Updated Covid vaccines for the fall may be in jeopardy under Kennedy's new rules
Under the change by Kennedy, according to an HHS spokesperson, all new vaccines will need to go through placebo-controlled clinical trials — where some people get the actual shot and others get something inactive, like a saline shot — to compare the results.
Running trials that include a placebo group is already routine for most new vaccines.
The original Covid vaccines, from Pfizer and Moderna, approved in late 2020, went through placebo-controlled trials. But as the virus continued to mutate and the vaccines needed to be updated to match the circulating strain, drugmakers moved to a flu vaccine-like model — using smaller studies to test how well the updated shots triggered an immune response against the variant in question.
Like the annual flu shot, the updated Covid vaccines weren't treated as entirely new products, since they still used the same formula, with just a tweak to what strain the vaccine would be targeting. The mRNA Covid vaccines were designed so that this change would be particularly easy to make, in the event the shots needed to be quickly updated.
Quickly, in this case, turns out to be several months. In order to have enough Covid doses ready to go for the fall, vaccine-makers are told what strain to target in the spring.
The Food and Drug Administration's vaccine advisory committee is expected to meet in May or June to make a recommendation on which strains should be included in the next round of shots. A person familiar with the matter, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said the FDA had planned to schedule a meeting for May 22. An HHS spokesperson declined to comment on the meeting date.
If the FDA deems Pfizer's and Moderna's updated vaccines 'new' products, requiring fresh trials, it's extremely unlikely the doses would be ready for the fall, experts said.
Dr. Paul Offit, the director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a member of the FDA's vaccine advisory committee, said the change would almost certainly delay the rollout of the updated shots from Pfizer and Moderna by 'months,' as it would take time for the drugmakers to design the new trials and enroll participants.
That would only be the start — the drugmakers would then have to run the actual trial, which would take several months on its own, at minimum, and analyze the results.
Even the Covid vaccines — which were hailed as 'the most successful government science program' because of how quickly they were developed, according to Dr. Alex Greninger, a professor of laboratory medicine and pathology at UW Medicine in Seattle — still took at least about six months to run their Phase 3 trials.
The HHS spokesperson didn't directly respond to a question about whether the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines would require new clinical trials.
However, the spokesperson said in a statement that 'FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary has indicated that significant updates to existing vaccines — such as those addressing seasonal strain changes or antigenic drift — may be considered 'new products' requiring additional clinical evaluation.'
'As we've said before, trials from four years ago conducted in people without natural immunity no longer suffice,' the spokesperson said. 'A four-year-old trial is also not a blank check for new vaccines each year without clinical trial data,' they said, adding that the flu shot would be exempt from the new rule, because it 'has been tried and tested for more than 80 years.'
The FDA has already delayed the approval of Novavax's updated Covid vaccine, requiring the company to carry out a new clinical trial because the strain included in the shot differs from what was originally authorized.
Vaccine experts panned the new requirements.
It's 'unethical,' Offit said, noting that it's generally frowned upon in the scientific community to give someone a placebo when an approved product already exists that can protect them.
Dr. Stanley Plotkin, a pediatrician who played a key role in developing the rubella vaccine, said the move would make 'no sense.'
'What would be reasonable is to compare the old vaccine with the new vaccine to see whether the new vaccine gives better immunologic responses,' Plotkin said. 'We have vaccines against Covid, where we have pretty concrete ideas as to what works and what doesn't work. We know they're not perfect, but we have vaccines we know work.'
Spokespeople for Pfizer and Moderna did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Former government officials have said HHS, under Kennedy, was moving to slow-walk vaccine approvals, including by imposing new regulatory hurdles on drugmakers, such as changing the requirements for approval or seeking additional clinical trial data.
Vaccine experts also fear the rule change is part of a broader effort by Kennedy to sow distrust in vaccines and limit public access to them.
'The goal is to make vaccines more onerous to make, more onerous to test by bringing up these sort of false safety concerns or false efficacy concerns,' Offit said.
Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases, said the change is unlikely to affect brand-new vaccines. But it could have major implications for vaccines that may require updates besides Covid — like those for RSV — since placebo trials are costly and take significantly more time to conduct.
'It's really not feasible, and would lead to lots of hospitalizations and deaths,' O'Leary said.
Plotkin added that vaccines being developed for infections that are incurable, like HIV, may also be at risk.
'Suppose you wanted to develop a new HIV vaccine?' he asked. 'Would you do a placebo-controlled trial in that situation? I mean exposing children to a disease which is very serious without offering them anything.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Getting HIV is no longer a death sentence — but the fight is not over
In the next few weeks, Congress will vote on what may be the most important question lawmakers have had to decide about HIV this century: whether to continue on the path toward the elimination of the disease or to allow the country to slip back into the 1980s-era nightmare of an uncontrolled surge of the virus. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up HIV remains a threat in the United States. One in 300 Americans is already infected, and more than 30,000 new infections and 4,000 deaths occur annually. But 40 years ago, HIV was more than a threat — it was a death sentence. It was the Advertisement But an epidemic that started as a public health debacle turned into one of the field's greatest achievements: New drugs have been developed that are capable of cutting HIV Advertisement However, obstacles remain: Access to HIV care is not always easy. In order for patients to keep the virus in check, they must adhere to sometimes complex drug regimens over their lifetimes. What's more, people who get HIV are often unaware that they've been infected and can unknowingly spread the virus to others. As a result, as many as Still, policymakers remain hopeful that new cases of HIV in the United States can be eliminated entirely going forward. In his 2019 State of the Union address, President Trump announced the launch of an ambitious program he called ' However, these costs pale in comparison to the expense of managing a rise in cases that could result from funding cuts to prevention programs. It is much less expensive to prevent a case of HIV than it is to treat one. Advertisement The average American, thankfully, hears very little about HIV these days. That is a good thing — but it also means there is more opportunity for political will to keep the virus in check to wane. Or even for the basic tenets of what makes HIV deadly to be questioned. Enter Robert F. Kennedy Jr. In 2021, before he was made secretary of health and human services, he wrote in his book 'The Real Anthony Fauci' that he ' In a videotaped This past April, not long after Kennedy was confirmed as HHS secretary, Before long, Advertisement Then Kennedy took his most dramatic action. In his HIV is the most exhaustively studied virus in human history, and the vast body of evidence clearly indicates that it is an infectious cause of disease. It is deeply worrying that RJK Jr. would reclassify efforts to contain and treat HIV under an agency not responsible for infectious disease. RFK Jr.'s proposed reorganization is now before Congress. If his plan goes ahead, the consequences may not be immediately visible. HIV doesn't explode into outbreaks as soon as prevention lags. Initially, the spread of HIV infection will be invisible, particularly if our monitoring systems are shuttered. But we may wake up one day to discover that an HIV epidemic is once again raging — a scourge we worked so long and so hard to escape.

CNN
9 hours ago
- CNN
Anti-vaccine group that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. founded files suit against him over vaccine safety task force
A nonprofit anti-vaccine group founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is suing him, in his capacity as secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, for failing to establish a task force to promote the development of safer childhood vaccines. 'Our first priority will ALWAYS be children's health. Sec. Kennedy has FAILED 'to establish a task force dedicated to making childhood vaccines safer, as mandated by federal law,' so we WILL be holding him accountable,' Children's Health Defense said Tuesday in a post on X. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 directs the HHS secretary to establish a task force consisting of the director of the National Institutes of Health, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The NIH director is designated as chair. According to an article posted Monday on Children's Health Defense's news site, in the years since the act was passed, no HHS secretary – including Kennedy – has ever reported to Congress on steps taken to make vaccines safer. 'This is part of the 1986 act itself,' Children's Health Defense CEO Mary Holland said in the article. 'That no secretary has done so since the passage of this law is a blow to the rule of law. I hope and trust that the current secretary will fulfill his obligation to Congress's mandate.' The organization says attorney Ray Flores, its senior outside counsel, filed the lawsuit on its behalf. Kennedy filed a similar case in 2018 after a Freedom of Information Act request failed to produce any of the reports that are supposed to be filed under the Act. HHS has not responded to CNN's request for comment about the new lawsuit. 'Even if it does not include the people in the [National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act], there are multiple federal committees that routinely look at vaccine safety and how to make vaccines safer. It's something that gets a lot of attention,' Dorit Reiss, a professor of law at UC Law San Francisco, told CNN in an email. 'This looks performative, and it may give Kennedy cover for convening this task force that he may already want to convene. It may well be collusion,' she wrote. 'To me, this looks like a way to give political cover to something the Secretary may want to do anyway (and can do without anything). The government has answers to this lawsuit, but may not want to.'
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
21-year-old MIT dropouts raise $32M at $300M valuation led by Insight
Karun Kaushik and Selin Kocalar weren't planning to raise a Series A so soon. Their AI compliance startup, Delve, which announced a $3 million seed round in January, was growing fast and signing customers at a steady clip. Then, inbound interest started rolling in, COO Kocalar told TechCrunch. Delve, which automates regulatory compliance with AI agents, ended up fielding multiple term sheets, eventually closing a $32 million Series A at a $300 million valuation. The round was led by Insight Partners, which took up most of the round, with participation from CISOs at Fortune 500 companies. Insight has been 'amazing to work with, and we felt they were the right long-term partner for us,' said the COO. Delve's new valuation represents a roughly 10x jump from its previous round. Similarly, its customer base has grown from the 100 companies it reported back in January to over 500, many of them fast-growing AI startups like recently minted AI unicorn Lovable, Bland, and Wispr Flow. And while the 2-year-old company, made up of AI researchers from MIT, Stanford, and Berkeley, has seemingly struck gold by using AI to eliminate hundreds of hours of manual processes, its story began much differently. Kaushik and Kocalar met as classmates during their freshman year at MIT. Both had deep interests in AI and health tech. Kaushik had already scaled a COVID diagnostic system to thousands of users during the pandemic. In 2023, they began working on an AI-powered medical scribe to help doctors handle patient documentation. However, handling sensitive healthcare information meant they quickly encountered the costly and time-consuming world of HIPAA compliance. Instead of continuing with the medical scribe, they started building tools to help other companies get HIPAA-compliant faster and more affordably. That pivot got the team into Y Combinator last year and helped them raise their seed round from General Catalyst, FundersClub, Soma Capital, and others. The founders dropped out during their sophomore year in 2023. What started with HIPAA quickly expanded. 'As our customer base grew, they started asking for support with other frameworks: SOC 2, PCI, GDPR, ISO, basically the whole alphabet soup of compliance,' Kocalar narrated. Compliance paperwork can be necessary in everything from launching products to closing enterprise deals. But instead of driving growth, its manual work can become a bottleneck. 'Compliance frameworks are standardized. Businesses aren't,' says CEO Kaushik. 'That mismatch is why traditional software breaks down and teams fall back to duct-taped workflows across email, Slack, and shared drives.' Delve replaces that busywork with AI agents that run in the background (after integrating with customers' tools) like internal team members. These agents collect evidence, write reports, update audit logs, and track configuration changes across fragmented systems, automating compliance workflows in real time. Kocalar says compliance is just the wedge into broader back-office operations. Long-term, the AI startup wants to automate a billion hours of other work — eventually expanding into adjacent areas like cybersecurity, risk, and internal governance. Insight Partners' interest reflects this roadmap. 'Since compliance touches every part of how a business runs, from scaling operations to closing deals to building customer trust, modernizing this function will modernize the entire organization,' said Praveen Akkiraju, managing director at Insight. 'That's what makes Delve's approach so important.' Still, the startup won't be without competition. Several AI companies are emerging with agents to automate business workflows. In addition, larger AI labs like OpenAI are releasing general-purpose agents capable of performing complex tasks. That said, Kocalar says these developments are a validation, not a threat, to Delve's business. She points to the company's domain depth in contrast to more general-purpose agents. 'We're positioning ourselves to improve as AI advances and labs roll out more sophisticated agentic technologies. But what truly sets us apart is the deep, domain-specific knowledge we're building into the platform,' she said. 'Compliance is always shifting as new regulations emerge and existing ones evolve, with companies interpreting them in different ways. That's where Delve stands out.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data