logo
Louis Pasteur's Relentless Hunt for Germs Floating in the Air

Louis Pasteur's Relentless Hunt for Germs Floating in the Air

New York Times17-02-2025
Louis Pasteur was at his most comfortable when working in his Paris laboratory. It was there that he had some of his greatest scientific triumphs, including experiments that helped confirm germs can cause disease. 'Everything gets complicated away from the laboratory,' he once complained to a friend.
But in 1860, years before he became famous for developing vaccines and heating milk to kill pathogens, Pasteur ventured to the top of a glacier, on a remarkable quest for invisible life.
He and a guide began at the base of Mont Blanc in the Alps, hiking through dark stands of pines. Behind them, a mule carried baskets of long‑necked glass chambers that sloshed with broth. They ascended a steep trail until they reached Mer de Glace, the sea of ice.
The wind blew briskly over the glacier, and the vale echoed with the sound of frozen boulders crashing down the slopes. Pasteur struggled to make out the path in the glare of sunlight bouncing off the ice.
When the scientist reached an altitude of 2,000 meters, he finally stopped. He removed one of the glass chambers from the mule's pack and raised it over his head. With his free hand, he grabbed a pair of tongs and used them to snap off the end of the neck. The cold air rushed inside the container.
The sight of Pasteur holding a globe of broth over his head would have baffled other travelers visiting Mer de Glace that day. If they had asked him what he was doing, his answer might have seemed mad. Pasteur was on a hunt, he later wrote, for 'the floating germs of the air.'
Now, 165 years later, scientists around the world hunt for floating germs. Some study how coronaviruses wafting through buses and restaurants spread Covid. Spores of fungi can travel thousands of miles, infecting people and plants. Oceans deliver microbes into the air with every crashing wave. Even clouds, scientists now recognize, are alive with microbes.
The sky's ecosystem is known as the aerobiome. In Pasteur's day, it had no name. The very idea of living things drifting through the air was too strange to imagine.
But Pasteur began to wonder about the possibility of airborne life when he was a little-known chemist teaching at the University of Lille in France. There, the father of one his students approached him for help. The man owned a distillery where he used yeast to turn beet juice into alcohol. But the juice had inexplicably turned rancid.
Inspecting the liquid under a microscope, Pasteur discovered dark rods — bacteria rather than yeast — in the sour vats. The discovery helped him work out a theory of fermentation: Microorganisms absorbed nutrients and then produced new compounds. Depending on the species, they could turn butter rancid or grape juice into wine.
The discovery won Pasteur a prestigious new post in Paris. In his account of the discovery, Pasteur suggested in passing that the bacteria might have floated through the air and settled into the vats. That notion earned him an angry letter from Félix‑Archimède Pouchet, one of France's leading naturalists.
Pouchet informed Pasteur that the microorganisms Pasteur discovered had not dropped into the vats from the air. Instead, the beet juice had spontaneously generated them. 'Spontaneous generation is the production of a new organized being that lacks parents and all of whose primordial elements have been drawn from ambient matter,' Pouchet had written earlier.
Pasteur coolly replied that Pouchet's spontaneous generation experiments were fatally flawed. The conflict between Pasteur and Pouchet prompted the French Academy of Sciences to announce a contest for the best study addressing whether spontaneous generation was real or not. What started as a private spat had turned into a public spectacle. Pasteur and Pouchet both signed up to compete for the prize of 2,500 francs.
The public eagerly followed the competition, struggling to imagine either view of life. Spontaneous generation had the whiff of blasphemy: If life could spring into existence, it did not require divine intervention. But Pasteur's claim that the atmosphere teemed with germs also strained the 19th‑century mind. A French journalist informed Pasteur that he was going to lose the contest. 'The world into which you wish to take us is really too fantastic,' he said.
To prove that his world was real, Pasteur set out to pluck germs from the air. Working with glassblowers, he created flasks with narrow openings that stretched for several inches. He filled them with sterile broth and waited to see if anything would grow inside. If the necks were pointed straight up, the broth often turned cloudy with microorganisms. But if he sloped the necks so that the openings pointed down, the broth stayed clear. Pasteur argued that germs in the air could drift down into the flasks, but could not propel themselves up a rising path.
When Pouchet heard about Pasteur's experiments, he sneered. Did Pasteur really believe that every germ in decaying organic matter came from the air? If that were true, every cubic millimeter of air would have been packed with more germs than all the people on Earth. 'The air in which we live would almost have the density of iron,' Pouchet said.
Pasteur responded by changing his hypothesis. Germs were not everywhere, he said. Instead, they drifted in clouds that were more common in some places than others.
To prove his claim, Pasteur took his straight-necked flasks out of his lab and began collecting germs. In the courtyard of the Paris Observatory, all 11 of his flasks turned cloudy with multiplying germs. But when he traveled to the countryside and ran his experiment again, more of his flasks stayed sterile. The farther Pasteur got from human settlements, the sparser airborne life became. To put that idea to an extreme test, Pasteur decided to climb Mer de Glace.
His first foray to the glacier ended in failure. After holding up a flask, he tried using the flame from a lamp to seal its neck shut, but the glare of the sun made the flame invisible. As Pasteur fumbled with the lamp, he worried that he might be contaminating the broth with germs he carried on his skin or his tools. He gave up and trudged to a tiny mountain lodge for the night.
He left his flasks open as he slept. In the morning they were rife with microorganisms. Pasteur concluded that the lodge was packed with airborne germs that travelers had brought from around the world.
Later that day, Pasteur modified his lamp so that the flame would burn bright enough for him to see it under the glacier-reflected sun. When he climbed back up Mer de Glace, the experiment worked flawlessly. Only one of the flasks turned cloudy with germs. The other 19 remained sterile.
In November 1860, Pasteur arrived at the Academy of Sciences in Paris with the 73 flasks he had used on his travels. He entered the domed auditorium, walked up to the table where the prize committee sat, and laid out the flasks. The judges peered at the broth as Pasteur described his evidence, saying it gave 'indubitable proof' of floating germs in inhabited places.
Pouchet refused to accept the evidence, but nevertheless withdrew from the contest. Pasteur was awarded the prize.
Still, the two continued to spar. The rivalry remained so intense that the Academy set up a new commission to evaluate their latest experiments. Pouchet dragged out the proceedings, demanding more time for his research.
Pasteur decided to seize public opinion and put on a spectacle. On the evening of April 7, 1864, in an amphitheater filled with Parisian elites, Pasteur stood surrounded by lab equipment and a lamp to project images on a screen. He told the audience it would not leave the soiree without recognizing that the air was rife with invisible germs. 'We can't see them now, for the same reason that, in broad daylight, we can't see the stars,' he said.
At Pasteur's command, the lights went out, save for a cone of light that revealed floating motes of dust. Pasteur asked the audience to picture a rain of dust falling on every surface in the amphitheater. That dust, he said, was alive.
Pasteur then used a pump to drive air through a sterile piece of cotton. After soaking the cotton in water, he put a drop under a microscope. He projected its image on a screen for the audience to see. Alongside soot and bits of plaster, they could make out squirming corpuscles. 'These, gentlemen, are the germs of microscopic beings,' Pasteur said.
Germs were everywhere in the air, he said — kicked up in dust, taking flights of unknown distances and then settling back to the ground, where they worked their magic of fermentation. Germs broke down 'everything on the surface of this globe which once had life, in the general economy of creation,' Pasteur said.
'This role is immense, marvelous, positively moving,' he added.
The lecture ended with a standing ovation. Pasteur's hunt for floating germs elevated him to the highest ranks of French science.
By the time he died 31 years later, Pasteur had made so many world-changing discoveries that his many eulogies and obituaries did not mention his trip to Mer de Glace.
But scientists today recognize that Pasteur got the first glimpse of a world that they are only starting to understand. They now know that life infuses the atmosphere far more than he had imagined, all the way to the stratosphere. Our thriving aerobiome has led some scientists to argue that alien aerobiomes may float in the clouds of other planets. Ours is not the only world that seems too fantastic to believe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Korean scientists say they developed oral drug against COVID-19
Korean scientists say they developed oral drug against COVID-19

UPI

time8 minutes ago

  • UPI

Korean scientists say they developed oral drug against COVID-19

An illustration is intended to show how CP-COV03, or Xafty, works against COVID-19 in the body. Image courtesy of Hyundai Bioscience SEOUL, Aug. 4 (UPI) -- A group of scientists, primarily from South Korean universities, has confirmed the efficacy of an oral anti-viral treatment, called CP-COV03 or Xafty, against COVID-19 after a clinical trial. If a later-stage trial is successful and the medication is approved by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, the drug could be available next year. Developed by Korea's biotech company Hyundai Bioscience, the drug was found to address major COVID-19 symptoms listed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, including cough, headache, sore throat, nausea and chills. The findings were published in the latest edition of the peer-reviewed journal Nature Communications. "We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 300 patients to learn that CP-COV03 was effective in improving COVID-19 symptoms for more than 48 hours, with no serious adverse events," Dankook University professor Choy Jin-ho told UPI. He is one of the paper's corresponding co-authors. "Patients treated with CP-COV03 returned to usual health more quickly and had a lower risk of hospitalization compared to the control group. This shows that the drug is safe and effective in patients suffering from mild to moderate COVID-19," he said. Choy said he expects that CP-COV03 to have strong commercial potential because it was based on niclosamide, a well-known medication previously used to treat tapeworm infections. "Niclosamide's clinical use has been limited due to poor solubility and bioavailability. However, our study indicates that niclosamide-based CP-COV03 works as a safer and more effective alternative to previous COVID-19 treatments such as Paxlovid," Choy said. Hyundai Bioscience noted that the Seoul-based company would develop CP-COV03 as a versatile anti-viral treatment for a range of diseases, beyond just COVID-19. "We are prepared to produce CP-COV03 as a broad-spectrum treatment once we are authorized to do so in our target countries," Hyundai Bioscience CEO Bae Byoung-jun said in a phone interview. "To use CP-COV03 as a treatment for dengue fever, for example, we have received approval to start a seamless phase II/III clinical trial in Vietnam. We hope to launch the study this year, with the aim of bringing the drug to market next year," he said.

Utah vaccine exemption rate rises to No. 2 in nation
Utah vaccine exemption rate rises to No. 2 in nation

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

Utah vaccine exemption rate rises to No. 2 in nation

Utah now has the nation's second highest rate of vaccine exemptions for kindergartners, as the state's share of fully immunized children continues to drop. Threat level: Utah's kindergarten vaccination rates have long fallen below the 95% needed for herd immunity against highly contagious illnesses — and kids are about to return to school amid a measles outbreak. As of fall 2024, just 88.6% of Utah kindergartners were up to date on their measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines, per new CDC data. Whooping cough was at 88.1%. Meanwhile, whooping cough is spreading in southwest Utah, health officials announced last week. What we're watching: Kindergarten vaccination rates in parts of Utah are dropping toward the 80% herd immunity threshold for polio, per the latest data from the state health department. More than 19% of kindergartners in southwest Utah were not fully vaccinated for polio, with nearly 15% in the central counties. The big picture: Anti-vax sentiments — once considered a liberal trend — gained ground on the political right amid hostility toward COVID prevention measures. A Gallup poll last year found that 69% of respondents viewed childhood vaccines as "extremely" or "very" important, down from 94% in 2001 — a drop researchers attributed to those who lean Republican. By the numbers: More than 10% of Utah kindergartners obtained immunization waivers last fall, up a full percent from the previous year. Only Idaho had a higher rate of exemptions, at 15.4%. The intrigue: Of the 10.3% of Utah kindergartners who sought exemptions, just 0.3% were for medical reasons. About 85% were for "personal" reasons, with "religion" accounting for another 12.5%. Catch up quick: A 2022 Axios analysis of Utah immunization data by ZIP code showed exemptions after 2020 largely spiked in politically conservative areas. Caveat: Vaccine waivers are far more common among online students, covering more than half of the state's nearly 1,500 online kindergartners. Of the 44,000 in-person kindergartners, 9% had exemptions, up from 7.9% a year before. Another 1% were out of compliance — neither vaccinated nor exempt. Flashback: Trump cut more than $30 million in Utah childhood immunization funding in April. Zoom in: Salt Lake County's exemption rate was the lowest of any local health district in the state at 5.5%.

Are electric scooters safe? A rash of injuries, deaths raises concerns.
Are electric scooters safe? A rash of injuries, deaths raises concerns.

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Are electric scooters safe? A rash of injuries, deaths raises concerns.

SAN FRANCISCO – A 77-year-old man was killed after being hit by an electric scooter while crossing a street in downtown San Francisco in July, the type of serious scooter-pedestrian collision the city's police department calls 'uncommon.'' Other types of e-scooter accidents that result in a trip to the emergency room, however, are becoming all too frequent across the nation. The growing popularity of electric scooters – easily accessible for commuters to reach their final destination or tourists to enjoy sightseeing – has been accompanied by skyrocketing numbers of injuries, typically to the riders and at times to others in their way. A 2023 report by the Consumer Product Safety Commission revealed that from 2017 – when the devices were first introduced at scale – through 2022, the U.S. recorded 360,800 ER visits related to e-bikes, e-scooters and hoverboards, known collectively as micromobility vehicles. Of those visits, 169,300 were linked to the scooters, or 47%. By comparison, ER trips stemming from e-bike accidents added up to 53,200, or less than 15%. Just as concerning, of the 233 micromobility-related deaths the CPSC registered through that six-year stretch, nearly half (111) were from e-scooter incidents, usually as a result of collisions with cars and/or control issues. Scooters mistakenly seen as 'very low risk' After a dip in the early part of the COVID pandemic, the ER-worthy injuries related to powered scooters – mostly the electric variety – have steadily risen from just under 30,000 in 2020 to 118,485 last year, nearly twice the 2023 total (64,329). 'People view scooters as very, very low risk for some reason, but we do see broken wrists, head injuries, neck injuries, cervical injuries. Those are all very common," said Dr. Eric Cioe-Peña, associate professor of emergency medicine and vice president of Northwell's Center for Global Health in Long Island, New York. Cioe-Peña has noticed the surge in injuries over the last five years, coinciding with the rise in e-scooter ridership. According to data from the National Association of City Transportation Officials, dockless scooter ridership in the U.S. was up to 65 million in 2023, the latest year for which the nonprofit has statistics. As of 2024, there were 130 American cities with e-scooter-sharing programs, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics says. And a recent report projects the North American market for e-bikes and e-scooters to grow from about $500 million last year to more than $3 billion by 2033. Ignoring traffic rules and neglecting protection All those rides will inevitably lead to more injuries, and Cioe-Peña expressed concern about the number or riders who ignore the rules of the road – such as blowing past stop signs – and neglect to wear protective equipment, especially helmets. He said the worst e-scooter injuries he has seen at the ER involved a helmetless rider in Staten Island whose vehicle's front wheel hit an irregular spot on the street – possibly a storm drain slot – and was catapulted over the handlebar. The rider landed on concrete, sustaining a severe concussion and ankle and wrist fractures. 'The pedestrian risk is more sensational," Cioe-Peña said, 'but the real burden of disease is head injuries with unhelmeted riders." Studies of helmet use among e-scooter riders are scarce but generally show low percentages, as little as 2%. Alex Engel, a spokesperson for NACTO, said most of e-scooter injuries are sustained by riders, who are vulnerable to potholes or small objects on the road causing accidents. 'With e-scooters the center of gravity is much higher because you're standing on them, and because the wheels are much smaller and there's in general much less shock (absorption), pavement quality tends to matter a lot more than it does for bikes or e-bikes," Engel said. A need for more safe places to ride Still, he pointed out cars are by far the biggest danger to riders, which makes the significant increase in bike lanes across many cities a welcome development for micromobility fans. 'The most important thing any city can do is providing safe places for people to ride," Engel said. 'That provides space for those who are already riding, and it encourages more ridership. There's safety in numbers.'' Few if any cities have bike lanes on every street, and it's not uncommon to see e-scooters on sidewalks, which is generally against the law. Though civic leaders tend to appreciate the e-scooters' eco-friendly convenience, a few cities and two states – Pennsylvania and Delaware – have effectively banned them from public roads. There's wide variation in state and municipal regulations regarding e-scooters, from minimum age requirements to whether riding on sidewalks is allowed, leading to confusion among practitioners. While more than 30 states have set speed limits of between 15 mph and 20 mph, another six permit riders to go at least as fast as 25 mph, according to a detailed guide on the webpage of scooter maker Unagi. Lax enforcement of regulations The regulations are not commonly known and rarely enforced, said Joseph Schofer, a professor emeritus of civil and environmental engineering at Northwestern University who specializes in transportation issues. 'A teenager riding a scooter, my sense is they have no obligation to get training," Schofer said. 'And if there is, there's no way to enforce it." He remembers a few years ago seeing a man on a rental e-scooter riding around Washington, D.C., with his child, maybe 2 or 3 years old, on his shoulders. It was a reminder of the need for better public education regarding these contraptions, not to mention common sense. Schofer said he sees the value in efficient conveyances like e-scooters, which can make it easier to navigate city streets. He also wonders about the risk involved, especially for young riders and tourists who may not be familiar with a town's layout and traffic patterns. 'You have a really cheap avenue to getting access to motorized transportation, and to young people who aren't licensed drivers, and to people of limited income, it's very appealing," he said. 'So how do you make this work?" 'A place in the transportation ecosystem' Dr. Ben Breyer, a professor at the University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, said that's where city involvement comes in. Breyer spent 10 years at San Francisco's leading trauma center and conducted several studies on bicycle trauma. More recently, he collaborated in a widely cited UCSF study published last summer that found nationwide e-bike injuries nearly doubled and e-scooter injuries rose by more than 45% every year from 2017-2022. Despite that, Breyer's likes the potential for these vehicles. 'These kind of micromobility options do have a place in the transportation ecosystem," he said. 'They help keep cars off the road, they help decrease congestion, they help people make that final mile in their commute. I think we need more infrastructure to help support riders, and there may need to be some regulations on maximum speeds and these kind of things to help ensure folks ride safely." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Are electric scooters safe? Injuries, deaths raise concerns.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store