Judge rules Trump can't invoke national security powers to ban foreign Harvard students
'Here, the government's misplaced efforts to control a reputable academic institution and squelch diverse viewpoints seemingly because they are, in some instances, opposed to this Administration's own views, threaten these rights. To make matters worse, the government attempts to accomplish this, at least in part, on the backs of international students, with little thought to the consequences to them or, ultimately, to our own citizens,' wrote U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs.
She said the case is about 'core constitutional rights that must be safeguarded: freedom of thought, freedom of expression and freedom of speech, each of which is a pillar of a functioning democracy and an essential hedge against authoritarianism.'
Earlier this month, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation that invoked national security powers to bar Harvard's international students from entering the country.
The order comes after U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs ruled in the university's favor for a separate preliminary injunction on Friday, allowing Harvard to host international students.
The pair of injunctions effectively replaces two temporary restraining orders on those issues that were granted in May and June.
Burroughs still needs to rule on the legality of the case, but the injunctions provide a pause until that happens.
It comes after Trump boasted on Friday of a 'mindbogglingly HISTORIC' deal with Harvard University.
The reported deal is on the back of months of battling between the two parties, where the Trump administration has claimed the university failed to protect Jewish students, particularly in the wake of the war in Gaza.
Meanwhile, Harvard has claimed the government aims to wreak 'havoc' on the institution, 'throwing into disarray every aspect of campus life,' the university's legal team wrote in a request for a temporary restraining order.
'The government has done so not because of any concerns about the risks posed by those students — who (as the Proclamation says expressly) could be admitted to the United States if they sought to attend any other school in the country — but instead solely to punish Harvard and force it to yield to the Administration's unlawful demands,' the institution continued.
Since the battle between the two, international students and U.S. students have been considering transferring to other universities.
About 27% of Harvard's undergraduate and graduate students are international, according to 2024 to 2025 data.
Harvard international students have been wrongly detained at Boston Logan Airport and denied visas, according to Maureen Martin, Harvard's Director of Immigration Services, who wrote in a court filing.
The Trump administration, in a lengthy 44-page brief, stated its opposition to a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in the case.
'That Harvard has now become the subject of an immigration related enforcement action is neither discriminatory nor retaliatory. It reflects considered enforcement discretion directed to address well-founded national-security concerns, which courts cannot question,' the federal government wrote.
The battle over international students started when the Department of Homeland Security said it was revoking a key certification that allows Harvard University's international students to study there.
The institution was offered an ultimatum by the Trump administration to lose the certification or give up information about its foreign student population.
Quickly after, Judge Burroughs granted a temporary restraining order.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio later stated that the U.S. would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students and increase vetting of social media accounts of student visa applicants.
Following the revocation attempt, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation that barred Harvard's international students from entering the country to study. He also directed Rubio to consider stopping the processing of Harvard student visas.
A temporary restraining order from Burroughs blocked that, and the State Department ordered embassies around the world to resume processing Harvard University student visas.
Harvard has a separate lawsuit in reaction to the federal government freezing or cutting nearly $3 billion in federal funding, citing antisemitism at Harvard.
'In the Trump Administration, discrimination will not be tolerated on campus. Federal funds must support institutions that protect all students,' the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services wrote in May as it cut $60 million in grants to Harvard.
Harvard's Jewish faculty have their own wish list for a deal with Trump
These 16 states are supporting the Trump admin in lawsuit with Harvard
Alums urge Harvard to resist compromise with Trump as reports of deal emerge
'Devastating': 10 Harvard researchers detail 'essential' work set to be cut by Trump
Federal judge halts Trump's plans to keep Harvard from enrolling foreign students
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
17 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Floats a Mass Deportation ‘Temporary Pass'
If you're confused about the Trump Administration's mass deportation policy, join the club. First it was the full Stephen Miller, deporting every illegal in the land. Then there was going to be a reprieve for the agriculture and hospitality industries, then it was back to the full Miller. On Sunday the President said he now wants a 'temporary pass' for some businesses. 'I don't back away,' Mr. Trump said on Fox News Sunday Morning Futures. 'What I do have, I cherish our farmers. And when we go into a farm and we take away people that have been working there for 15 and 20 years, who were good, who possibly came in incorrectly. And what we're going to do is we're going to do something for farmers where we can let the farmer sort of be in charge. The farmer knows he's not going to hire a murderer.' He's right about that. Employers need good workers, and it's crazy policy for the U.S. government to raid businesses in order to drag away someone who arrived here illegally but has been a reliable employee for years. 'But you know, when you go into a farm and you set somebody working with them for nine years doing this kind of work, which is hard work to do and a lot of people aren't going to do it, and you end up destroying a farmer because you took all the people away—it's a problem,' Mr. Trump added. 'You know, I'm on both sides of the thing. I'm the strongest immigration guy that there's ever been, but I'm also the strongest farmer guy that there's ever been, and that includes also hotels and, you know, places where people work, a certain group of people work.'

Wall Street Journal
18 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Tries to Issue a Pardon—in Israel
President Trump has taken up a new cause: the Benjamin Netanyahu innocence project. 'It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure,' he wrote on Truth Social on Saturday, one of three posts against the Israeli Prime Minister's trial, which has dragged on since 2020. 'LET BIBI GO, HE'S GOT A BIG JOB TO DO!' The President isn't the first to wonder, 'How is it possible that the Prime Minister of Israel can be forced to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING'? At issue are vague breach-of-trust charges over his alleged receipt, from 2007 to 2016, of gifts of cigars and champagne valued at some $200,000 in total, plus a novel legal theory that construes positive news coverage as an illegal bribe. But the workings of Israel's overactive legal system and domestic politics aren't within a U.S. President's purview. We doubt Mr. Trump is familiar with the details of the Netanyahu case, nor should he be. It isn't America's place to say, as Mr. Trump has, that 'Bibi Netanyahu's trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY,' or to threaten, 'We are not going to stand for this' after mentioning U.S. military aid. That aid furthers a strategic purpose, as all the world saw this June in Iran, not a political one. We criticized Joe Biden in 2023 for intervening in Israel's judicial debate. That looked like an effort to topple Mr. Netanyahu, whereas Mr. Trump's is to prop him up. Neither is appropriate for an ally, and neither is in the long-term interest of the U.S.-Israel alliance.

Wall Street Journal
18 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How Holdout Alaska Senator Shaped Trump's Megabill
WASHINGTON—At 3 a.m. Tuesday, with President Trump's sprawling domestic-policy bill in trouble on the Senate floor, no one had more leverage than Sen. Lisa Murkowski With two GOP senators firmly opposed and Sen. Susan Collins (R., Maine) likely to vote 'no,' the senior senator from Alaska was the pivotal vote for Trump's legislative agenda. Murkowski, a patient and often inscrutable moderate Republican, was dead set on amending the bill to benefit her constituents and softening the blow from spending cuts in the package.