempts smartphones, chips, computers from tariffs
New rail-sea route boosts auto exports from western China to Middle East
How RFID helps retailers streamline reverse supply chains
ITS Logistics issues April U.S. port/rail ramp freight index
Trump's tariffs rattle fashion's global supply chain
The post Check Call: New legislation targets freight fraud appeared first on FreightWaves.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why is the price of bitcoin hitting a record high? Experts explain.
Why is the price of bitcoin hitting a record high? Experts explain.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why is the price of bitcoin hitting a record high? Experts explain.

Bitcoin vaulted to a record high on Monday, climbing more than 1% in early trading and hurtling past $120,000 for the first time. The surge comes as the U.S. House of Representatives stands poised for 'crypto week,' a series of debates over the coming days on legislation that could ease regulatory complexity long viewed as an impediment for the industry. The price of bitcoin clocked in at $120,290, amounting to a nearly 15% surge over the past month as crypto-friendly legislation made its way through Congress and investors displayed growing adoption of a new tool for investment in bitcoin. MORE: Trump admin live updates: Trump threatens 100% tariffs on Russia Ether, the second-largest cryptocurrency, also climbed 1% on Monday. Solana, another popular cryptocurrency, climbed 2%. Analysts who spoke with ABC News attributed the surge to signals of a continued government posture friendly toward crypto as well as the growing adoption of a new tool for investment in bitcoin. The rise in price also owes to a steadily approaching limit in the supply of bitcoin, which means heightened demand has outpaced the release of new bitcoins, some analysts previously told ABC News. Some observers question the role of bitcoin's limited supply, since they believe the long-known feature of bitcoin's architecture has already been factored into the asset's price. The House is set to take up the GENIUS Act, an industry-backed measure establishing rules targeting stablecoins, which are a type of cryptocurrency pegged to the value of another asset, often the U.S. dollar. Supporters of the GENIUS Act applaud the measure as a first-of-its-kind effort to formalize a key segment of the cryptocurrency industry, offering safeguards for consumers, allowing entry for conventional financial firms and growing the digital currency market. Critics of the measure, however, say it amounts to an industry-friendly set of weak regulations that fail to adequately protect consumers and police illicit trading of stablecoins. Members of the House will also debate a measure that could clarify the federal government's regulatory posture toward crypto, as well as another bill that would prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing its own digital asset. Bryan Armour, the director of passive strategies research at financial firm Morningstar, said the policy blitz in the House marks the latest in a string of positive developments for crypto in Washington, D.C., since President Donald Trump's election victory in November. Since the presidential election, the price of bitcoin has soared nearly 80%. 'Crypto week,' Armour said, foretells the 'continuation of broader crypto policy' under the Trump administration. Trump's business dealings in cryptocurrency have raised concerns among some observers about a potential conflict of interest. In March, Trump-backed crypto firm World Liberty Financial issued a stablecoin USD1. An Abu Dahbi-based investment firm last month used the stablecoin to make a $2 billion investment in crypto exchange Binance, putting Trump's company in a position to profit from the deal. Trump has denied any wrongdoing. Trump has yet to release his financial disclosures as president, so it's unclear what arrangements he has made to ensure a firewall between his personal businesses and his presidency. A White House spokesperson told Reuters in April that "President Trump's assets are in a trust managed by his children. There are no conflicts of interest." Crypto gains over recent months have also been propelled in part by U.S. approval last year of Bitcoin ETFs, or Exchange-Traded Funds. Bitcoin ETFs allow investors to buy into an asset that tracks the price movement of bitcoin, while avoiding the inconvenience and risk of purchasing the crypto coin itself. Top investment firms like Fidelity and Franklin Templeton offer bitcoin ETFs, making it easier for investors to pour funds into the world's largest cryptocurrency. As demand has grown, analysts said, the price of bitcoin has climbed. A rush of investment into Bitcoin ETFs in recent days sent the combined asset value of such investment vehicles to a record high of more than $158 billion, according to The Block, an outlet that covers digital assets. Investors placed more than a billion dollars into Bitcoin ETFs on consecutive days last week, The Block found. 'Since the U.S. approval of bitcoin ETFs, we've seen institutional adoption of bitcoin,' Nikhil Bhatia, a professor of finance and business economics at the University of Southern California who studies cryptocurrency, told ABC News. The run-up to bitcoin ETF approval in fall 2023, Bhatia added, was when bitcoin 'got back into bull market mode.' MORE: Stocks mixed after Trump issues tariffs on EU, Mexico While policy conditions and new investment tools bode well for bitcoin, the precise reasons for the recent surge remain difficult to pin down, some analysts told ABC News. Digital currencies lack an underlying value beyond the price set by the ebb and flow of investor demand, contrasting the assets with stock prices determined in part by expectations of future profits, Bryan Routledge, a professor of finance at Carnegie Mellon University's Tepper School of Business, told ABC News. 'Bitcoin prices have always been puzzling in a sense,' Routledge added. 'It begs the question: 'Why now?' I don't know what the new information is.'

Senate Republicans scramble to lock down support for Trump's spending clawbacks
Senate Republicans scramble to lock down support for Trump's spending clawbacks

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Senate Republicans scramble to lock down support for Trump's spending clawbacks

Whether and to what extent the Senate ends up tweaking the package likely hinges on the responses from the administration. Republican senators will hear from White House Budget Director Russ Vought during a closed-door lunch Tuesday about which specific accounts the administration would cut if Congress approves its request. For weeks, Republicans on both sides of the Capitol have asked the White House for those specifics, and many say they have not yet gotten satisfactory responses. 'We've been working with a number of our colleagues over the weekend trying to address concerns they have and again see what a path forward on amendments looks like,' Thune said Monday evening as he left the Capitol. Asked if he thought he had the votes to start the process on the floor, he added: 'To be determined. We're still having those conversations.' Republicans believe Collins will vote to push the rescissions package out of committee, the first step in the floor process. But they are less certain, based on where talks currently stand, whether she would agree to start debate. Asked about that second step on Monday, Collins noted Vought is coming back to the Capitol on Tuesday so 'this will be a chance to try to pin him down and get the detailed information that we need.' Other Republicans in the meeting with Collins on Monday night are expected to support the administration's effort to claw back the funding but have left the door open to supporting amendments or backing their GOP colleagues' requests for more information. 'I just think it's curious,' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) told reporters Monday night about the lack of specificity from the White House. 'I've already said I'm a lean yes,' Tillis added. 'But I think there's some very important process questions that people are asking that could make me rethink that, particularly just answering the questions of the members.' Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( who is hosting the lunch with Vought, said 'hopefully we can get a lot of questions answered' there. When asked if she'll be offering any amendments or needs to see specific changes, she added: 'No, but I'm listening.'

Biden says he made the clemency decisions that were recorded with autopen
Biden says he made the clemency decisions that were recorded with autopen

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Biden says he made the clemency decisions that were recorded with autopen

'I made every decision,' Biden said in a phone interview Thursday, asserting that he had his staff use an autopen replicating his signature on the clemency warrants because 'we're talking about a whole lot of people.' Advertisement The interview was Biden's first about the parallel investigations begun by the Trump White House, the Justice Department, and Congress into a series of clemency decisions made by Biden in his final weeks in office and his mental acuity during his term. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republicans in Congress have demanded sworn interviews with former Biden aides, prompting them to hire their own lawyers. Some lawyers are said to have warned their clients not to talk publicly and about the dangers of testifying because the Justice Department under Trump might be eager to bring perjury charges over any inconsistency, no matter how minor. Biden's former White House doctor, who has said his medical evaluations showed he was fit to serve, invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions from lawmakers last week. His lawyers cited the pending Justice Department inquiry and the risk of being ensnared in ambiguous circumstances. But Biden, as a former president, has greater constitutional defenses against being subpoenaed by Congress. Advertisement The full picture of what Biden did on pardon and clemency decisions, and how much he directed those decisions and the actions of his staff, including the use of the autopen, may come down to tens of thousands of Biden White House emails that the National Archives has turned over as part of the investigation by the Trump White House and the Justice Department. Those emails contain keywords like 'clemency,' 'pardon' and 'commutation' from November 2024 through Jan. 20, 2025, according to people familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive issue. The Times has reviewed several dozen of those emails, which discussed each of the major grants of clemency that were recorded by an autopen near the end of Biden's term. But the Times has not seen the full extent of the emails, so it is impossible to capture the totality of information they contain or what else they might show about Biden's involvement in the pardon and clemency decisions. But those that were reviewed by the Times show that the Biden White House had a process to establish that Biden had orally made decisions in meetings before the staff secretary, Stefanie Feldman, who managed use of the autopen, would have clemency records put through the signing device. Asked what evidence the Trump White House has that Biden did not authorize the clemency actions, a spokesperson, Harrison Fields, said Sunday that Biden 'should not be trusted,' adding, 'The truth will come out about who was, in fact, running the country.' Advertisement While Biden had previously criticized the GOP claims that he did not make the clemency decisions as 'ridiculous and false' in a written statement, he spoke to the Times as he and his team are stepping up efforts to counter the attack by Trump and his congressional allies. Trump, asked by a reporter last month whether he had uncovered evidence that anything had been illegally signed without Biden's knowledge, said no. But he cited his rival's debate performance in June 2024, when Biden, 81 at the time, delivered halting and meandering answers. Biden withdrew soon after from his reelection bid. Age-related cognitive decline is a spectrum. At one end, many older people become more prone to blanking on names or losing their train of thought when speaking at length, but remain able to process information and make reasoned decisions. At the other, some develop profound dementia. Republicans are positing an extreme version, claiming that Biden was incapacitated. They are speculating that his staff conspired to use the autopen to make presidential decisions in his name. At the end of his term, Biden reduced the sentences of nearly 4,000 federal convicts and preemptively pardoned politically prominent people he considered potential targets of Trump for criminal investigations. Biden said in Thursday's interview that he had his staff use an autopen for the warrants because he had granted clemency to so many people; the autopen was used, in all, on 25 pardon and commutation warrants from last December to January. Some of the individual warrants included large batches of names because they all fell into the same broad policy category, such as reducing the sentences of nonviolent drug offenders who met standards Biden established. Advertisement Trump and his congressional allies are focused in particular on trying to delegitimize Biden's final batch of clemency actions. That set extended preemptive pardons to many people Trump perceives as enemies, including General Mark A. Milley, Dr. Anthony Fauci and members and staff of the House committee that investigated the Capitol riot. Trump has claimed on social media that the Jan. 6 committee pardons are invalid, asserting, without offering evidence, that Biden 'did not know anything about them!' In the 10-minute interview, which the Times requested as part of its reporting on the investigations, Biden said he shielded those people, along with members of his family, so they would not have to run up large legal bills from politically motivated investigations by the Trump Justice Department. 'Everybody knows how vindictive he is, so we knew that they'd do what they're doing now,' Biden said, adding, 'I consciously made all those decisions.' This article originally appeared in .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store