North Carolina unemployment payments would go up $100 per week under proposed bill
House Bill 48, which was heard and approved by the House Finance committee on Tuesday, comes months after an executive order boosted unemployment payments to a $600 weekly cap following Hurricane Helene. That increase is set to expire on March 1.
'We have created a very healthy (unemployment) fund,' said Rep. Julia Howard (R-Davie), who is co-sponsoring the bill. 'I think it's reasonable to think the fund will sustain itself at $400 a week.'
Entering the hearing, the new increased rate was set at $400. But a Democrat-led amendment to bump it to $450 found unanimous support Tuesday.
'We're putting more of our money back into our economy instead of letting it sit there,' said Rep. Deb Butler (D-New Hanover), who proposed the change.
Howard said she wasn't opposed to the change — acknowledging that before discussing the proposal with the Senate, she had favored a higher increase.
'When it goes to the Senate, I have no clue what changes they might make to it,' Howard said.
Under current North Carolina law, the state pays out 12 weeks of unemployment insurance, with weekly payments set at 50% of an individual's prior wages. Those payments are currently capped, however, at $350 per week.
The bill would not impact those who have already filed for higher payments after Helene, legislative staff said Tuesday. Those people's weekly rates were set in their first week of payments.
Federal disaster money has also funded an additional 14 weeks of unemployment payments for Helene-impacted counties in the mountains.
Former Gov. Roy Cooper, shortly after Helene devastated western North Carolina, issued an executive order adding a $250 bonus to that 50% base rate, and raised the weekly cap to $600.
That order expires when the state's disaster declaration for Helene does — on March 1. The bill both ratifies Cooper's order — but also says that he did not have the authority to issue it in the first place.
'It's questionable, but we don't think he had the authority,' Howard said of Cooper's order. 'But we felt that it was necessary that we do ratify, and at the same time show a definite termination date.'
But Democrats expressed concern Tuesday that the part of the bill ending Cooper's executive order could also hamper future efforts to boost unemployment after disasters.
'The challenge that I see, and worry about, is the governor can act a lot faster than this body generally does,' said Rep. Eric Ager (D-Buncombe).
Butler also proposed an amendment Tuesday to remove that section from the bill. It was voted down by Republicans on the committee.
North Carolina's unemployment fund is funded through assessments on businesses, who pay into the fund at varying rates.
The bill being considered would also create a tax credit for those employers. That credit would be equal to the amount the employer paid toward the fund in the fourth quarter of 2024.
As of 2023, North Carolina's unemployment trust fund sits at $5 billion.
More than a decade ago, lawmakers passed a bill significantly shortening how long the state pays out unemployment.
The 2013 law cut the total length from 26 weeks to a range of 12 to 20 weeks, depending on the employment rate. It also set the current weekly cap of $350.
The current length of 12 weeks is triggered anytime the unemployment rate is below 5.5%.
Those changes came as lawmakers sought to dig out of a federal loan — taken out to cover a wave of unemployment claims stemming from the 2007-08 recession.
'That's when we were really in a world of hurt,' Howard said. 'That's when we redrafted the state plan and made a lot of changes to it.'
Critics of the current plan have argued it is among the least generous in the nation — and that North Carolina's current fund and growth could safely allow for higher payments.
Advocates have previously urged the General Assembly to increase the duration of benefits back to 26 weeks; to increase the maximum cap; and to change the way weekly benefits are calculated, among other measures.
HB 48 now heads to the powerful House Rules Committee, where it will need to win approval before it can be considered by the full House of Representatives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Here's where Democrats stand in polls at Trump's six-month mark
Recent polling is painting a mixed picture for Democrats as they look to chart a path forward in the wake of their loss to President Trump in November. Trump's approval rating remains comfortably underwater as he reaches the six-month mark back in office on Sunday. But while Democrats have scored some notable victories in high-profile elections since then, they've been unable to pull away from the GOP as the party hopes to regroup for the midterms next year. Data experts said Democrats' position has improved since Trump started his second term, but they still have a lot of work to do to win back trust from the American people and be poised to take back control of the House. 'You can't just be on the attack. You can't beat something with nothing,' said Democratic pollster Celinda Lake. 'We have to show and tell what we would do, but I think that we're on the precipice of a big opportunity, and I hope we take advantage of it.' Months after Democrats suffered a major blow with Trump sweeping all seven battleground states and the GOP winning control of both houses of Congress, the party is still seeking to put the pieces back together. Halfway through the first year of Trump's term, many data points on where the party stands don't appear bright. Views of the Democratic Party have been at historic lows for a couple months. The percentage of registered voters who view the party favorably reached some of its lowest levels since at least the start of Trump's first term in office in YouGov's average, more than 20 points underwater as of late May. A CNN poll released Thursday found only 28 percent of Americans view the party favorably, a record low in the history of the outlet's polling dating back to 1992. Views of the Republican Party also aren't strong but haven't been quite as poor. A poll conducted by the Democratic super PAC Unite the Country found recently that voters perceive the party as 'out of touch,' 'woke' and 'weak.' An AP-NORC poll found just over a third of Democrats are optimistic about the party's future, compared to 57 percent last July. Surveys have also shown widespread frustration with Democratic leaders and a feeling that Democrats aren't fighting hard enough against the Trump administration and for their voters. This has been particularly pointed against Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), whose favorability rating has been stuck in the mid-to-upper 20s throughout Trump's second term, according to the Decision Desk HQ polling average, though his net favorability has improved somewhat more recently. Scott Tranter, the director of data science for DDHQ, said Democrats are still trying to form a coherent message but don't have a clear 'rallying cry,' though some of them have received attention as they've been arrested during faceoffs with Trump administration officials or visited detention centers like 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Florida. 'It's pretty clear that Schumer is not the guy, just based on his approval rating,' Tranter said. 'And one can make the argument that [former House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi's approval rating was underwater as well, but… Schumer doesn't seem to have that kind of gravitas that she did.' One other common trend in polling over these months is a lack of agreement over who the leader of the Democratic Party is after 2024. A CNN poll found in March that 30 percent of Democrats didn't give a name to respond to a question about which leader best reflects the party's core values. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) had the most support but with only 10 percent, while former Vice President Harris had 9 percent and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) had 8 percent. An Emerson College Poll found Democrats widely split among the field of potential 2028 presidential contenders, with the leading candidate only with 16 percent. Tranter said this dynamic is somewhat to be expected following a party's loss in the presidential election, pointing to the first months of 2005 for Democrats after John Kerry's loss and of 2013 for Republicans after Mitt Romney's loss. 'Coming out of Kerry, the Democrats were also in the wilderness,' he said. 'And so I think that the takeaway is that every time something like this happens, each party goes through its transformation. I think we're still pretty early on it.' But the data does show some reasons to be optimistic for Democrats. Trump's approval rating and favorability have consistently been underwater, not abnormal for him even as he won the November election, but still presenting Democrats with an opportunity. Democrats have mostly kept a lead in DDHQ's average of the generic congressional ballot since early March, albeit a small one of a couple points at most. They led on that question by 1 point as of Monday. The same CNN poll showing disapproval of the Democratic Party found Democrats are more motivated to vote in next year's midterms. A poll from Republican pollster Fabrizio Ward found Republicans trailing the generic ballot in 28 battleground House districts. Democrats also expressed hope that the passage of Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' extending Trump's tax cuts and increasing border security funding but also cutting Medicaid spending, could give them the opportunity they've been looking for. Multiple polls have shown at least a plurality of registered voters or adults oppose it, though many also say they don't know enough. 'Trump and the Republicans are certainly focused on incredibly unpopular policies that are likely to benefit the Democrats that they deserve leading into the midterms,' said Ryan O'Donnell, the interim executive director of the progressive polling firm Data for Progress. 'But Democrats also have to show that they're hearing people's concerns and actively offering solutions to those concerns to make their lives better and more affordable.' Lake said the lack of a clear leader has a positive side, as the 2028 Democratic field will likely feature many showing what the Democratic alternative is to Trump. But she said the process of a leader or a few leaders emerging has been slower than in the past, and she expects that is unlikely to be 'fixed' before the 2026 midterms. That will require having a unified message if no unified leader, she said. 'They need to have a unified voice and a unified plan, and that plan has to include a proactive, populist economic message about what we're going to do and who we're going to fight for,' Lake said. Lake's polling firm and the Democratic donor network Way to Win partnered to conduct a poll released Thursday evaluating those who voted for President Biden in 2020 but didn't vote in 2024. The poll, conducted from late April to early June, found many of those voters didn't like either candidate and didn't feel that Harris had a strong enough economic message to convince them she would lower costs. Pollsters also found most of those voters lean toward voting for a Democrat if the midterms were held today. Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, the co-founder and vice president of Way to Win, said the feelings of regret that respondents indicated they felt about not voting, particularly as relates to the Medicaid cuts and the cost of living not dropping, give the party an opening. She said the poll, showing the most anguish about cuts to programs that help children and Medicaid, was taken before the law's passage, but those concerns are coming to fruition now. 'I think you can use that, right? You could leverage that to say, 'The thing you care about the most is the thing that is actually happening. And so you need to come and be a part of [the] opposition to this,'' Fernandez Ancona said. And the firm's poll, along with other polling, has shown Democrats want their party to go on offense. 'The table has been set,' she said. 'So the question is, will we be able to take advantage of it? Will we really lean in? Will we not shy away from actually going on offense about this bill? It's all about, can we seize the opportunity?'
Boston Globe
21 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Student loan debt may be tougher to pay off and expand the wealth divide after passage of Trump's big bill
'I'm at an age when people are advancing in their careers, starting families, buying houses,' she said. '[The debt] takes a huge emotional and financial toll. I'm very pro-active, I create budgets. On every spreadsheet, I have to budget for this dark cloud.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up German Roman is one of the Advertisement Recent efforts by the Trump administration and Republican-led Congress to restrict access to federal student loans may further deepen these disparities. By limiting funds historically under-represented communities have relied on, students of color and women may be pushed toward private lending, or skip higher education altogether. As part of the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' signed by President Trump on July 4, federal loans for medical and law students will be capped at $200,000, below Advertisement The bill also limits repayment options, with fewer flexibilities, restricted pathways to debt forgiveness, and faster repayment requirements. According to the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy and research group, all students, regardless of income or whether they've completed their degree, will face higher monthly payments as a result of these changes. Outside of the legislation, the Trump administration The Student Debt Crisis Center, a separate advocacy group, estimates these fees will amount to about $300 a month. Already 5 million Americans have defaulted on their student loans, with another 2 million projected to default this month. Natalie Abrams, president and founder of the debt crisis center, now expects these numbers to grow. Advertisement 'This is a bad bill for borrowers,' she said. Advocates who have been raising alarm bells for years about rising student debt are now stuck in a strange position: Advocating for federal loans to continue, while also calling for major changes to the system through debt cancellation and lowered tuition. On its face, the Republican-led changes seem to acknowledge concerns about the country's But critics counter that in the face of federal loan caps, borrowers will rely on higher-priced, more risky private loans, or skip school altogether. Borrowers of color, who have less family wealth to tap into and are therefore more reliant on student loans, will be hurt the most. Student debt diminishes the ability of historically under-represented communities to build generational wealth, diverting money that could go toward savings, retirement, or investing in big-ticket items that traditionally fuel family wealth, such as homes. Advertisement 'Generations of systemic racism have forced Black and brown folks — especially Black women — to borrow at higher rates than our white peers and bear an enormous financial burden, denying us the opportunity to succeed and build generational wealth,' Representative Ayanna Pressley told the Globe in an emailed statement. Changes by the Trump administration, while reducing a reliance on federal student loans, could actually worsen the divide. Lending limits 'means fewer people who are not already rich will be able to go to college, and the people who still need to get education and training that are not already rich are going to be targeted for predatory private loan projects,' said Eileen Connor, executive director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending, a legal and policy organization focused on predatory for-profit colleges and lenders that started at Harvard Law School. 'There's been a fair amount of talk about Trump policies leading to resegregation,' Persis Yu, deputy executive director and managing council at the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group that aims to improve the student loan system, said. 'And I think this is part of that project.' Amina Khamsi will be starting her third year at Boston University School of Medicine this fall. Originally from El Paso, Texas, Khamsi, who is a first-generation immigrant with Moroccan and Colombian roots, has already taken out nearly $120,000 in federal student debt, which has accrued nearly $10,000 in interest. She's already considering whether she can afford to stay in Boston for residency, and worries doctors will have to reconsider whether they can work in underserved communities, where positions pay less, if they have to take on more private debt. Advertisement 'You are forcing people to make decisions not based on ethical practices or how they want to practice medicine, but 'how am I going to cope with this.' I fear in the long run we're going to have less doctors who look like me, who look like a lot of patients across America, and that could have detrimental effects to health care.' Private lenders seem primed for the potential influx. In the weeks leading up to the legislation's passage, Sallie Mae calling for caps on federal student lending. The CEO of Navient, a major private student lender, As students consider their now whittled-down options, German Roman encourages them to be informed. She doesn't regret going to college, but she does regret taking on debt, even as she feels she should consider herself lucky, since the $20,000 she owes is half tuition-free college. 'No one is arguing for the status quo,' said Yu. 'But until there is a real investment in higher education, both on the federal and state level,' millions of students and their families will continue to rely on federal debt, with now-tightened conditions. 'These proposals,' Yu said, 'are going to make the crisis worse, not better.' Advertisement This story was produced by the Globe's team, which covers the racial wealth gap in Greater Boston. You can sign up for the newsletter . Mara Kardas-Nelson can be reached at
Boston Globe
21 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Today in History: Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin walk on the moon
In 1775, 250 years ago, Major Joseph Vose of Milton led about 400 soldiers and rowers on a raid on Boston Light, which was held by British troops. The patriots stripped the lighthouse of furniture and the island of gunpowder and set afire the lighthouse. This was the latest in a series of raids -- including off Cape Ann -- destroying light houses and other navigation aids thought to benefit the British. Vose's forces also stripped the Nantasket Peninsula of grains. In 1917, America's World War I draft lottery began as Secretary of War Newton Baker, wearing a blindfold, reached into a glass bowl and pulled out a capsule containing the number 258 during a ceremony inside the Senate office building. Advertisement In 1944, an attempt by a group of German officials to assassinate Adolf Hitler with a bomb failed as the explosion only wounded the Nazi leader. In 1951, Jordan's King Abdullah I was assassinated in Jerusalem by a Palestinian gunman who was shot dead by security. In 1969, astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin 'Buzz' Aldrin became the first men to walk on the moon after reaching its surface in their Apollo 11 lunar module. In 1976, America's Viking 1 robot spacecraft made a successful, first-ever landing on Mars. In 1977, a flash flood hit Johnstown, Pa., killing more than 80 people and causing $350 million worth of damage. In 1990, Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan, one of the court's most liberal voices, announced he was stepping down. In 1993, White House deputy counsel Vincent Foster Jr., 48, was found shot to death in a park near Washington, D.C.; it was ruled a suicide. In 2006, the Senate voted 98-0 to renew the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act for another quarter-century. In 2007, President George W. Bush signed an executive order prohibiting cruel and inhuman treatment, including humiliation or denigration of religious beliefs, in the detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects. In 2012, gunman James Holmes opened fire inside a crowded movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, during a midnight showing of 'The Dark Knight Rises,' killing 12 people and wounding 70 others. (Holmes was later convicted of murder and attempted murder, and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.) In 2015, the United States and Cuba restored full diplomatic relations after more than five decades of frosty relations rooted in the Cold War. Advertisement
