Tesla approves US$29bil in shares to Musk as court case rumbles on
WASHINGTON : Electric vehicle maker Tesla handed its chief executive Elon Musk a US$29 billion pay package today, as a lengthy legal battle over his compensation winds on.
The company said in a statement it will award an 'interim' distribution of 96 million Tesla shares to Musk as it 'intends to compensate its CEO for his future services commensurate with his contributions to our company and shareholders'.
'We have recommended this award as a first step, 'good faith' payment,' it added when announcing the board's approval of granting new shares to Musk.
'Retaining Elon is more important than ever before.'
The massive pay package comes eight months after the judge in a Delaware court rejected Musk's even larger US$55.8 billion compensation package at Tesla, denying an attempt to restore the pay deal through a shareholder vote.
In an initial decision in early 2024, the court struck down the package as excessive and unfair to shareholders.
Musk has appealed the ruling.
The new package would boost Musk's roughly 13% stake in the company, at a time when he seeks to prevent a possible ouster by activist shareholders.
Musk would be required to forfeit the new compensation package should the appeals court rule in his favour and grant him the full 2018 compensation, which at the time was valued at US$55.8 billion.
The new payout is sure to fuel concerns about the compensation for Musk, already the world's richest man, and whether the Tesla board is placing a sufficient check on the company's chief executive.
The statement posted on Tesla's X account came in the form of a letter to shareholders written by Robyn Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, the two members of the board's special committee addressing the Musk compensation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysia Sun
31 minutes ago
- Malaysia Sun
Elon Musk's engagement fuels rise of hard-right voices
ROME, Italy: Across Europe, and sometimes even the world, a growing number of hard-right politicians, activists, and online influencers have discovered that getting the attention of Elon Musk is a powerful shortcut to amplifying their voices. Consider the case of a German politician whose party has been flagged as extremist by her country's own domestic intelligence service. For years, her reach was limited. However, on the days Musk liked or replied to her posts, her audience on X (formerly Twitter) leapt from a steady 230,000 to more than 2.2 million. Soon after, she guided her party to its strongest showing at the ballot box. In Britain, an anti-immigration activist who was once banned from Twitter and even jailed for contempt of court found new life after Musk reinstated him in late 2023. Since his return, he has mentioned or tagged Musk more than 120 times, earning nearly one million new followers. What once looked like the end of his career in public life has instead turned into a revival, thanks in no small part to the billionaire's willingness to grant him space on the platform. Even minor figures have benefited. A little-known influencer from Cyprus, who entered politics with little more than a fixation on Musk, suddenly emerged as a surprise member of the European Parliament. Before his win, his social-media goal seemed simple: to meet and embrace Musk. He not only got his hug but also a political boost. On days Musk engaged with his posts, his views skyrocketed from about 300,000 to nearly 10 million. Although Musk has soured in Washington politics—he resigned from President Donald Trump's advisory council this year and more recently has traded insults with Trump as he pursues his own political ambitions—his power on X has only grown. The platform he bought for US$44 billion has become his personal stage, giving him the ability to boost allies, undermine critics, and shape political conversations across borders. An Associated Press analysis of public data shows just how influential his digital megaphone has become in Europe. Reviewing more than 20,000 posts by 11 far-right figures in six countries, AP found that Musk's interactions often triggered surges in attention and followers for accounts aligned with nationalist, anti-immigration, or anti-progressive agendas. Musk himself has engaged with these accounts nearly 190 times since taking over Twitter, while European influencers have tagged or replied to him close to a thousand times. The results, European lawmakers warn, are troubling. "Every alarm bell needs to ring," said Christel Schaldemose, a vice president of the European Parliament who focuses on election integrity and digital regulation. She and others see Musk's behavior not simply as casual banter but as a form of political intervention—foreign interference of a kind Europe has long feared from Russia or China, now emanating from Silicon Valley. The numbers are striking. One influencer who had about 120,000 followers when Musk purchased Twitter in October 2022 grew to more than 1.2 million by early 2025. Seven other European accounts recorded six-figure jumps in the same period. While other forces, including national politics, certainly contributed, AP's findings suggest that Musk's attention can be the decisive spark that propels local actors onto the global stage. Musk himself frames his role differently. Declaring himself a "free speech absolutist," he has repeatedly argued that X should serve as an open forum for ideas, no matter how controversial. Yet critics point out that the platform is not neutral—it amplifies Musk's speech and those he chooses to elevate. Indeed, his own account has become the single most dominant presence on X. Since his acquisition, Musk's followers have more than doubled to more than 220 million, eclipsing every other account. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi saw a 25 percent jump over the same period, adding 21 million followers. Donald Trump's account grew by 12 million, or 14 percent. Pop star Taylor Swift managed just three million new followers, a three percent gain. None of them come close to Musk's relentless climb. The effect is a further concentration of digital power in the hands of one individual. Musk now commands the largest audience on a platform used by hundreds of millions worldwide, with the ability to direct attention at will. For governments, regulators, and voters, the question is no longer whether Musk matters in European politics. The question is how much—and whether democracies can adapt to a world where the world's richest man, through a single platform, can tilt debates, boost movements, and disrupt political balances that have held for decades.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Australia's internet network signs Amazon satellite service
SYDNEY (Reuters) -The Australian government-owned internet network hired Amazon's untested startup satellite service to provide connectivity to people who cannot access its terrestrial network rather than Elon Musk's Starlink. From next year, low-Earth orbit satellites owned by Amazon's Project Kuiper will start replacing two Australian government-owned satellites due for decommissioning in 2032, NBN Co and Amazon said in a joint statement on Tuesday. The deal, for which financial terms were not disclosed, is designed to give high-speed internet to some 300,000 homes and businesses that NBN's terrestrial network does not reach. The thousands of low-Earth orbit satellites are connected to each other through optical links and communicate with antennas and other connection points on the ground. The deal represents a missed opportunity for Starlink, by far the world's biggest provider of such network services and which already has more than 250,000 customers in Australia, according to industry data. Australia's two biggest telecoms providers sell Starlink residential connection dishes and some government entities, including the Australian Electoral Commission, also have contracts with the company. Starlink, a unit of Musk's SpaceX rocket company, now has 8,000 fast-orbiting satellites since it began launching them in 2019, while Amazon's service has just 78 since its first launch in April. NBN and Amazon said Project Kuiper would ultimately have more than 3,200. NBN said the decision followed a rigorous procurement process, but did not say why it had chosen the Amazon service. Starlink was not immediately available for comment. "It is true that Amazon Kuiper has not launched services yet in Australia or globally, but they are reportedly pumping in about $15 billion into that programme," said Gavin Williams, chief development officer for regional and remote services at NBN. "We have every confidence that we've got a partner in Kuiper that will do what they say they're going to do," he added in an interview. Asked if Musk's ownership of Starlink played a part in the decision, Williams said only that NBN supplied critical infrastructure with regulatory and legal obligations and "technical, operational, and commercial imperatives that fall into that consideration were contemplated and ventilated through the procurement process." (Reporting by Byron Kaye and Alasdair Pal; Editing by Kate Mayberry)
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Fed's Daly says time is nearing for rate cuts, may need more than two
San Francisco Fed president Mary Daly observed that the job market was losing strength, without clear signs of persistent tariff-led inflation. (X/@MaryDalyEcon pic) WASHINGTON : San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank president Mary Daly on Monday said that given mounting evidence that the US job market is softening and no signs of persistent tariff-driven inflation, the time is nearing for interest rate cuts. 'I was willing to wait another cycle, but I can't wait forever,' Daly said of the Fed's decision last week to leave short-term borrowing costs in their 4.25%-4.50% range rather than cut them, as a couple of her colleagues wanted and as President Donald Trump has demanded. While that doesn't mean a September rate cut is a lock, she said, 'I would lean to thinking that every meeting going forward is a live meeting to think about these policy adjustments.' The two quarter-point interest-rate cuts that Fed policymakers back in June penciled in for this year still 'look to be an appropriate amount of recalibration, and less important is, does it happen in September and December than does it happen at all…there's all kinds of permutations to get those two cuts.' Daly said there is still plenty of data including a couple of labour market and inflation reports due out before the Fed's policy-setting meeting, in September, and she's keeping an open mind. 'We of course could do fewer than two (rate cuts) if inflation picks up and spills over or if the labour market springs back,' Daly said. But 'I think the more likely thing is that we might have to do more than two…we also should be prepared in my judgment to do more if the labor market looks to be entering that period of weakness and we still haven't seen spillovers to inflation.' A Labor Department report Friday showed US employers added just 73,000 jobs last month, and massive revisions to previously reported data showed only 33,000 jobs were added in the two prior months. Those figures, to Daly's mind, don't mean the job market is precariously weak – in times of economic flux, she said, raw employment numbers are often less informative than ratios like the unemployment rate, which ticked up just a tenth of a percentage point in July to 4.2%. Still, she said, looking at a broad dashboard of labour-market measures, there is 'evidence after piece of evidence' that the labour market is softening quite a bit compared to last year. 'I would see further softening as an unwelcome result,' she said. 'I'm comfortable with the decision we made in July, but I am increasingly less comfortable with making that decision again and again.' At the same time, she said, there's no evidence that tariff-driven price increases are seeping more broadly into inflation, and if the Fed waits long enough to be certain it won't – a process that could take six months or a year, she said – the Fed will 'for sure' be too late to move. The Fed is approaching a 'tradeoff space where you are trying to make a judgment about where does policy need to be to continue to put downward pressure on inflation, and where does it need to be to continue to make sure that sustainable employment can be achieved,' she said. 'That's why I didn't think that July was a necessary change, but I do think, increasingly, policy is not aligned.'
