"Money Match" checks are in the mail to Pennsylvania residents. What to know about the unclaimed property program.
"The first Pennsylvania Money Match checks are officially in the mail and they're on their way to their rightful owners, how great is that!" Pennsylvania Treasurer Stacy Garrity said Monday.
Pennsylvania Money Match checks totaling more than $1.7 million were mailed out this week to nearly 7,400 people. Garrity said these checks are real and if you receive one in your mailbox, the money belongs to you.
"The best news is there's a lot more to come," Garrity said.
The new Money Match program allows the state treasury to automatically return certain unclaimed property.
"That means no searching, no forms to fill out, and no documents to provide. Automatic returns through Money Match apply to unclaimed property that is owned by a single individual and worth up to $500. Other properties still require search and filing a claim, for now!" Garrity said.
"I was completely unaware that I had unclaimed property until I received a letter back in January from the Pennsylvania Treasury stating that I would be receiving a check for nearly $500," said Nina Hard, a Pennsylvania Money Match check recipient.
More than $4.5 billion in unclaimed property is being safeguarded in the Treasury's vault. It could be old bank accounts, uncashed checks, rebates, or even the contents of abandoned safe deposit boxes.
Garrity said Money Match checks will be sent quarterly. She said the next batch of letters will go out to 40,000 people in May with checks to follow by mid-June.
"It's a simple, efficient, and effective way to get money back into the hands of the people who own it and deserve it," said Senator Scott Hutchinson (R-21).
"Less red tape, less paperwork, and more money in your pocket... after all money should be going to the people who earned it," said Representative Ryan Bizzarro (D-3).
Garrity said people should continue to search for unclaimed property
on the treasury's website
because claims still need to be filed for properties valued above $500 or those that have multiple owners.
There are at least two bills being proposed by lawmakers, including one that's sponsored by Bizzarro that would increase the amount that can be returned automatically to thousands of dollars.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Top economist Brad DeLong to recent college grads: Don't blame AI for job struggles—blame the sputtering economy
As recent college graduates face one of the toughest job markets in years, Berkeley economist and voluble Substacker Brad DeLong has a message for those struggling to land their first full-time gig: Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are not to blame. Larger forces are at work. DeLong, a professor at UC Berkeley and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, argued in a recent essay that the challenges confronting young job-seekers today are primarily driven by widespread policy uncertainty and a sluggish economy—not by the rapid rise of AI tools like ChatGPT or data-crunching robots. DeLong offered his analysis on July 23, roughly 10 days before the July jobs report stunned markets, revealing that the economy has been much weaker than previously thought for several months. Prominent business leaders had also flagged troubling signs in the economy before the July jobs report dropped. IBM Vice Chair and former Trump advisor Gary Cohn went on CNBC a day before the jobs data, noting 'warning signs below the surface.' Cohn said he pays close attention to the quits rate in the monthly JOLTS data, arguing that 150,000 fewer quits was an ominous sign of poor economic health. DeLong sounded a prophetic note, writing that 'policy uncertainty' over trade, immigration, inflation, and technology has 'paralyzed business planning,' leading to a self-reinforcing cycle of hiring freezes. New entrants to the job market are bearing the brunt of the retreat to risk aversion. In other words, the college graduate class of 2025 is really unlucky. The economist argued that the uncertainty causes companies to delay major decisions—including hiring—in the face of an unpredictable policy environment. 'This risk aversion is particularly damaging for those at the start of their careers, who rely on a steady flow of entry-level openings to get a foot in the door,' he wrote. DeLong has sounded similar warnings of a slowdown for years. He talked to Fortune in 2022 about his theory of the economy starting to sputter from his book Slouching Towards Utopia. In 2025, he wrote, the big story in the jobs market is not actually AI, but something different. Policy paralysis So, what's really keeping freshly minted graduates from clinching that all-important first job? DeLong cited Bloomberg BusinessWeek's Amanda Mull and her theory about 'stochastic uncertainty'—a cocktail of unpredictability around government policies, trade, immigration, and inflation. Companies aren't firing; instead, they're just waiting. And many are delaying new hires in anticipation of possible sudden shifts in tariffs, inflation rates, and regulatory environments. The result is a wait-and-see climate where employers, worried about future economic shocks, have selected caution over expansion. The holding pattern hits new entrants to the workforce especially hard. While overall unemployment in the U.S. remains low, the situation is uniquely difficult for new graduates relative to the rest of the workforce. Citing economists including Paul Krugman, DeLong noted that while the absolute unemployment rate for college graduates isn't alarming, the gap between graduate unemployment and general unemployment rates is at record highs. In the past, higher education reliably led to lower unemployment, but now recent grads are struggling 'by a large margin' compared to previous generations. As previously reported by Fortune Intelligence, Goldman Sachs has argued that the college degree 'safety premium' is mostly gone. The team, led by Goldman's chief economist Jan Hatzius, wrote: 'Recent data suggests that the labor market for recent college graduates has weakened at a time when the broader labor market has appeared healthy.' It also found that since 1997, young workers without a college degree have become much less likely to even look for work, with their participation rate dropping by seven percentage points. Mull cited an analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York which found that tech and design fields, including computer science, computer engineering, and graphic design, are seeing unemployment rates above 7% for new graduates. Why the AI hype misses the mark Although the tech sector is buzzing about AI's potential to replace junior analysts or automate entry-level tasks, DeLong urged caution in assigning blame. In his typical style, he noted, 'there is still [no] hard and not even a semi-convincing soft narrative that 'AI is to blame' for entry-level job scarcity.' Hiring slowdowns, he pointed out, are driven by broader economic forces: uncertainty, risk aversion, and changes in how companies invest. Here again, DeLong's analysis rhymes and aligns with recent research from Goldman's Hatzius. The bank's quarterly 'AI Adoption Tracker,' issued in July, found that the unemployment rate for AI-exposed occupations had reconciled with the wider economy, which contradicts fears of mass displacement. They also noted there have been no recent layoff announcements explicitly citing AI as the cause, underscoring that it's contained to disruption of specific functions, not entire industries. Crucially, he argued, rather than hiring people, companies in the tech sector are splurging on 'the hardware that powers artificial intelligence'—notably Nvidia's high-performance chips—fueling a boom in capital investment while sidelining junior hires. 'For firms, the calculus is straightforward: Investing in AI infrastructure is seen as a ticket to future competitiveness, while hiring junior staff is a cost that can be postponed.' Underpinning these trends is a shift away from any and all risk. Employers prefer to hire for specific short-term needs and are less willing to invest in developing new talent—leaving young applicants caught in a cycle where 'just getting your foot in the door' is more difficult than ever. Incumbent workers, worried about job market uncertainty, are less likely to change jobs, leading to fewer openings and greater stagnation. DeLong's analysis harmonized with Goldman Sachs' findings about the declining premium attached with a college degree: 'For the longer-run, the rise in the college wage premium is over, and a decline has (probably) begun.' For decades, he continued, a college degree was a ticket to higher earnings, and the labor market rewarded those with advanced skills and credentials. In recent years, though, 'this has plateaued and may even be falling.' The causes are complex, he added, but the takeaway: While degrees remain valuable, they are no longer the ever-ascending ticket to prosperity they once were. These comments confirm the gloomy remarks of University of Connecticut professor emeritus Peter Turchin, who recently talked with Fortune about the declining status of the upper middle class in 21st century America. When asked where else he sees this manifesting in modern life, Turchin said, 'It's actually everywhere you look. 'Look at the overproduction of university degrees,' he said, arguing that the decreasing premium that Goldman and DeLong write about shows up in declining rates of college enrollment and high rates of recent graduate unemployment. 'There is overproduction of university degrees and the value of a university degree actually declines.' DeLong's bottom line for recent grads: Blame a risk-averse business climate, not technology, for today's job woes. And now that we know the economy may have been much more risk-averse in 2025 than previously, DeLong's warnings are worth revisiting. DeLong did not respond to a request for comment. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bill Maher says he was wrong about Trump's tariffs — why the comedian is suddenly walking back his calls for catastrophe
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Love him or hate him, Bill Maher isn't shy about eating his own words. On an episode of his Club Random podcast, the comedian says he was wrong about President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. 'Tariffs. Now, I remember, I, along with probably most people, were saying at the beginning, 'Oh, you know, by the 4th of July the economy was going to be tanked by then.' And I was kind of, like, 'Well, that seems right to me.' But that didn't happen,' Maher said in a clip posted July 28. 'The truth is, I don't know what [Trump's] strategy is. But look, the stock market is at record highs. I know not everybody lives by the stock market, but I also drive around, I don't see a country in a depression at all — I see people out there just living their lives. And I would have thought — and I've got to own it — that these tariffs were going to sink this economy by this time. And they didn't.' Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Many experts were — and several remain — critical of Trump's trade policies. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers called Trump's tariffs 'a self-inflicted wound on the American economy,' while Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman said they 'create an impossible environment for business.' To be sure, the uncertainty surrounding tariffs did rattle Wall Street. Trump's first 100 days were the worst start for stocks under a president since the Nixon era. But they've since bounced back, and as Maher alluded to, major indices like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq have hit new all-time highs. The blunt reality? While Trump's tariffs may have consequences — particularly on consumer prices — the U.S. economy remains a global powerhouse. That enduring strength is why investing legend Warren Buffett has long urged investors to stay optimistic about America's future. As Buffett wrote in his 2022 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders: 'I have yet to see a time when it made sense to make a long-term bet against America. And I doubt very much that any reader of this letter will have a different experience in the future.' Here's a look at two simple ways to bet on America. Own a slice of America — the Buffett way For Buffett, betting on the U.S. is a no-brainer — thanks to his unwavering faith in the resilience and growth of American businesses. 'American business — and consequently a basket of stocks — is virtually certain to be worth far more in the years ahead,' Buffett wrote in his 2016 letter to shareholders. You don't need to be a stock-picking expert to follow Buffett's playbook. His advice to individual investors is as simple as it is enduring: 'In my view, for most people, the best thing to do is own the S&P 500 index fund,' he famously stated. This straightforward approach gives investors exposure to 500 of America's largest companies across various industries, providing diversified exposure without the need for constant monitoring or active trading. The beauty of this approach is its accessibility — anyone, regardless of wealth, can take advantage of it. Even small amounts can grow over time with tools like Acorns, a popular app that automatically invests your spare change. Signing up for Acorns takes just minutes: link your cards, and Acorns will round up each purchase to the nearest dollar, investing the difference — your spare change — into a diversified portfolio. With Acorns, you can invest in an S&P 500 ETF with as little as $5 — and, if you sign up today, Acorns will add a $20 bonus to help you begin your investment journey. Read more: BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — Invest in US real estate The U.S. is currently facing a significant housing shortage. A recent Zillow analysis estimated the housing shortage to be 4.7 million homes. Even Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has acknowledged the severity of the issue. 'The real issue with housing is that we have had, and are on track to continue to have, not enough housing,' he stated in September 2024. For investors, the housing supply gap presents a unique opportunity to invest in America. Housing demand isn't going away — regardless of who's in the White House, people will always need a place to live. In fact, Buffett has often pointed to U.S. real estate as a prime example of a productive, income-generating asset. In 2022, Buffett stated that if you offered him '1% of all the apartment houses in the country' for $25 billion, he would 'write you a check.' Of course, you don't need billions to benefit from real estate investing. Crowdfunding platforms like Arrived offer an easier way to get exposure to this income-generating asset class. Backed by world-class investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived allows you to invest in shares of rental homes with as little as $100, all without the hassle of mowing lawns, fixing leaky faucets or handling difficult tenants. The process is simple: browse a curated selection of homes that have been vetted for their appreciation and income potential. Once you find a property you like, select the number of shares you'd like to purchase, and then sit back as you start receiving any positive rental income distributions from your investment. Another option is First National Realty Partners (FNRP), which allows accredited investors to diversify their portfolio through grocery-anchored commercial properties without taking on the responsibilities of being a landlord. With a minimum investment of $50,000, investors can own a share of properties leased by national brands like Whole Foods, Kroger and Walmart, which provide essential goods to their communities. Thanks to Triple Net (NNN) leases, accredited investors are able to invest in these properties without worrying about tenant costs cutting into their potential returns. Simply answer a few questions — including how much you would like to invest — to start browsing their full list of available properties. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
How the crypto treasury craze is creating ‘true scarcity,' says BitMine chairman Tom Lee
Tom Lee reckons investors are overlooking one of the most important trends inside the crypto treasury craze: the aggressiveness with which a handful of companies are buying up Ethereum. 'There's true scarcity in Ethereum right now,' the Wall Street strategist and chairman of BitMine Immersion Technologies said in an interview with DL News. But it's not just the asset — 'it's the velocity at which we're accumulating it,' he said. Michael Saylor kicked off a trend that is only getting bigger — buying cryptocurrencies and holding them on a company's balance sheet. Strategy, the firm he leads, now holds more than 3% of Bitcoin's total supply, and shareholders have enjoyed a tenfold price appreciation in the company's stock price since it started buying the cryptocurrency in August 2020. Now, companies are looking down the risk curve into other cryptocurrencies, like Ethereum. Lee recently became chairman of BitMine, a little-known Bitcoin miner that has quickly become the largest public holder of Ethereum. In just two weeks, the firm has accumulated over $2 billion of Ether. But the firm is just getting started. According to a July investor deck titled The Alchemy of 5%, BitMine plans on acquiring up to 5% of the entire supply of Ether. But Lee did not reply to questions about supposed risk presented by Ethereum treasury companies, instead cutting the interview short. Concerns abound. Famed short seller Jim Chanos has called one of Strategy's financial maneuvers 'complete financial gibberish' and shorted the company's stock. Coinbase analysts warned treasury companies pose 'systemic risk' to the crypto market. Macro analyst Noelle Acheson has called the trend 'alarming.' For Lee, Ethereum presents a bigger opportunity than Bitcoin. 'Ethereum is the biggest macro trade of the decade,' he told DL News. Why? Stablecoins. Indeed, stablecoins have become a killer use-case for crypto, amassing a staggering market valuation of $272 billion. And now that US President Donald Trump signed into law the Genius Act, which opens the floodgates for banks to issue their own stablecoins, the pie could get even bigger. 'Stablecoins are the 'ChatGPT' of crypto,' Lee said. 'And Ethereum is the backbone. It's legally recognised, and has zero downtime.' Mimicking Strategy Popularised by Strategy's Bitcoin-per-share model, BitMine is rolling out its own 'ETH per share.' Investors can now track how much Ethereum the company holds for each share of stock. It's a way to measure value — not by earnings, but by onchain assets. As of July 27, BitMine reported about 600,000 Ether worth around $2.2 billion, along with 192 Bitcoin and over $400 million in cash. With 118 million fully diluted shares, their net asset value per share comes in around $23—up from $4 less than a month earlier. The company plans to grow that figure through market activity, reinvested cash flow, and — ideally — a rising price of Ether. Unlike Bitcoin treasury plays, however, BitMine's thesis doesn't rely on price alone. By staking its Ether, BitMine expects to generate $100 million in net income annually, making it part treasury play, part infrastructure business. The company hasn't disclosed when it will start staking, nor how much it will allocate to staking. Transforming capital markets 'MicroStrategy transformed capital markets,' Lee said, using a former energy giant as an example. ExxonMobil had the largest market capitalisation for long stretches of time between the 1990s and 2010s, often trading places with Apple and other tech giants. Its valuation, however, wasn't just based on quarterly earnings — it was underpinned by its massive reserves of untapped oil and gas, which the market treated as future revenue. According to Lee, Exxon was valued for the resources it controlled, a logic, he said, that now applies to crypto treasury companies. Strategy, for instance, posted a $10 billion profit in the second quarter, propped up mostly by its Bitcoin holdings. 'It's a new world: companies valued purely on their crypto holdings.' Pedro Solimano is DL News' Buenos Aires-based markets correspondent. Got at a tip? Email him at psolimano@ Sign in to access your portfolio
