logo
In Md., Moore's weed pardons are a political pitch. What's the impact?

In Md., Moore's weed pardons are a political pitch. What's the impact?

Washington Post4 days ago
Last June, Gov. Wes Moore (D) issued a blanket pardon to 100,000 people in Maryland, forgiving decades of low-level marijuana possession charges in one of the nation's most far-reaching acts of clemency.
The historic act, which the governor's office said forgave 175,000 misdemeanor cannabis possession and misdemeanor drug paraphernalia convictions, was praised by criminal justice reform advocates as a symbolic but meaningful step in rectifying harm done by the failed war on drugs. The Juneteenth pardons have since become a cornerstone of Moore's political pitch as he seeks a second term as governor and raises his national profile amid speculation over a potential 2028 presidential bid.
A year after the pardons — which Moore has called record setting 'both in impact and scope' — their practical impact has been limited.
The Maryland Judiciary added a pardon notation to the bottom of the affected cases in the court system's publicly available online case search database, a signal of the state's forgiveness to landlords or potential employers inclined to research someone's criminal record. As a follow-up during this year's state legislative session, Moore championed the Expungement Reform Act of 2025, which, among other things, was meant to hide the 175,000 pardoned charges from the court's public database.
But that law, which the governor's office helped write, excludes two of the three charges he pardoned. The omission calls into question whether about 18,000 forgiven convictions — for misdemeanor use of drug paraphernalia or possession with intent to use drug paraphernalia — will actually be cleared from case search when that part of the law goes into effect in January.
The new law's impact on the other 150,000 or so charges that were included, all for misdemeanor cannabis possession, is unclear because many were already expunged last summer — just weeks after Moore's pardons — as part of the Maryland Cannabis Reform Act passed by state lawmakers in 2023, a Washington Post review of those laws and state data found.
The governor's office says the new law will apply to a subgroup of people who have other charges on their records besides cannabis possession but were not covered by the 2023 law. A Moore spokesperson, however, was unable to say how many such cases exist.
Moore's senior spokesman, Carter Elliott, did not answer questions from The Post about why the paraphernalia charges were omitted from the governor's 2025 law. But he said in a statement that the administration will work with the judiciary branch and state lawmakers to 'ensure that the legislative intent to include all pardoned convictions are hidden from view.'
'Gov. Moore's historic mass pardons were intended to right the wrong of a policy that criminalized the possession and use of marijuana and disproportionately impacted communities of color, because no one should continue to suffer the ill effects of a conviction for conduct that is no longer a crime in the State of Maryland,' Elliott said in a separate statement.
On Juneteenth of this year, Moore's office announced an additional 6,938 pardons that were mistakenly omitted from the original pardons. But a Maryland Judiciary spokesperson did not respond to questions about whether those simple cannabis possession charges should have been expunged under the 2023 law or if they'll be expunged now. The governor's office said they will be hidden from the court's public online database under this year's new law.
Sen. Jeff Waldstreicher (D-Montgomery), who is vice chair of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee and helped author the Expungement Reform Act, said the intent of that bill was to include all pardoned convictions.
'If for some reason there was an error in the drafting, the legislature will unquestionably come back and remedy that error with emergency legislation that would take effect immediately,' Waldstreicher said. 'But what we should not do is allow the complicated processes between three branches of government to obscure the moral act that the governor took.'
Adrian Rocha, policy director for the Last Prisoner Project advocacy group seeking to end the harmful impacts of those convicted for offenses that are now legal, said governors often use their pardon powers only in lame duck periods.
'Here we have a first-term governor who has front loaded pardons,' said Rocha, who worked with Moore's office on securing the pardons. 'It's a very strong message about where Governor Wes Moore believes his impact exists and what he wants to do with that.'
Cannabis reform has been a key issue for Moore since he took office in 2023. He has often spoken about the importance of rectifying the harms done to Black and Brown communities through mass incarceration due to drug arrests. Moore's administration created a Cannabis Workforce Development Program that provides job opportunities in that industry to people convicted of marijuana-related offenses. The administration also distributes grants and loans to small businesses entering the cannabis industry through a Cannabis Business Assistance Fund established in 2023.
Long before Moore was elected governor, state lawmakers also had been chipping away at the legacy of the war on drugs in Maryland, complex work requiring the cooperation of three distinctly different and constitutionally separate branches of government: the executive, the legislature and the courts.
Maryland legalized medical cannabis in 2014 and Maryland voters approved the legalization of recreational use in a 2022 ballot referendum, paving the way for lawmakers to pass the Maryland Cannabis Reform Act in 2023 — which Moore signed into law.
Along the way, lawmakers prioritized the purging of court records for cannabis-related criminal charges through expungement, meaning someone with such a conviction could submit a petition to the courts requesting the permanent obliteration of all related records.
An expungement is the most effective tool for clearing someone's criminal record, guaranteeing it will be purged from the three places documentation of it exists: the courthouse, the Maryland Judiciary case search database and the state's central repository, which is what gets tapped during criminal background checks. But the expungement process is also burdensome and expensive for those seeking relief, often requiring the help of a lawyer.
'These systems are complicated, they're cumbersome, there's paperwork,' said Heather Warnken, executive director of the Center for Criminal Justice Reform at the University of Baltimore School of Law. 'People who have been held back and marginalized by their convictions are facing even greater barriers to be able to engage with these systems.'
Advocates have championed laws that mandate automatic expungement of certain charges. It's the only way to truly give people a clean slate and second chance, said Del. David Moon (D-Montgomery), one such advocate. Auto-expungement was a key component of the Maryland Cannabis Reform Act of 2023, which, in part, ordered the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services to purge misdemeanor cannabis charges from the central repository.
But officials from the Maryland judiciary have told lawmakers that auto-expungement is a financial and resource burden, prompting the General Assembly to instead use a method called 'shielding' in reform laws. Shielding hides criminal records from the public-facing Maryland Judiciary Case Search database — a form of relief that is simpler to achieve. But it does not include the destruction of records at the courthouse or from the central repository.
Waldstreicher expressed frustration with the Maryland Judiciary for its reticence to commit to auto-expungement policies. 'The judiciary continues to plead poverty when it comes to their ability to expunge records,' Waldstreicher said.
The governor's office said in a statement that administration officials chose to shield the charges the governor pardoned rather than expunging them because shielding 'provides many of the same benefits of an expungement, and does so without requiring that the individual take any action.' The governor's office added that auto-shielding was done 'using existing state resources' and 'without flooding courthouses with expungement petitions.'
To completely purge their charges, those who were pardoned will still need to apply for expungement. Of the 100,000 people Moore pardoned, just 700 have taken that extra step, the judiciary said. It's not clear if those expungement applications were for the cannabis possession or paraphernalia charges. But the gap highlights the legal and administrative hurdles faced by people hoping for a clean slate in a state that disproportionately arrests and imprisons Black people
Officials in Moore's office and criminal justice reform advocates said they've known since the June 2024 pardons that clemency was just the first step in a multipart plan to bring relief to those charged with acts that are no longer crimes in Maryland. Since then, the administration has worked to bring additional relief.
The Maryland Expungement Reform Act expands expungement eligibility to three additional misdemeanor criminal charges: driving without a license, cashing a bad check and possession of a stolen credit card. Additional charges that were written into the original bill but later killed by lawmakers included resisting arrest, making a false statement to an officer and counterfeiting drug prescriptions, the latter of which would have given expungement eligibility to those who became addicted to opioids often originally prescribed by doctors.
Most important to advocates, the new law overturns a 2022 Appellate Court of Maryland ruling that barred expungement for anyone who had violated their probation, even if the underlying charge was eligible under state law.
The appeals decision originated with the case of a man, called Abhishek I. in court documents, who had pleaded guilty to low-level theft and was sentenced to probation. But he violated that probation when he was later arrested for marijuana possession, serving four days in jail.
When he applied to have his theft conviction expunged a decade later, a judge denied his request, ruling that Abhishek's probation violation meant he had not satisfied the terms of his sentence and, therefore, was not eligible for expungement.
Abhishek's attorneys unsuccessfully appealed the decision, with the Maryland appeals court ruling that the state's expungement laws at the time did not clearly address probation violations.
The Expungement Reform Act provides that clarity by defining the satisfaction of a sentence as 'the time when a sentence has expired, including any period of probation, parole, or mandatory supervision.' Under that part of the law, which goes into effect in October of this year, a probation violation cannot automatically undermine an expungement application.
Warnken called the governor's support for the Expungement Reform Act a 'game changer' that helped the Abhishek reform succeed.
Aside from the Expungement Reform Act, all other expungement proposals died in committee during the most recent legislative session. Among other changes, those bills sought to make all criminal charges eligible for expungement and auto-expunge certain charges.
When asked about his pardons and follow-up legislation earlier this year, Moore told reporters that he believes it is the 'responsibility' of the government to 'make sure that we're not just putting in laws that make sense in theory, but then we're also putting the supports in place to make people actually believe that redemption and efficient governance can be a reality for them as well.'
'Sometimes when you pass a really important piece of legislation or do things that I think are good, important, you still have to come back and make adjustments to make sure that it's being done correctly and being implemented properly,' the governor said.
Warnken said the next frontier of cannabis reform in Maryland should include expanding relief — through pardons and legislation — for those with low-level, nonviolent criminal charges related to marijuana.
'The power of the pardon and the forgiveness is so profound and absolute, but it's not going to wipe it away from the record searches,' she said. 'These are all just steps and we have to keep going. We can't just take victory laps.'
Katie Shepherd and Erin Cox contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk Mentions ‘Epstein List' Again After Trump Mocks His America Party
Musk Mentions ‘Epstein List' Again After Trump Mocks His America Party

Forbes

time22 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Musk Mentions ‘Epstein List' Again After Trump Mocks His America Party

Elon Musk on Monday took an apparent jab at President Donald Trump—posting on X about the inconsistent White House claims about a so-called 'Epstein list'—after the president mocked the billionaire's announcement of a new political party, as the feud between the two former allies is apparently back on. The feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump continued to escalate after Musk ... More announced the formation of his own America Party. Getty Images In a post on X, Musk shared a meme that seems to call out the Trump administration over its failure to release a purported list of powerful clients kept by disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Musk's post is likely a response to an Axios report, which cited a Justice Department and FBI investigation report that found no evidence of Epstein maintaining such a list and using it to blackmail influential figures. Musk also responded to a post from another X account that contrasted the Axios report with an older news headline that cited Attorney General Pam Bondi saying the Epstein list was on her desk. When the feud between Musk and Trump first broke out last month, the billionaire alleged without evidence the White House had not released the Epstein list because Trump's name was on it. Musk has since deleted that post and the feud briefly thawed last month, with the billionaire expressing regret for his remarks. In a post on Truth Social on Sunday, Trump said he was 'saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks.' The president said a third political party has 'never succeeded in the United States' and claimed the U.S. political system was 'not designed for them.' Trump said third parties were only good for creating 'Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS.' Before he flew from Bedminster, New Jersey, to Washington, D.C. on Sunday, Trump told reporters Musk's third-party idea was 'ridiculous.' The president added that U.S. politics have 'always been a two-party system, and starting a third party just adds to confusion…so he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous.' What Do We Know About The America Party? Musk mentioned the idea of an 'America Party' last week as he assailed Trump's signature spending bill in a series of posts on X. The billionaire had tweeted: 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day.' The X owner later retweeted the results of an unscientific poll he conducted on the platform last month and wrote, 'VOX POPULI VOX DEI 80% voted for a new party.' Musk informally launched the party on Saturday, after bashing both the Democrats and the GOP by referring to them as the 'uniparty.' According to the Axios report, the Trump administration plans to release both raw and "enhanced" versions of videos that reportedly show that no one entered the area of the prison where Epstein was being held on the night of his death. The investigators believe this supports the earlier medical evidence that the financier took his own life, a version of events several right-wing influencers have questioned in the past. The memo also reportedly notes that investigators did not find any 'incriminating 'client list'' owned by Epstein or 'credible evidence' to support claims that Epstein was blackmailing influential clients. Tangent In the Truth Social post, where he mocked Musk's new party, Trump said Musk was angry about his signature spending bill's passage, as it 'eliminates the ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate.' The president claimed when Musk endorsed him in the 2024 race, he asked the billionaire 'whether or not he knew that I was going to terminate the EV Mandate…He said he had no problems with that.' Trump also said Musk had asked him to nominate 'one of his close friends,' Jared Isaacman, for the NASA administrator role. The president claimed he was 'surprised to learn' that Isaacman was a 'blue blooded Democrat' and also felt it was 'inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the Space Business, run NASA, when NASA is such a big part of Elon's corporate life.' Trump withdrew Isaacman's nomination in May. Further Reading Trump-Musk Feud: Musk Says Trump's Comments About Him Are 'Just Plain Wrong' (Forbes) Elon Musk Suggests His New 'America Party' Will Target Senate And House Seats (Forbes) Elon Musk Announces New 'America Party' In Split With Democrats And Republicans (Forbes)

Florida man, 60, says he lost $1.6M in an elaborate investment scam — fronted by a woman he'd known for years
Florida man, 60, says he lost $1.6M in an elaborate investment scam — fronted by a woman he'd known for years

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Florida man, 60, says he lost $1.6M in an elaborate investment scam — fronted by a woman he'd known for years

Real estate scams are all too common and older people tend to be easy targets. When Jose Luis Fernandez of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida invested money with Ybis Del Carmen of Realty Golden Group, he wasn't worried. After all, he had known her since 2012. But authorities say Del Carmen wound up stealing more than $1.6 million from Fernandez through an elaborate real estate fraud scheme. And now, Fernandez's life will never be the same. "I lost everything," he told WPLG Local 10 News, the pain evident in his voice. I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Fernandez says he trusted Del Carmen to invest his money in a six foreclosure properties valued at around $842,000, reports WPLG Local 10 News. He gave her full access to his business bank account at Truist Bank so she could facilitate those transactions on his behalf. Del Carmen gave Fernandez documentation in support of the various sales, but it was all fake, say police. She never bought any of the properties she said she did. Fernandez became suspicious when he wanted his money and Del Carmen kept making excuses about why it wasn't available. Now, he calls his situation "very complicated." Members of the Sunny Isles Beach Police Department arrested Del Carmen, who faces charges of organized fraud and grand theft, says Local 10 News. And there's concern that she may have defrauded investors other than Fernandez. People with knowledge of her real estate fraud, or related fraud, are encouraged to report it anonymously at 305-471-8477. Read more: No millions? No problem. With as little as $10, here's of diversified assets usually only available to major players In 2024, there were 9,359 real estate fraud complaints filed, according to the FBI's Internet Crime Report. All told, consumers lost more than $173,000 million to real estate fraud. Sadly, it was older people who were most likely to lose money to real estate scams. In 2024, people ages 50 to 59 lost $22,466,504 to real estate fraud, compared to $6,623,054 among people in their 30s and $9,331,733 among people in their 40s. But people ages 60 and over reported 1,765 real estate crimes last year totaling an astounding $76,324,236 in losses. Because so many older people live or retire in Florida, it's not surprising that the state ranks among those with the most fraud complaints. In 2024, Florida came in third in that category, following only California and Texas. It was also third in terms of total financial losses. A big reason older people may be more likely to fall victim to real estate fraud is that they have more assets than their younger counterparts. And as the FBI states about scams in general, "Seniors are often targeted because they tend to be trusting and polite. They also usually have financial savings, own a home and have good credit — all of which make them attractive to scammers." In the context of real estate, the problem is that it's not difficult to create documents that look legitimate. Scammers can download public records and duplicate or manipulate them in a way that seems official. Plus, it's just not that difficult to pull off a real estate scam in general, even when the victim is someone younger and relatively tech-savvy. All a criminal needs to do is search for listings, pretend to be the agent in charge, forge some sale documents and take people's money. It's easy enough to look at public records to find a given property's rightful owner's name. From there, anyone can draft a contract, get a fake notary stamp and take other such actions that lead an innocent person to believe they're buying real estate when they aren't. You don't necessarily have to be older to fall victim to a real estate scam. But if you're vigilant, you can potentially avoid one. First, be wary of properties that seem like too much of a bargain. If you do some research and find that the average home price in your area for a three-bedroom is $400,000, a similarly sized home being sold for $200,000 should raise a red flag. Also, be careful with off-market properties. If a given home isn't listed on MLS, you may want to stay away. It's also important to verify the credentials of anyone who tries to sell you a home. Before you agree to a transaction, get references for the real estate agent involved and check up on their license to make sure it's valid. Unfortunately, it's possible for someone to have a valid license and still engage in fraud, but it's an extra layer of protection nonetheless, which means the fraudster has more to lose. Finally, always read your paperwork thoroughly and dig up all of the necessary property details. Inspect the deed and title of the property and review your contract carefully. Your best bet may be to hire a real estate attorney who is not only able to review your contract, but help with their expertise to do due diligence so you get extra peace of mind. This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Money doesn't have to be complicated — sign up for the free Moneywise newsletter for actionable finance tips and news you can use. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Sign in to access your portfolio

A Vermont dairy farm was raided. The mixed messages from Washington since then have increased fears
A Vermont dairy farm was raided. The mixed messages from Washington since then have increased fears

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A Vermont dairy farm was raided. The mixed messages from Washington since then have increased fears

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — After six 12-hour shifts milking cows, José Molina-Aguilar's lone day off was hardly relaxing. On April 21, he and seven co-workers were arrested on a Vermont dairy farm in what advocates say was one of the state's largest-ever immigration raids. 'I saw through the window of the house that immigration were already there, inside the farm, and that's when they detained us,' he said in a recent interview. 'I was in the process of asylum, and even with that, they didn't respect the document that I was still holding in my hands.' Four of the workers were swiftly deported to Mexico. Molina-Aguilar, released after a month in a Texas detention center with his asylum case still pending, is now working at a different farm and speaking out. 'We must fight as a community so that we can all have, and keep fighting for, the rights that we have in this country,' he said. The owner of the targeted farm declined to comment. But Brett Stokes, a lawyer representing the detained workers, said the raid sent shock waves through the entire Northeast agriculture industry. 'These strong-arm tactics that we're seeing and these increases in enforcement, whether legal or not, all play a role in stoking fear in the community,' said Stokes, director of the Center for Justice Reform Clinic at Vermont Law and Graduate School. That fear remains given the mixed messages coming from the White House. President Donald Trump, who campaigned on a promise to deport millions of immigrants working in the U.S. illegally, last month paused arrests at farms, restaurants and hotels. But less than a week later, the assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security said worksite enforcement would continue. Such uncertainty is causing problems in big states like California, where farms produce more than three-quarters of the country's fruit and more than a third of its vegetables. But it's also affecting small states like Vermont, where dairy is as much a part of the state's identity as its famous maple syrup. Nearly two-thirds of all milk production in New England comes from Vermont, where more than half the state's farmland is dedicated to dairy and dairy crops. There are roughly 113,000 cows and 7,500 goats spread across 480 farms, according to the Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets, which pegs the industry's annual economic impact at $5.4 billion. That impact has more than doubled in the last decade, with widespread help from immigrant labor. More than 90% of the farms surveyed for the agency's recent report employed migrant workers. Among them is Wuendy Bernardo, who has lived on a Vermont dairy farm for more than a decade and has an active application to stop her deportation on humanitarian grounds: Bernardo is the primary caregiver for her five children and her two orphaned younger sisters, according to a 2023 letter signed by dozens of state lawmakers. Hundreds of Bernardo's supporters showed up for her most recent check-in with immigration officials. 'It's really difficult because every time I come here, I don't know if I'll be going back to my family or not,' she said after being told to return in a month. Like Molina-Aguilar, Rossy Alfaro also worked 12-hour days with one day off per week on a Vermont farm. Now an advocate with Migrant Justice, she said the dairy industry would collapse without immigrant workers. 'It would all go down,' she said. 'There are many people working long hours, without complaining, without being able to say, 'I don't want to work.' They just do the job.' ___ Ramer reported from Concord, N.H. Holly Ramer And Amanda Swinhart, The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store