Kiwi software company Xero to buy US payments platform for $4.1b
Xero says the new deal would be a significant change for the company. File photo.
Photo:
RNZ
Accounting software giant Xero - based in Wellington but listed in Australia - is to buy an American payments platform operator Melio for US$2.5 billion (NZ$4.1b), as it looks to expand earnings in the United States.
The deal will combine Xero's accounting software with Melio's payments platform in the key small and medium business market.
Xero chief executive Sukhinder Singh Cassidy said the deal would be a significant change for the company.
"Xero and Melio are highly complementary - together they complete the key jobs to be done for US SMBs (small medium businesses), extend reach across customer segments, provide both direct and syndicated offerings, and deliver multiple revenue drivers."
She said the deal would double Xero's 2025 financial sales by 2028.
The company earns the bulk of its earnings through sales in Australia and New Zealand, but has been challenged in trying to grow its US earnings.
The acquisition is being funded by a sale of 10.5m new shares to big investors at A$176 each, a 9 percent discount to Xero's last traded price. That will raise about half of the purchase price, while existing Xero shareholders will be offered a total of A$200m worth of shares at a discounted price.
Xero is also issuing shares to current Melio shareholders, as well as using some cash reserves, to be supplemented by some borrowing.
Xero was the flag bearer for New Zealand's technology sector when it listed on the NZX in 2007, but
switched to a single listing on the Australian stock exchange in 2018
, although it has maintained its nominal head office Wellington.
It
shed hundreds of jobs
in a restructuring in 2023.
- RNZ
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Why Mark Zuckerberg is offering millions to work for him.
Mark Zuckerberg, the man behind Facebook and Instagram, is on the hunt for new staff, and his approach is wild. In the race to snap up A.I talent, Zuckerberg is reportedly going on house visits and dangling big incentives, in some cases offering people a signing bonus of 100 million dollars. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
What does the US remittance tax mean for the Pacific?
A view of the US Capitol in Washington on 30 June 2025. US senators began voting Monday on Donald Trump's flagship spending bill, as the deeply divisive package -- expected to slash social programs for the poor and add an eye-watering $3 trillion to the national debt -- entered its frenetic home stretch. Photo: AFP / Jim Watson The United States is set to implement a tax on remittances paid by migrants to their communities overseas. The tax is a component of the " One Big Beautiful Bill ", a cornerstone fiscal measure under President Donald Trump. When the spending bill passed through the House of Representatives, the tax was set at 5 percent. The US Senate reduced it down to 3.5 percent, and now again to 1 percent. The bill has undergone numerous amendments in the Senate before it goes back to the House for final negotiations and then to the White House. However, even if the final tax level falls on the lower end, Pacific development experts say that both direct and indirect impacts pose a significant threat to the region. Deep within the pages of congressional reports on the "One Big Beautiful Bill" lies a section titled "Removing Taxpayer Benefits for Illegal Immigrants". The tax takes aim at outward flows of income generated by illegal immigrants within the US economy, one of several measures designed to disadvantage illegal immigrants financially. Remittance transfer providers, such as US banks, credit unions, or licensed brokers and dealers, would collect the tax at the point of transfer before the remittance is sent abroad, increasing the cost of sending remittances. The tax applies to all US citizens and nationals sending money overseas, though it had originally been aimed only at illegal immigrants before a Senate redraft on 30 June. With the US responsible for the largest global share of remittances, particularly to Latin America and the Caribbean, critics argue it could cause serious damage in the developing world. In May, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum denounced the tax as "a measure that is unacceptable". It is also proven controversial in right-leaning circles, particularly among libertarians, prompting draft after redraft of the policy. The American Enterprise Institute, a conservative-leaning think tank, called the tax "poorly designed". "Although the Senate bill's narrowing of the tax would greatly diminish these problems, it would not eliminate them. That outcome can be attained by rejecting the remittances tax in its entirety." The US Migration Policy Institute estimates that, as of 2023 there are 166,389 immigrants currently in the US who were born in Oceania (other than Australia and New Zealand). The Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG), an organisation of civil society groups throughout the region, said the tax will have "profound implications" on Pacific livelihoods. PANG deputy coordinator Adam Wolfenden told RNZ Pacific that, while relatively less remittance cash finds its way into the Pacific, these are nations who rely on it. "For a country like Samoa, which gets 20 percent of its remittance money from the US, we'll see that cut. For a country like Tonga, for who the US is its biggest source of remittances at just over 35 percent, this will see a cut." "Studies have shown that any increase in the cost of sending money home has a larger impact." According to the World Bank, sending remittances currently costs an average of 6.62 percent of the amount sent, thanks to things like provider fees. Wolfenden pointed to a study by the Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research, which found that demonstrates that one percentage point increase in remittance costs would correlate with a 1.6 percent decline in the amount that reaches it's final destination. A potential 3.5 percent tax would reduce remittance flows by 5.6 percent, PANG said. "The fear is that, for those who receive remittances in those domestic economies, particularly that rely on remittances to fund a lot of consumption, the tax will ultimately lead to some kind of decrease in economic growth. Amid other US actions in the Pacific, such as massive cuts to aid, tariffs and increased militarisation, Wolfenden believes the US simply is not considering the Pacific in the decision making. "I think they are promoting their interests above all else. And I think that is a short-sighted view towards what a relationship with the Pacific means." The Australian National University's Development Policy Centre deputy director Dr Ryan Edwards called the tax "terrible". "Remittances can get sent in many ways. There's the cash ones which will be targeted through formal channels, and informal channels, where people often just carry it back in their suitcases and declare it or find other ways," he said. "This will push everything to the informal channel market, which many countries have tried for a long time to move people away from for security reasons." Edwards told RNZ Pacific that he is concerned about the precedent the policy will set, and what kind of signal it would send to governments with significant aid contributions. "We have seen the current US administration testing the waters with international trade, aid, and other things. [These things] tend to benefit both sides in ways that we often do not pick up at a first glance. "It is a slippery slope in terms of setting an example, and the US has historically had a role as a global example not so much anymore."
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Port companies and KiwiRail reach agreements over two new Cook Strait ferries
The new ferries will replace the ageing Interislander fleet. Photo: Flickr user Sid Mosdel CC BY 2.0 Agreements have been reached with port companies and KiwiRail on the type of infrastructure and equipment needed before two new Cook Strait ferries arrive in 2029. Rail Minister Winston Peters announced the agreements between Ferry Holdings, Centre Port, Port Marlborough and KiwiRail while in Picton on Tuesday. "The agreements entered into effectively mean the ports and KiwiRail are in, boots and all, with Cabinet's preferred low-cost option," Peters said. Existing port infrastructure would be used where possible to keep costs down, he said. New wharves would be built in Picton and the existing wharf in Wellington would be modified, strengthened and extended "by the minimal amount necessary" to accommodate the new, larger ships, Peters said. New linkspans will be built at both ports. The plan aims to reuse the current passenger and commercial vehicle facilities and the terminal building at both ports. "We are pleased to confirm for the locals in Picton that the Dublin Street overbridge will be built - ridding the town of the blocked streets it will experience when freight-laden trains arrive at the port," Peters said. "The road and rail will be grade separated before 2029 as a safety and an efficiency improvement for road and rail." The ports and KiwiRail have agreed to minimal scope improvements to the rail yards, which Peters said would avoid a costly scope creep by reusing as much of the existing yards as possible at both ports. Six shipbuilders have been shortlisted for the job of delivering the new Cook Strait ferries, with a contract expected to be awarded later this year. The investment split between the companies and each company will also be confirmed later this year. Ferry Holdings - which was set up to lead contractual negotiations with shipyards and ports - has outlined the jobs ahead to 2029 as part of its first Statement of Performance Expectations and Statement of Intent. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
