‘Gerrymandering' row engulfs first meeting of new-look Angus Council
In the opening stramash since losing minority control of the authority last month, the former SNP administration accused the new ruling group of 'gerrymandering' committee numbers to their advantage.
It came after a surprise move by new council leader – and former SNP second-in-command – George Meechan to reduce the membership of key council committees from 16 to 15.
It would provide a make-up of seven administration, six opposition and two non-aligned members.
Mr Meechan said the change would 'improve the overall stability' of council decision-making.
But the nationalist defector's committee proposal sparked fury among former party colleagues.
Deposed SNP council leader Bill Duff said: 'It's blatant gerrymandering of the rules to suit the new insurgent administration.
'It would have been courtesy to put this in the (council) papers,' he said.
Mr Duff said it was like 'trying to change the rules of the football match while we're on the pitch.'
'It leaves a very bad taste,' he added.
'It's underhand, devious and we should reject it.'
Council depute leader Derek Wann hit back.
The Arbroath Conservative said: 'I'd like to dispel any myth in this that folk are seeing it as gerrymandering.'
'It's actually to try and run a coherent council, which we haven't seen for the last eight or nine months.
'This is purely to make an efficient and coherent working council for the administration and the officers to get on with the job.'
New leader Mr Meechan previously vowed not to be dragged into 'public squabbling' after the change of power.
'The recent changes in leadership are about moving Angus forward, not playing political games,' he said at the time of the power switch.
The move split the chamber 14-14.
And it was the casting vote of newly-crowned Angus Provost Craig Fotheringham which saw the change to committee structures voted through.
Monifieth Conservative Mr Fotheringham had earlier been voted in as the first move of the special council meeting.
It was called after opposition rebels claimed control of the chamber with a successful vote of no-confidence in the SNP.
Mr Fotheringham defeated the opposition nominee, Carnoustie Independent David Cheape, by 15 votes to 13.
The appointment of Depute Provost was a closer run affair.
It came down to a cut of the cards for two Brechin councillors after a 14 – 14 vote.
Independent administration member Jill Scott secured the role over opposition SNP nominee Chris Beattie.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Campaigners to challenge Eaglesham battery plant ruling
Mum-of-three Morag Hannan is worried about the possible fire risk from lithium-ion batteries as the 40-megawatt storage plant is set to be installed opposite her home on Glasgow Road. Alongside her husband Craig, they have raised a petition for judicial review against East Renfrewshire Council. The couple have launched a crowdfunding campaign to cover the costs of the action, with almost £3,400 donated so far. Ms Hannan said she has 'many concerns about the safety risk as well as toxic fumes' from the site. She believes her family, and an elderly neighbour, would be forced to evacuate towards a fire, as there is no way out to the back of their properties. But they could become trapped if fire engines need to use a hydrant outside their driveway, the mum said. READ MORE: All the latest changes to Glasgow city centre streets explained GPC 1137 Ltd, a subsidiary of Apatura, had an initial bid refused by East Renfrewshire's planning committee last year, when councillors voiced concerns over fire risk, but a second application was later approved. After that decision, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Government rejected an appeal over the first plan. He found the proposal would lead to 'adverse visual effects in a greenbelt location'. Apatura wants to store surplus energy from the national grid in the batteries, which would then be returned when required. It has said the development will 'support the decarbonisation of the energy industry in the UK'. Judicial reviews focus on the process or legality of a decision, rather than the planning merits of the application. It is understood the review will centre on Cllr Paul Edlin, who the campaigners say was unable to vote at the second planning meeting following a complaint that he had 'prejudiced himself' with comments made about the project at a community council meeting. They believe this wasn't the case and Cllr Edlin faced 'undue pressure' not to attend the meeting, denying him an opportunity to 'partake in local democracy'. READ MORE: This is the plan for this iconic Glasgow city centre building Almost 3,700 people have signed a petition which calls for the decision to be overturned. Council officials are currently investigating the required legal steps and the cost of revoking permission, following a motion from Conservative councillors. They previously had a motion which pushed for revocation ruled incompetent. Ms Hannan said: 'The only remedy available to us is to take legal action ourselves and we are going to continue this fight until the decision is overturned.' East Renfrewshire Council is expected to defend its position. A spokesman said the authority is unable to comment due to the ongoing legal proceedings. Campaigners believe the case could be heard in September. The developers have previously said the application was 'accompanied by a suite of technical documents which demonstrate the proposal will not lead to significant adverse harm'. Ahead of the meeting where planning permission was granted, council officials reported the second application differed from the original as more information has been submitted on fire safety and a water tank is now proposed to be created underground.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Candidates confirmed ahead of by-election in Barrhead
Voters will go to the polls on Thursday, August 21 to elect a new councillor following the death of Cllr Betty Cunningham. The long-serving Labour councillor, who represented the Barrhead, Liboside and Uplawmoor ward, passed away in May at the age of 79 after a period of ill health. Labour has selected Julie Ann Costello McHale to contest the seat while the SNP will be represented by David McDonald. READ MORE: Date revealed for Barrhead by-election following death of councillor Farooq Choudhry is the Scottish Conservative candidate, Karen Sharkey will stand for the Scottish Greens and Andy MacGibbon has been picked by Reform. Abolish the Scottish Parliament party is also contesting the election and has selected Gus Ferguson. The council is currently led by a minority Labour-independent administration, which includes independent councillor Danny Devlin. There are now four Labour councillors, three independents, five SNP and five Conservatives. At the last election in 2022, Cllr Devlin picked up the most first preference votes in the ward (1,753), followed by the SNP's Angela Convery (1,639). Cllr Cunningham and Cllr Chris Lunday, SNP, were also elected. Polls will be open between 7am and 10pm on August 21 and residents have until midnight on Tuesday, August 5 to register to vote. The count will take place on the morning of Friday, August 22. READ MORE: Campaigners to challenge Eaglesham battery plant ruling Following Cllr Cunningham's death, tributes were paid from across the political spectrum. Council leader Owen O'Donnell said: 'Social justice and the sense of what is right and wrong was ingrained in Betty's DNA. 'She was a ferocious fighter for the people of Barrhead and beyond and would leave then Prime Minister Tony Blair and First Minister Jack McConnell trembling in her wake! 'She had the biggest heart but was also great fun and someone you wanted to spend time with.' Cllr Cunningham was first elected in 1999 and served as Provost from 2003 to 2007. She received an OBE from the Queen in the New Year's Honours List of 2011 for services to East Renfrewshire and Malawi, having first travelled to the African country in 2007. Her charity, the Betty Cunningham International Trust, built a health clinic and nursery schools.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Here's why John Swinney should ask Keir Starmer for a Section 30 now
The SNP continuing to call this out as anti-democratic or just plain unfair is not going to bother them one jot. The Scottish electorate will look upon this as a circular argument going absolutely nowhere, then get bored hearing it and turn off entirely. The [[SNP]] need to have a plan to break this logjam! READ MORE: John Swinney needs to understand socialism and independence are inseparable They should ask the Prime Minister for a Section 30 Order to hold a referendum on the same day as the Holyrood 2026 election to fulfil the mandate won at the previous [[Holyrood]] election that produced a majority pro-independence parliament. It is not clear if the current SNP First Minister has even asked for this. Now is the time. If Keir Starmer turns this down, as he no doubt will, the First Minister should inform him that he will fight the [[Holyrood]] 2026 election as an election for independence. Every independence-supporting party will be encouraged to put 'for Scottish independence' under their party logo to maximise the vote for [[Scottish independence]]. READ MORE: Jonathan Shafi: No referendum is coming. Let's drop the 'Yes' and refocus A majority of votes cast for independence-supporting parties would then constitute a win for Scottish independence. The Scottish electorate will fully know what they are getting into, and can back this route for the dissolution of the Union. What happens next will be crucial. The winning independence side should then (if they have not already done so) encourage leaders of sympathetic nations to openly congratulate Scotland on winning its independence to build pressure on the Westminster government to concede. The First Minister should then call for a government of national unity at [[Holyrood]] to prepare Scotland for the transition to independence and negotiate the withdrawal from the UK. If Westminster wants to avoid any constitutional crisis, it should agree to the mandated independence referendum. Otherwise any perceived constitutional crisis will be entirely of their own making. Patrick Johnstone Rhu IN his 'renewed strategy for independence' launched in The National on July 18, John Swinney talks of turning the heat up on [[Westminster]] over Scotland's right to choose. That right to choose should be the basis of our manifesto offer in 2026, as has been proposed by myself and others. What is missing from John's 'renewed strategy' is any commitment to taking any definite action in pursuit of his stated aim of letting the Scottish people exercise their right to choose. A campaign built around Scotland's right to choose requires what Peter A Bell recently described as 'a solid commitment to specific action within a defined timeframe.' Without such a commitment, John's 'renewed strategy', rather than turning the heat up on Westminster, would, as many have said, be regarded as nothing but more hot air. READ MORE: Can we return to the ambition and drive that took us so close in 2014? My recent letters to The National are aimed at promoting the action that should be the first step in either exercising that right to choose in any referendum or gaining the decisive level of support that would be required for a future election to be the democratic event that can lead to independence. Getting a mandate from the 2026 election on a manifesto pledge to bring forward in the first year a bill at Holyrood 'to assume the responsibility for constitutional affairs as directed by the people of Scotland' will be just such an action. The Newington branch of the [[SNP]] has submitted, for annual conference in October, a resolution titled Manifesto for Scotland's Right to Decide. This motion asks conference to agree: firstly, that seeking a Section 30 order from the UK Government to hold a referendum on Scotland's constitutional future undermines Scotland's sovereign right to decide; and secondly, that sovereignty lies with the Scottish people, not [[Westminster]]. The final paragraph reads: 'Therefore, conference agrees that the [[SNP]] shall put in their manifesto for the 2026 Scottish Parliament election, that if a majority of [[SNP]] and other pro-independence MSPs are returned to [[Holyrood]] in 2026, they will bring forward a bill to assume responsibility for constitutional affairs as directed by the people of Scotland. This will include the right to hold referendums on increased powers and independence – driven by the will of the people.' Considerable pressure, applied both from within the SNP and from the wider independence movement, may well be required to see this commitment get on the agenda for conference and then, hopefully, adopted as our principal manifesto offer for 2026. Mike Wallace Edinburgh INTERNATIONAL relations is as multifaceted as any other human activity one cares to mention. The outcomes and the consequences can shatter and reshape and involve everyone, even those who think they wear their political disengagement on their sleeves. Political theatre, like all performative activities, can entertain, can elicit applause, indifference or even derision. However, when the stage is international it is always consequential. Like it or not, Donald Trump heads up what is – for now at least – the planet's only military hegemon. He is also, thanks to the inactivity of Scottish and UK governments of every stripe, a landowner. READ MORE: 'Epstein Island' sign put up at Donald Trump's Scottish golf course The diplomatic snub is as much part of the political tool box as war and dialogue, and I can think of some instances, particularly in recent years, when it has been underused by Scottish and most certainly UK governments. A decision in the summer of 2025 to diplomatically snub the head of the world's military hegemon would almost certainly be consequential, and not in a good way. Bill Ramsay via email
