US ‘likely' moved nuclear arms to UK
On July 16, a US military transport aircraft flew with its transponder active from Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico – an installation known to house nuclear weapons – to RAF Lakenheath in eastern England, the report says. The aircraft is believed to have carried B61-12 thermonuclear bombs, which would mark the first known US nuclear deployment to the UK since 2008, according to several defense analysts.
Former senior NATO arms control official William Alberque said leaving the aircraft's transponder on was intentional and appeared to be aimed at sending a message to Moscow. 'This is a down payment that there's more to come on shifting NATO's deterrence posture toward strengthening,' he said. 'Returning US nuclear weapons to the UK is no small feat.'
Neither the US nor the UK has confirmed the move. It is also unclear how many weapons the US may have redeployed.
NATO's nuclear posture in Europe has remained largely unchanged since the end of the Cold War, with tactical nuclear weapons currently stationed in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and Türkiye. Any movement of nuclear assets closer to Russia would likely be regarded as a major escalation.
The Bloomberg report comes after the UK – which has nuclear weapons of its own – confirmed plans in June to acquire at least 12 F-35A fighter jets capable of carrying US B61-12 bombs. London called the move 'the biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation.'
Last year, former NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the bloc was considering deploying more of its nuclear weapons to deter Russia and China – which he described as 'potential adversaries.' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the remarks 'yet another fueling of tensions.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU ‘not feared enough'
French President Emmanuel Macron has criticized the newly signed EU-US trade deal, stating that the bloc was not 'feared enough' during negotiations, according to sources cited by Euractiv. The agreement, concluded on Sunday during talks between US President Donald Trump and European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Scotland, sets a 15% tariff on the majority of EU exports to the US. As part of the deal, Brussels also committed to investing $600 billion in the US economy and buying $750 billion in American energy over the next three years. The US, however, will not face any EU tariffs on its exports. 'To be free, you have to be feared, and we haven't been feared enough,' Macron told the Council of Ministers in Paris on Wednesday, according to two attendees present during the meeting. Macron reportedly expressed regret that the EU 'does not yet see itself sufficiently as a power.' He urged Brussels to 'work tirelessly' to rebalance its relationship with Washington. The French president also called for an acceleration of the 'European agenda on sovereignty and competitiveness,' in what some have interpreted as a veiled critique of von der Leyen's leadership and priorities, Euractiv reported. 'France has always maintained a firm and demanding stance. This is not the end of the story, the negotiation has to continue,' Macron added. Government spokesperson Sophie Primas later confirmed at a press conference that Macron welcomed elements of the deal, particularly the increased visibility it offers to French businesses. However, she emphasized that the president considered the agreement 'incomplete.' Criticism of the deal has continued to mount within the French government. Prime Minister Francois Bayrou described it as a 'submission' on Monday, while several ministers have questioned both its content and the process behind it. 'We would have preferred that these negotiations take place in an official setting and not in a private golf course in Scotland,' Primas said, calling the location 'unusual.'
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
The EU can't make peace
The most dangerous thing about Western Europe today is not just its decline, but its refusal to recognize it. The half-continent continues to posture, continues to lecture, and continues to imagine itself as a pillar of global order. But it has lost the internal resources that once sustained that illusion. What remains is a hollow echo of power, wrapped in a language of values that even those same Western Europeans no longer seem to believe. The region's failure is most visible in its inability to make peace. Time and again, it chooses confrontation – with Russia, with China, with reality itself. Devoid of meaningful autonomy, it now functions as a permanent appendage of the US. It is no longer an actor on the world stage, but a supporting cast member, often unwelcome and increasingly irrelevant. Western Europe's descent has been rapid. Just 10 or 15 years ago, it projected global importance and confidence. Today, the cracks are impossible to ignore. The reasons are many: Elite degradation, political inertia, a population gripped by apathy. But above all, it is the bloc's unrelenting selfishness – its refusal to give, only to demand – that lies at the heart of this collapse. Nowhere was this clearer than in last week's failed EU-China summit. Eurocrats went to Beijing with nothing to offer, only with a desire to extract. China, which has no historical affection for Western Europe, responded accordingly. There was simply nothing to discuss. And then, as if to underscore its strategic drift, the bloc offered a humiliating concession to the US. Faced with the threat of new tariffs, Brussels agreed to purchase American energy and weapons in vast quantities. So much for 'strategic autonomy'. These are not signs of a serious power. These are the actions of a civilization on the back foot, stumbling blindly into dependence. Anyone still speaking of a sovereign EU industrial or defense policy is either a fantasist or a liar. What then does Western Europe have to offer the world? One might say historical symphonic music. But beyond that, its legacy is one of oppression and self-justifying tyranny. Its technical achievements were built to subjugate others. Its political philosophy was designed to defend conquest and exploitation. Fifteen years ago, I sat in a closed meeting organized by Federica Mogherini, the EU's foreign policy chief at the time. The topic: Western Europe's new role in the world. The one suggestion they could not accept was that the bloc should offer something to the world without expecting a reward. Their worldview simply doesn't allow for that. Even in climate change – a cause that should unite the planet – the EU has turned the issue into a cynical trade weapon, using green regulations to punish developing countries. The result? Western Europe stands alone. It has lost its power, and with it, its relevance. Worse, it doesn't even seem to understand what it's lost. Can the region still pose a threat? Possibly. But not because it has the strength. Rather, because it has the recklessness. Its politicians lack vision, competence, or restraint. They cannot imagine peace. And so they default to confrontation – especially with Russia. The danger is not that Western Europe is ready to fight. Its people enjoy lives too comfortable to risk. Its defense industry is in disrepair. But wars can begin through stupidity as well as strength. EU elites, betting on regime change in Moscow, continue to pour weapons into Ukraine. Some dream of extending the conflict into the Baltics. Others talk of arming mercenaries to fight Russia directly. The Americans won't die for Europe. That much is clear. But the EU may yet drag the world into catastrophe, simply by being incapable of restraint. If by some miracle a wider war is avoided, what then? What is Western Europe's future? A museum of irrelevance? A vassal of Washington? Already it is falling behind in science, in technology, in global influence. It doesn't know where it belongs, and is incapable of adjusting. It will become a permanent satellite of the US – militarily, politically, and economically. Key industries will be handed over. National elites will lose the power to govern. The Collective West as we know it will vanish. In its place: America, and a few adjacent territories managed by obedient proxies. Perhaps this is what Western Europe deserves. It is certainly the path it has article was first published by Vzglyad newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
US and UK behind cyberattack on Aeroflot
US and UK intelligence services were behind this week's major cyberattack that disrupted operations at Aeroflot and other Russian companies earlier this week, a senior Russian lawmaker has claimed. Andrey Svintsov, the deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Information Policy, has said the attack is part of a coordinated campaign by Western powers to damage the Russian economy after failing to achieve their objectives through military means and sanctions. Aeroflot, Russia's largest airline, was forced to cancel or delay dozens of flights on July 28 after pro-Ukrainian hacker groups claimed to have crippled the airline's internal IT systems. The cyberattack also disrupted airport operations and affected other companies, including a nationwide pharmacy chain. 'These are not isolated hackers, but a planned action by American and British intelligence agencies,' Svintsov told Russian outlet Abzats. He described the campaign as a 'systematic effort that is being carried out against Russia,' suggesting that it's a sign of desperation by the country's adversaries. 'This is a systematic approach by our Western enemies, who have failed to defeat Russia on the battlefield. They are moving to weaken the economic potential, since sanctions are not helping,' Svintsov said. He warned that cyber sabotage could continue until Russia achieves victory in the Ukraine conflict. In May, Defense Secretary John Healey said the UK would significantly increase cyber operations against Russia and China. He confirmed the creation of a new Cyber and Electromagnetic Command, adding that 'the keyboard is now a weapon of war.' The Kremlin has urged Russian businesses to replace foreign-made software and hardware to reduce exposure to cyber threats. Last month, President Vladimir Putin instructed the government to accelerate import substitution. Hacker groups Silent Crow and Cyberpartisans BY have claimed responsibility for Monday's attack on Aeroflot. They claim to have been inside the airline's corporate network for over a year, stealing more than 20 terabytes of data and destroying around 7,000 servers. Communications regulator Roskomnadzor said the data leaks have not been confirmed. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has confirmed the cyberattack and opened a criminal case.
