Love in full bloom? Anele Mdoda showered with congratulations over Xhosa 'wedding' pics
Adding to the intrigue, Khaya Dlanga congratulated the couple in a now-deleted post, and photos surfaced of Mdoda in what appears to be traditional Xhosa attire.
While neither Mdoda nor her partner has confirmed the news, fans have taken to social media to celebrate what may be a new chapter for the much-loved media personality.
Social media has been abuzz with speculation that popular radio personality and businesswoman Anele Mdoda may have recently tied the knot in a traditional Xhosa wedding ceremony.
The rumours gained traction after several close friends and public figures, including radio host Sizwe Dhlomo, hinted at attending a special union last weekend.
Dhlomo tweeted about being present at a significant event, leading many to believe he was referring to Mdoda's wedding.
Adding fuel to the speculation, Khaya Dlanga, another close friend of Mdoda, posted a now-deleted message congratulating the couple on their new union.
While neither Mdoda nor her partner, lawyer Bonelela "Buzza" James, had publicly confirmed the wedding by Monday morning, fans and followers have been quick to celebrate the possibility.
The speculation comes months after ZiMoja reported that Mdoda and James, a member of the Abathembu royal clan, were in a serious relationship, having been spotted together at family gatherings, high-profile events, and even on international trips. He was her date to Zozibini Tunzi and Luthando Bolowana's wedding in March.
According to sources, the couple has been open about their relationship, with James reportedly bonding well with Mdoda's son, Alakhe.
Images circulating online show Mdoda dressed in what appears to be traditional Xhosa attire, further fuelling wedding rumours. While some fans have expressed excitement, others remain cautious, noting that neither Mdoda nor James have officially confirmed the news.
Neither Mdoda nor her representatives have responded to requests for comment. However, supporters on X (formerly Twitter) have flooded the platform with congratulatory messages, praising the couple and expressing happiness for the media personality.
For now, the public remains eager for an official confirmation or denial from the couple themselves.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
21 Of The Funniest Posts About Cats And Dogs This Week (July 19-25)
Woof — it's been a long week. If you feel like you've been working like a dog, let us offer you the internet equivalent of a big pile of catnip: hilarious posts about pets. We Shih Tzu not. Each week at HuffPost, we scour Bluesky, Instagram and X, formerly Twitter, to find the funniest posts about our furballs being complete goofballs. They're sure to make you howl. (And if you want more, no need to beg ― you can check out last week's batch right here.) Related... 23 Of The Funniest Posts About Cats And Dogs This Week 30 Of The Funniest Posts About Cats And Dogs This Week 24 Of The Funniest Posts About Cats And Dogs This Week
Engadget
4 hours ago
- Engadget
LeBron James is reportedly trying to stop the spread of viral AI 'pregnancy' videos
It seems like LeBron James' legal team has been trying to stop the spread of viral AI videos featuring the basketball star. As 404 Media reported , a law firm representing James has sent a cease and desist letter to a person behind an AI platform that allowed Discord users to make AI videos of James and other NBA stars. As 404 noted, these videos have been circulating for awhile but it's one particularly strange clip that seems to have gotten James' lawyers involved. The video, which reportedly racked up millions of views on Instagram, shows a pregnant James being loaded into an ambulance after telling an AI Steph Curry to "come quick our baby is being born." 404 reports that at least three Instagram accounts that had shared the clip have since been removed, though the video is available on X . The founder of the AI platform used to make the videos also posted about the cease and desist letter he received . It's unclear what is in the letter, or if James' lawyers were also in touch with Meta about the videos. We've reached out to the company for more info on its rules. Of course, LeBron James is far from the only public figure to grapple with unwanted AI versions of themselves. Social media scammers routinely impersonate celebrities to promote sketchy products and other schemes. We've previously reported on such scams involving deepfakes of Elon Musk and Fox News personalities that have proliferated on Facebook. Jamie Lee Curtis also recently had to publicly plead with Mark Zuckerberg to take down deepfaked ads of herself. A still from a clip created with Google's Veo (left) and images generated by Meta AI (right) (Screenshots via Veo and Meta AI) But the videos of James are a little different. They don't feature fake endorsements and seem to be more of a prank meant to go viral in the way that lots of "AI slop" does. And James and other celebrities will likely continue to have a difficult time preventing these kinds of deepfakes from spreading. Some quick testing by Engadget showed that it's relatively easy to get AI chatbots to create images and video of "pregnant LeBron James." We first asked ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot to make such a photo. All chatbots initially refused, saying that such an image could go against their guidelines. But when given an image of James and asked to "make this person eight months pregnant," Google's Gemini delivered a 7-second clip of the basketball star cradling a pregnant belly. (We've reached out to Google to clarify its rules around such content.) Likewise, Meta AI seemingly had no reservations about producing images of "pregnant LeBron James" and promptly delivered many such variations. While these creations aren't as detailed as the initial video that went viral, they do highlight how difficult it can be for AI companies to prevent people from circumventing whatever guardrails may exist.
Android Authority
7 hours ago
- Android Authority
Elon Musk is about to ruin Vine just like he's ruined everything else
Short-form video is everywhere in 2025. From TikTok to Instagram, YouTube to Snapchat, you've got no shortage of options to turn to when you're looking to scratch this particular itch. But the landscape wasn't always this vast, and not all the early pioneers of short-form content made it through that evolution unscathed. While Snapchat was arguably the first snowball to get rolling here, it wasn't long before it was followed by Vine. And before Vine even had a chance to release its mobile apps, it found itself acquired by Twitter. That early Twitter interest really helped drive the platform's success, and the limitation of its six-second clips encouraged creativity from a new generation of creators, with many now-prominent names first finding success on Vine. A few years later, though, everybody was basically doing their own take on Vine, with many social platforms introducing native support for short-form video. And right as Twitter started deprioritizing Vine, blocking new uploads ahead of shuttering the service entirely, TikTok emerged to essentially steal Vine's crown. That's basically been the world we've lived in for the past eight years, with Vine relegated to our memories of short-form-video nostalgia. But 2025 is a messy, weird year, and anyone with an iota of power can quickly find themselves getting away with just the worst ideas they're able to think up. So of course that includes Elon Musk. Yesterday, on nuTwitter, Musk ominously posted his intention to bring Vine back 'in AI form.' That phrasing alone should be sufficient to send a small chill down your spine. Bringing things back that already ran their course can be a fraught enough proposition on its own, but when that effort immediately seeks to also transmute that nostalgia into something new… this is practically shoving a red flag down our throat. Pogs didn't save ALF, and AI won't save Vine. Easily the biggest question here is what 'Vine but AI' would even look like. At a high level, it's not hard to think about what Musk and his fellow AI advocates might picture a tool like this offering when there's no other limiting factors in play: a system that takes user input (or better yet, just knows what they want based on past analytics) and endlessly churns out generative short-form video content in response. To a certain mind, that probably sounds perfect — no creators to worry about, no trends to chase, just users saying what they want and the service making it appear. Of course, while that's currently not so far-fetched an idea that we don't even have to talk about it, it's also nowhere near anything approaching economically viable. Pogs didn't save ALF, and AI won't save Vine. Tools like Google's Veo 3 might make it feel like an AI-powered bottomless video spigot is out there waiting for us to open, but right now such solutions are far too slow and power-hungry to be practical on any kind of scale like we'd need for a public video app. OK, so what else could AI-Vine be? Well, the next best (worst?) version would probably be a hybrid between what we just described and the Vine of the past, only using AI to generate boatloads of videos across all manner of popular subjects in advance, and then serving them up to users later. This has the benefit of at least sounding remotely practical. Why is there a basket directly above the middle of the court? Just like this Veo 3 clip, don't expect anything you see in AI-Vine world to make any sense. Would creators be involved at all? So far we've been talking about systems where Musk's AI would be responsible for basically all the content being served up, but that doesn't necessarily have to be the direction a project like this would go. Maybe 'Vine in AI form' would be pretty much the same as OG Vine, but now explicitly embracing creators who lean heavily on AI, as we've started seeing YouTube do. On our sliding scale of likelihood, this one sounds maybe the most practical yet, but also a bit underwhelming — less 'AI form' and more 'just like every other video platform in 2025.' Which would also have us wondering what's the point of even doing this at all. Maybe that's the most frustrating component of this discussion. We've been splitting hairs over exactly what an AI-ified Vine would look like, but the anxiety we're feeling that drives this is less about Vine in particular and more about the depressingly widespread appeal of AI content. Perhaps it's just that Vine was from an era where creators were constantly hustling to make a name for themselves in that then-nascent space. Those attempts didn't always work; just like now there was plenty of low-effort, cringe content out there. But others were discovering what really played, building up audiences of fans and bringing us back to Vine again and again. Those creators have all moved on, though, and if Vine were to reappear today, maybe the only way to avoid a massive content vacuum really would be tapping in to AI tools to build up a new video library. Discerning viewers aren't likely to find a Vine like that particularly appealing. But if Musk's disastrous influence on Twitter has taught us anything, it's that even services that are deeply unappealing to users with taste don't have to worry when they have the vast depths of the internet to tap into. There are absolutely legions of people out there who would love nothing more than spending their days watching one AI-generated six-second video after another. And I hope they never get what they want.
