
‘The Encampments': Behind the scenes at Columbia's student protests
That's a name you may have heard. Born in a Syrian refugee camp to Palestinian parents, Khalil, who received his master's degree from Columbia's school of international affairs last semester, was one of the student leaders of the protest and a negotiator between students and the school administration. On March 8, he was arrested by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. Despite having a green card and being married to an American citizen, deportation proceedings have been initiated against him.
But his backstory, in which Khalil explains his journey from refugee camp to campus activism, is only a small part of 'The Encampments,' which arrives in the choppy wake of last month's thematically similar documentary 'October 8.' Co-directed by Kei Pritsker and Michael T. Workman, 'The Encampments' aims, among other things, to counter that earlier film's narrative about spiking campus antisemitism in the aftermath of Hamas's attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. To do so, the directors of 'The Encampments' focus on the organizers of Columbia's protest, including student spokesperson Sueda Polat and Grant Miner, a Columbia grad student and president of the Student Workers of Columbia union.
As they characterize it, the initial 14-day protest — a kind of sit-in or tent city centering on demands that Columbia divest from weapons manufacturers and defense contractors with ties to Israel — was more about kumbaya moments than bomb-throwing. Although it eventually devolved into some violent clashes with pro-Israel counterprotesters, the encampment, organizers say, was a mostly peaceful gathering of people from all religious and ethnic backgrounds, with hardly a rude word spoken.
'Where are the sound bites of people saying antisemitic things?' asks one of the film's subjects, a worker in Columbia's communications office who appears on camera with his face obscured and voice altered, presumably because he disagreed with the university's handling of the protests. Never mind the ample evidence that there were such encounters.
The film's vibe of harmony — at least inside the encampment, where leaders claim antisemitism had no home — seems more than a little stage-managed, if not whitewashed. Students in yarmulkes are shown side by side with those in kaffiyehs. Singers deliver an impromptu rendition of the Mexican folk song 'Cielito Lindo,' a woman hands out free chicken wraps. It's 'We Are the World,' against a backdrop of tense negotiation.
There is, however, a kernel of truth in there. Despite accusations of rampant antisemitism by some Jewish students, faculty and others, the documentary points to a surprising number of Jews among the protesters, including Miner, a PhD candidate who was ultimately expelled for his role in the protest. Jewish Voice for Peace, a leftist group in solidarity with Palestinians, was one of the main protest organizers, Miner notes.
Miner also offers a provocative explanation of why some Jews may say they felt unsafe, and how their voices have been amplified. 'There's a certain minority of students who feel threatened by the very presence of people who are advocating for stopping a genocide,' Miner says. 'And those people are listened to much, much more than the majority of the people who are advocating for cutting ties with a genocidal regime.' It's an argument that strays perilously close to the trope of undue Jewish influence.
In contrast to 'October 8,' Pritsker and Workman barely acknowledge that any protesters indulged in such tropes. There's an early clip of Minouche Shafik's testimony before Congress, in which Rep. Lisa C. McClain, a Michigan Republican, is shown grilling Columbia's then-president about whether she considers the chant 'From the river to the sea, Palestine shall be free' to be problematic. (Some take it to be a call for the eradication of Israel.) 'Yes,' Shafik eventually concedes, after hemming and hawing. More embarrassingly, in the same clip, McClain mispronounces intifada, the Arabic word for uprising or resistance, as 'infitada.' So does Fox News host Greg Gutfeld in another sound bite.
There is one moment of heartbreaking poignancy in the film: We listen to a 2024 audio recording of a 6-year-old Palestinian girl in Gaza, Hind Rajab, speaking to an emergency dispatcher after her family's car was fired upon by what appears to have been Israeli troops. Hind was ultimately killed, along with several other family members and two paramedics who rushed to their aid. After protesters took over Columbia's Hamilton Hall, they temporarily renamed the academic building in the girl's memory. It's a stark and powerful reminder of what the protesters are actually protesting.
Too often that gets lost in 'The Encampments,' whose name, perhaps unintentionally, suggests the very conflict between factions — both armed and unarmed — that is at stake here. Labels are bandied about, without definition: Zionist, anti-Zionist, genocide, terrorism, resistance, colonialism. Too often, in a film about an ostensibly peaceful form of dissent, it feels like adversaries are being targeted, albeit subtly, when the real enemy is war itself.
Unrated. At AFI Silver Theatre. Contains scenes of violence and some coarse language. In English and some Arabic with subtitles. 82 minutes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Black America Web
4 minutes ago
- Black America Web
Officer In Breonna Taylor's Death Given 33-Month Jail Term
Source: Probal Rashid / Getty On Monday (July 21), a federal judge in Louisville, Kentucky, sentenced former Louisville police officer Brett Hankison to almost three years in prison for his role in the raid on EMT worker Breonna Taylor's home, which took her life five years ago. The sentence was a rebuke of the request of the Trump administration's request that Hankison receive a sentence of one day in prison. District Court Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings received a letter from Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet K. Dhillon, which requested that Hankison only serve one day in prison (the amount of time he spent in jail when he was initially charged) and three years of supervised release. The insulting request sparked outrage from Taylor's family and the community, resulting in protests outside of the federal courthouse in Louisville during the proceedings. Dhillon is a staunch ally of Trump and has worked with the Department of Justice to dismiss lawsuits against police officers in Louisville and Minneapolis, which were brought in the wake of Taylor's murder and the murder of George Floyd that same year. 'Every American who believes in equal justice under the law should be outraged,' attorneys for the family said in a statement after the administration's request. 'Recommending just one day in prison sends the unmistakable message that white officers can violate the civil rights of Black Americans with near-total impunity.' The request is a new moment in the Trump administration's culture war seeking to elimintate claims of discrimination against law enforcement. Hankison was convicted last November of one count of violating Breonna Taylor's civil rights through the use of excessive force by firing 10 shots through her window during a raid, which police claimed was to seize illegal drugs. During testimony, he claimed it was to protect fellow officers during the 'no-knock' raid. His shots hit a neighboring apartment. Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, shot at the officers thinking they were intruders. Officers Myles Cosgrove and Jonathan Mattingly fired back, striking and killing Taylor. 'If I knew everything I knew today, I never would have fired my gun,' Hankison said to the Taylor family and her friends in court before sentencing, according to local CBS network WLKY . Two other officers, Kyle Meany and Joshua Jaynes, are awaiting trial on charges alleging that they falsified the warrant used for the botched raid on Taylor's home. Cosgrove and Mattingly were never charged for their role in Taylor's death. SEE ALSO Officer In Breonna Taylor's Death Given 33-Month Jail Term was originally published on

5 minutes ago
Head of FEMA Search and Rescue resigns over agency's response to Texas floods: Sources
The head of FEMA's Urban Search and Rescue branch, Ken Pagurek, resigned on Monday, multiple sources confirmed to ABC News. Pagurek told colleagues he was frustrated by the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to dismantle FEMA and by new hurdles that slowed the agency's response to the catastrophic flooding in Central Texas earlier this month, according to sources familiar with the matter. Sources said he pointed to a new DHS policy requiring all spending over $100,000 to be personally approved by Secretary Kristi Noem as a key factor behind the delays and, ultimately, his decision to step down. CNN. Pagurek had worked with FEMA's search and rescue operations for more than a decade and had served as its chief for the past year. Pagurek did not respond to a request for comment by ABC News. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told ABC News, "The attempt to spin a personal career decision into some big scandal is RIDICULOUS. It is laughable that a career public employee, who claims to serve the American people, would choose to resign over our refusal to hastily approve a six-figure deployment contract without basic financial oversight." "We're being responsible with taxpayer dollars, that's our job," McLaughlin said. "FEMA experienced no delays in deployment of assets, and Texas officials have unequivocally and vocally applauded the federal government and FEMA's response. If anyone is upset by the end of unchecked, blank-check spending under President Trump's administration, that says more about them than it does about us."

5 minutes ago
What's in Trump's trade agreement with Japan?
President Donald Trump announced a trade agreement with Japan on Tuesday, making it the largest U.S. trade partner to broker an accord as the White House threatens to impose tariffs on dozens of countries within days. Before the deal, Japan faced the prospect of a 25% tariff rate set to take effect Aug. 1. Instead, products from the fifth-largest U.S. trade partner will be slapped with a 15% tariff, in exchange for a willingness on the part of Japan to import some goods, among other concessions. In a post on social media late Tuesday, Trump touted the agreement as a 'massive deal.' The White House has yet to release full details of the agreement. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba also celebrated the accord. 'With the national interests of both countries in mind, we were able to reach an agreement at this time,' Ishiba said. Japan's Nikkei index surged 3.5% on Wednesday, while major U.S. indexes nudged slightly higher in early trading. Here's what to know about what's in the trade agreement and what comes next: What's in the U.S. trade agreement with Japan? The trade agreement lowers the tariff rate on Japanese products to 15%, putting it below the threatened rate of 25% but higher than a universal rate of 10% faced by nearly all imports. Even more, the U.S. agreed to set a 15% tariff on Japanese cars, putting it below the 25% tariff rate placed on imported vehicles from other nations. Japan purchased nearly $80 billion worth of U.S. products in 2024, while the U.S. bought about $148 billion worth of Japanese goods, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, a government agency. Cars and auto parts accounted for about $52 billion worth of imported Japanese products, making up more than one-third of products purchased by the U.S., government data shows. Shares of Japan-based Toyota soared more than 13% on Wednesday, while Honda jumped about 12%. In exchange for the softening of U.S. tariffs, Japan agreed to open its economy to imports of trucks, rice and other agricultural goods, Trump said. Japan also agreed to invest $550 billion in the U.S. economy, Trump added, but the president did not specify how the funds would be spent. How many trade agreements has the White House achieved so far? When Trump delayed the onset of so-called 'reciprocal tariffs' in April, the White House vowed to strike 90 trade agreements in 90 days. Before that deadline elapsed, Trump proposed a flurry of similar country-specific tariffs with a new effect date of Aug. 1. So far, Trump has brokered agreements with the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines and Japan. The White House also reached a preliminary accord with China that lowered tit-for-tat tariffs previously imposed by the world's two largest economies. For his part, the president has insisted that the on-again, off-again levies make up a key part of his negotiation strategy. "The president and his trade team want to cut the best deals for the American people and the American worker," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said last month when she announced the Aug. 1 deadline. Price hikes could hit coffee, shoes, appliances and a range of other products if additional tariffs take effect on Aug. 1, analysts previously told ABC News.