Major row dividing the coalition over income for artists
Extra.ie understands that the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (DPER), led by Fianna Fáil's Jack Chambers, and the Department of Culture, led by Fine Gael's Patrick O'Donovan, are at loggerheads over plans to scrap the Basic Income for the Arts (BIA) pilot scheme.
Under the scheme, initiated by former arts minister Catherine Martin, of the Green Party, the State pays €325 a week to around 2,000 artists to address the financial instability faced by many working in the sector. Successful applicants were notified in September 2022 and the pilot runs over three years from 2022 to 2025. Media Minister Catherine Martin was first told of a potential golden handshake to RTÉ's head of content Jim Jennings at the end of May.
Extra has learned, however, that the scheme barely escaped the budgetary knife during a DPER review of spending in the Culture Department. As part of the build-up to the revamped National Development Plan (NDP) and Budget 2026 – which the Government has warned will be a difficult one – DPER have been reviewing the spending of all departments. One minister noted: 'It is like a home invasion.
They [the DPER] are going through everywhere like a dose of salts; a lot of ministers are feeling very bruised.' This is especially the case within the Department of Culture, where sources told Extra: 'The artists scheme barely survived; the minister had a battle to get a six-month extension.'
One senior figure noted: 'The DPER accountants were not impressed. They were using phrases like 'strong reservations' on any future schemes.'
A departmental source added: 'The suggestion was made was that it was a measure that doesn't need repeating. Pic: Gareth Chaney/Collins Photos
'That's civil service speak for taking the scheme to the vets to be put down.'
The DPER accountants are believed to have met stern resistance from Minister O'Donovan.
One Government figure noted: 'The minister has strong personal views on this: he will not accept losing a penny or a single artist. The minister will react very vigorously to any attempts to trim this scheme.' They added: 'There has been significant research into the operation of this project. There is a comprehensive report. All artists were, as part of the process, questioned over its impact.'
One furious senior Fine Gael figure lambasted the move, noting: 'It's politically stupid. You would think we would have far better things to be doing than taking on a few starving artists.' They warned the Government is 'kicking over a whole series of hornets nests' to save money for the budget, alluding to the ongoing row over whether to scrap a €1,000 reduction in student fees that was introduced as a cost-ofliving measure. Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. Pic: Fran Veale
Another Fine Gael source warned: 'Jack [Chambers] would want to be very careful.
'Culture is a small department but sometimes in these matters it's not the size of the dog in the fight, but rather the size of the fight in the dog that matters, and Patrick likes fighting.' They warned that the Fine Gael TD for Limerick County would not 'tolerate any incursions like this on his patch'.
Another Fine Gael source noted: 'It is a classic example of Fianna Fáil knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing.
'All these words by Micheál Martin and others about the value of and pride in Irish culture sound very hollow. Pic: Shutterstock
'Pride has to eat, you know.'
Responding to queries on the issue, the Department of Public Expenditure said: 'Any matters relating to decisions for Budget 2026, including the below mentioned scheme, will be considered as part of the normal budgetary process.'
Given the perceived success of the scheme, Culture Minister Mr O'Donovan received some criticism when he announced a short six-month extension of the current arrangements.
Labour arts spokesperson Rob O'Donoghue sharply criticised the scenario where artists had been left with a 'six-month Sword of Damocles hanging over their heads'. Pic: Shutterstock
Mr O'Donovan has already signalled that he expects a full renewal of the scheme in Budget 2026, noting at the announcement of the six-month extension of the current scheme: 'I intend to bring proposals for a successor scheme to Cabinet as part of Budget 2026.'
He added: 'The extension I am announcing today will provide time to finalise the research programme and to undertake stakeholder engagement, which will provide the Government with a comprehensive evidence base upon which to base future policy decisions about the Basic Income for the Arts (BIA).'
Mr O'Donovan added that evidence collected to date indicates 'the BIA payment is having a consistent positive impact across almost all indicators'. Cairn Community Games ambassador Jack Woolley with children Helena Casey and Joseph Farrell at the launch of Cairn Community Games in the Gate Theatre. Pic: Julien Behal
He said artists in receipt of the support are typically able to 'devote more time to their art, produce more pieces of work, experience a boost to their wellbeing through greater life satisfaction, experience reduced anxiety, and are protected from the precariousness of incomes in the sector to a greater degree than those who are not receiving the support'.
The Basic Income for the Arts pilot scheme was launched in 2022 with two funding streams: one for newly qualified artists and one for more established ones. Some 2,000 eligible applicants were chosen through random selection, having met the criteria. No means test was applied to applicants.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Taoiseach hits back at US ambassador's 'vat of Guinness' comments over Occupied Territories Bill
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has hit back at claims from a senior Trump administration figure that the Government "fell into a vat of Guinness" when drawing up the Occupied Territories Bill. US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee had posted on social media that Ireland should "sober up" and apologise to Israel for the bill's passage through the Oireachtas. "Did the Irish fall into a vat of Guinness and propose something so stupid that it would be attributed to act of diplomatic intoxication?" Mr Huckabee said in the post. "It will harm Arabs as much as Israelis. Sober up Ireland! Call [the Israel foreign ministry] and say you're sorry!" Trade ban The bill will ban the trade of goods with illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land. The Government said there is a narrow legal basis, based on an advisory opinion from the UN's top court, to ban the trade of goods with illegal Israeli settlements. The Government has said this is being done to comply with the International Court of Justice, which said last year that countries should "take steps to prevent trade or investment relations" that maintain illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land. In response, Mr Martin said that he "rejects the comments made by the ambassador". "The situation is very serious in Gaza, including an appalling loss of human life. Terrible war crimes are being committed," he said. "Ireland has consistently condemned Hamas and we equally condemn Israeli breaches of international humanitarian law in Gaza. The slaughter of children must stop. The slaughter of innocent civilians queuing for food must stop. What is going on is beyond any moral compass. "Ireland stands for peace and a political pathway forward." Mr Huckabee's criticism was echoed by others in the US, including the pro-Israel organisation, the Anti-Defamation League, which said it was "deeply concerned" about the bill, which will impact a small amount of trade. On Wednesday in the Seanad, Senator Michael McDowell roundly rejected all and any claims that the actions of Ireland, its Government, or its Houses of Parliament were motivated by, or amounted, to anti-semitism. Claims that Ireland's position reflected anti-semitism, which he defined as hatred of Jews, were grossly defamatory and untrue. 'Our position on Gaza is shared by many Israeli Jews, including a former Israeli prime minister.' Referring to the appearance of former deputy Alan Shatter at an Oireachtas committee, Mr McDowell cited a passage in a book written and published by Mr Shatter in which the former justice minister had claimed that an accusation of 'arrogance' made against him by Willie O'Dea in the Dáil was an 'anti-semitic' trope. 'It is simply defamatory and untrue to assert that Ireland's position on Gaza and recognition of the Palestinian state was motivated by anti-semitism or hatred of Jews.' Read More Crush at Gaza aid site kills at least 20, GHF blames armed agitators
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Ukrainian refugees may be allowed stay in Ireland once EU temporary protection directive expires
The Government may consider a new bespoke permission system to allow Ukrainian refugees remain in Ireland once the EU's temporary protection directive expires in 2027. Discussions on the future of how the State deals with Ukrainian refugees are under way within Government, with a raft of options being considered, including the international protection system. However, sources have indicated Ukrainian nationals may be reluctant to move into the international protection system, as it would prohibit them from returning to Ukraine. It could also lead to a significant increase in the number of people seeking international protection, which could potentially overwhelm Ireland's decision-making systems. Last month, EU countries confirmed the extension of the temporary protection directive to March 2027, with Ireland supporting the proposal. It had previously been due to expire in March 2026. However, there is no single EU strategy to deal with the ending of temporary protection, with national governments due to decide on their own how to proceed. The European Commission has recommended to EU States to introduce a temporary residence permission for refugees, until it is possible for them to return to Ukraine. One of the main exit strategies for the Government when the temporary protection directive ends is to return refugees back to Ukraine. However, it is understood that returns are likely to be done on a phased basis, to coincide with reconstruction efforts within the country. The Government is also considering moving Ukrainian refugees to legal residence status in Ireland. However, under current rules, this would significantly restrict the number as it is typically linked to employment status or third-level education. It is understood if existing rules were applied, around 10% of Ukrainian refugees currently in Ireland would be eligible for a general employment permit. However, a new permission system could be considered by Government, targeted at Ukrainians who have lived, studied or worked in Ireland for several years and who have already integrated into society. Earlier this year, the CSO said there are more than 79,600 Ukrainian beneficiaries of temporary protection still living in Ireland as of November 30. In total, there were 112,189 personal public service numbers issued to Ukrainians who then registered with the Department of Social Protection to access social services and employment since March 4, 2022, eight days after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine began. In recent years, there have been a number of policy changes made, including reductions in welfare available to Ukrainians who arrived in the first two years of the war. This saw it fall from the full Jobseeker's rate of €232 per week to €38.80 per adult and €29.80 per child while in State accommodation. Arrivals from Ukraine are also only permitted to access State-provided accommodation for the first 90 days, after which they are required to find their own lodgings. However, when they leave State-provided accommodation, they are entitled to apply for standard social welfare assistance, if they meet the eligibility criteria. Read More Russian attacks on four Ukrainian cities leave 15 injured
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Compulsory purchase order system to be reformed — eight years after overhaul was recommended
The Government is moving to reform the compulsory purchase order (CPO) system eight years after an overhaul was recommended. Legislation introduced by Fine Gael's James Geoghegan seeks to streamline the process and reduce the current 18-month timeframe. Mr Geoghegan said the existing laws predate the foundation of the State and are fragmented, outdated, and overly complex. "It causes unnecessary delays, inflates costs, and slows down the very projects we urgently need — from new homes to vital infrastructure," the Dublin TD said. The legislation will streamline the CPO process, provide legal clarity, and reduce timelines which Mr Geoghegan said will make it easier to deliver the infrastructure needed at a national scale. It is expected that the bill would see the CPO process reduced by six months with the possibility of it being reduced to below one year in the future. "Research from the Department of Finance shows that a six-month delay can reduce the return on a project from 10% to 8% and a 12-month delay pushes it down to just 6%," Mr Geoghegan said. "That 40% drop is enough to make some projects unbuildable. We cannot allow bureaucracy to kill off good development." Fine Gael TD James Geoghegan said the system 'causes unnecessary delays, inflates costs, and slows down the very projects we urgently need'. Judicial review and CPO uncertainty are already driving up the cost of major projects that require CPOs for land acquisition such as the Shannon Water Pipeline, he said. Uisce Éireann has cited the risk of both judicial review and CPO-related delays as "major cost drivers" in terms of the Shannon project. The bill will also support faster housing delivery and unlock vacant buildings making it a key step towards tackling the housing crisis, Mr Geoghegan said. Under the Dereliction Sites Act, local authorities can CPO premises but this legislation would provide "stronger tools" in dealing with the vacant and derelict site registers. "Recent data shows over 12,000 residential and commercial units [in Dublin] lie empty and shockingly, 40% have been vacant for more than four years," Mr Geoghegan said. "These buildings could be transformed into badly needed homes." Another element of the bill involves providing compensation upfront to landowners who would get market value for the land. The final piece of the bill is consolidating over 70 pieces of legislation that deal with the area of CPO, Mr Geoghegan said, acknowledging that it will require a "significant body of work" by the Department of Justice.
