logo
USAID Analysis Rejects Israeli Claims Of Massive Loot Of Gaza Aid By Hamas

USAID Analysis Rejects Israeli Claims Of Massive Loot Of Gaza Aid By Hamas

News182 days ago
A USAID analysis found no evidence of Hamas systematically stealing US-funded humanitarian supplies, contradicting claims by Israel.
An internal US government analysis has found no evidence of systematic theft by the Palestinian militant group Hamas of US-funded humanitarian supplies, contradicting the primary justification given by Israel and the US for supporting a new armed private aid operation.
This analysis, conducted by a bureau within the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and completed in late June, reviewed 156 incidents of theft or loss of U.S.-funded supplies reported by US aid partner organizations between October 2023 and May 2024. According to a slide presentation of the findings seen by Reuters, it found 'no reports alleging Hamas" benefited from US-funded supplies.
A State Department spokesperson disputed these findings, claiming there is video evidence of Hamas looting aid but did not provide any such videos. The spokesperson also accused traditional humanitarian groups of covering up 'aid corruption."
White House spokesperson Anna Kelly questioned the existence of the analysis, stating that no State Department official had seen it and suggesting it 'was likely produced by a deep state operative" aiming to discredit President Donald Trump's 'humanitarian agenda."
The U.N. World Food Program reports that nearly a quarter of Gaza's 2.1 million Palestinians face famine-like conditions, with thousands suffering acute malnutrition. The World Health Organization and doctors in Gaza report starvation deaths among children and others.
The U.N. estimates that Israeli forces have killed more than 1,000 people seeking food supplies, mostly near militarized distribution sites of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a new private aid group using a for-profit U.S. logistics firm run by a former CIA officer and armed U.S. military veterans.
The study by USAID's Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance (BHA) was the largest funder of assistance to Gaza before the Trump administration froze all U.S. foreign aid in January. The Trump administration has also started dismantling USAID, folding its functions into the State Department.
The analysis found that at least 44 of the 156 incidents where aid supplies were reported stolen or lost were 'either directly or indirectly" due to Israeli military actions. Israel's military did not respond to questions about these findings.
The study noted a limitation: because Palestinians receiving aid cannot be vetted, it was possible that U.S.-funded supplies went to administrative officials of Hamas, the Islamist rulers of Gaza. A source familiar with the study cautioned that the absence of reports of widespread aid diversion by Hamas 'does not mean that diversion has not occurred."
The Gaza conflict began after Hamas attacked Israel in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and capturing 251 hostages, according to Israeli sources. Palestinian health officials report nearly 60,000 Palestinians have been killed since the Israeli assault began.
Israel, which controls access to Gaza, asserts that Hamas steals food supplies from U.N. and other organizations to control the civilian population and boost its finances by reselling goods at inflated prices. The Israeli military claims its allegations are based on intelligence reports showing Hamas militants seizing aid cargoes by embedding themselves on aid trucks, diverting up to 25% of supplies for their fighters or selling them to civilians.
Hamas denies these allegations, stating that Israel has killed more than 800 Hamas-affiliated police and security guards trying to protect aid vehicles and convoy routes, missions coordinated with the U.N. Reuters could not independently verify claims from either side.
GHF also accuses Hamas of massive aid theft in defending its distribution model. The U.N. and other groups reject calls by GHF, Israel, and the U.S. to cooperate with the foundation, citing violations of international humanitarian principles of neutrality.
The 156 reports of theft or losses of supplies reviewed by BHA were filed by U.N. agencies and other humanitarian groups as a condition of receiving U.S. aid funds. After receiving these reports, USAID staff followed up with partner organizations to determine if Hamas was involved and would redirect or pause aid distributions if Hamas was nearby.
Aid organizations working in Gaza must vet their personnel, sub-contractors, and suppliers for ties to extremist groups before receiving U.S. funds, a condition waived by the State Department in approving $30 million for GHF last month.
According to the slide presentation, USAID partners tend to over-report aid diversion and theft by groups designated by the U.S. as foreign terrorist organizations to avoid losing U.S. funding.
Of the 156 incidents, 63 were attributed to unknown perpetrators, 35 to armed actors, 25 to unarmed people, 11 directly to Israeli military action, 11 to corrupt subcontractors, five to aid group personnel engaging in corrupt activities, and six to others, categorised as commodities stolen in unknown circumstances.
The armed actors included gangs and other individuals with weapons. A review of all 156 incidents found no affiliations with U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organizations, including Hamas.
Most incidents could not be definitively attributed to a specific actor, as partners often discovered the commodities had been stolen in transit without identifying the perpetrator.
While there could be classified intelligence reports on Hamas aid thefts, BHA staff lost access to classified systems during USAID's dismantlement. A source familiar with U.S. intelligence assessments said they knew of no U.S. intelligence reports detailing Hamas aid diversions, with Washington relying on Israeli reports.
The BHA analysis concluded that the Israeli military 'directly or indirectly caused" 44 incidents of lost or stolen U.S.-funded aid. This included 11 incidents attributed to direct Israeli military actions, such as airstrikes or evacuation orders. Indirect losses included cases where the military compelled aid groups to use high-risk delivery routes, ignoring requests for safer alternatives.
About the Author
News Desk
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...Read More
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
view comments
Location :
Washington D.C., United States of America (USA)
First Published:
July 26, 2025, 14:30 IST
News world USAID Analysis Rejects Israeli Claims Of Massive Loot Of Gaza Aid By Hamas
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?
U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?

Economic Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs U.S EU Trade deal agreement has finally been chalked. In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump 's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15 per cent tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9 per cent economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%.Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week."The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB ."We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses."That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner."Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world."A1. President of USA is Donald Trump.A2. US is levying 15 per cent tariffs on Europe.

Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei accused of sleeping, getting high all day in shocking Mossad report
Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei accused of sleeping, getting high all day in shocking Mossad report

Economic Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Iran's supreme leader Ali Khamenei accused of sleeping, getting high all day in shocking Mossad report

What exactly did the Mossad-linked account claim? Live Events Why is this causing a stir inside and outside Iran? Is there credibility to these explosive accusations? FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A shocking social media post linked to Israel's Mossad sparked international attention after making bold claims about Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. A social media account connected to Israel's national intelligence agency accused Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of sleeping and using drugs, causing global outrage. These explosive allegations come amid growing frustration within Iran over deteriorating living conditions and government contentious post, written in Farsi, mocks Khamenei while highlighting Iran's escalating domestic issues, which range from a lack of electricity to water shortages and civil unrest, as per a report by Fox Mossad's Farsi account posted on X on Friday, asking, "How can a leader lead when they sleep half the day and spend the other half high on substances?" the Mossad's Farsi account wrote Friday on X. "Water, electricity, life!""Consuming drugs and conversing with spirits are not desirable traits for someone leading a country,' the account the Israeli intelligence agency has not formally verified the account's affiliation, the post was made by a new X account with a premium subscription that was created last month and purported to be the official Mossad spokesperson in Farsi, Iran's official language, as per a report by Fox the past month, the account has posted multiple times regarding Khamenei's health and the situation in Iran, including the lack of electricity, clean water, and education."To everyone contacting us through private messages, for your own security, please ensure you are using a VPN," the bio for the account designation of the recently appointed, albeit unnamed, commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, the command center of the Iranian Armed Forces, was covered in a post on the account linked to Mossad claimed to already know the name and invited Iranians to submit their guesses after Iran refused to disclose the commander's identity for his protection, according to a report by Iran's semi-official news agency, Tasnim News Agency, which is affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, as per a report by Fox response, the account advised the "lucky winner" who correctly identified Ali Abdollahi Aliabadi to "contact us privately to receive your prize."While the account's tone is unconventional, even sarcastic, analysts say the information it shares carries weight. Beny Sabti, a former IDF Persian-language officer and Iran researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, said, 'Some of the details this account has posted could only have come from Mossad.'If proven credible, the claims could further tarnish Khamenei's image in a country already shaken by unrest, economic strain, and a widening generational account's aggressive claims and humorous jabs are not typical of the Mossad's public relations style, but two intelligence analysts informed Israeli news outlet JFeed that the odd Mossad-affiliated account seems has previously been suggested that Khamenei is a drug user; in 2022, an Iranian scholar claimed that the Iranian Supreme Leader frequently takes the time, Nour Mohamed Omara stated on a Turkish TV station connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, "Many viewers do not know this, but Khamenei himself uses drugs." "He has a special village in Balochistan, where the drugs used by the leader are produced," the scholar continued. "This village is run by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and no one is allowed in."Drug use was openly deemed "un-Islamic" by the Ayatollah following the Iranian Revolution of 1979. Death is a possible punishment for drug-related Tehran has not released a formal statement regarding the allegations; however, Iranian state media has increased its criticism of Israel's online influence the meantime, the conversation surrounding Khamenei's alleged private behavior continues to to the account, Khamenei spends the majority of his time sleeping or using drugs, while Iranians struggle to meet their basic Israeli government has not confirmed it, but experts believe the information provided indicates authenticity.

U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?
U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?

U.S EU Trade deal agreement has finally been chalked. In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump 's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15 per cent tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. U.S EU Trade Deal Face-saver for Europe? Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Technology others Data Analytics Data Science PGDM MCA healthcare MBA Public Policy Product Management Leadership Healthcare Project Management Others Digital Marketing Design Thinking CXO Operations Management Management Cybersecurity Data Science Artificial Intelligence Degree Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta SEPO - IIMC CFO India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nazlat Alsman: Unsold Sofas Prices May Surprise You (Prices May Surprise You) Sofas | Search Ads Search Now Undo While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9 per cent economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Live Events Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB . "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." Big Win for Donald Trump? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." FAQs Q1. Who is President of USA? A1. President of USA is Donald Trump. Q2. How much tariffs USA is levying on Europe? A2. US is levying 15 per cent tariffs on Europe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store