Supreme Court allows US victim suits against Palestinian authorities
The court issued a unanimous 9-0 decision in a long-running case involving the jurisdiction of US federal courts to hear lawsuits against the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Americans killed or injured in attacks in Israel or the West Bank or their relatives have filed a number of suits seeking damages.
In one 2015 case, a jury awarded $655 million in damages and interest to US victims of attacks which took place in the early 2000s.
Appeals courts had dismissed the suits on jurisdiction grounds.
Congress passed a law in 2019 -- the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (PSJVTA) -- that would make the PLO and PA subject to US jurisdiction if they were found to have made payments to the relatives of persons who killed or injured Americans.
Two lower courts ruled that the 2019 law was a violation of the due process rights of the Palestinian authorities under the US Constitution but the Supreme Court ruled on Friday to uphold it.
"The PSJVTA reasonably ties the assertion of federal jurisdiction over the PLO and PA to conduct that involves the United States and implicates sensitive foreign policy matters within the prerogative of the political branches," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.
The PA announced in February that it would end its system of payments to the families of those killed by Israel or held in Israeli prisons, responding to a long-standing request from Washington.
In 2018, during his first term as US president, Donald Trump signed into law rules suspending financial assistance to the PA as long as it continued to pay benefits to Palestinians linked to "terrorist" entities, according to the criteria of the Israeli authorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Donald Trump signs executive order lifting US sanctions on Syria
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order late on Monday ending many economic sanctions on Syria. The order follows through on promises made to Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa during their meeting in Riyadh in May. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says the order is designed to 'promote and support the country's path to stability and peace.' The executive order is meant to 'end the country's isolation from the international financial system, setting the stage for global commerce and galvanizing investments from its neighbours in the region, as well as from the United States,' said Brad Smith, US Treasury's acting undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence. Washington granted Syria sweeping exemptions from sanctions in May, which was a first step towards fulfilling Trump's pledge to lift the half-a-century old of penalties on a country shattered by 13 years of brutal civil war. Along with the lifting of economic sanctions, Monday's executive order lifts the national emergency outlined in an executive order issued by former Republican President George W. Bush. Bush's order was in response to Syria's occupation of Lebanon and the pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and missile programs, Treasury officials said. Five other previous executive orders related to Syria were also lifted. Monday's order does not however revoke sanctions imposed on ousted former President Bashar al-Assad, his top aides, family members and officials who had been determined to have committed human rights abuses, been involved in drug trafficking or part of Syria's chemical weapons programme. It also leaves intact a major set of sanctions passed by Congress targeting anyone doing business with or offering support to Syria's military, intelligence or other suspect institutions. While the Trump administration has passed temporary waivers on those sanctions, known as the Caesar Act, they can only be permanently rescinded by law. Sanctions targeting terrorist groups and manufacturers and sellers of the amphetamine-like stimulant Captagon, which al-Assad regime officials were widely accused of having benefited from its trade in the Middle East, will remain in place. Trump met with al-Sharaa in the Saudi Arabian capital, Riyadh, in May as part of his three country tour of the Middle East. The 47th US president told his Syrian counterpart he would lift sanctions and explore normalising relations in a major policy shift between Washington and Damascus. 'This is another promise made and promise kept,' Leavitt said Monday. Since Trump's first announcement in Riyadh of removing sanctions on Syria, the European Union and United Kingdom have since followed suit. The EU has lifted nearly all of its remaining sanctions on Syria. While Trump's order is a major move for Damascus, carrying potentially major positive effects on its struggling economy, some restrictions still remain in place. The US has still not removed its designation of Syria as a state-sponsor of terrorism. The group al-Sharaa led – Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) – is also still regarded as a foreign terror organisation. A State Department official says those designations are being reviewed.
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Trump cuts to foreign aid looms large at UN conference on international development
01:52 01/07/2025 Israeli ministers criticize settler attacks in West Bank 30/06/2025 Paris put on highest heatwave alert level Tuesday: French weather agency 30/06/2025 Scorching temperatures grip Europe, putting regions on high alert 30/06/2025 Israel strikes pound Gaza, killing 60, ahead of US talks on ceasefire 30/06/2025 France's public broadcasting reform: What would its impact be? 30/06/2025 Iran says usual cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog cannot go forward 30/06/2025 New York mayoral candidate Mamdani defends campaign despite Democratic unease 30/06/2025 Police inquiry after anti-Israel speech at Glastonbury 30/06/2025 'We have to do more with less' - international development challenges after USAID cuts
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Trump administration accuses Harvard of anti-semitism, threatens more cuts
US President Donald Trump 's administration said on Monday that an investigation had concluded Harvard University violated federal civil rights law for failing to address harassment of Jewish and Israeli students, though critics and some faculty say such probes are a pretext to assert federal control over schools. The announcement could lay the groundwork for further action against the school, which has already seen billions of dollars in grant money frozen by the administration as part of a broader campaign against Harvard and other universities across the country. Universities have said Trump's actions threaten academic freedom and free speech, as well as critical scientific research. The Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights accused Harvard of "deliberate indifference" toward discrimination against Jewish and Israeli students, according to a notice from the administration. The department outlined a series of harassment incidents and faulted Harvard's response for being "too little, too late." "Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources," lawyers for the administration wrote in a separate letter to Harvard President Alan Garber that was viewed by Reuters. The result of the probe was first reported by the Wall Street Journal. In a statement, Harvard said it had taken "substantive, proactive steps" to address antisemitism on campus, including updating its disciplinary processes and expanding training on antisemitism. "Harvard is far from indifferent on this issue and strongly disagrees with the government's findings," the school said. Monday's letter is the latest in a multi-pronged assault that Trump has waged against Harvard, the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, after it rejected sweeping demands to alter its operations. The administration has frozen some $2.5 billion in federal grant money to Harvard, moved to block it from enrolling international students and threatened to remove its tax-exempt status. Harvard has filed lawsuits challenging those moves. In addition to targeted funding freezes at specific schools, the administration's cutbacks at agencies such as the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health have also resulted in terminated grants to research universities. The president has taken particular aim at Harvard and Columbia, two of the nation's most prominent universities. Earlier this year, the administration said it had terminated grants and contracts to Columbia University worth $400 million, accusing the school of not protecting students from antisemitic harassment during massive campus protests against the Israel-Gaza war, which included some Jewish organizers. Civil rights groups in response have said the contract cancellations lacked due process and were an unconstitutional punishment for protected speech. However, Columbia agreed to negotiate with the administration over demands that the school tighten its protest rules. The school's interim president, Katrina Armstrong, stepped down days later. 01:38 In May, the Trump administration concluded that Columbia had violated civil rights law by failing to address antisemitism, just as it did on Monday regarding Harvard. Earlier this month, Trump's Department of Education said Columbia had failed to meet accreditation standards by allegedly failing to protect Jewish students from harassment. Other schools have also become targets for the pressure campaign. On Friday, the president of the University of Virginia, James Ryan, resigned under pressure from the Trump administration over the school's diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Last week, the Trump administration announced it would investigate hiring practices at the massive University of California system - which enrolls nearly 300,000 students - to examine whether they run afoul of anti-discrimination law.
