
Conclave Movie Serves As Guidance For Cardinals Voting For Next Pope
New Delhi:
Before entering the papal elections to pick the next pope, several Catholic cardinals reportedly watched the film Conclave, starring Ralph Fiennes, to get a sense of the traditions and political undercurrents of the process.
The film, directed by Edward Berger and based on Robert Harris's novel, unexpectedly became a guide for many of the 133 cardinal-electors who entered the Sistine Chapel on Wednesday. Released four months before Pope Francis' death on April 21, the movie served as an unintended primer for those less familiar with the inner workings of the Vatican.
A majority of the cardinals participating in this conclave were appointed by Pope Francis himself and have never experienced the intricate ceremony of papal election. Many also come from smaller, historically overlooked dioceses, mirroring the background of characters portrayed in the film. One cleric, speaking to Politico, confirmed that several participants "watched it in the cinema" as part of their informal preparation.
In the film, Mr Fiennes plays Cardinal Thomas Lawrence, the dean of the College of Cardinals. He deals with intense rivalries, leaked dossiers, and the surprise appearance of a little-known cardinal from a remote region. Even though dramatised, many procedural elements were spot on, like the paper ballot voting system and the famous smoke signal from the chimney indicating the election result.
The movie also accurately showed how the Sistine Chapel is sealed before voting begins. Windows are shuttered, phones are taken away, and electronic jammers are used to block communication.
While this protects the secrecy of the process, information often leaks out afterwards just like it did in 2005, when it became known that Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Pope Francis) was a top contender before he was eventually elected in 2013.
The film also captures the power struggles within the College of Cardinals. But experts, as per The Washington Post, said that most of the serious discussions and lobbying usually took place during the general congregations before the conclave started. These meetings, held off-camera and often influenced by Vatican gossip and media speculation, were where the real positioning happened.
Joanne M Pierce, a professor emerita at the College of the Holy Cross, said the film crossed church rules by showing cardinals casually chatting and campaigning - something forbidden.
The Vatican even has a saying, "He who enters the conclave a pope, exits a cardinal." Meaning anyone who wants the job too much or isn't humble is not chosen.
The film also has dramatic touches like nuns speaking during meals and the idea of a surprise cardinal secretly appointed by the pope, known as 'in pectore'. While this practice exists, it is extremely rare and unlikely to affect a conclave.
The storyline also touched upon themes of money and influence, hinting at bribery and political games. Though exaggerated, it wasn't entirely off base. Wealthy conservative groups have tried to sway outcomes by backing certain candidates. But since 80 per cent of the current cardinal-electors were appointed by Francis, such efforts had limited impact, The Washington Post said.
The film got several details right. From the cardinals' modest accommodations to the solemn atmosphere. Author Robert Harris had confirmed that both his book and the film were carefully researched.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Love, faith, & vegetarian life: Usha Vance opens up on life as US second lady; wants to have Holi party
Second Lady Usha Vance has stepped into the national spotlight with unexpected candour, offering a warm and thoughtful glimpse into her family life, vegetarian upbringing, and Hindu faith. In a candid appearance on Meghan McCain's Citizen McCain podcast, she painted a picture of an interfaith household marked by openness, choice, and deep cultural respect. Reflecting on her interfaith marriage to Vice President JD Vance—who converted to Catholicism after the birth of their first child—Usha shared how they navigated the complexities of faith. 'We had to have a lot of real conversations about how do you do that, when I'm not Catholic, and I'm not intending to convert,' she said, explaining their decision to send their children to Catholic school while ensuring they have full access to Hindu traditions through family, books and travel With her husband JD Vance now a central figure in Donald Trump's Republican administration, Second Lady Usha Vance has begun carving out a public identity of her own. In an extended conversation with Meghan McCain, Usha opened up about family life, her Hindu faith, her upbringing as a vegetarian, and how the Vance children are being raised with elements of both parents' traditions. 'They know that I'm not Catholic. .. They have plenty of access to the Hindu tradition,' Usha explained. Love story that started in law school Usha first met JD Vance during a tour at Yale Law School, where they were in the same classes and became fast friends. 'He was just obviously really good friend material right off the bat,' she recalled. 'It really was... in our second semester when he started to talk more about where he was from... that I started to think of him in this different way.' Usha Vance Opens Up: Her First Extended Interview on Life as Second Lady with Meghan McCain Although author Amy Chua, famed as the "Tiger Mom," is often cited in their love story, Usha clarified: 'She wasn't instrumental in us dating... but she was really important later on,' especially in helping JD realise that pursuing happiness—including their relationship—was more important than chasing elite clerkships. Interfaith Marriage: Conversations, choices, and catholic school When JD converted to Catholicism after their first child was born, it prompted serious discussions. 'We had to have a lot of real conversations about how do you do that, when I'm not Catholic, and I'm not intending to convert.' The Vance children now attend Catholic school but are allowed to make their own decision on baptism. 'Our oldest child has done that... We make going to church a family experience. The kids know that I'm not Catholic. ' Usha said the children are also immersed in Hindu culture through family, books and travel. 'They know many practising Hindus... Their main point of access is through spending time with my parents and my grandmother.' Though the family doesn't mark many Hindu festivals formally at home, the children connect with their heritage through visits and stories. 'My grandmother is a particularly devout Hindu... She prays every day, goes to the temple, does her own pujas." Usha said she hopes to change that in future: 'We're actually hoping to have a Holi party, so we're looking forward to that next year.' Life as a vegetarian—and JD's culinary experiments Raised in a vegetarian household, Usha said she's always thought of meals holistically. 'It's really hard to think about vegetarian diets as substituting for meat... the better way is to have a number of smaller things on your plate.' When they began dating, JD took it upon himself to learn vegetarian cooking. 'The first place that he went was actually to my mum to learn how to make some of the dishes that I enjoyed.' Today, he's known in the family for his chocolate chip cookies and Southern-style biscuits. 'He makes amazing biscuits... He's made some really good cakes, so those are my favourites.' Parenting in the public eye Raising children under the glare of politics and media hasn't been easy. Usha said they try to maintain normal routines. 'They have to put away their laundry... If they spill something, they have to clean it up.' She said the goal is to give them as grounded a life as possible: 'Almost every decision that we make is directed at making it as much like what it would have been like if they'd been growing up in Cincinnati.' Reflecting on a rapid life change When JD was named vice president, everything changed in an instant. 'We had to suddenly move hotel rooms... There was really no opportunity for reflection.' Only after the inauguration did Usha have time to think about how she wanted to use her new platform. 'Now actually, this is maybe truly the fun part... where I can start bringing projects to the light.'

The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
From rap career to politics, Zohran Mamdani is shaking up New York city politics
Zohran Mamdani is 33. He met his wife Rama Duwaji, a Syrian-born illustrator, on Hinge, a dating app. While grocery shopping, he listens to an hour-long auto-tuned version 'One Pound Fish' by a Bangladeshi man trying to sell fish in London's Queen's Market. His parents are filmmakers Mira Nair and Columbia professor Mahmood Mamdani. He went by 'Mr. Cardamom' when he had a rap career. Mamdani's campaign promises include freezing rent, making public transport free, and subdising grocery stores. He also has a chantable, two-syllable name. 'Zoh-ran' 'Zoh-ran' seems to have a nice ring to it. Facts. So many facts off the top of my head. On June 24, when he won the democratic primary against his opponent Andrew Cuomo Rohan Joshi, an Indian stand-up comic and content creator, suggested in an Instagram reel that we go out to hug our South Bombay friends who were enthusiastically celebrating his victory in the democratic primary — a portion of the New York Mayoral elections. The chronically-online Indian millennial and Gen Z audience suddenly seemed to know far more about Mamdani and voting in New York than facts about their own Members of Parliament. All this, and the guy isn't even mayor yet. What about him has captured the fancy of a young Indian voter base that rarely gets out to vote and cannot name the Member of Legislative Assembly representing their constituency? Is it his A) humble and relatable off-the-rack suit, tie and Casio demeanour B) several hundred Hindi references, appealing to the Indian diaspora C) work with communities including the Blacks, gays and the immigrant population? D) simple good looks and youth or E) ability to use public transport and walk long distances. (You are allowed to choose over one option). Politico says, 'Critics scoffed at the 33-year-old democratic socialist's pie-in-the-sky agenda. And then he trounced everyone.' I'd like to think that Mamdani has struck a chord with young voters globally because he knows how to work social media. His Instagram reels speak to a generation that seeks what he promises: affordable housing, free transport and decent use of taxpayer money. They also want to see their pestilent youth represented in the office. It's why Mamdani's campaign deliberately uses clear fonts and easy chants in colours the Gen Z loves. I now know how much food at a halal cart costs even though I have never set foot in America, let alone eaten at one. While he is now being hailed as Lenin's second coming in liberal circles that are finally coming into their polity, skeptics wonder if his policies will even work in today's age. It's the optimism that works in his favour though. Despite these several opinions, I wonder what I will do with as much information about Mamdani and his campaign. Considering I will never vote there, will I shut this information in the brainrot corner of my head, or will it inform how I envision politics transforming in my own country? Elections in India are not won because of social media but dramatically influenced by it. Only last year, during the Lok Sabha polls, Prime Minister Narendra Modi could be seen rubbing shoulders with influencers. With only one year to go for the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly elections, one can see the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and Bharatiya Janata Party's IT wings buzzing. Going by evidence from previous elections, it seems like politicians will only use social media to promote supercuts of their fan edits. It is unlikely that they will harness the tool to not just speak, but also connect and elicit a response from the audience. But 10 months is too soon to tell. For now, I have little choice. I will go to bed thinking of what it must be to eat Mamdani's promised eight dollar chicken on rice at the several halal carts outside Central Park, drinking iced coffee in the concrete jungle where dreams are made of, with a byline that someday ends at New York, New York. Level up Zaddy: You might think this is some interesting portmanteau that Gen Z came up with but it really is just what it sounds like, a sexy, charismatic daddy who is usually older. Now you know why Zohran is called Mamzaddy. Are you wondering about the what's happening on Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), Reddit and Discord? Pop it like it's hot, a fortnightly column from The Hindu, catches you up on everything pop culture. All you need to do, is tune in.


Time of India
18 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Propaganda machine': Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for $787M over call with Trump; cites edited video
Gavin Newsom (AP), Fox News (Fox News) California Governor Gavin Newsom on Friday sued Fox News, accusing the network of deliberately misrepresenting his recent phone call with President Donald Trump. The suit, lodged in Delaware where Fox is based, seeks at least $787 million in damages and calls for a court order to stop the network from airing or publishing content that falsely claims Newsom lied about the conversation. The lawsuit centers on a segment from Fox News host Jesse Watters, which allegedly featured a deceptively edited video of Trump to back claims that Newsom had misled the public. The governor's legal team argues that the coverage was not only inaccurate but also intentionally damaging, regarding Trump's recent decision to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles. Newsom has increasingly taken a confrontationalist approach ever since Trump sent troops in LA this month amid his administration's immigration crackdown. Newsom's lawyers also sent a five-page letter to the media house summarizing the lawsuit, filled with sharp attacks on the network's integrity and mocking remarks about Trump's mental sharpness, reported Politico. 'It is perhaps unsurprising that a near-octogenarian with a history of delusionary public statements and unhinged late-night social media screeds might confuse the dates,' the lawyers wrote. 'But Fox's decision to cover up for President Trump's error cannot be so easily dismissed.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Eat 1 Teaspoon Every Night, See What Happens A Week Later [Video] getfittoday Undo The letter also stated that the governor was ready to drop the suit if Fox retracts its claim and the host Jess Watters renders an on air apology. The amount sought by Newsom is nearly the same $787.5 million in damages that Fox News paid Dominion Voting Systems in 2023 to settle a high-profile defamation case involving false claims about the election. His lawsuit comes at a time when President Trump has also launched multiple legal battles against major media outlets and corporations, many of which have ended in multi-million dollar settlements. 'If Fox News wants to lie to the American people on Donald Trump's behalf, it should face consequences, just like it did in the Dominion case,' Newsom told Politico in a statement. 'Until Fox is willing to be truthful, I will keep fighting against their propaganda machine.' Newsom says his last phone call with Trump lasted about 16 minutes and took place on June 7, just one day before Trump ordered 2,000 troops to Los Angeles, despite Newsom's objections, to respond to ongoing protests. On June 8, Newsom spoke about the phone call on MSNBC. However, on June 10, Trump told reporters he had spoken with Newsom 'a day ago,' suggesting the call happened the same day 700 US marines were sent to Los Angeles. Newsom quickly disputed that timeline in a post on X, rejecting Trump's statement. 'There was no call. Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to,' Newsom said in the post. That evening, Jesse Watters aired a shortened version of Trump's comments and questioned, 'Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him?' At the same time, he displayed a screenshot of the president's call log, provided by Fox host John Roberts, which actually confirmed Newsom's account that their last conversation took place on June 7. The lawsuit accuses Fox News of intentionally misrepresenting the dispute between Newsom and Trump to damage Newsom's political future. His legal team argues the coverage meets the standard for defamation and could hurt his support with voters and donors. They also claim Fox's actions violated California's unfair competition law by engaging in deceptive business practices.