logo
Major road rule changes coming into effect across Australia from today

Major road rule changes coming into effect across Australia from today

Yahoo9 hours ago

Several road rule changes are being introduced in Australian states and territories from today, July 1, with tougher penalties and new speed limits designed to crack down on dangerous driving behaviours.
From increased fines for mobile phone use and speeding offences, to new obligations when passing roadside assistance vehicles, in some cases, non-compliance could cost hundreds and trigger licence suspensions.
Drivers in multiple states are being urged to brush up on the new rules — or risk paying the price.
From July 1, Victoria will require drivers to slow to 40 km/h when passing roadside assistance vehicles, including tow trucks, breakdown support and incident response units — as long as flashing lights are activated and workers are visible. The penalty: a fine of up to $961, but no demerit points.
In high-pedestrian areas and school zones, there's also been a recent push to slash the speed limit to 30 kilometres per hour.
Little-known road rule with $600 fine shocks Aussie drivers
Drivers warned major road rule change with $961 fines 'weeks' away
Road rule warning after driver cops $1,775 fine, 22 demerits in one go
Starting today, NSW will apply average speed cameras to light vehicles — including cars and motorbikes — at two high-traffic locations.
The cameras, already in place for heavy vehicles, will be active on a section of the Hume Highway in the state's south, and on a 15km stretch of the Pacific Highway on the Mid North Coast. A grace period with warning notices has been running since May 1, 2025, but enforcement with fines will begin from July 1.
NSW is phasing out ticketless parking fines, addressing concerns over drivers unknowingly receiving fines without physical notices.
As of July 1, Queensland is introducing a 3.5 per cent increase to fines across a range of offences, including speeding, seatbelt violations and mobile phone use. Distracted driving will be a particular focus, with enhanced enforcement tech and a tougher approach to infringement.
Queensland is set to reduce speed limits from 50 to 40 km/h in select tourist and residential areas, including the Hervey Bay Esplanade and various urban neighbourhoods.
South Australia's latest road rule change requiring drivers to slow down to 25 km/h when passing stationary breakdown service vehicles displaying flashing amber lights came into effect on May 19. The change extends the current protections for emergency vehicles and is part of a broader safety campaign.
While no changes are coming in on July 1 in WA, road users in the state should be across some new initiatives recently launched.
AI-powered cameras have begun detecting speeding, seatbelt non-compliance, and phone use, with enforcement to begin after a warning period concludes later this year.
A three-year trial reducing speed limits on hundreds of roads in Augusta–Margaret River continues after it began in 2025 to improve safety in high-risk regional areas.
Correction: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that fines for some traffic offences in WA would increase from July 1.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jury deliberates for 2nd day in the triple murder trial of Australian accused of mushroom poisonings
Jury deliberates for 2nd day in the triple murder trial of Australian accused of mushroom poisonings

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Jury deliberates for 2nd day in the triple murder trial of Australian accused of mushroom poisonings

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — A jury was deliberating for a second day Tuesday in the triple murder trial of an Australian woman accused of killing her estranged husband's relatives by deliberately serving them poisonous mushrooms for lunch. The jurors who began deliberating Monday are sequestered, a rarity in Australia that reflects public and media fervor about the case against Erin Patterson, with several news outlets publishing live blogs that covered every moment of the two-month trial. The jurors will remain secluded until they reach a unanimous decision on the charges of murder and attempted murder. Three of Patterson's four lunch guests — her parents-in-law Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson — died in the hospital after the 2023 meal, at which she served individual beef Wellington pastries containing death cap mushrooms. The fourth, Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, became gravely ill but survived. Patterson, 50, told the trial she didn't deliberately poison her guests and must have accidentally mixed up store-bought and wild mushrooms, which she had foraged herself without knowing they were death caps. She also said she ate the mushrooms but didn't get as sick because she threw up soon after the lunch due to an eating disorder. Prosecutors in the case, which has gripped Australia for two years, said the accused woman researched, foraged and served the mushrooms deliberately and lied to investigators to cover her tracks. Patterson accepted she had disposed of a food dehydrator after the fatal meal and reset her phone multiple times. The prosecution said she lied about having a dire medical diagnosis to ensure her guests attended the lunch, cooked individual pastries to avoid poisoning herself, and faked symptoms to make it look as though she fell ill, too. Prosecutors didn't offer a motive but suggested a deteriorating relationship between the accused and her estranged husband, Simon Patterson, as well as her exasperation with her former in-laws. Simon Patterson was invited to the fatal lunch but didn't go. Patterson would face life in prison if she is convicted.

Native birds allegedly slaughtered by tradies in 'horrifying' act with potential $110,000 fine
Native birds allegedly slaughtered by tradies in 'horrifying' act with potential $110,000 fine

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Native birds allegedly slaughtered by tradies in 'horrifying' act with potential $110,000 fine

Warning — Distressing images: Confronting pictures of ibis birds lying on the ground limbless and dead have been shared on social media after workers cut down palm trees at a Sydney business park, allegedly taking local bird life with them. The native birds were known to be residing in the five fully grown palm trees in the city's west earlier this year. Workers began to prune and hack the trees, allegedly leaving dozens of ibis eggs, chicks and fully matured birds killed or significantly injured in the process. Yahoo News understands a member of public noticed the commotion and contacted a local wildlife organisation. Rescuers rushed to the scene, and despite desperately telling the workers to stop, the work continued. One bird allegedly died in the arms of a wildlife rescuer. It's been alleged that workers were throwing the tree debris into a wood chipper, and birds were also being tossed in. Yahoo News reached out to NSW Police who confirmed officers were dispatched to the scene on May 31, following a report of animal cruelty. "Police were told about 9.30am on Saturday 31 May 2025, two Ibis birds were killed during tree maintenance work, with a further 13 injured. The trees that were trimmed or cut were known to contain a protected bird species," a NSW Police spokesperson said. An investigation is now underway. Australians face 'taxing' battle as 'iconic' sound mysteriously vanishes from suburbs Photograph of 31 rare birds sparks ripples in midst of hunting season Shocking find inside bird highlights worrying beach trend NSW's National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) also confirmed to Yahoo News the incident was being investigated and warned companies can face fines of up to $110,000 if caught carrying out work that harms native wildlife. "People found to have injured or killed protected wildlife face fines of up to $22,000 for individuals and $110,000 for corporations," a NPWS spokesperson said. Yahoo News has also been in contact with the company that owns the Gladesville business park which declined to provide any comment. After the pictures were shared online, hundreds of Australians expressed their anger at the alleged incident, calling it "horrifying". It's not the first time 'bin chickens' have been killed at a Sydney business park, with one of the rescuers who attended the recent incident also on the scene at a similar incident in Chullora in August when more than a dozen birds were brutally killed as trees were trimmed. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Major sunscreen brands to defend greenwashing claim
Major sunscreen brands to defend greenwashing claim

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Major sunscreen brands to defend greenwashing claim

The makers of two popular sunscreen brands will defend allegations they misled environmentally conscious shoppers by labelling products as "reef friendly". More than 90 Banana Boat and Hawaiian Tropic sunscreens allegedly contained false and potentially misleading representations between 2020 and 2024, the consumer watchdog claimed on Tuesday. The brands' owner Edgewell labelled the sunscreens as "reef friendly", claiming they did not contain two ingredients known to cause damage to reefs. But the sunscreens included other ingredients that cause harm to marine life, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission says. The claims are detailed in a lawsuit filed in the Federal Court on Monday evening against the US personal care company and its Australian arm. Court documents allege Edgewell "took advantage of consumers' concerns about the environmental impact of ... products on reefs". The company also knew of scientific studies and reports that found these ingredients can negatively affect reefs. The personal care company's claims had "no reasonable or scientific basis" and affected both its competitors and consumers, the watchdog said on Tuesday. "Businesses should not shy away from promoting the environmental credentials of their products, but they must be able to substantiate any claims," deputy chair Catriona Lowe said. "By engaging in this alleged greenwashing, we say Edgewell deprived consumers of the ability to make an informed decision and may have prevented them from purchasing a different brand of sunscreen that did not contain chemicals which risked causing harm to reefs." Edgewell removed "reef-friendly" tags off its US products in 2020 but allegedly continued the branding in Australia until December 2024. The ACCC is seeking penalties, costs and other court orders. A spokesperson for the company's Australian arm said it would defend the lawsuit. "Edgewell has fully co-operated with the ACCC throughout its investigation and firmly stands by the claims it has made," the spokesperson told AAP. The lawsuit comes after testing of popular sunscreens by consumer advocacy group Choice found some major sunscreen brands failed to meet their SPF labels. Several brands disputed the consumer group's claims.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store