Petrobras gets a win in Amazon drilling push but future licensing in doubt
Documents seen by Reuters show Ibama head Rodrigo Agostinho warned in his decision against "disorderly multiplication of future requests for environmental licenses" in the Foz do Amazonas basin, an oil frontier near the mouth of the Amazon River.
The area, in the northernmost part of Brazil's Equatorial Margin, is considered Petrobras' most promising oil frontier, sharing geology with nearby Guyana, where Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab is developing huge fields.
But Agostinho said it would be hard to issue "fragmented and successive exploration licenses" in the Foz do Amazonas basin without a complex environmental study known as an AAAS that could take years to complete.
Ibama had previously requested an AAAS to evaluate Petrobras' bid, but Brazil's solicitor-general issued a legal opinion that such a study should not hold up licensing.
Agostinho's renewed demand adds to uncertainty about future licensing in the region, where Brazil is preparing to offer new blocks at a June auction.
For now, the agency chief granted approval to a Petrobras proposal for how it would assist local fauna in the event of an oil spill in the environmentally sensitive region, which includes vast coral reefs, opens new tab and coastal Indigenous communities.
Petrobras said it welcomed the decision on Monday, taking it as a green light to run a test of its environmental emergency plan, which it called the last step before a final licensing decision.
The progress for Petrobras represents a loss for Ibama's technical staff, which had signed a document in February saying the plan to rescue fauna in case of an oil spill had only a "remote possibility" of being successful.
In 2023, Ibama denied a Petrobras request to drill in the area, which the company immediately appealed, stoking divisions in Brazil's government between environmental advocates and allies pushing for oil and gas development in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Kazakh Black Sea oil exports resume as tankers given access, sources say
MOSCOW, July 24 (Reuters) - Russia's FSB security service has started handing out clearance for foreign tankers to access the Black Sea ports, allowing for Kazakhstan's oil exports to resume after they were halted for nearly a day, four industry sources said on Thursday. The suspension led to the disruption of around 2% of global supply and drove international oil prices to almost $70 a barrel on Thursday before they pared gains. Russian regulations mean foreign ships require the approval of Russia's FSB security service to access the country's ports. The new law was signed by President Vladimir Putin on Monday and came into effect after a decision by the European Union at the end of last week to impose further sanctions on Russia over its actions in Ukraine. Two industry sources said on Wednesday foreign tankers were being temporarily barred from loading at Russia's main Black Sea ports. That effectively halted oil exports from Kazakhstan via the Caspian Pipeline Consortium that connects Kazakhstan's oil fields with export markets. Shareholders of the CPC include U.S. majors Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab and ExxonMobil (XOM.N), opens new tab. None of the source Reuters spoke to could be named because they were not authorised to speak publicly. Kazakhstan's energy ministry said the country's pipeline operator KazTransOil was in talks with the oil terminal owner over operations and additional security measures in the Russian Baltic Sea's port of Ust-Luga. The ministry did not elaborate. An industry source, familiar with the matter, said the talks related to the additional costs for the Russian insurance coverage and divers' inspections. Black Sea CPC Blend oil exports from the CPC terminal in Russia were set at 1.66 million barrels per day for August, or about 6.5 million metric tons, almost unchanged from the July export plan, Reuters reported last week. Exports and oil transit via Novorossisk are expected to be around 2.2 million metric tons in July, according to industry sources. Supplies from Novorossisk and the CPC terminal together account for around 2% of global oil supplies. Adding to nervousness on international oil markets about supplies, BP (BP.L), opens new tab said on Thursday that contaminants were detected in some of the oil tanks at Turkey's BTC Ceyhan terminal. It said however that loadings continued from other reservoirs.
Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
Converging Exxon and Chevron operations could spur next mega-merger
LONDON, July 24 (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil and Chevron's recent major acquisitions raise a provocative question: does the U.S. still need two energy titans, or might it be more efficient for the two to join forces? An $800 billion combination would certainly evoke memories of Standard Oil, the conglomerate John D. Rockefeller created in 1870 that dominated the American oil industry before the Supreme Court branded it an illegal monopoly in 1911, forcing it to break up into multiple companies from which Exxon and Chevron trace their roots. Concerns about a new behemoth monopolizing the U.S. energy industry are probably smaller today than in the early twentieth century, given the scale and diversification of the current sector. Nevertheless, a merger of such magnitude would face daunting legal and logistical complexities. But never say never. Growing volatility in energy prices amid the bumpy global transition away from fossil fuels, shifts in market leadership, heightened geopolitical tensions, and the related rise in resource nationalism could create a confluence of circumstances in the coming years that might make a 'ChExxon' merger more than a fantasy. Over the decades, the oil and gas sector has gone through several waves of consolidation largely driven by the need to increase scale, improve efficiency and better enable companies to weather periods of weak commodity prices. The modern era's first wave of consolidation followed the oil price crash of 1997, which sparked a cycle of mergers that formed today's so-called 'Big Oil' companies: Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab, Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab, Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab, TotalEnergies ( opens new tab and BP (BP.L), opens new tab. The latest consolidation wave, which is centred in the United States, began in 2022 when companies gobbled up rivals to increase their access to high-quality resources as boards shifted their focus to shareholder returns, rather than output, following years of rapid expansion in shale basins. This included Exxon's acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources for $60 billion, ConocoPhillips' $23 billion acquisition of Marathon Oil and Diamondback Energy's $26 billion acquisition of Endeavor Energy. One of the biggest deals in this period was Chevron's $60 billion acquisition of New York-listed Hess, which was first announced in October 2023 but completed only last week following a lengthy legal battle with Exxon over Hess' lucrative 30% stake in Guyana's giant Stabroek oilfield. The Hess deal and Chevron's acquisition in May 2023 of shale producer PDC Energy for $7.6 billion have also given Chevron's U.S. production a significant boost. Exxon and Chevron's buying spree solidified their position as the largest U.S. producers – and also highlighted how much of their portfolios overlap. Exxon today produces around 1.9 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (boed) in the United States, of which two-thirds come from the Permian basin, the heart of the shale boom. Exxon expects its Permian production to reach 2 million boed by 2027. Meanwhile, Chevron's U.S. production is currently around 1.8 million boed when including Hess and PDC. Nearly half of this total is in the Permian, where it aims to keep output steady at 1 million boed through 2040. Put together, the two companies account for over 10% of total U.S. oil and gas production and nearly 20% of oil and gas production in the Permian. Shale production requires constant new drilling just to keep output steady. And given that many of the most prolific shale structures are ageing and rapidly depleting, the need for further consolidation in the sector will likely intensify as companies try to improve productivity. In Guyana, where production has skyrocketed to 668,000 bpd as of March, Chevron and Exxon's overlap is even more extreme. Despite their recent legal dispute, the two are now partners in the South American country. Exxon, which operates and owns 45% of Guyana's enormous Stabroek block, expects its output there to nearly double to 1.3 million bpd by the end of 2027. Chevron now owns 30% of the block. Finally, Exxon and Chevron's upstream portfolios both include significant operations in Kazakhstan, Australia and West Africa – more potential opportunities for consolidation. There are still significant differences between the two energy giants, of course. For one, Exxon has a larger global footprint than Chevron, including a significant presence in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. There also may be a difference of culture, which Chevron CEO Mike Wirth said when speaking to Reuters. Exxon has a reputation for being hierarchical and increasingly litigious, while Chevron is often seen as more engaged with its workforce and partners. Such differences can be hard to quantify but can indeed complicate large mergers. The oil and gas sector appears poised to undergo another round of consolidation in the coming years due to the convergence of multiple trends. The energy transition will likely lead to greater volatility in energy prices, while increased competition among the oil majors for a shrinking pool of investors could also increase the incentive to streamline operations and cut costs through mergers. Finally, tensions between the United States and China, and the renewed interest in industrial policy more broadly, could also put pressure on American companies to consolidate ownership of vital natural resources. And the financial benefits of combining the two U.S. energy giants? It is hard to put a firm number on this given the sheer size of Exxon and Chevron, which have a combined value of $775 billion, but the savings from merging their U.S. headquarters and administrative functions in other countries where they both operate would almost certainly measure in the billions alone. Divestments of non-core assets would further boost the financial benefits. For context, consider that Exxon expects to achieve $3 billion in savings from its Pioneer acquisition, a company that was bought for a fifth of Chevron's current value. This isn't to argue that the merger is likely in the near future, but the idea shouldn't be discounted entirely. And if the merger of the two largest U.S. energy companies were to occur, it would signal – like the breakup of Standard Oil in 1911 – that the industry was entering a new era. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
Tesla takes veiled swipe at Trump
Elon Musk's Tesla has taken a swipe at Donald Trump over US tariffs just months after the billionaire quit the White House. On Wednesday, the carmaker said Mr Trump's 'unclear' policies were hampering the global economic environment, It came after Tesla reported sharply lower profits as motorists shunned Tesla amid a political backlash over Mr Musk's links with the White House. In veiled swipe at Mr Trump, Tesla said it was investing in more development 'despite a sustained uncertain macroeconomic environment resulting from shifting tariffs, unclear impacts from changes to fiscal policy and political sentiment'. The company said on Wednesday night that revenues for the second quarter were $22.5bn (£16.6bn), down 12pc on the year before. Profits slumped 16pc to $1.2bn. Sales of Model 3 and Y cars to dealerships fell 12pc from a year ago while the sale of other vehicles including the Tesla Cybertruck slumped 52pc. The company said its vehicle launch plans for 2025 remained on track and it would target 'more affordable models'. The company is facing increasing pressures from rival manufacturers challenging its grip on electric car sales. An overhauled version of the Model Y, its bestselling car, has also disappointed. Tesla revealed earlier this month that car sales had fallen by 13.5pc in the second quarter of the year. It means that sales are likely to fall for a second consecutive year, putting pressure on the company's status as the world's most valuable car maker. Mr Musk has increasingly bet the company's future not on traditional car sales, but on an experimental Robotaxi service in which self-driving Teslas ferry passengers around. It has started deploying the service in Texas but the launch has already grown scrutiny from regulators. Mr Musk has also claimed that Tesla's humanoid robot, Optimus, will ultimately be the company's biggest business. Mr Musk promised Tesla investors that he would return to full-time work at the company after leaving Doge, Mr Trump's government efficiency project, but has since pledged to start his own political party after falling out with the US President. Uncertainty over Mr Musk's commitment to Tesla has led to turmoil in its share price and pressure from investors to commit to the company. He tweeted this week that he was 'back to working 7 days a week and sleeping in the office'. The company also faces a potential blow from the Trump administration no longer offering tax credits for buying electric vehicles. Mr Musk has promised a cheaper new vehicle, as well as a dedicated driverless 'Cybercab' with no steering wheel or pedals.
