logo
Why Good Food hasn't published a mushroom recipe in months

Why Good Food hasn't published a mushroom recipe in months

Several days later, I asked another senior editor when Good Food might resume publishing mushroom recipes, such as those I had commissioned six months earlier from one of Australia's most creative food writers. 'Never,' he replied firmly, if not literally suggesting an everlasting ban. 'Three people have died.'
The reluctance is understandable. Not since 2018, when punnets of strawberries were found to be contaminated with sewing needles, has the country been so singularly focused on one ingredient.
The Google Trends graph charting Australian searches for 'beef Wellington' shows an almost vertical spike since Monday, suggesting interest has jumped more than 1000 per cent. Perhaps some of those searches are from the cooks reportedly hosting macabre dinner parties serving beef Wellington on mismatched plates.
Featuring medium-rare eye fillet surrounded by duxelles (finely chopped and sauteed mushrooms) and prosciutto inside a crisp puff pastry shell, the ostentatious dish requires a high level of technical skill (and patience) to master its many components.
Good Food contributor Nagi Maehashi, founder of the popular website RecipeTin Eats, says it's one of the trickiest of haute cuisine classics to crack. And she would know. Maehashi tested and tweaked her recipe many times before it became the centrepiece of her best-selling debut cookbook, Dinner.
Unfortunately, it also became a centrepiece of the mushroom trial, the court having heard that it was Maehashi's recipe that Patterson adapted for that fateful, fatal lunch.
The dish's complexity undoubtedly explains why, according to evidence given in court, Patterson returned to the supermarket several times to restock on the key ingredients for the dish, including almost three kilograms of puff pastry, a kilogram of sliced mushrooms, and several eye fillets.
Despite having more than 10,000 recipes in Good Food's collection, beef Wellington is one dish we don't have, and that situation is unlikely to change.
Yet sometime soon, once the court case has ended, I hope the news desk will relent on the mushroom ban and allow me to publish other mushroom recipes I've had on hold for months.
As the mother of two sons who have dabbled in vegetarianism, I'm conscious of how important they are as a source of protein, nutrients and umami flavour for vegetarians vegans, and anyone trying to reduce their meat consumption.
Australians have long appreciated button and field mushrooms. They're a staple of 'big brekkies' at cafes across the land. In the past decade, we have begun to dabble with a wider range of fungi, including locally grown enoki, shiitake, king oyster and lion's mane.
Food writers are excited to share the culinary possibilities these mushrooms offer.
Not just yet, though. Apparently, it's still too soon for 'shrooms.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A trip to the tip, hospital visit and beef wellington leftovers: Photo exhibits from murderer Erin Patterson's trial released
A trip to the tip, hospital visit and beef wellington leftovers: Photo exhibits from murderer Erin Patterson's trial released

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

A trip to the tip, hospital visit and beef wellington leftovers: Photo exhibits from murderer Erin Patterson's trial released

Photos shown to the jurors who determined Erin Patterson's fate as a triple murderer have been released by the court. Patterson on Monday was found guilty of murdering her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson by serving a toxic beef wellington lunch in July 2023. Patterson was also convicted of the attempted murder of Heather's husband and local church pastor Ian Wilkinson, who survived the meal after a lengthy stint in hospital. A tranche of exhibits, released by the Victorian Supreme Court following the verdict, have given a glimpse into Patterson's home during a police search in the aftermath of the toxic meal. Further footage shows Patterson's hospital visit in the days after the lunch, as well as her trip to the tip to dump a food dehydrator. Inside Patterson's home after toxic lunch An annotated photograph shows where each lunch guest sat at the table during Patterson's beef wellington lunch. The image depicts Ian at the head of the table with his wife Heather to his left and Gail to his right, while Don sat opposite Erin. On August 5, 2023, Patterson's home was searched by police and a number of items were seized, including a computer. Detective Leading Senior Constable Stephen Eppingstall told the trial he was the main officer tasked with staying by Patterson's side during the search. Patterson was allowed to move around her home but an officer was with her at all times, he said. Mr Wilkinson gave evidence during the trial that the beef wellingtons were dished out as individual serves on different coloured plates. The church pastor said there were five plates in total, four grey ones and another which was an orangey-tan colour. Patterson served herself a portion of food on the odd plate and then carried it to the table, he said. The defence argued Patterson did not own a full set of matching plates in her home. The beef wellington leftovers The court heard the beef wellington recipe was sourced from a RecipeTin Eats cookbook. During her testimony, Patterson claimed she bought the fresh mushrooms used in the meal from Woolworths, as well as dried ones from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's south-east. She had stored the dried mushrooms in a Tupperware container. Patterson told the court she had dehydrated and foraged for mushrooms in the past, and feared some may have mistakenly been mixed into her beef wellington meal. She denied the poisonings were deliberate. Leftovers of the meal were later retrieved from a red bin at her property by police and provided to pathology and toxicology for testing. The testing came after Patterson's four lunch guests were admitted to hospital due to being critically unwell in the days after the lunch. CCTV released of Patterson's trip to the tip During the trial, the court was played CCTV footage of Patterson dumping a food dehydrator at the Koonwarra Transfer Station and Landfill on August 2, four days after the lunch. Stills of the footage, which have now been released, show Patterson carrying a large item from her red SUV as she walks towards a large green shed. The trial heard the operations manager of the group which runs Koonwarra Transfer Station was contacted by police on August 4 in relation to the CCTV footage. The manager asked one of his employees to look for the item depicted in the footage, which was dumped in an e-waste bin. The worker then found what he described as a microwave-type dehydrator. Police went to the tip to pick up the appliance the following day. The hospital saga Patterson presented to Leongatha Hospital about 8am on July 31, but discharged herself against medical advice only about five minutes after she arrived. Dr Chris Webster told the jury he tried to call Patterson three times after she left the hospital amid fears for her health. He left her three voice messages, and later called police as he was concerned for the mother-of-two's welfare. At this stage, Don and Gail had been transferred to Dandenong hospital, while Ian and Heather were at Leongatha. Patterson returned to the hospital a few hours later and was transferred to Monash Medical Centre with her children after doctors were told the kids had eaten leftovers of the meal. The jury delivered their guilty verdict on Monday after seven days of deliberations, bringing to a close what has been 10 weeks of proceedings in the regional Victorian town of Morwell. The prosecution argued Patterson's lunch was intentionally laced with death cap mushrooms, but the mother-of-two denied the poisonings were intentional. Prosecutors further argued that Patterson faked a cancer diagnosis to lure her guests over for lunch as she needed advice on how to break the medical news to her children. Her estranged husband Simon Patterson was invited to the lunch, but pulled out of the gathering the day before by text message. It is not yet known when the mother-of-two will be sentenced.

Qantas hack victims could get compensation, say experts
Qantas hack victims could get compensation, say experts

The Age

time7 hours ago

  • The Age

Qantas hack victims could get compensation, say experts

Qantas customers affected by the data hack could ultimately be entitled to compensation if the airline were found to have breached passenger privacy, experts say. A week after Qantas disclosed the loss of data of up to six million customers, consumer law experts say the airline could ultimately face penalties, if a series of conditions are met. Qantas detected unusual activity on a 'third-party platform' used by the airline's contact centre in Manila early last week, prompting an investigation, which determined customer names, email addresses, phone numbers and birthdates, as well as frequent flyer numbers had been accessed, through a third-party vendor to Qantas. The airline disclosed the breach, which has been suspected to be the work of a criminal cybergang called Scattered Spider. On Monday, Qantas said 'a potential cybercriminal has made contact' with the airline, saying it was 'working to validate' the communication. Cybersecurity officials fear the data could ultimately be used as ransom. Loading The uncertainty over the status of customer data highlights the volume of data held by Qantas. Maurice Blackburn class action lawyer Lizzie O'Shea, who specialises in privacy issues, said: 'Qantas is a holder of a very significant amount of consumer information, involving huge amounts of data that are used for all sorts of purposes, including profiling consumer behaviour.' Australian privacy law requires an entity to take reasonable steps to protect customers' information from misuse and unauthorised access.

Qantas hack victims could get compensation, say experts
Qantas hack victims could get compensation, say experts

Sydney Morning Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Qantas hack victims could get compensation, say experts

Qantas customers affected by the data hack could ultimately be entitled to compensation if the airline were found to have breached passenger privacy, experts say. A week after Qantas disclosed the loss of data of up to six million customers, consumer law experts say the airline could ultimately face penalties, if a series of conditions are met. Qantas detected unusual activity on a 'third-party platform' used by the airline's contact centre in Manila early last week, prompting an investigation, which determined customer names, email addresses, phone numbers and birthdates, as well as frequent flyer numbers had been accessed, through a third-party vendor to Qantas. The airline disclosed the breach, which has been suspected to be the work of a criminal cybergang called Scattered Spider. On Monday, Qantas said 'a potential cybercriminal has made contact' with the airline, saying it was 'working to validate' the communication. Cybersecurity officials fear the data could ultimately be used as ransom. Loading The uncertainty over the status of customer data highlights the volume of data held by Qantas. Maurice Blackburn class action lawyer Lizzie O'Shea, who specialises in privacy issues, said: 'Qantas is a holder of a very significant amount of consumer information, involving huge amounts of data that are used for all sorts of purposes, including profiling consumer behaviour.' Australian privacy law requires an entity to take reasonable steps to protect customers' information from misuse and unauthorised access.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store