logo
Minister ‘respectfully' rejects Paul Keating's super tax warning

Minister ‘respectfully' rejects Paul Keating's super tax warning

News.com.au7 hours ago

A minister has brushed off a warning from former prime minister Paul Keating that Labor's proposed super tax could penalise younger workers down the track.
Mr Keating, who was key in setting up Australia's superannuation system, released a statement on Monday celebrating the increase of compulsory super contributions to 12 per cent – a target he envisioned.
But he cautioned that younger generations would consequently save faster, with many likely hitting the $3m mark in the 2050s.
The Albanese government's tax, as proposed, would not be indexed, meaning more Australians than the initial 80,000 put out by Labor would be captured as the decades go on.
Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth on Tuesday praised Mr Keating as the 'architect of superannuation' but disagreed with the Labor reformist.
'First, I would say that Paul Keating is a great Labor person and was the architect of superannuation, and that's why he is absolutely cheering on us getting to 12 per cent superannuation guarantee that's happening today,' Ms Rishworth told Nine's Today.
'In terms of the superannuation proposals that we have put forward around people with very, very large balances of $3m.
'Of course, we listen to different views and we listen to Paul Keating respectfully as we do others.'
She noted that 0.5 per cent of super account holders 'are currently affected'.
'I think a lot of Australians feel that they are very, very far off from a balance of $3m,' Ms Rishworth said.
'This is a modest change and it is about sustainability in our super system.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is it OK to have multiple bank accounts?
Is it OK to have multiple bank accounts?

ABC News

time18 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Is it OK to have multiple bank accounts?

Opening a bank account is pretty easy these days thanks to online banking and apps. But how many accounts is too many and is it OK if they are spread across different banks? We asked a finance and consumer expert what we need to consider when using multiple accounts, including whether it's worth consolidating them. According to data from the Australian Banking Association, the average number of bank accounts Australian's have is about 2.4 per person. Kate McCallum and her husband have multiple accounts, including an everyday account, savings, individual spendings, a home loan and offset account, spread across three different banks. "It just so happened that we were able to get a better mortgage through one bank than our two existing banks," says the finance adviser and author. "So, we went with the third bank for our mortgage and that's where our offset account lives." Ms McCallum, who is based on Darkinjung lands on the News South Wales Central Coast, believes it is not necessarily how many accounts you have, but how you use them that matters. "There is no 'right number'," she says. "If you have multiple accounts and they each have a purpose, bravo. "But many people end up with umpteen accounts that may have had a great reason originally and now have none and it compounds when you couple." According to our Instagram straw poll, many of us have more than the national average. Of 1,811 votes on the ABC Lifestyle account, 43 per cent said they had between three and four accounts, while 32 per cent had between one and two accounts. 18 per cent had between five and six accounts, while seven per cent had more than seven accounts. Our stats are in line with what Ms McCallum has observed when helping clients get their finances in order. "When I deal with people, [the number of accounts] often is one of the biggest friction points," she says. She says there are three things that can happen if you have too many bank accounts: Andy Kollmorgen, investigations editor at consumer advocacy group Choice, says when it comes to day-to-day banking, it's important to make sure your bank isn't charging account-keeping and administrative fees. It's particularly important if you're setting up several accounts for your budget, as you could be charged multiple fees. "All fees will need to be disclosed on the relevant product disclosure statement for the account, which you can find on the website," he says. To find account fees on a banking app, you typically need to navigate to the account details section and look for a 'fees' or 'account Information' section. Some account-keeping fees are charged each month, while others may be conditional on making a certain number of transactions or deposits. You might find yourself forgetting about a bill or direct debit and being charged an overdraft fee. Some people even forget about old bank accounts they have set up. In fact, Australians have about $2.3 billion in forgotten bank accounts, shares and life insurance. If you have multiple bank accounts, Ms McCallum recommends assigning each one a purpose. For example: Automating regular payments can help you manage your money better. "Things like future car registration, rent, mortgage payments, groceries, petrol, anything that you know is a regular expense," she says. She says she likes to review accounts monthly. Ms McCallum also recommends mapping out your money flow (money in, money out) so you have an understanding of your expenses, income and what your savings goals are. Ms McCallum says the more that you can consolidate, the "less stuff there is to do". If you want to reduce the number of accounts you currently have, you could: This article contains general information only. You should consider obtaining independent professional advice in relation to your particular circumstances.

FBI says it dismantled North Korean fraud scheme spanning 16 US states
FBI says it dismantled North Korean fraud scheme spanning 16 US states

ABC News

time20 minutes ago

  • ABC News

FBI says it dismantled North Korean fraud scheme spanning 16 US states

Authorities in the US have busted an alleged fraud scheme which planted remote tech workers in more than 100 American companies to help finance the North Korean regime's weapons programs. The scheme saw North Korean tech workers allegedly use stolen and fake identities to gain remote work at the companies with the help of co-conspirators in the US, China and other countries. In one case, the tech workers stole sensitive information including "export-controlled US military technology", the US Justice Department said. In a second case, they stole about $US900,000 ($1.4 million) in virtual currency from an Atlanta, Georgia-based company, according to court documents. Roman Rozhavsky, assistant director of the FBI's counterintelligence division, said these latest schemes were part of a "massive campaign" by North Korea's regime. "North Korea remains intent on funding its weapons programs by defrauding US companies and exploiting American victims of identity theft," he said. "The FBI will do everything in our power to defend the homeland and protect Americans." The US and United Nations have long used sanctions to isolate the North Korean regime and force it to denuclearise, which has heavily restricted its economy. Australia has imposed autonomous sanctions on North Korea since 2006. The US Justice Department says 29 known or suspected "laptop farms" have been searched across 16 states as part of investigations. Law enforcement has also seized 29 financial accounts used to launder illicit funds, the department said. A New Jersey man was arrested on Monday, local time, for his alleged role in one of the schemes which spanned several years and generated more than $US5 million ($7.6 million) in revenue. Six Chinese nationals and two Taiwanese nationals were also charged in connection to the scheme. According to court documents, the accused stole the identities of more than 80 US citizens to secure work at more than 100 US companies, including Fortune 500 companies. They then caused the victim companies to incur legal fees, computer network repair costs and other damages and losses totalling about $US3 million ($4.6 million). The co-conspirators also created "laptop farms", hosting laptops belonging to US companies in their homes and enabling tech workers to access them remotely. This tricked the companies into believing the IT workers were based in the US. The accused also created shell companies with corresponding websites and financial accounts, to link the tech workers to supposedly legitimate US businesses. They funnelled money from the targeted US companies into these accounts. On Monday, the FBI also seized 17 webpages and 29 financial accounts holding tens of thousands of dollars in funds, which were used to launder revenue for North Korea's regime. In a second case, prosecutors allege four North Korean nationals schemed to steal more than $US900,000 ($1.4 million) in virtual currency from two companies based in Serbia and Atlanta, Georgia. The four North Koreans, who remain at large, then laundered the money through foreign accounts, according to the justice department. "This indictment highlights the unique threat North Korea poses to companies that hire remote IT workers," US Attorney Theodore S Hertzberg for the Northern District of Georgia said. The US Department of State has offered potential rewards of up to $US5 million ($7.6 million) in support of international efforts to disrupt North Korea's "illicit financial activities". This includes cybercrimes, money laundering and sanctions evasion.

Live sheep export ban transition advocate to meet WA Agriculture Minister within weeks
Live sheep export ban transition advocate to meet WA Agriculture Minister within weeks

West Australian

time30 minutes ago

  • West Australian

Live sheep export ban transition advocate to meet WA Agriculture Minister within weeks

WA Agriculture Minister Jackie Jarvis is set to meet the Federally-appointed live sheep export ban transition advocate within weeks after accusations the State Government had 'walked away' from the industry. Shadow agriculture minister Lachlan Hunter came out swinging last month after it was revealed Ms Jarvis had not met the WA-based advocate, Dr Chris Rodwell, since his appointment to the role five months ago. Dr Rodwell, a former CSIRO staffer, was picked by the Federal Government to facilitate two-way communication between the Commonwealth and farmers affected by Labor's plan to ban live sheep exports. A spokeswoman for Ms Jarvis said the Cook Government had been 'clear and consistent from the start' in its lack of support for the Federal Government's planned live sheep export ban and a meeting with Dr Rodwell had been in Ms Jarvis' diary 'for some time'. She declined to reveal what date and where the meeting would take place, but said it would be 'within weeks'. 'We understand the Transition Advocate has met, and is meeting, with a range of stakeholders and industry representatives, including the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, as part of their role,' the spokeswoman said. 'Minister Jarvis has an upcoming meeting with the transition advocate, which has been scheduled for some time.' Dr Rodwell was appointed as the transition advocate for the Federal Government in January, taking on a role described as Australia's 'most unpopular job' by industry leaders and the Opposition. Ms Jarvis' spokeswoman said the State Government had gone in to bat for WA farmers affected by the ban, netting an additional $32.7 million in Federal funding for the transition package after lobbing to have it increased from $107m to $139.7m. 'This additional funding was announced in October and as part of this announcement, the Federal Government committed $43.5m for WA to support processing capacity grants and community wellbeing,' she said. 'A process is under way to contract providers for the $1.5m community wellbeing program, with announcement expected in August. 'Program guidelines for the Commonwealth Government's $40m processing capacity program are being developed by Rural Business Development Corporation in partnership with the Commonwealth.' The live sheep export ban is set to come into effect in mid-2028. Mr Hunter, who is the Central Wheatbelt MLA, said the State Government's lack of engagement with Dr Rodwell demonstrated it had walked away from the industry. 'It's shocking that the Agriculture Minster has not bothered to meet with Dr Rodwell after nearly five months,' he said. 'It confirms what we've long suspected — WA Labor has walked away from our sheep producers, exporters, and regional communities. 'No State-led plan. No advocacy. No care. 'WA is the home of Australia's live sheep trade — and Labor has thrown it under the bus.' Ms Jarvis' spokeswoman said while the State Government opposed the end of live sheep export, 'the Federal legislation has passed'. 'Even the member for Central Wheatbelt acknowledged this ... in the Legislative Assembly, stating 'to be fair, the Federal Government won the election and has a mandate to end the live sheep trade. It took that to the people and people spoke',' she said. 'The Cook Government will continue to work with industry and advocate on their behalf for certainty and sustainable future here in WA for meat processing, WA sheep meat and wool producers.' A spokeswoman for the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry confirmed Dr Rodwell was scheduled to meet Ms Jarvis regarding the phase-out transition. 'Dr Rodwell has met with a number of State Government representatives and will initiate further meetings as required,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store