logo
Trump and Netanyahu set to meet again Tuesday on Gaza

Trump and Netanyahu set to meet again Tuesday on Gaza

CBC6 hours ago
U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will meet again on Tuesday afternoon to discuss Gaza as Trump's Middle East envoy said Israel and Hamas were closing their differences on a ceasefire deal.
Trump and Netanyahu dined together on Monday at the White House during the Israeli leader's third U.S. visit since the president began his second term. Netanyahu met with Vice-President JD Vance and then visited the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday.
Netanyahu told reporters after a meeting with the Republican House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson that while he did not think Israel's campaign in the Palestinian enclave was done, negotiators are "certainly working" on a ceasefire.
"We have still to finish the job in Gaza, release all our hostages, eliminate and destroy Hamas's military and government capabilities," Netanyahu said.
Shortly after Netanyahu spoke, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, said the issues keeping Israel and Hamas from agreeing had dropped to one from four and he hoped to reach a temporary ceasefire agreement this week.
"We are hopeful that by the end of this week, we'll have an agreement that will bring us into a 60-day ceasefire. Ten live hostages will be released. Nine deceased will be released," Witkoff told reporters at a meeting of Trump's cabinet.
Netanyahu's plan to return to the White House to see Trump at 4:30 p.m. ET on Tuesday pushed back his meeting with U.S. Senate leaders to Wednesday.
The war erupted when Hamas attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Some 50 hostages remain in Gaza, with 20 believed to be alive.
Israel's retaliatory assault on Gaza has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to the enclave's Health Ministry. Most of Gaza's population has been displaced by the war and nearly half a million people are facing famine within months, according to United Nations estimates.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump contemplates taking control of Washington, D.C., government
Trump contemplates taking control of Washington, D.C., government

Globe and Mail

time16 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Trump contemplates taking control of Washington, D.C., government

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday his administration was considering taking over governance of Washington, D.C., and suggested he could take similar action in New York because of his distaste for the leading candidate for mayor there. Trump has made a similar threat regarding Washington before, but has not followed through even as he criticized crime rates and bashed other institutions there. The president, speaking during a cabinet meeting at the White House, said his chief of staff, Susie Wiles, was in close touch with Mayor Muriel Bowser, who favors making the city a U.S. state. 'We have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to. We could run D.C. I mean, we're ... looking at D.C.,' Trump said. 'Susie Wiles is working very closely with the mayor.' Bowser's office declined to comment. The District of Columbia was established in 1790 with land from neighboring Virginia and Maryland. Congress has control of its budget, but voters elect a mayor and city council, thanks to a law known as the Home Rule Act. For Trump to take over the city, Congress likely would have to pass a law revoking that act, which Trump would have to sign. U.S. Supreme Court clears path for Trump's plans to cut federal work force Becoming the 51st state would give Washington's roughly 700,000 residents voting representation in Congress. Democrats support that plan, while Republicans, who are reluctant to hand Democrats any politically safe seats in the House of Representatives and Senate, oppose it. Trump suggested his administration would run the city better with an appointed leader than the democratically elected government. 'We would run it so good, it would be run so proper. We'd get the best person to run it,' he said. 'The crime would be down to a minimum, would be much less. And you know we're thinking about doing it, to be honest with you.' While Trump said his administration had a good relationship with Bowser, he had less complimentary words for Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist who won the race to be the Democratic Party's nominee in New York's November mayoral election. Trump described Mamdani as a 'disaster.' A representative for Mamdani did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. 'We're going to straighten out New York... Maybe we're going to have to straighten it out from Washington,' Trump said. 'We're going to do something for New York. I can't tell you what yet, but we're going to make New York great again also.'

U.S. copper tariffs threat adds to Manitoba minerals global push
U.S. copper tariffs threat adds to Manitoba minerals global push

Winnipeg Free Press

time36 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

U.S. copper tariffs threat adds to Manitoba minerals global push

Europe and Asia are in the sightline of Manitoba's mining industry as the United States threatens further tariffs. U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday he'd slap a 50 per cent tariff on all copper imports. He didn't announce a start date. Manitoba was Canada's fourth-largest producer of copper in 2023. The keystone province accounted for 2.4 per cent of production, or 12,000 tonnes, Natural Resources Canada data show. Data on Manitoba's recent copper exports to the United States wasn't available by print deadline. Across Canada, copper and copper-based exports were valued at $9.4 billion in 2023. 'All tariffs are inherently harmful,' said John Morris, co-director of the Mining Association of Manitoba (MAMI). He forecasts the new tax — and its related cost increase — will hurt Manitoba exports and U.S. manufacturers. Companies use copper to make electronics and appliances, among other things. Should the tariff last, mining companies will look to sell in other regions, Morris predicted. Manitoba holds at least two copper mines: Hudbay's Snow Lake operation and Vale's plant near Thompson. Copper isn't the sole focus of either hub. The Snow Lake mine produces gold and zinc; it has a daily mill capacity of 5,300 tonnes. Vale oversees, primarily, a nickel mine. Neither company answered questions about production and exports by print deadline. 'Critical minerals are a commodity with a global demand,' Morris said. 'The issue is, we have established linkages to the United States economy.' MAMI is creating a campaign to market Manitoba minerals globally. New tariffs didn't spark the plan; the association received $1.5 million from the provincial government, and another $100,000 through the provincially-funded Manitoba Mineral Development Fund, this spring. Targeted advertisements via social and traditional media should appear in the fall, Morris said. Europe and Asia will be the ads' recipients. Nineteen European ambassadors and high commissioners visited Manitoba in April. They showed interest in local minerals. Germany's ambassador to Canada listed zinc, lithium and nickel as exports the country was eyeing. 'We're working very close with the Manitoba government to ensure that we'll have success going forward, with respect to exporting of our products,' Morris said. The provincial government created a contingency for tariff relief in its most recent budget. It highlighted up to $300 million for businesses and farmers affected by tariffs, should 25 per cent across-the-board tariffs materialize. The funds haven't been tapped; an across-the-board fee hasn't appeared. Still, copper is the latest export poised for a U.S. tariff. Levies on steel, aluminum and items outside the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement on trade have been in place since March. Canada placed 25 per cent tariffs on $59.8 billion worth of U.S. imports in retaliation, not including non-CUSMA compliant U.S.-made vehicles. — with files from The Canadian Press Gabrielle PichéReporter Gabrielle Piché reports on business for the Free Press. She interned at the Free Press and worked for its sister outlet, Canstar Community News, before entering the business beat in 2021. Read more about Gabrielle. Every piece of reporting Gabrielle produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Hegseth did not inform the White House before he authorized pause on weapon shipments to Ukraine, sources say
Hegseth did not inform the White House before he authorized pause on weapon shipments to Ukraine, sources say

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Hegseth did not inform the White House before he authorized pause on weapon shipments to Ukraine, sources say

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth waits for the arrival of Indian Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar during an Honor Cordon at the Pentagon on July 01, in Arlington, Virginia. (via CNN Newsource) Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth did not inform the White House before he authorized a pause on weapons shipments to Ukraine last week, according to five sources familiar with the matter, setting off a scramble inside the administration to understand why the halt was implemented and explain it to Congress and the Ukrainian government. U.S. President Donald Trump suggested on Tuesday that he was not responsible for the move. Asked on Tuesday during a Cabinet meeting whether he approved of the pause in shipments, Trump demurred, saying only that the US would continue to send defensive weapons to Ukraine. Pressed again on who authorized the pause, Trump replied, 'I don't know, why don't you tell me?' The episode underscores the often-haphazard policy-making process inside the Trump administration, particularly under Hegseth at the Defense Department. The pause was the second time this year that Hegseth had decided to halt the flow of US weapons to Ukraine, catching senior national security officials off guard, sources said. It first happened in February and the decision was quickly reversed, three of the sources said — mirroring what happened on Monday night, when Trump announced that the weapons shipments would continue despite Hegseth signing off on the pause. The US special envoy to Ukraine, Ret. Gen. Keith Kellogg, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also Trump's national security adviser, were also not told about the pause beforehand and learned about it from press reports, according to a senior administration official and two of the sources. Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson told CNN in a statement that said in part, 'Secretary Hegseth provided a framework for the President to evaluate military aid shipments and assess existing stockpiles. This effort was coordinated across government.' Asked whether Hegseth informed the White House prior to approving a pause on the shipments, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that the Pentagon conducted a review 'to ensure all support going to all foreign nations aligns with America's interests,' and added that Trump 'has made the decision to continue providing defensive weapons to Ukraine to help stop the killing in this brutal war, which the Pentagon has said they are actively working on.' She added that 'the President has full confidence in the Secretary of Defense.' Two of the sources attributed Hegseth's not informing the White House to the fact that he has no chief of staff or trusted advisers around him that might urge him to coordinate major policy decisions better with the interagency partners. Trump told Hegseth to restart some shipments Shortly after learning of the pause last week, Trump told Hegseth to restart the shipment of at least some of the munitions — specifically, interceptor missiles for Patriot air defense systems, which have been critical to protecting Ukrainian civilians from relentless missile and drone attacks by Russia. Many of the munitions are already in Poland and could be transferred to Kyiv quickly, the senior administration official said. The weapons package had been allocated by the previous administration and was already en route to Ukraine when it was stopped. In a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday, Trump downplayed his role in the decision to halt the flow of weapons, CNN has reported. The Pentagon did not announce until late Monday night, however, that it would restart shipments at the direction of the president — after Trump had said publicly earlier in the evening that the Ukrainians needed the defensive weapons to protect themselves. Trump reiterated that position on Tuesday at the White House. 'I will say this — the Ukrainians, whether you think it's unfair that we gave all that money or not, they were very brave, because somebody had to operate that stuff,' he said. 'And a lot of people I know wouldn't be operating it, they wouldn't have the courage to do it.' Trump also appears less inclined to give Russia a 'win' at this moment by halting military aid to Ukraine, two of the sources said. He has soured on Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks as it has become increasingly clear that Putin is not willing to engage in peace talks with Ukraine. 'We get a lot of bulls**t thrown at us by Putin,' Trump said on Tuesday. 'You want to know the truth? It's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' A European official told CNN that Trump's frustration with Putin was clear during the NATO summit in the Netherlands last month, and that their understanding was that the pause in weapons shipments to Ukraine 'genuinely did not originate' with Trump. Trump requested assessment of US weapons stockpiles but not pause to Ukraine shipments The Pentagon's decision to suspend the shipments of weapons — including Patriot interceptor missiles and artillery ammunition — came after Trump asked Hegseth last month during their trip to the NATO summit to provide him with an assessment of US weapons stockpiles, one of the sources told CNN. Iran and Israel were bombing each other, and Trump wanted to be sure US troops in the region had sufficient munitions to defend themselves if necessary. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell confirmed last week that the department was conducting 'a capability review … to ensure US military aid aligns with our defense priorities.' But Trump did not specifically direct Hegseth to halt weapons shipments to Ukraine as part of that review, three of the sources said. That recommendation came from Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby, all five sources said, who has long been skeptical of sending large quantities of US military aid to Ukraine. 'A Europe first policy is not what America needs in this exceptionally dangerous time. We need to focus on China and Asia - clearly,' Colby wrote on X last year. Colby then provided his recommendations to Deputy Secretary of Defense Steve Feinberg, who approved of the move — particularly because of his longstanding concerns that the defense industry is not moving fast enough to replenish US stockpiles, two of the sources said. Hegseth provided the final signoff, thinking it would align with Trump's 'America first' priorities, one of the sources familiar with his thinking said. After the White House learned about the pause, White House officials told Hegseth and DoD that they would temporarily provide 'cover' for the decision, two of the sources said. But the White House emphasized that the Pentagon had to explain the move to Congress, which also had not been informed of the pause beforehand. Pentagon officials have argued to congressional staffers in recent days that the move was necessary because of US stockpile shortages, according to two sources familiar with the matter. But the sources said Congress has not been briefed on or given any information from the Pentagon that would suggest a critical and imminent shortage of weapons. 'Congress would be glad to work with DoD if credible evidence was presented that the Pentagon stockpiles were critically short, requiring them to take unilateral action like they did last week,' one of the sources said. The Pentagon routinely requests additional funding and authorization from Congress for long-term weapons procurement. 'But there have been no new urgent requirements submitted to Congress from DoD for any of these munitions,' this person added. CNN's Kylie Atwood and Nick Paton Walsh contributed reporting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store