Hospitality at the end of life: Owners open their homes to terminally ill
:
Advertisement
A similar housing infrastructure for those wanting to die on their schedule is developing in Oregon, which lifted its assisted-dying law's residency requirement in July 2023, two months after Vermont. Of the 10 states and the District of Columbia that allow medically assisted dying, they are the only jurisdictions to have done so.
Accommodations typically include extra rooms in private residences, and apartments or second homes that people have traditionally listed independently or through Airbnb or Vrbo. Few are like Suzanne's, specially designed for patients and the loved ones by their side when they die.
What the properties have in common is that their owners support the death-with-dignity movement, which in 1997 led Oregon to become the first state to legalize medically assisted dying. Oregon's law, which became a template for other jurisdictions, included residency requirements in response to concerns the state would become a death destination, with bodies washing up on its beaches, recalled Peg Sandeen, CEO of the advocacy group Death With Dignity.
That hasn't happened, and lawmakers in some states, including New York, are introducing assisted-dying bills without residency requirements. Montana, where a 2009 court ruling made the procedure legal, doesn't have clear-cut residency rules, but people tend not to go there as they do to Vermont and Oregon, according to the advocacy group Compassion and Choices.
Advertisement
When Vermont lifted its residency requirement, property owners wanting to open their homes to patients seeking medically assisted dying began contacting Patient Choices Vermont, the nonprofit that helped enact the assisted-dying law, known as Act 39. PCV has transitioned into a resource for end-of-life organizations in other states seeking clarity about the law, and everyone from physicians to patients navigating it in the state.
The retreat overlooks a mountain range, seen in January.
Ian Thomas Jansen-Lonnquist/For The Washington Post
PCV's Wayfinders Network, an independent group of hospice nurses, case managers and death doulas, reaches out to doctors, hospices and social workers 'letting folks know we exist, and that people can get support,' said Kasey March, a network member and death doula whose services include companionship, comfort, education and guidance to people at end of life.
Terminally ill patients ending their lives prefer the comfort and privacy of a home over a hotel, said March, who keeps a list of four or five accommodations and is always looking for more. She learns about them from friends, acquaintances and fellow Wayfinders.
'You want somewhere that no one is going to knock on your door and ask what's going on and make you feel uncomfortable in some way, shape or form,' she said. Price, availability and location vary. Most people seeking medical aid in dying have mobility challenges and seek accessible accommodations close to urban centers, PCV President Betsy Walkerman said.
Cindy, a consultant who lives on the top floor of a two-story duplex in Burlington, Vermont, and whose full name is not being used for privacy reasons, discounts her short-term rental rate for those using the ground floor for Act 39. 'I would not want money to be an issue, so I just make it work,' she said.
Advertisement
Suzanne works on an offering system — if someone makes a donation, she puts the money back into the property, building the infrastructure for future patients.
According to the Vermont Department of Health, as of June, at least 26 people had traveled to the state to die, accounting for nearly 25 percent of the reported assisted deaths there since May 2023. Suzanne hosted three; Cindy, two. Cindy has another scheduled for late January.
As with others in their situation, neither lists their space as an assisted-dying destination because they can host only someone who has met strict eligibility criteria, including having less than six months to live. Only a doctor in Vermont can make that determination, and a second consulting doctor has to confirm it.
'The doctors are the ones who are the sentries at the gate,' Suzanne said. 'If you don't have a doctor or meet the eligibility requirements, you can't voluntarily die using Act 39 in Vermont.'
Suzanne says she feels this painting symbolizes the mission and purpose of her retreat space.
Ian Thomas Jansen-Lonnquist/For The Washington Post
As with many states, Vermont has a doctor shortage that can make it hard even for in-state residents to obtain care. Finding a Vermont physician from out of state is even more challenging, as a family that used Suzanne's center last summer discovered.
For a month in early summer 2024, the younger daughter, who lives in a western state and asked that her family name not be used for privacy reasons, called at least a dozen palliative care clinics in Vermont and Oregon for her father, 78, who was dying of cancer. The earliest appointment was in September, in Vermont. She wasn't sure her father would live that long, and he'd made it clear he did not want to die in a hospital, surrounded by strangers.
Advertisement
When she learned that a palliative clinic in Vermont had an opening in August, the family flew there, and the father was approved. The doctor and clinic program director provided Suzanne's contact information and also suggested the family call hotels and Airbnbs and be up front about booking a room.
The daughter called Suzanne first. 'I'm so grateful I didn't have to make any of those phone calls saying, 'I need to make a reservation for someone to die here,'' she said.
Two weeks later, the family returned to Vermont for the father to die. He and his wife stayed at Suzanne's. Their adult daughters, son-in-law, and granddaughter stayed at a hotel five minutes away.
'Suzanne was very accommodating,' the man's wife said — she gave the family free run of her house adjacent to the center, installed a full-size bed in front of the picture window so the couple could enjoy the view while they rested together, and welcomed the rescue dog the older daughter had brought for emotional support.
'I was able to spend the last night with him,' the man's wife recalled. 'The view was amazing — there's butterflies all over, there's hummingbirds, there's a gazebo on the property. You can see the hills from the big window. We said afterwards, 'It's exactly what he wanted — other than being in his own home.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
23-06-2025
- Forbes
Physician-Assisted Suicide Is A Bigger Problem Than We Realize
"We may seem a long way from legalizing physician-assisted suicide in the United States," writes ... More health policy expert Sally Pipes. "But it wasn't very long ago that such a thing seemed unthinkable in Canada, too." Dovie Eisner was born with a rare genetic condition called nemaline myopathy. He requires a wheelchair and has a host of other health problems. Last year at one point, he stopped breathing, passed out on the street, and was taken to the emergency room. 'I was alive—thanks to the determination of law enforcers and local medical personnel to keep me that way,' Eisner wrote recently in UnHerd. But, he warns, a law being considered in his home state of New York 'threatens to undo this presumption in favour of lifesaving' that motivated first responders to keep him alive. The bill, called the Medical Aid in Dying Act, would allow mentally competent adults with six months or less to live 'to obtain a prescription that would put them to sleep and peacefully end their lives.' New York is not alone. Seventeen states—including Florida, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania—are considering so-called 'death with dignity' laws. Eleven states and the District of Columbia already have them on the books. Advocates say these laws spare the terminally ill from unnecessary suffering. But a closer look at Europe and Canada—where physician-assisted suicide has been legal and common for years—paints a darker picture. Far from providing peace to terminal patients, these laws are often used by government-run healthcare systems to nudge sick patients toward ending their lives. The United States may not have a completely socialized system of medicine yet. But the government covers nearly half of all healthcare expenditures in this country. Over the past 40 years, its share of the nation's health bill has been growing, slowly but surely. At some point, it may have a financial incentive in hastening people toward their demise. Around 8,700 Americans have died by assisted suicide since 1997, when Oregon became the first state to legalize the practice. That's around 300 people annually. For comparison, some 3 million Americans die every year. In other countries, assisted suicide is a much more common cause of death. In the Netherlands—the first country to legalize the process, in 2002—more than 5% of annual deaths are due to medically-assisted suicide. In Canada, more than 15,000 people died by physician-assisted suicide in 2023—4.7% of total deaths. Canada only legalized physician-assisted suicide in 2016. Until last year, the rate of assisted suicide north of the border rose around 31% annually. The majority of Canadians choosing 'medical assistance in dying' are between 65 and 80. But the number of Canadians aged 18 to 45 opting to end their lives by MAiD has been increasing each year. There were just 34 in 2017—but 139 in 2021. Those numbers are likely to grow as Canada continues to expand the pools of people eligible for physician-assisted suicide. The government has already expanded the law to include those who are not terminally ill but living in circumstances they themselves deem 'intolerable.' Now, the United Kingdom is considering similar legislation. Last week, the House of Commons greenlit a bill that would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales to take their own lives with a physician's help. The legislation is moving on to the House of Lords. Proponents of these policies may characterize them as compassionate. But it's impossible to ignore the Canadian government's financial interest in having one less person who needs government-funded health care. The Canadian government certainly acts on that interest in other ways—most notably by denying access to cutting-edge prescription drugs. Just 45% of new drugs launched worldwide between 2012 and 2021 were available in Canada as of October 2022. Eighty-five percent were available in the United States. The Canadian government's calculus could apply on this side of the border. The federal government already pays for Medicare coverage for 68 million people. That number will grow as the population ages. And Medicare has shown that it will restrict access to some forms of care, through its Coverage with Evidence Development framework. Some 22 devices, services, and therapies are subject to these restrictions, as of 2023. Medicare defends those restrictions by saying it needs more evidence of clinical benefit. But some of those restrictions have been in place for a decade or more. A skeptic might reasonably wonder whether Medicare is holding back because of unspoken concerns about cost. There's no doubt that medical assistance in dying will be effective—if the goal is to save the government money caring for the elderly. We may seem a long way from legalizing physician-assisted suicide in the United States. But it wasn't very long ago that such a thing seemed unthinkable in Canada, too. Let's hope lawmakers stateside change course before it's too late.
Wall Street Journal
17-06-2025
- Wall Street Journal
Assisted Suicide Heralds a Culture of Despair
Your editorial 'New York's Assisted-Suicide Mistake' (June 11) captures what many of us have experienced up close. My grandfather James Powell helped pass the nation's first 'death with dignity' law in Oregon, occasionally appearing in TV ads in support of the measure. Years later, after an agonizing battle with lymphoma, he drank a lethal dose of barbiturates, prescribed by a physician. I was there along with many family members, and while I remember my grandpa with overwhelming affection, his last act has always struck me as wrong. How to describe the feeling of watching your hero kill himself, being watched by his family, those ordinarily expected to protect him? I can't help but reflect on how there were hours left unlived, words left unsaid, kisses left unshared. We were poorer for his choice and so, I think, was he. It is ironic that many people who oppose capital punishment, war and other state-sanctioned violence support euthanasia. Their ethic inevitably falls back on 'choice' and 'autonomy' as its ultimate visions of moral good. Never mind that these two things will inevitably be taken from us. The shape of our final days, months or even years are inexplicably valuable. They have the potential to enrich others' lives in ways we can't anticipate.
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
What's in RI's proposed $14.3B budget? Help for primary care, RIPTA funds and 'Taylor Swift tax'
PROVIDENCE – Rhode Island House Democrats have unveiled a new $14.3 billion state budget that seeks to bolster the finances of primary care doctors, hospitals and nursing homes without raising income taxes on the wealthy. The proposed tax and spending plan for the year starting July 1 would raise Medicaid reimbursement rates to inject, including federal dollars, $45 million into primary care, $38 million into hospitals and $12 million into nursing homes. Funding for primary care practices would come in part from a new health insurance fee estimated to generate $30 million per year. Although it spares the well-heeled an income tax hike, the House budget resurrects a tax proposed a decade ago on second homes worth more than $1 million, branded the "Taylor Swift tax" after the Watch Hill vacation home of the famous pop star. Proceeds would go to fund the state's low-income housing tax credit. The budget would inject $15 million into the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority, the same amount of money lawmakers added to the statewide bus system a year ago but less than half of the $33 million the agency says it needs to plug a budget hole and avoid service cuts. The extra RIPTA funding will come from a 3-cent-per-gallon hike in the gas tax slated to go into effect July 1 and tweaks to the formula that distributes transportation funds. A 1-cent-per-gallon increase in the gas tax is already set to go into effect in July. The budget, a rewrite of the $14.2 billion tax and spending plan Gov. Dan McKee proposed in January, was quickly passed on an 11-3 vote by the House Finance Committee on June 10, setting it up for a vote before the full House on June 17. "All our colleagues have heard, the Senate has heard and we decided that we needed to take action now," House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi told reporters about the money for primary care. "We've heard that our reimbursement rates are low, and that's the primary cause of the health care shortage. We wanted to address that immediately." Senate President Valarie Lawson in an email applauded budget investments in healthcare, RIPTA and child care, suggesting it won't have much trouble passing that chamber. As expected, the House abandoned several of McKee's proposals, including a 50-cent hike in the cigarette tax, buying an office building from Citizens Bank in East Providence and a tax on digital advertising that the governor hoped would pull in $9.5 million next year and $23.5 million annually by 2030. But the House budget agreed with the governor on other proposals, including a new fee on electric vehicles and charging the state's 5% hotel tax to short-term rentals of whole homes on sites such as Airbnb. Other budget highlights include: Truck tolls. The House accepted McKee's plan to turn on the legal-again tolls on tractor trailers in the first half of 2026 and collect an estimated $10 million in state revenue. Washington Bridge: $22 million in state dollars to match federal funds to build a new westbound Washington Bridge. Education: The House proposal would spend $16.5 million more on education than McKee proposed and $59 million more than the current-year budget. Conveyance tax: A 63% increase in the real estate conveyance tax on all home purchases, which doubles for the portion of a sale over $800,000 is proposed with proceeds going to services for homeless Rhode Islanders. The tax increase is projected to raise $8.4 million next year. Airbnb: Extends the 5% state hotel tax to whole-house rentals, something lawmakers rejected last year but McKee's budget expects will generate $4.7 million per year, with a part of the collections also going to homeless services. DMV: A $1 hike in the Division of Motor Vehicles "technology fee" to $3.50 per transaction. Superman Building: The House budget included a provision, already passed as a standalone bill in the Senate, that would exempt the owner of the vacant Industrial Trust Tower in Providence from sales tax on construction materials while claiming a maximum in other state incentives. Parking: The state's 7% sales tax would be charged to parking, generating $3.2 million per year. Nicotine pouches: The tax applied to the wholesale cost of tobacco products would be expanded to synthetic nicotine pouches such as Zyn, generating $12 million per year. Vacation home tax: The "Taylor Swift Tax" would not go into effect until the fiscal year that starts July 1, 2026 and no estimate was provided of how much it would eventually raise. Longtime advocates of increasing taxes on Rhode Island's highest-earning residents hoped the budget pressure facing the state this year would convince top lawmakers that the time was now right to do it. They proposed a 3% surcharge on income above $625,000, which was estimated to generate $190 million in annual revenue. And as lawmakers waited for the final details of the budget to be hammered out on June 10, the Working Families Party camped outside the State House with a box truck showing illuminated messages of support for a tax hike, such as, "Save Rhode Island. Tax the Rich." But Shekarchi told reporters that lawmakers decided against a tax hike, at least until the state knows whether Congress is going to pass a tax cut bill that could slash Medicaid funding and shift more costs to states. "We don't know what's going to happen in Washington," Shekarchi said. "We don't know what changes are going to be made in the federal tax code. We felt comfortable enough to do the non-owner-occupied taxes over a million dollars at this time, and we will revisit that issue when we have more clarity from Washington." But Working Families Political Director Zack Mezera said what's happening in Washington is even more reason to make the "1% pay their fair share," not an excuse. 'Today's budget shows that state leadership would rather raise gas taxes for working families than increase taxes on millionaires," Mezera wrote in a news release. "As President Trump and his allies advance destructive cuts that could cause over 240,000 Rhode Islanders to lose Medicaid and hundreds of educators and care workers to lose their jobs, we need bold action to raise revenue now – otherwise working people and small businesses will be paying the price for years." With $15 million from the budget to fill a $33 million projected shortfall, it looks as though RIPTA is going to need to scale back what it does, but Shekarchi said it would not necessarily mean large layoffs or route cuts. "I think they need to look at everything," he said. "Maybe it's smaller buses, maybe it's addressing the ride schedule, maybe it's a slight fare increase, maybe it's looking at management positions. That's why we mandated, when we gave them $15 million last year, they do an efficiency study and find out the solutions." Despite the prospect of having to make painful cuts this summer, RIPTA CEO Christopher Durand said the bus system is "grateful" for the additional permanent state revenue. "The agency has long needed a consistent funding stream to allow us to better support getting Rhode Islanders to work, school and healthcare," he said in an email. "The last time the agency saw a permanent change in its funding structure was over ten years ago; this is a needed improvement, which we are thankful for." This article originally appeared on The Providence Journal: RI's proposed $14.3B budget: Primary care; RIPTA; 'Taylor Swift tax'
