
Indonesia touts ‘big, gutsy' plan for 80,000 cooperatives to help villagers, but experts flag financial risks
These Red-White cooperatives, named after the colours of the country's national flag, will not only distribute goods subsidised by the government, like cooking oil and fertilisers, but also offer a wide range of services.
While its intentions might be noble, the initiative - which comes with a 400 trillion rupiah (US$25 billion) price tag – could pose serious risks to the economy if not executed properly, analysts said.
They warned that the programme could suffer the same fate as a failed Suharto-era policy, which was riddled with mismanagement and corruption practices. Based on the number of cooperatives set up, current President Prabowo Subianto's programme is nine times bigger than the country's second president's.
Due to the sheer scale of the newly-launched programme and the way these cooperatives are financed, experts said Prabowo's initiative could also leave some villages trapped in a cycle of debt while state-owned banks risk having liquidity issues.
'Many cooperatives are not professionally managed and eventually collapsed because of mismanagement, mounting debt and corruption,' Achmad Nur Hidayat, an economics and public policy lecturer from the Jakarta National Development University, told CNA.
Speaking at a launch ceremony for the cooperatives in Central Java on Monday (Jul 21), Prabowo said more than 80,000 of these cooperatives will operate across Indonesia over the next three months, adding that 108 are currently operational.
"Each village will have a warehouse to store (people's) harvests. We will also have shops for basic necessities, along with savings and loans services,' Prabowo said.
Each cooperative will also operate a small clinic and a pharmacy as well as offer transportation solutions for farmers looking to bring their goods to nearby markets, he added.
HOW ARE THE COOPERATIVES FINANCED?
In launching the cooperatives, Prabowo sought to explain why his government did so with a big bang.
He said the cooperatives will provide rice milling services so farmers no longer need to sell their grains for cheap to private millers.
Prabowo argued that there have been many cases where subsidised fertilisers ended up in the hands of brokers who resold them to farmers with huge mark-ups. There were also times when farmers had to borrow money from loan sharks because a family member fell ill.
'These (areas) are what we must address and we are addressing them with big steps,' he said, explaining why the cooperatives were launched at such a scale and in less than five months since the idea was floated in early March.
'We are a big nation, so we have to think big and have the guts to take big actions.'
The cooperatives initiative is just one of a series of ambitious programmes spearheaded by Prabowo since he took office in October.
In January, the president launched his signature free meal initiative, which aims to feed 83 million children, pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers with one free meal a day. Prabowo also plans to build three million houses for low-income families annually and establish 100 boarding schools for the poor every year.
On Jul 1, the Finance Ministry predicted all of these programmes would cause a government deficit of around US$40 billion, or 2.7 per cent of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) by the end of 2025.
Not wanting to cause further deficit, Indonesian officials decided to partially finance these cooperatives by reallocating money meant for the village fund programme, an initiative meant to support small-scale infrastructure and economic empowerment projects, which Prabowo's predecessor, Joko Widodo, initiated in 2015.
Prabowo has said that the village fund programme 'does not bring the needed changes' and that money for the legacy programme should be redirected to his village cooperative initiative instead.
But Zulkifli Hasan, coordinating minister for food affairs and chief of a government task force in charge of the Red-White cooperative project, said money from the village fund programme would cover only part of the initial capital needed to set up a single cooperative.
Each cooperative must then apply for loans of up to 3 billion rupiah from state-owned banks to develop the many business arms these cooperatives are expected to have.
Banks will scrutinise the loan applications so that they can reduce the risk of default.
'(Cooperatives) will have to state how they plan to use the money, when they expect to be profitable and so on. So we are (giving loans) the right way, not the easy way,' he said at the programme's launch.
Experts however warn that loan defaults among the newly built cooperatives will be high.
'It's a preposterous financing scheme,' Media Askar, a researcher from Jakarta-based think-tank Center for Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS), told CNA.
For one, he said that state-owned lenders might not have enough money to lend to all 80,000 cooperatives.
Indonesia's biggest state-owned lender, Bank Mandiri, for example, manages an asset of 2,400 trillion rupiah for 30.7 million customers while its smallest, Bank Syariah Indonesia, oversees 400 trillion rupiah for 19 million account holders.
'The banks' assets would be reduced to zero just by lending billions of rupiah to thousands of cooperatives,' Media said.
'And these (cooperatives) are newly established entities with zero experience, no credit history and no proof that their businesses are heading towards profitability. So the risk that they will not be able to pay back their loans is high.'
If a significant number of cooperatives default simultaneously, Media said, 'it could shake the stability of the entire banking sector'.
Achmad of Jakarta National Development University echoed the sentiment.
"Not all of these cooperatives will be profitable, certainly not immediately. In the meantime, (the villages) will have to pay (back the loans) in instalments. If they cannot repay then it will be a disaster for these villages and the banks," he said.
For the villages, Achmad added, they might see strategic assets seized by the banks if they defaulted. Meanwhile for the banks, they might face liquidity issues from these non-performing loans.
HIGH RISK INVESTMENT
Analysts also expressed doubts on whether the cooperatives will be well-managed, given the relatively short lead time from its inception to launch, with the Red-White cooperative programme first floated by Prabowo at a Cabinet meeting only in March.
'I doubt the government can find competent people to manage these cooperatives in such a short amount of time,' Achmad said, adding that the short timeframe also leaves little room for the government to come up with proper business models.
'Coming up with a business model that works is not easy. They must be tailored to the specific characteristics of a village, its economic potential and its people. Even then, it takes years to build the solid foundation needed for a cooperative to be profitable and sustainable.'
Experts say the lack of a viable business model and the top-down nature of the programme are reminiscent of Suharto's Village Unit Cooperative (KUD) programme, which was also designed to be multi-functional rural enterprises.
When it was launched in 1973, Suharto made a pledge similar to Prabowo's that the programme would cut down the middlemen, eradicate the predatory lending practices of loan sharks and ensure subsidised goods would not fall into the wrong hands.
'But because of mismanagement, debts were mounting, loans went unpaid, corruption was rampant,' Acuviarta Kartabi, an economist from Pasundan University, told CNA.
Government support for the 9,000 KUDs established during the Suharto regime ended when he stepped down as president in 1998. Since then, most have declared bankruptcy or have been abandoned by their members and fallen into obscurity. Only 385 are still active today.
'Such is the risk of establishing cooperatives born out of a top-down policy. They become dependent on government incentives and support because they were born not out of people's needs and initiatives,' Acuviarta said.
Prabowo has promised that his Red-White cooperatives will be closely monitored, preventing cases of embezzlement and corruption.
'Technology will allow (cooperatives) to be monitored closely. All money coming in and out (will be monitored) through technology. (Corruption involving cooperatives) will be a thing of the past,' he said.
Prabowo also said that his programme 'will be the backbone of local economies' and that people will do what they can to keep their local cooperatives afloat, with or without support from the central government in Jakarta.
COMPETENT PEOPLE NEEDED
Despite the risks, experts and industry players believe that some of these cooperatives can thrive and have the potential to improve local economies.
'There are farmers who struggle to get bank loans because they do not have bank accounts or because they are not legal entities. The savings and lending services provided by these cooperatives can offer solutions for our members,' Muhlis Wahyudi, secretary-general of the Indonesian Poultry Farmers Association, told CNA.
Muhlis said his association is also hoping these cooperatives would buy chicken meat and eggs from traditional farmers at fair and stable prices.
'Because prices fluctuate, we sometimes have to buy feed when prices are high and sell our chicken when prices are low. Many of our members went bankrupt because of this issue,' he said.
Experts said in order for these cooperatives to work, the government needs to recruit people who have a good understanding of the problems faced by locals in certain areas and turn these problems into economic opportunities.
'Each village has their own unique sets of challenges and opportunities. One village might benefit more from the logistics arm of the cooperative because of how remote it is and (be) less reliant on storage facilities because the products they sell are not so perishable,' Media of CELIOS said.
'Some villages might not even need a new cooperative because they already have one born out of their own initiative that is working and thriving.'
Economist Achmad echoed the sentiment.
'It takes more than the big budget and goodwill of the government to build a cooperative programme. They must be based on people's needs, run professionally and monitored closely by internal and external mechanisms,' he said.
Acuviarta of Pasundan University said Prabowo should have started small to prove whether his concept actually works.
'Training cooperative officials, monitoring their performance, determining what system and business models work and which don't, making adjustments and improvements, these all take time,' Acuviarta said.
'There's no need to rush.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
The AI race has big tech spending US$344 billion this year
[LONDON] If there's any lesson to take from the spending plans issued by the world's largest technology companies over the past two weeks, it's to never underestimate the fear of missing out. Microsoft, which set a US$24.2 billion capital spending record last quarter, plans to drop upwards of US$30 billion in the current period. similarly spent US$31.4 billion last quarter, almost double what it dropped a year ago, and is maintaining that level of investment. Google owner Alphabet raised its capital expenditures guidance this year to US$85 billion. Then there's Meta Platforms: The social networking giant lifted the low end of its forecast for 2025 capital expenditures and projected that costs will continue to grow at an even faster pace next year. Altogether, the four companies are expected to spend more than US$344 billion for the year, with much of it going to the data centres necessary to run artificial intelligence (AI) models. 'We have basically tripled capex investment in cloud due to AI,' Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh said. The emphasis from virtually every company executive during this earnings season was on investing as quickly as possible to get ahead. 'We need the teams to execute at their very best to get the capacity in place as quickly and effectively as they can,' Microsoft chief financial officer Amy Hood told analysts in a call on Wednesday. Susan Li, Meta's CFO, said the goal of its own spend is to secure the advantage 'in developing the best AI models'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Wall Street's response has been mixed. Meta was rewarded – in large part because the company posted a strong second-quarter sales beat and issued a rosy revenue forecast, signalling that the billions it's spending on AI are paying off. 'On advertising, the strong performance this quarter is largely thanks to AI unlocking greater efficiency and gains across our ad system,' chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg said on an analyst call. Zuckerberg has plans to build several massive data centres and has been luring top AI researchers with compensation packages valued at hundreds of millions of US dollars. The company recently restructured its internal AI division, now referred to as Meta Superintelligence Labs, in an effort to build human-level AI capabilities and apply that technology across its products. Shares of the company have gained more than 8 per cent since it reported earnings on Wednesday. Amazon, on the other hand, failed to convince investors that its lavish spending has been worth it. The stock was down as much as 8.1 per cent on Friday after the company reported tepid sales from its cloud division. The results were 'especially disappointing' given the strong performance from Google's and Microsoft's own cloud services, according to Bloomberg Intelligence (BI). And the ongoing capital costs will not help. The operating margin for Amazon's cloud unit will continue to face pressure 'through 2026 as capital spending ramps up', BI analysts Poonam Goyal and Anurag Rana said. Alphabet's shares are essentially unchanged from last week when it reported earnings and issued guidance. The company raised its capital expenditures outlook by US$10 billion and expects to ramp up spending even more in 2026. chief executive officer Sundar Pichai explained that the investments are necessary to keep up with customer demand. 'Obviously, we are seeing strong momentum across our portfolio, and especially in cloud,' Pichai told analysts in a call on Jul 23. 'It's a tight supply environment, and we are investing more to expand.' Nikhil Lai, an analyst at Forrester, put it another way: If Google wants to keep up with rivals, he said, it has little choice but to follow suit: 'Google's hand is forced by OpenAI to spend tremendously on AI's infrastructure and applications.' Microsoft tied its AI investments directly to a 39 per cent jump in sales for its Azure cloud-computing division, which came in ahead of analysts' estimates. 'We continue to lead the AI infrastructure wave and took share every quarter this year,' chief executive officer Satya Nadella said in a call with analysts on Jul 30. 'In Microsoft's case, the returns are good,' Gil Luria, an analyst with DA Davidson, said. The only question now is whether Microsoft's customers are in turn seeing a decent return on investment, he said. 'That's where the test will be,' he said. 'If they don't, they are not going to increase that spend next year.' Apple's capital plans pale in comparison to its big tech peers. But the iPhone maker did raise its spending estimates, tying much of the increase to AI efforts. Apple's property, plant and equipment investments totalled US$9.47 billion in the nine months ended Jun 28, up nearly 45 per cent from a year ago. 'You are going to continue to see our capex grow,' chief financial officer Kevan Parekh told analysts on Thursday. 'It's not going to be exponential growth, but it is going to grow, substantially. And a lot of that's a function of the investments we are making in AI.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Wall Street banks lose ground in Europe as tariffs spook clients
AS US President Donald Trump has ratcheted up his rhetoric against trading partners in Europe, corporates across the continent are taking notice. Some companies have begun to diversify their banking relationships away from the giants of Wall Street, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That has been a boon for Europe's leading banks, which have been actively vying to win the extra business. 'Some players are saying that it's better to go to European or French investment banks for advice on financing or mergers and acquisitions,' said Arnaud Petit, managing director of Edmond de Rothschild's corporate finance business. Deutsche Bank chief executive officer Christian Sewing said he sees similar in potential clients' requests for proposals. 'It is happening every day with client wins and RFPs and new business that we put on.' So far this year, roughly half of the euro bond deals from non-US companies did not involve any of the five biggest US banks, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That is up five percentage points from a year earlier. For sterling bonds, the gap has widened even further. Wall Street banks were shut out of just 47 per cent of deals throughout all of last year. So far this year, though, they have been excluded from 64 per cent of them. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The emergence of the ability of a few European banks 'to be able to offer competitive services and advice to clients' has created a desire among clients to switch, according to UBS chief executive Sergio Ermotti. 'We believe we are well-placed to continue to benefit from that diversification.' 'Specific skills' Even before Trump's trade war kicked off in earnest, the biggest of the US banks warned that it was starting to see an impact. By April, JPMorgan Chase had already lost 'a couple' of bond deals tied to the tariff uncertainty, with companies opting for local banks instead, chief executive officer Jamie Dimon said in an interview with Fox Business at the time. He warned that the tumult was 'causing cumulative damage, including huge anger at the United States'. The latest example of a win for non-US banks came this week, when Zurich-based insurer Chubb issued an offshore yuan bond. It opted for Standard Chartered to help take on the deal. The bank was told: 'We want to bank with the regional champions, rather than just with global banks in general,' Standard Chartered chief financial officer Diego de Giorgi said. 'Because we think that you guys bring specific skills in a world that is fragmenting.' Chubb is not an exception. The effect is most pronounced in Asia, where economies are expected to be hard hit by the changing trade regimes and the re-routing of supply chains, said Ruchirangad Agarwal, head of corporate banking for Asia and the Middle East at research firm Coalition Greenwich. 'The willingness of companies in Asia to change their transaction bank is currently at a high: a third of them plan to issue a new (request for proposal) within the next 12 months,' Agarwal said. Already, US lenders' market share in financing trade for Chinese companies has dropped in recent years, from 12 per cent in 2017 to about 7 per cent share now, he added. Martin Smith, head of markets analysis at East & Partners, said: 'We expect to see heightened uncertainty and customer churn at US banks as large corporates take an active risk management stance on FX, interest rates, counterparty risk, geopolitical tensions and supply chain disruptions.' BNP Paribas, meanwhile, has gained more share than any other player in Asia, he added. 'There are clearly strategic opportunities in the tectonic shifts that the world has been seeing in recent months,' Societe Generale chief executive officer Slawomir Krupa said of companies looking to shift toward European banking partners. 'The logic behind this form of risk diversification has become more apparent for companies.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
10 hours ago
- Business Times
Buffett's Berkshire hit with US$3.8 billion Kraft Heinz charge
WARREN Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway took a US$3.8 billion impairment on its Kraft Heinz stake, the latest hit to a bet that's weighed on the billionaire investor's company in recent years. On Saturday (Aug 2), Berkshire marked down the carrying value of its Kraft Heinz investment to US$8.4 billion, down from more than US$17 billion at the end of 2017. It's a rare disappointment for Buffett, 94, who was an instrumental force in the merger of both Kraft and Heinz about a decade ago. While the billionaire is still in the black on his bet, the stock of the packaged foods giant has fallen 62 per cent since then. During the same period, the S&P 500 has risen 202 per cent. Berkshire's Kraft Heinz stake is now marked at its fair value as of the end of June. The writedown was 'overdue', said Kyle Sanders, an analyst at Edward Jones. 'You could argue they should have done it a couple of years ago.' Kraft Heinz is now contemplating a spinoff of part of its business as it grapples with headwinds including inflation weighing on consumers' spending and people seeking healthier alternatives to its products. Last month, the company posted a decline in sales that wasn't as bad as analysts had predicted, in part thanks to higher prices. In recent months, Berkshire has signalled that it's taking a slight step back with its ties to Kraft Heinz. In May, Kraft Heinz announced that Berkshire gave up seats on the packaged foods company's board. And because Buffett's company is now limited to what Kraft Heinz discloses publicly, Berkshire said it would start reporting its share of Kraft Heinz's earnings on a one-quarter lag. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The writedown, disclosed Saturday in a regulatory filing, was driven in part by the sustained decline in fair value. But the company also said it considered its relinquishing of those board seats and Kraft Heinz's push to evaluate strategic transactions when determining how much of a charge to take. 'Given these factors, as well as prevailing economic and other uncertainties, we concluded that the unrealised loss, represented by the difference between the carrying value of our investment and its fair value, was other-than-temporary,' Berkshire said in the filing. While Buffett's conglomerate said it owns 27.4 per cent of Kraft Heinz stock at the end of June, the writedown could ease the path to a reduction of that holding in the future, according to Edward Jones's Sanders. 'I think they're giving themselves more flexibility to potentially exit their position in the future,' he said. 'This is one of Warren's largest missteps in the past couple of decades. It might just be time to move on from it.' Cash hoard Buffett's cash pile ended up dropping 1 per cent in the three months through June, to US$344 billion, the first time in three years that the war chest has shrunk. Those funds had previously kept soaring to all-time highs as he struggled to find opportunities to invest. Buffett ended up taking a cautious approach to the stock market in the second quarter. He was a net seller of other companies' shares during the period, offloading about US$3 billion of equities. He even steered clear of Berkshire's own stock, forgoing any buybacks. He's been on the sidelines for repurchases for roughly a year now, despite the stock falling 12 per cent after Buffett announced in May that he would step down as chief executive officer at the end of the year. Buffett's perceived cautious stance towards the market, including his own stock, may weigh on Berkshire's share performance compared with the market, according to Sanders. 'The things that they need to do to get the stock working, they're just not willing to pull the trigger on yet,' he said. Operating profit Berkshire had a weaker second quarter at its operating businesses. Profit dropped 3.8 per cent to US$11.16 billion, driven by a decline in underwriting earnings at its insurers. Its auto insurer, Geico, posted pretax underwriting earnings that rose 2 per cent to US$1.8 billion in the second quarter. The unit's underwriting expenses surged 40 per cent in the period, as the company spent more to increase its policy count. 'They were behind their peers, they lost market share and it took a couple of years to turn the ship,' Sanders said. 'That comeback is finally on solid footing.' Berkshire's utility business, which runs Pacificorp, MidAmerican and NV Energy, posted a 7 per cent increase in operating earnings. The company said it is currently evaluating the impact of President Donald Trump's tax law as it accelerates the phase-out of clean energy production. At its railroad network operator, BNSF, operating earnings rose 19 per cent to about US$1.5 billion, an increase Berkshire attributes to increased productivity and a lower tax rate. The unit, which Berkshire acquired in 2010, has been caught up in dealmaking speculation in recent weeks. Two major competitors, Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, struck a US$72 billion deal to create the first transcontinental railroad operator. BNSF's strong performance in the second quarter calls into question the necessity for the railroad to do its own deal to remain relevant, according to Cathy Seifert, an analyst at CFRA Research. 'We just came out of a quarter where they've had to write down a deal that didn't work out very well,' she said. 'So there's really a hesitancy to pay up when you've got a potential target that's been bid up in anticipation of you making a deal.' BLOOMBERG