
Is Canada now free of internal trade barriers? Read the fine print
OTTAWA — Federal and provincial leaders are working to dismantle internal trade barriers that push up the cost of goods and make it harder to do business within Canada.
But anyone expecting all of them to be gone by tomorrow should read the fine print.
Throughout the spring federal election campaign, Liberal Leader Mark Carney repeatedly vowed to 'eliminate' interprovincial trade barriers and create 'free trade by Canada Day.'
The rhetoric has been at times confusing and the political scorecard on this one is hard to track.
With July 1 just a day away, Carney's government has passed its planned changes into law — but it's more like the start of a conversation than the final word.
'It's a starting gun and it's starting a lot more activity and work, which is honestly the really exciting part,' said internal trade expert Ryan Manucha. 'If any of this was easy, it would have been done.'
Manucha writes on the topic for the Macdonald-Laurier Institute think tank and authored the book, 'Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada's Quest for Interprovincial Trade.'
'When I'm advising governments, I say, 'Don't think of this as a light switch,'' he said. 'We are changing the way that everyone approaches the concept of regulation and risk here, and so it's going to take some time.'
The rush to break down internal barriers to trade comes in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war with Canada. One study estimates that existing internal trade hurdles cost the economy some $200 billion a year.
Manucha said Canada has talked about this problem for decades but is only addressing it seriously now — and it would 'never have happened had we not had Trump.'
He said the introduction of the Carney government's bill on internal trade was 'incredible to see' because the idea was just 'an academic theory maybe even as little as eight months ago.'
Bill C-5, the omnibus bill that reduces federal restrictions on interprovincial trade and also speeds up permitting for large infrastructure projects, became law on June 26.
An analysis of the law by McMillan Vantage says that 'this legislation would not achieve' the elimination of all internal trade barriers.
When Carney made his campaign promise, he was talking about cutting red tape put up by the federal government — not the rules set by the provinces, which have the most authority in this area.
The prime minister described this effort as a sort of quid pro quo with the provinces.
'We're getting rid of a bunch of duplicative federal regulations. We're going to have a principle of one project, one review — and in exchange, they're going to agree to eliminate all the barriers to trade and labour mobility,' Carney said at a rally in Kitchener, Ont., on March 26.
'The federal government committed that we will sweep away all of our impediments by Canada Day. Free trade by Canada Day.'
But Canada's internal trade barriers won't all be eliminated by then — not even all the federal ones.
Canada's supply management system for dairy products, which sets provincial production quotas, will remain in place. Quebec also retains language requirements that will stay in place.
Credit unions have complained that the new law does not break down barriers to their expansion into multiple provinces.
Bill C-5 aligns federal requirements for goods and services with provincial ones if they cross provincial or territorial borders. It allows the provincial requirement to replace a federal one if the rules are 'comparable.'
Ottawa likes to point to energy efficiency standards. A washing machine made in B.C. that meets the provincial standard still needs to meet additional federal standards before it can be sold in Alberta or Ontario. But this new law means the B.C. standard would replace the federal one.
The law also eliminates redundant licensing requirements for labourers. Federal regulators would have to recognize provincial occupational certifications.
So just how many federal barriers does the bill eliminate? That's hard to sort out. A lot of the details will have to wait until regulations are drafted — a process that will involve consultations with affected industries.
'I don't really know what this legislation could end up doing because a lot of veto power, a lot a discretion still rests with the regulatory authorities,' Manucha said.
'According to the text of that legislation, it would seem like meat inspection would come off. Is (the Canadian Food Inspection Agency) really going to allow for interprovincial trade and inspection of meat coming from non-federally licensed abattoirs? I don't know.'
There is no comprehensive list of existing internal trade barriers. Even some lobby groups have told parliamentarians they don't know how many barriers their own industries face.
There isn't even consensus on what all counts as a trade barrier.
'In the provincial legislation in Ontario, they're talking for many occupations having a 30-day service standard for how long it'll take for credentials to be recognized,' Manucha said. 'Nova Scotia, meanwhile, is on the 10-day turnaround time. That's less than a third. Can you call the 30-day versus 10-day a trade barrier?'
Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, who has repeatedly stated that most of the barriers are at the provincial level, testified to the Senate that she will meet with her provincial counterparts on July 8 to discuss next steps.
One major obstacle is in Freeland's crosshairs: Canada's patchwork of interprovincial trucking regulations.
'One of three areas that I will be putting on the agenda at that meeting is trucking,' she said on June 16. 'It should be a lot easier than it is to drive a truck from Halifax to Vancouver. We need to get rid of conflicting requirements.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 30, 2025.
Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
13 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Team Canada is still at the table': Trade council member Volpe on Canada-U.S. trade talks
APMA President and Canada-U.S. relations council member Flavio Volpe joins CTV to give an update on the on-going Canada-U.S. trade deal.


Globe and Mail
13 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
3 Millionaire-Maker Technology Stocks
Key Points If quantum computing takes off in the next decade, IonQ could be a big winner. SoundHound is a company that has shown its ability to adapt, and it could become a big winner in agentic AI. Palantir has the potential to become one of the largest AI companies in the world. 10 stocks we like better than IonQ › If you're looking to invest in potential millionaire-making tech stocks, you're sometimes going to have to swing for the fences. The three stocks below are bold bets on companies chasing massive markets with long runways. You're not buying these stocks looking for modest returns; you're buying them because you see a shot at something transformational. That said, these are high-risk, high-potential-reward stocks. None of their valuations are cheap, and most are still just starting to scratch the surface of their potential. But if the technologies deliver and management teams execute, the upside could be enormous. IonQ Quantum computing company IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) isn't just an academic lab with a bunch of theoretical physics testing hypotheses, like the characters on the TV show "The Big Bang Theory." It's building real quantum computers that are already being tested in commercial, government, and academic settings. IonQ is working to build fault-tolerant systems that can operate at scale, which is the holy grail in quantum computing. Without that reliability, this emerging technology won't move beyond the lab. The company has made solid early progress. It's working with AstraZeneca, Amazon, and Nvidia on early use cases, and it has a strong balance sheet with around $700 million in cash and investments and zero debt. That gives it time and room to invest without constantly going to the market for funding. IonQ also opened a 65,000 square foot facility in Washington to manufacture systems in-house. That's another sign that this isn't just a science project anymore and that the company is gearing up to deliver working machines. The company has also been acquiring smaller quantum computing players to help bolster its capabilities. That's a smart move in a burgeoning field where technical talent and intellectual property are key. There's still a long road ahead, but if quantum computing takes off in the next decade, IonQ is positioned to be one of the companies that could be a huge winner. SoundHound AI While SoundHound AI (NASDAQ: SOUN) is still a relatively young company, it has consistently been able to adapt in an ever-evolving tech landscape. That's something great tech companies do. A leader in "speech-to-meaning" and "deep meaning understanding" technology, the company acquired Amelia last year to add its advanced conversational intelligence to its platform. It's now taking this combined technology and applying it to create voice-first artificial intelligence (AI) agents that can go out and complete tasks without the need for human intervention. By merging its voice technology with Amelia's enterprise software, SoundHound now has a complete voice automation platform. SoundHound has been strong in the automobile and restaurant industries, while Amelia brought with it expertise in the medical and financial verticals, which have their own nuances and specific industry jargon. It's also used Amelia's technology as part of the foundation for its AI agent ambitions. With the recent rollout of its Amelia 7.0 platform, it's now moved beyond being simply an AI voice company to being a voice-first agentic AI company. This is still a small company with something to prove, but the product roadmap and customer traction suggest it's heading in the right direction. And as I said at the beginning, it has been quick to adapt. The company actually started out as a platform for discovering music, where it would then direct customers to online music stores. It's come a long way since those early days, and the future looks bright. Palantir Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) is the largest company on this list and the one with the clearest momentum. Originally formed to help fight terrorism after 9/11, the data gathering and analytics company has been a key government vendor for years. However, it has successfully expanded into the commercial sector, where its AI platform (AIP) has become a central tool for helping organizations implement AI in the real world. Most businesses don't lack data -- they lack the tools to do anything meaningful with it. Palantir helps organizations gather data from a wide variety of sources and then structure it into an ontology that links the data to their real-world counterparts. The ontology provides clean, structured data that helps AI models operate more effectively. Customers can then apply whatever AI models they want with this ontology to identify real-world problems and then go out and solve them. AIP has been a hit with commercial customers. In Q1, its U.S. commercial revenue grew 71%, and commercial deal value more than doubled. Best of all, most of these deals are in their early stages, and Palantir has a big opportunity not just to add more customers, but to grow significantly within its existing customer base. The stock's valuation is steep, no question. However, given the breadth of use cases across industries for which AIP can be used, the company has the potential to become one of the largest AI companies in the world in the future. Should you invest $1,000 in IonQ right now? Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025


CTV News
13 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘We are close to an end': Union negotiator Gallant on Canada Post contract negotiations
Watch Unionized workers at Canada Post voted to reject the corporation's latest contract offer, CUPW's Jim Gallant joins CTV to discuss how an end may be in sight.